Histocompatibility Gene Organization and Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction

TRANSFORMATION of allogenic lymphocytes in mixed cultures depends chiefly on an incompatibility between the lymphocyte donors at the major histocompatibility locus in man (HL-A), mouse (H-2) and rat (H-l)¹. Although the mouse H-2 locus can be divided into several regions each of which controls one or more antigenic specificities² and two or more subloci control HL-A antigens in man³, it is not known whether all parts of the major histocompatibility locus are equally important in eliciting transformation in mixed lymphocyte cultures. We now show that capacity to elicit lymphocyte transformation is different for different parts of the mouse H-2 locus.     

Demonstration of an “Excitation-Contraction Recoupling” Mechanism in Mammalian Ventricular Myocardium

A PROCESS called “excitation-contraction coupling” has been generally accepted to take place only in the direction of excitation to contraction. Through this mechanism a propagated action potential initiates an active state in skeletal or cardiac muscle and the muscle contracts. We propose that, in the mammalian ventricular myocardium at least, the process is not unidirectional and an important reverse coupling between the contractile system and the excitable plasma membrane has been overlooked. Through this feedback interaction the mode of contraction (that is, isotonic or isometric) not only determines the instantaneous electrical state of the plasma membrane, but also influences the mechanical events of the subsequent beats. Thus when Kaufmann et al.¹ recorded intracellular action potentials from cat papillary muscle, the time course of the repolarization was altered depending on the mode of contraction. Some kind of contraction-excitation feedback has also been suggested by Stauch² and Lab^3,4. They showed a difference in the shape of the monophasic action potential, as recorded by a suction electrode, when comparing isotonic and isovolumic contraction of the intact ventricle. But their experimental conditions did not allow satisfactory analysis of the phenomenon.     

The Structure of Calf Liver Cytochrome <Emphasis Type="Italic">b</Emphasis><Subscript>5</Subscript> at 2.8 Å Resolution

CYTOCHROME b₅ is a haem-containing protein in the microsomes of liver tissue. It interacts specifically with a flavo-protein, cytochrome b₅ reductase, which catalyses the transfer of electrons from NADH to the haem iron of the cytochrome¹. The microsomal cytochrome b₅ system has been implicated in fatty acid desaturation reactions² and a similar system in erythrocytes may catalyse the reduction of methaemoglobin³. Calf liver cytochrome b₅, solubilized by pancreatic lipase, has a molecular weight of 11,000 and consists of ninety-three amino-acids in the sequence shown in Fig. 1 (refs. 4 and 5). The haem group is non-covalently bound to the protein and can be removed reversibly by acid acetone treatment⁶.     

Structure of the “Peroxy-Y Base” from Liver tRNA<Superscript>Phe</Superscript>

WE wish to report that reconstituted sperm whale myoglobin prepared by the method of Breslow¹ (except that pH 2 was found sufficient to remove all the haem) (I) crystallizes² in a different habit from those prepared by the method of Rossi-Fanelli et al.³ (II) using haemin of Sigma lot 77B-0220 and our own ⁵⁷Fe photoporphyrin preparation and the native myoglobin (III). Although all three form type A³ monoclinic prisms, the best developed plane is [001] for II and III, it is [100] for I. There seems to be great interest in reconstituted haemoproteins^4,5, so it is important that crystallization habit may be a sensitive test for subtle changes in protein structures.     

Glucagon Affinity Absorbents: Selective Binding of Receptors of Liver Cell Membranes

AFFINITY chromatography has been used in the rapid isolation of enzymes, antibodies, antigens and other ligand-binding proteins^1–6. Selective adsorbents with biological specificity perhaps may best be used in the resolution and isolation of complex biological structures and important regulatory macromolecules present in cells in very low amounts. For example, polypeptide and steroid hormone receptors, drug receptors, transport proteins and repressor molecules may be well suited for study by this technique because they display specific binding functions with a high degree of affinity.     

Role of the Galactose Binding Protein in Chemotaxis of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis> toward Galactose

The galactose binding protein is the part of the galactose chemoreceptor which recognizes the attractants galactose, glucose and a number of structurally related chemicals.     

Additional Nucleotide Sequences in Precursor 16S Ribosomal RNA from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis>

MATURE 5S, 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA species present in E. coli ribosomes are the end products of complex biosyn-thetic pathways. They are formed by reduction in length, and methylation of longer RNA chains transcribed on the ribosomal RNA cistrons of E. coli DNA. While these modifications take place the ribosome structure is formed by progressive addition of ribosomal proteins and conformational changes in the resulting ribonucleoprotein precursor particles¹.     

Ribosomes,G-factor and Siomycin

G-factor interacts with the 50S ribo-somal subunit at a site which is distinct from the peptidyl transferase centre and which is inactivated by siomycin.     

Passive Haemagglutination Test for Anti-rhinovirus Antibodies

The use of chromic chloride as a coupling reagent has made it possible to coat red cells with rhinovirus protein. This is shown by immunofluorescence, electron microscopy and immunocolloidal experiments.     

Failure of Neuraminidase to unmask Histocompatibility Antigens on Trophoblast

DURING outbred pregnancy the mother is exposed to genetically foreign tissue because the offspring inherits transplantation antigens from the father. The survival of the foetus is ensured by the intervention of the trophoblast which does not express transplantation antigens between mother and foetus: mouse trophoblast is not rejected even when transplanted into immune recipients^1,3. The mechanism of this failure to express histocompatibility antigens is not understood^1–4, but Kirby et al. have suggested that the extracellular fibrinoid surrounding trophoblast cells is involved^5,6. Currie has suggested that the thick sialomucinous glycocalyx of the trophoblast cell might “mask” the histocompatibility antigens on the trophoblast^7,8 and has demonstrated that neuraminidase unmasked these antigens⁸. Our experiments, however, show that trophoblast incubated with neuraminidase cannot sensitize allogeneic mice to donor histocompatibility antigens. Furthermore, pretreatment of trophoblastic implants with neuraminidase did not interfere with their proliferation and growth in highly immune allogeneic recipients.