Pathognomonic macular ripples are revealed by polarized infrared retinal imaging

A pathognomonic macular ripple sign has been reported with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy images in patients with foveal hypoplasia, though the optical basis of this sign is presently unknown. Here we present a case series of seven individuals with foveal hypoplasia (based on spectral domain optical coherence tomography). Each patient underwent infrared scanning laser ophthalmoscopy retinal imaging in both eyes, acquired with and without a polarization filter and assessment for a ripple-like effect in the fovea. On imaging, macular ripples were present in all eyes with foveal hypoplasia when using a polarization filter, but not when imaged without the filter. We conclude that the macular ripple sign is an imaging artifact attributable to the unique pattern of phase retardation of the Henle fiber layer in the setting of foveal hypoplasia. By utilizing a polarization filter with retinal photography, this feature can be exploited to promptly identify foveal hypoplasia in settings where OCT is not possible due to nystagmus.     

Estrogen provision by reactive glia decreases apoptosis in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata)

Upregulation of aromatase (estrogen synthase) in glia around the site of neural injury may limit neural degeneration. Systemic administration of estrogen limits neural damage, but the specific role of local estrogen provision in this effect is unclear. In male zebra finches, we tested the effect of local aromatase inhibition and estrogen replacement on type of cellular degeneration and the distance of this degeneration from the source of insult. Subjects received injections of the aromatase inhibitor fadrozole into one telencephalic lobe and fadrozole and estradiol into the contralateral lobe. Seventy-two hours later, we used Fluoro-Jade B and TUNEL to label dying and apoptotic cells, respectively. Since each subject was its own control, we were able to assess the influence of local estrogen replacement in relative distinction from circulating steroids and constitutive aromatization. Cellular degeneration around the lesion was measured with Fluoro-Jade B, TUNEL, and indirectly with aromatase expression. Additionally, the glial nature of aromatase-positive cells around the injury was queried by co-localization with vimentin. The estrogen replaced injury had fewer apoptotic cells clustered more closely around the injury compared to the hemisphere injected with fadrozole alone. Since Fluoro-Jade B and TUNEL labeled similar numbers of cells, and the distance of these cells from the injection was identical, we suggest that estrogen replacement functions primarily to restrict apoptosis in the current paradigm. Lastly, aromatase-positive cells around injuries co-localize vimentin, establishing their glial nature. Thus, glial estrogen provision at sites of neural insult may be critical in limiting the cellular degeneration caused by injury via an inhibition of apoptosis.     

High-throughput screening assay for identification of small molecule inhibitors of Aurora2/STK15 kinase

STK15/Aurora2 is a centrosome-associated serine/threonine kinase, the protein levels and kinase activity of which rise during G2 and mitosis. STK15 overexpression induces tumorigenesis and is amplified in various human cancers and tumor cell lines. Thus, STK15 represents an important therapeutic target for small molecule inhibitors that would disrupt its activity and block cell proliferation. The availability of a robust and selective small molecule inhibitor would also provide a useful tool for identification of the potential role of STK15 in cell cycle regulation and tumor development. The authors report the development of a novel, fast, simple microplate assay for STK15 activity suitable for high-throughput screening. In the assay, gamma-(33)P-ATP and STK15 were incubated in a myelin basic protein (MBP)-coated FlashPlate(R) to generate a scintillation signal. The assay was reproducible, the signal-to-noise ratio was high (11) and the Z' factor was 0.69. The assay was easily adapted to a robotic system for drug discovery programs targeting STK15. The authors also demonstrate that STK15 is regulated by phosphorylation and the N-amino terminal domain of the protein. Treatment with phosphatase inhibitors (okadaic acid) or deletion of the N-amino terminal domain results in a significant increase in the enzymatic activity.     

2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth

Background

The International Scientific Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT), that produced its first Guidelines in 2005, felt the need to revise them and increase their scientific quality. The aim is to offer to all professionals and their patients an evidence-based updated review of the actual evidence on conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis (CTIS).

Methods

All types of professionals (specialty physicians, and allied health professionals) engaged in CTIS have been involved together with a methodologist and a patient representative. A review of all the relevant literature and of the existing Guidelines have been performed. Documents, recommendations, and practical approach flow charts have been developed according to a Delphi procedure. A methodological and practical review has been made, and a final Consensus Session was held during the 2011 Barcelona SOSORT Meeting.

