蓖麻蚕两种凝集素在蚕体内的出现与分布

蓖麻蚕Philosamia cynthia ricni血淋巴含两种凝集素,一种凝集兔新鲜红血球,凝血活力被L-鼠李糖和D-半乳糖抑制;另一种凝集戊二醛固定的人和鸡的红血球,凝血活力被岩藻糖抑制.它们在蚕的不同生长阶段及在蚕体各组织中的分布和凝血活力显著不同.血淋巴中这两种凝集素的凝血活力明显比其他组织中高.卵中测不到这两种凝集素活力.本文对这两种凝集素在蚕体中可能的生理功能进行了讨论.     

The Ability of GAP1IP4BP To Function as a Rap1 GTPase-Activating Protein (GAP) Requires Its Ras GAP-Related Domain and an Arginine Finger Rather than an Asparagine Thumb

GAP1^IP4BP is a member of the GAP1 family of Ras GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that includes GAP1^m, CAPRI, and RASAL. Composed of a central Ras GAP-related domain (RasGRD), surrounded by amino-terminal C2 domains and a carboxy-terminal PH/Btk domain, these proteins, with the notable exception of GAP1^m, possess an unexpected arginine finger-dependent GAP activity on the Ras-related protein Rap1 (S. Kupzig, D. Deaconescu, D. Bouyoucef, S. A. Walker, Q. Liu, C. L. Polte, O. Daumke, T. Ishizaki, P. J. Lockyer, A. Wittinghofer, and P. J. Cullen, J. Biol. Chem. 281:9891-9900, 2006). Here, we have examined the mechanism through which GAP1^IP4BP can function as a Rap1 GAP. We show that deletion of domains on either side of the RasGRD, while not affecting Ras GAP activity, do dramatically perturb Rap1 GAP activity. By utilizing GAP1^IP4BP/GAP1^m chimeras, we establish that although the C2 and PH/Btk domains are required to stabilize the RasGRD, it is this domain which contains the catalytic machinery required for Rap1 GAP activity. Finally, a key residue in Rap1-specific GAPs is a catalytic asparagine, the so-called asparagine thumb. By generating a molecular model describing the predicted Rap1-binding site in the RasGRD of GAP1^IP4BP, we show that mutagenesis of individual asparagine or glutamine residues that lie in close proximity to the predicted binding site has no detectable effect on the in vivo Rap1 GAP activity of GAP1^IP4BP. In contrast, we present evidence consistent with a model in which the RasGRD of GAP1^IP4BP functions to stabilize the switch II region of Rap1, allowing stabilization of the transition state during GTP hydrolysis initiated by the arginine finger.The Ras-like family of small GTPases are ubiquitously expressed, evolutionarily conserved proteins that, by undergoing conformational changes in response to the alternate binding of GDP and GTP, function as binary switches (28, 31, 35). The GDP-bound “off” state and the GTP-bound “on” state recognize distinct effector proteins, thereby allowing the regulation of a variety of downstream signaling events (28, 31, 35). While Ras is the best-known and best-studied Ras-like GTPase, Rap1 has recently attracted considerable attention (reviewed in reference 20).Rap1 was originally identified through its ability, when overexpressed, to reverse the phenotype of K-Ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells (19). As Ras and Rap1 have very similar effector regions, the ability of Rap1 to reverse the transformed phenotype appeared to arise through an ability to compete with K-Ras effectors. For example, Rap1 binds the Ras effector Raf1 but this does not lead to its activation (11). This is consistent with a simple model in which Rap1 functions as a Ras antagonist (6, 37). However, recent work has challenged this view. Increasing evidence points to Rap1 interacting with its own panel of effectors through which it controls cell-cell adhesion and cell-matrix interactions (reviewed in reference 20).Like that of other GTPases, the activation of Ras and Rap1 is regulated through guanine nucleotide exchange factors, which control activation by stimulating the exchange of GDP for GTP. Inactivation is driven by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). These enhance the intrinsic GTPase activity of Ras and Rap1, thereby leading to GTP hydrolysis. A wide variety of guanine nucleotide exchange factors and GAPs specific for these GTPases have been identified (14). Through the arrangement of different modular domains, these proteins are regulated following the activation of cell surface receptors. This occurs either through direct association with the activated receptor or indirectly through second messengers (4, 5, 14, 41).Mammalian proteins capable of functioning as Ras GAPs include NF1 (3, 27, 40), p120^GAP (38), the semaphorin 4D receptor plexin-B1 (29), and members of the GAP1 (reviewed in reference 41) and SynGAP (DAB2IP, nGAP, and SynGAP) families (10, 18, 39). These function as Ras GAPs by supplying a catalytic arginine residue—the arginine finger—into the active site of Ras. This stabilizes the transition state of the GTPase reaction, increasing the reaction rate by more than 1,000-fold (1, 33, 34).Rap1 GAPs include Rap GAPs I and II, the SPA-1 family (SPA-1, SPAR, SPAL, and E6TP1), and tuberin (16, 17, 26, 32). Unlike Ras, Rap1 does not possess the catalytic glutamine residue that is critical for GTP hydrolysis in Ras. This fundamental difference means that the mechanisms by which Ras and Rap1 GAPs function are distinct. Rap1 GAPs do not employ a catalytic arginine residue (8, 9); instead, they provide a catalytic asparagine—the asparagine thumb—to stimulate GTP hydrolysis (15). Here the asparagine carboxamide side chain has a function similar to that of the glutamine residue in Ras, stabilizing the position of the nucleophilic water and γ-phosphate in the transition complex (15, 36).Given such distinct catalytic mechanisms, surprisingly, some Ras GAPs, while having no detectable sequence homology with any Rap1 GAPs, are capable of stimulating the GTPase activity of Rap1. The first protein found to display such dual activities was GAP1^IP4BP (13) (also known as RASA3, GAPIII, and R-Ras GAP). This is a member of the GAP1 family, which also comprises GAP1^m, CAPRI, and RASAL (2, 23-25). These proteins are characterized by a domain architecture comprising amino-terminal tandem C2 domains, a highly conserved central Ras GAP-related domain (RasGRD), and a carboxy-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain that is associated with a Bruton''s tyrosine kinase (Btk) motif (41). Consistent with the presence of the RasGRD, all proteins display Ras GAP activity, although each is differentially regulated following receptor stimulation (41). With the notable exception of GAP1^m, all GAP1 proteins also possess efficient Rap1 GAP activity (22). Such dual specificity is not restricted solely to GAP1 proteins. Recently, C2 domain-containing SynGAP—a neuronal Ras GAP—has also been shown to display Rap1 GAP activity (21), an activity that appears to require, alongside the RasGRD, the presence of a single C2 domain (30).Here we have examined the mechanism behind the dual Ras and Rap1 GAP activities of GAP1^IP4BP. Through the generation of a series of GAP1^IP4BP/GAP1^m chimeras, we have established that while the C2 domains of GAP1^IP4BP are required to stabilize the RasGRD, these domains do not supply catalytic residues required for Rap1 GAP activity. Rather, the Rap1 GAP catalytic machinery appears to reside solely within the RasGRD. By the site-directed mutagenesis of selected asparagine and glutamine residues within this domain—selected following the generation of a predicted molecular model of the GAP1^IP4BP RasGRD-Ras(Rap1) complex—we establish that the ability of GAP1^IP4BP to function as a Rap1 GAP does not occur via a mechanism that utilizes a classic asparagine thumb. Rather, we suggest that the GAP1^IP4BP RasGRD functions to stabilize the switch II region of Rap1 in a manner that allows a catalytic arginine finger from GAP1^IP4BP to drive the hydrolysis of GTP.     

