Skp1-Cul1-F-box Ubiquitin Ligase (SCFβTrCP)-mediated Destruction of the Ubiquitin-specific Protease USP37 during G2-phase Promotes Mitotic Entry

Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis is a key regulatory process in cell cycle progression. The Skp1-Cul1-F-box (SCF) and anaphase-promoting complex (APC) ubiquitin ligases target numerous components of the cell cycle machinery for destruction. Throughout the cell cycle, these ligases cooperate to maintain precise levels of key regulatory proteins, and indirectly, each other. Recently, we have identified the deubiquitinase USP37 as a regulator of the cell cycle. USP37 expression is cell cycle-regulated, being expressed in late G₁ and ubiquitinated by APC^Cdh1 in early G₁. Here we report that in addition to destruction at G₁, a major fraction of USP37 is degraded at the G₂/M transition, prior to APC substrates and similar to SCF^βTrCP substrates. Consistent with this hypothesis, USP37 interacts with components of the SCF in a βTrCP-dependent manner. Interaction with βTrCP and subsequent degradation is phosphorylation-dependent and is mediated by the Polo-like kinase (Plk1). USP37 is stabilized in G₂ by depletion of βTrCP as well as chemical or genetic manipulation of Plk1. Similarly, mutation of the phospho-sites abolishes βTrCP binding and renders USP37 resistant to Plk1 activity. Expression of this mutant hinders the G₂/M transition. Our data demonstrate that tight regulation of USP37 levels is required for proper cell cycle progression.     

新型2-喹诺酮类Polo样激酶1抑制剂的设计合成及分子对接研究

目的:设计合成新型2-喹诺酮类Polo样激酶1(Plk1)抑制剂。方法:以Plk1抑制剂ON 01910为先导化合物,利用生物电子等排原理设计一系列2-喹诺酮类衍生物,用Autodock软件将该类化合物与Plk1进行分子对接和虚拟筛选,计算结合自由能;以取代的氯(溴)苄为起始原料,先后经巯基乙酸取代、双氧水氧化、与(对甲氧基)苯胺酰化,再经环合、水解制得目标化合物。结果:设计的化合物大多数与Plk1的结合自由能均比ON 01910的低,结合强度高、稳定性好;合成了16个2-喹诺酮类衍生物,产物结构经1H-NMR确证。结论:所得化合物中有15个为新化合物,化合物的结构设计科学合理,虚拟筛选结果良好,为后续实体筛选和化合物结构优化提供了理论依据和参考。     

Cytokinesis and cancer： Polo loves ROCK＇n＇ Rho（A）

Cytokinesis is the last step of the M (mitosis) phase, yet it is crucial for the faithful division of one cell into two. Cytokinesis failure is often associated with cancer. Cytokinesis can be morphologically divided into four steps: cleavage furrow initiation, cleavage furrow ingression, midbody formation and abscission. Molecular studies have revealed that RhoA as well as its regulators and effectors are important players to ensure a successful cytokinesis. At the same time, Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is an important kinase that can target many substrates and carry out different functions during mitosis, including cytokinesis. Recent studies are beginning to unveil a closer tie between Plk1 and RhoA networks. More specifically, Plk1 phosphorylates the centralspindlin complex Cyk4 and MKLP1/CHO1, thus recruiting RhoA guanine nucleotide-exchange factor (GEF) Ect2 through its phosphopeptide-binding BRCT domains. Ect2 itself can be phosphorylated by Plk1 in vitro. Plk1 can also phosphorylate another GEF MyoGEF to regulate RhoA activity. Once activated, RhoA-GTP will activate downstream effectors, including ROCK1 and ROCK2. ROCK2 is among the proteins that associate with Plk1 Polo-binding domain (PBD) in a large proteomic screen, and Plk1 can phosphorylate ROCK2 in vitro. We review current understandings of the interplay between Plk1, RhoA proteins and other proteins (e.g., NudC, MKLP2, PRC1, CEP55) involved in cytokinesis, with particular emphasis of its clinical implications in cancer.     

Cytokinesis and cancer:Polo loves ROCK'n' Rho(A)

Cytokinesis is the last step of the M (mitosis) phase,yet it is crucial for the faithful division of one cell into two.Cytokinesis failure is often associated with cancer.Cytokinesis can be morphologically divided into four steps:cleavage furrow initiation,cleavage furrow ingression,midbody formation and abscission.Molecular studies have revealed that RhoA as well as its regulators and effectors are important players to ensure a successful cytokinesis.At the same time,Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is an important kinase that can target many substrates and carry out different functions during mitosis,including cytokinesis.Recent studies are beginning to unveil a closer tie between Plk1 and RhoA networks.More specifically,Plk1 phosphorylates the centralspindlin complex Cyk4 and MKLP1/CHO1,thus recruiting RhoA guanine nucleotide-exchange factor (GEF) Ect2 through its phosphopeptide-binding BRCT domains.Ect2 itself can be phosphorylated by Plk1 in vitro.Plk1 can also phosphorylate another GEF MyoGEF to regulate RhoA activity.Once activated,RhoA-GTP will activate downstream effectors,including ROCK1 and ROCK2.ROCK2 is among the proteins that associate with Plk1 Polo-binding domain (PBD) in a large proteomic screen,and Plk1 can phosphorylate ROCK2 in vitro.We review current understandings of the interplay between Plk1,RhoA proteins and other proteins (e.g.,NudC,MKLP2,PRC1,CEP55) involved in cytokinesis,with partitular emphasis of its clinical implications in cancer.     