Results

The contents of the document are: methodology; generalities on idiopathic scoliosis; approach to CTIS in different patients, with practical flow-charts; literature review and recommendations on assessment, bracing, physiotherapy, Physiotherapeutic Specific Exercises (PSE) and other CTIS. Sixty-five recommendations have been given, divided in the following topics: Bracing (20 recommendations), PSE to prevent scoliosis progression during growth (8), PSE during brace treatment and surgical therapy (5), Other conservative treatments (3), Respiratory function and exercises (3), Sports activities (6), Assessment (20). No recommendations reached a Strength of Evidence level I; 2 were level II; 7 level III; and 20 level IV; through the Consensus procedure 26 reached level V and 10 level VI. The Strength of Recommendations was Grade A for 13, B for 49 and C for 3; none had grade D.

Conclusion

These Guidelines have been a big effort of SOSORT to paint the actual situation of CTIS, starting from the evidence, and filling all the gray areas using a scientific method. According to results, it is possible to understand the lack of research in general on CTIS. SOSORT invites researchers to join, and clinicians to develop good research strategies to allow in the future to support or refute these recommendations according to new and stronger evidence.     

The CO2-SFE crude lipid extract and the free fatty acid extract from Perna canaliculus have anti-inflammatory effects on adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats

The anti-inflammatory (AI) activity of a supercritical fluid extract (CO(2)-SFE) of tartaric acid-stabilised Perna canaliculus mussel powder, and of the free fatty acid (FFA) class separated from the CO(2)-SFE extract by column chromatography, was investigated in the rat adjuvant arthritis model. Administration of the CO(2)-SFE extract (100 mg/kg BW/day s.c.) for 15 days post-adjuvant inoculation significantly reduced rear paw swelling by 34% and the deterioration in total body condition by 52% in arthritic rats, compared to vehicle controls. These observations were accompanied by a decreased serum ceruloplasmin oxidase activity, and reduced inflammatory response of the spleen. The mussel FFA extract given at one third of the dose (30 mg/kg BW/day s.c.) and for a shorter treatment period (5 days during the inflammatory phase) achieved an even greater AI activity, and was equipotent to piroxicam (2 mg/kg BW/day s.c.). Preliminary toxicology assessment using both arthritic and non-arthritic (healthy) rats revealed no significant differences between the mussel treatment groups and respective vehicle controls in either organ weights, tissue histology or selected biochemical parameters. These results indicate the CO(2)-SFE crude lipid extract and its FFA components from stabilised P. canaliculus mussel powder contain biologically significant AI activity in vivo, with no apparent adverse side effects.     

Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis Infection and Lethal Chytridiomycosis in Caecilian Amphibians (Gymnophiona)

Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) is commonly termed the ‘amphibian chytrid fungus’ but thus far has been documented to be a pathogen of only batrachian amphibians (anurans and caudatans). It is not proven to infect the limbless, generally poorly known, and mostly soil-dwelling caecilians (Gymnophiona). We conducted the largest qPCR survey of Bd in caecilians to date, for more than 200 field-swabbed specimens from five countries in Africa and South America, representing nearly 20 species, 12 genera, and 8 families. Positive results were recovered for 58 specimens from Tanzania and Cameroon (4 families, 6 genera, 6+ species). Quantities of Bd were not exceptionally high, with genomic equivalent (GE) values of 0.052–17.339. In addition, we report the first evidence of lethal chytridiomycosis in caecilians. Mortality in captive (wild-caught, commercial pet trade) Geotrypetes seraphini was associated with GE scores similar to those we detected for field-swabbed, wild animals.     