TAP score: torsion angle propensity normalization applied to local protein structure evaluation

Background  

Experimentally determined protein structures may contain errors and require validation. Conformational criteria based on the Ramachandran plot are mainly used to distinguish bet ween distorted and adequately refined models. While the readily available criteria are sufficient to detect totally wrong structures, establishing the more subtle differences between plausible structures remains more challenging.     

Characterization and expression analysis of Staphylococcus aureus pathogenicity island 3. Implications for the evolution of staphylococcal pathogenicity islands

We describe the complete sequence of the 15.9-kb staphylococcal pathogenicity island 3 encoding staphylococcal enterotoxin serotypes B, K, and Q. The island, which meets the generally accepted definition of pathogenicity islands, contains 24 open reading frames potentially encoding proteins of more than 50 amino acids, including an apparently functional integrase. The element is bordered by two 17-bp direct repeats identical to those found flanking staphylococcal pathogenicity island 1. The island has extensive regions of homology to previously described pathogenicity islands, particularly staphylococcal pathogenicity islands 1 and bov. The expression of 22 of the 24 open reading frames contained on staphylococcal pathogenicity island 3 was detected either in vitro during growth in a laboratory medium or serum or in vivo in a rabbit model of toxic shock syndrome using DNA microarrays. The effect of oxygen tension on staphylococcal pathogenicity island 3 gene expression was also examined. By comparison with the known staphylococcal pathogenicity islands in the context of gene expression described here, we propose a model of pathogenicity island origin and evolution involving specialized transduction events and addition, deletion, or recombination of pathogenicity island "modules."     

The role of organic amendments in wetland restorations

At the present rate of loss (since 1990), half of the remaining wetlands worldwide will be developed within ~140 years, underscoring the importance of improving the creation and restoration of wetlands. Organic amendments are sometimes used during wetland creation. To evaluate the effectiveness of adding organic amendments we used a combined numerical method to assign “scores” on five categories of evaluation metrics: plant growth, soil properties, carbon accrual, denitrification, and anaerobic processes (e.g. redox potential). We found that amendments identified as “topsoil” scored measurably higher and had consistently more positive values with fewer negative results compared to amendments identified as “allochthonous organic matter” (alOM). Organic amendments had about the same effect on soils with low soil organic carbon (<2.5%) compared to soils richer in organic carbon. Organic amendments are not uniformly effective, and in some cases may have negative side effects. For example, alOM often resulted in a loss of plant diversity. These outcomes along with site conditions should be evaluated before using organic amendments.     

