排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Stefan Artmann 《Biosemiotics》2009,2(1):31-38
Though the formal coherence and empirical utility of Marcello Barbieri’s concept of organic code have been starting to become
established, a general conception of how the semantics of organic codes is related to the pragmatics of their use is still
missing. Barbieri took a first step towards such a conception by distinguishing three types of semiosis in living systems:
manufacturing, signalling, and interpretive semiosis. This paper integrates Barbieri’s distinction into Roman Jakobson’s systematization
of possible functions of messages in order to propose a general conception of possible types of semiosis in living systems.
As a result, Barbieri’s thesis that manufacturing and signalling semiosis are basic types of semiosis, can be confirmed and
completed communication-theoretically.
相似文献
Stefan ArtmannEmail: |
2.
Andrew Gargett Eleni Gregoromichelaki Ruth Kempson Matthew Purver Yo Sato 《Cognitive neurodynamics》2009,3(4):347-363
This paper argues that by analysing language as a mechanism for growth of information (Cann et al. in The Dynamics of Language, Elsevier, Oxford, 2005; Kempson et al. in Dynamic Syntax, Blackwell, Oxford, 2001), not only does a unitary basis for ellipsis become possible, otherwise thought to be irredeemably heterogeneous, but also a whole range of sub-types of ellipsis, otherwise thought to be unique to dialogue, emerge as natural consequences of use of language in context. Dialogue fragment types modelled include reformulations, clarification requests, extensions, and acknowledgements. Buttressing this analysis, we show how incremental use of fragments serves to progressively narrow down the otherwise mushrooming interpretational alternatives in language use, and hence is central to fluent conversational interaction. We conclude that, by its ability to reflect dialogue dynamics as a core phenomenon of language use, a grammar with inbuilt parsing dynamics opens up the potential for analysing language as a mechanism for communicative interaction. 相似文献
3.
John Corbett 《FEMS microbiology letters》1992,100(1-3):39-44
1