What's Nu(SAP) in mitosis and cancer?

Unperturbed mitosis is a prerequisite for the generation of two genetically identical daughter cells. Nucleolar-spindle associated protein (NuSAP) is an important mitotic regulator. The activity of NuSAP is essential for a variety of cellular events that occur during mitosis starting from spindle assembly to cytokinesis. In addition to playing crucial roles during mitosis, NuSAP has been in the spotlight recently due to different studies exhibiting its importance in embryogenesis and cancer. In this review, we have extensively mined the current literature and made connections between different studies involving NuSAP. Importantly, we have assembled data pertaining to NuSAP from several proteomic studies and analyzed it thoroughly. Our review focuses on the role of NuSAP in mitosis and cancer, and brings to light several unanswered questions regarding the regulation of NuSAP in mitosis and its role in carcinogenesis.     

Phosphopeptides with improved cellular uptake properties as ligands for the polo-box domain of polo-like kinase 1

Human polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is involved in cell proliferation and overexpressed in a broad variety of different cancer types. Due to its crucial role in cancerogenesis Plk1 is a potential target for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Peptidic ligands can specifically interact with the polo-box domain (PBD) of Plk1, a C-terminal located phosphoepitope binding motif. Recently, phosphopeptide MQSpTPL has been identified as ligand with high binding affinity. However, a radiolabeled version of this peptide showed only insufficient cellular uptake. The present study investigated peptide dimers consisting of PBD-targeting phosphopeptide MQSpTPL and a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) moiety. The new constructs demonstrate superior uptake in different cancer cell-lines compared to the phosphopeptide alone. Furthermore, we could demonstrate binding of phosphopeptide-CPP dimers to PBD of Plk1 making the compounds interesting leads for the development of molecular probes for imaging Plk1 in cancer.     

Liaisons between Survivin and Plk1 during Cell Division and Cell Death

Survivin and Plk1 kinase are important mediators of cell survival that are required for chromosome alignment, cytokinesis, and protection from apoptosis. Interference with either survivin or Plk1 activity manifests many similar outcomes: prometaphase delay/arrest, multinucleation, and increased apoptosis. Moreover, the expression of both survivin and Plk1 is deregulated in cancer. Given these similarities, we speculated that these two proteins may cooperate during mitosis and/or in cell death pathways. Here we report that survivin and Plk1 interact during mitosis and that Plk1 phosphorylates survivin at serine 20. Importantly, we find that overexpression of a non-phosphorylatable version, S20A, is unable to correct chromosomes connected to the spindle in a syntelic manner during prometaphase and allows cells harboring these maloriented chromosomes to enter anaphase, evading the spindle tension checkpoint. By contrast, the constitutive phosphomimic, S20D, completes congression and division ahead of schedule and, unlike S20A, is able to support proliferation in the absence of the endogenous protein. Despite the importance of this residue in mitosis, its mutation does not appear to affect the anti-apoptotic activity of survivin in response to TRAIL. Together, these data suggest that phosphorylation of survivin at Ser²⁰ by Plk1 kinase is essential for accurate chromosome alignment and cell proliferation but is dispensable for its anti-apoptotic activity in cancer cells.     

Influence of chk1 and plk1 silencing on radiation- or cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in human malignant cells

The G2/M checkpoint is an attractive pathway for targeting and sensitizing tumor cells to cancer treatment. Abrogation of the G2/M checkpoint by targeting molecules, such as checkpoint kinase 1 (chk1), increases DNA breakage and sensitizes tumor cells to anti-tumoral agents. However, most of the previously described G2/M abrogators are actually targeting the G2-M border checkpoints rather than mitotic checkpoints. This prompted us to test the effects of combined targeting of chk1 and a critical regulator of mitosis, polo-like kinase 1 (plk1). Chk1 and plk1 were found to be co-expressed in 70% of primary neoplastic tissues we examined. Asynchronized tumor cells were treated with different DNA damaging-agents to activate G1/S, S or G2/M checkpoints. Either chk1 or plk1-specific antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ASODN) enhanced DNA damaging agent-induced apoptosis. When used in combination, however, chk1- plus plk1-specific ASODN failed to produce synergistic effects. Moreover, selective targeting of plk1 or chk1 in tumor xenografts of mice by oncolytic adenovirus mutants demonstrated potent anti-tumoral efficacy in the presence of low dose cisplatin. Again, combined targeting of chk1 and plk1 did not further enhance anti-tumoral efficacy. We concluded that combined targeting of chk1 and plk1 was not superior to either targeting chk1 or plk1 alone, which suggested that chk1 and plk1 silencing might overlap in their mechanism of action. Whether combined targeting of chk1 with other, more specific mitotic regulators would synergistically sensitize tumor to anti-neoplastic therapeutics needs to be further clarified. Qinglei Gao and Xiaoyuan Huang contributed equally to this work.