Absence of nonlinear responses in cells and tissues exposed to RF energy at mobile phone frequencies using a doubly resonant cavity

A doubly resonant cavity was used to search for nonlinear radiofrequency (RF) energy conversion in a range of biological preparations, thereby testing the hypothesis that living tissue can demodulate RF carriers and generate baseband signals. The samples comprised high‐density cell suspensions (human lymphocytes and mouse bone marrow cells); adherent cells (IMR‐32 human neuroblastoma, G361 human melanoma, HF‐19 human fibroblasts, N2a murine neuroblastoma (differentiated and non‐differentiated) and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells) and thin sections or slices of mouse tissues (brain, kidney, muscle, liver, spleen, testis, heart and diaphragm). Viable and non‐viable (heat killed or metabolically impaired) samples were tested. Over 500 cell and tissue samples were placed within the cavity, exposed to continuous wave (CW) fields at the resonant frequency (f) of the loaded cavity (near 883 MHz) using input powers of 0.1 or 1 mW, and monitored for second harmonic generation by inspection of the output at 2f. Unwanted signals were minimised using low pass filters (≤1 GHz) at the input to, and high pass filters (≥1 GHz) at the output from, the cavity. A tuned low noise amplifier allowed detection of second harmonic signals above a noise floor as low as −169 dBm. No consistent second harmonic of the incident CW signals was detected. Therefore, these results do not support the hypothesis that living cells can demodulate RF energy, since second harmonic generation is the necessary and sufficient condition for demodulation. Bioelectromagnetics 31:556–565, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to reciprocal transfers of soil between adjacent coniferous forest and meadow vegetation in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon

Little information exists on the responses of soil fungal and bacterial communities in high elevation coniferous forest/open meadow ecosystems of the northwest United States of America to treatments that impact vegetation and soil conditions. An experiment was conducted in which soil cores were reciprocally transplanted between immediately adjacent forests and meadows at two high elevation (∼1,600 m) sites (Carpenter and Lookout) in the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest located in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon. Half of the cores were placed in PVC pipe (closed) to prevent new root colonization, whereas the other cores were placed in mesh bags (open) to allow recolonization by fine roots. A duplicate set of open and closed soil cores was not transferred between sites and was incubated in place. After 2 year, soil cores were removed and changes in fungal and bacterial biomasses determined using light microscopy, and changes in microbial community composition determined by PLFA analysis, and by length heterogeneity PCR of the internal transcribed spacer region of fungal ribosomal DNA. At both sites soil microbial community structures had responded to treatments after 2 year of incubation. At Carpenter, both fungal and bacterial community structures of forest soil changed significantly in response to transfer from forest to meadow, with the shift in fungal community structure being accompanied by a significant decrease in the PLFA biomarker of fungal biomass,18:2ω6,9. At Lookout, both fungal and bacterial community structures of forest soil changed significantly in response to open versus closed core treatments, with the shift in the fungal community being accompanied by a significant decrease in the 18:2ω6,9 content of closed cores, and the shift in the bacterial community structure being accompanied by a significant increase in bacterial biomass of closed cores. At both sites, fungal community structures of meadow soils changed differently between open and closed cores in response to transfer to forest, and were accompanied by increases in the18:2ω6,9 content of open cores. Although there were no significant treatment effects on the bacterial community structure of meadow soil at either site, bacterial biomass was significantly higher in closed versus open cores regardless of transfer.     

The taste of polycose in hamsters

Hamsters show a preference for Polycose, a mixture of starch-derived glucose polymers, that is as strong as their preference for sucrose. However, in the hamster, taste aversions to Polycose may be less easily acquired than taste aversions to sucrose and the qualitative aspects of Polycose are unknown in this species. In order to examine the taste of Polycose in the hamster, we utilized a taste-aversion protocol with two conditioning trials. Animals were trained to avoid one of three different conditioning stimuli: 50 mM sucrose, 100 mM Polycose and a mixture of 50 mM sucrose with 100 mM Polycose. Control animals were conditioned with deionized water. After the second conditioning trial, generalization testing began for the three conditioning stimuli plus 3 mM citric acid, 300 mM KCI and 30 mM NaCl. The results showed that aversions to Polycose, sucrose or the Polycose/sucrose mixture cross- generalized, demonstrating that Polycose and sucrose share a common taste percept in the hamster. None of the aversions generalized to NaCl, citric acid or KCI. In addition, comparisons among the patterns of taste generalizations indicated that the tastes of Polycose and sucrose also had distinct qualitative components. Finally, although the taste of 100 mM Polycose was more salient than the taste of 50 mM sucrose, the taste of sucrose could still be detected in a mixture with Polycose.