Reply to J.N. Perry et al

The authors of “The anglerfish deception” respond to the criticism of their article.EMBO reports (2012) advanced online publication; doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.70EMBO reports (2012) 13 2, 100–105; doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.254Our respondents, eight current or former members of the EFSA GMO panel, focus on defending the EFSA''s environmental risk assessment (ERA) procedures. In our article for EMBO reports, we actually focused on the proposed EU GMO legislative reform, especially the European Commission (EC) proposal''s false political inflation of science, which denies the normative commitments inevitable in risk assessment (RA). Unfortunately the respondents do not address this problem. Indeed, by insisting that Member States enjoy freedom over risk management (RM) decisions despite the EFSA''s central control over RA, they entirely miss the relevant point. This is the unacknowledged policy—normative commitments being made before, and during, not only after, scientific ERA. They therefore only highlight, and extend, the problem we identified.The respondents complain that we misunderstood the distinction between RA and RM. We did not. We challenged it as misconceived and fundamentally misleading—as though only objective science defined RA, with normative choices cleanly confined to RM. Our point was that (i) the processes of scientific RA are inevitably shaped by normative commitments, which (ii) as a matter of institutional, policy and scientific integrity must be acknowledged and inclusively deliberated. They seem unaware that many authorities [1,2,3,4] have recognized such normative choices as prior matters, of RA policy, which should be established in a broadly deliberative manner “in advance of risk assessment to ensure that [RA] is systematic, complete, unbiased and transparent” [1]. This was neither recognized nor permitted in the proposed EC reform—a central point that our respondents fail to recognize.In dismissing our criticism that comparative safety assessment appears as a ‘first step'' in defining ERA, according to the new EFSA ERA guidelines, which we correctly referred to in our text but incorrectly referenced in the bibliography [5], our respondents again ignore this widely accepted ‘framing'' or ‘problem formulation'' point for science. The choice of comparator has normative implications as it immediately commits to a definition of what is normal and, implicitly, acceptable. Therefore the specific form and purpose of the comparison(s) is part of the validity question. Their claim that we are against comparison as a scientific step is incorrect—of course comparison is necessary. This simply acts as a shield behind which to avoid our and others'' [6] challenge to their self-appointed discretion to define—or worse, allow applicants to define—what counts in the comparative frame. Denying these realities and their difficult but inevitable implications, our respondents instead try to justify their own particular choices as ‘science''. First, they deny the first-step status of comparative safety assessment, despite its clear appearance in their own ERA Guidance Document [5]—in both the representational figure (p.11) and the text “the outcome of the comparative safety assessment allows the determination of those ‘identified'' characteristics that need to be assessed [...] and will further structure the ERA” (p.13). Second, despite their claims to the contrary, ‘comparative safety assessment'', effectively a resurrection of substantial equivalence, is a concept taken from consumer health RA, controversially applied to the more open-ended processes of ERA, and one that has in fact been long-discredited if used as a bottleneck or endpoint for rigorous RA processes [7,8,9,10]. The key point is that normative commitments are being embodied, yet not acknowledged, in RA science. This occurs through a range of similar unaccountable RA steps introduced into the ERA Guidance, such as judgement of ‘biological relevance'', ‘ecological relevance'', or ‘familiarity''. We cannot address these here, but our basic point is that such endless ‘methodological'' elaborations of the kind that our EFSA colleagues perform, only obscure the institutional changes needed to properly address the normative questions for policy-engaged science.Our respondents deny our claim concerning the singular form of science the EC is attempting to impose on GM policy and debate, by citing formal EFSA procedures for consultations with Member States and non-governmental organizations. However, they directly refute themselves by emphasizing that all Member State GM cultivation bans, permitted only on scientific grounds, have been deemed invalid by EFSA. They cannot have it both ways. We have addressed the importance of unacknowledged normativity in quality assessments of science for policy in Europe elsewhere [11]. However, it is the ‘one door, one key'' policy framework for science, deriving from the Single Market logic, which forces such singularity. While this might be legitimate policy, it is not scientific. It is political economy.Our respondents conclude by saying that the paramount concern of the EFSA GMO panel is the quality of its science. We share this concern. However, they avoid our main point that the EC-proposed legislative reform would only exacerbate their problem. Ignoring the normative dimensions of regulatory science and siphoning-off scientific debate and its normative issues to a select expert panel—which despite claiming independence faces an EU Ombudsman challenge [12] and European Parliament refusal to discharge their 2010 budget, because of continuing questions over conflicts of interests [13,14]—will not achieve quality science. What is required are effective institutional mechanisms and cultural norms that identify, and deliberatively address, otherwise unnoticed normative choices shaping risk science and its interpretive judgements. It is not the EFSA''s sole responsibility to achieve this, but it does need to recognize and press the point, against resistance, to develop better EU science and policy.     

Mapping the Structural Topology of the Yeast 19S Proteasomal Regulatory Particle Using Chemical Cross-linking and Probabilistic Modeling

Structural characterization of proteasome complexes is an essential step toward understanding the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Currently, high resolution structures are not available for the 26S proteasome holocomplex as well as its subcomplex, the 19S regulatory particle (RP). Here we have employed a novel integrated strategy combining chemical cross-linking with multistage tandem mass spectrometry to define the proximity of subunits within the yeast 19S RP to elucidate its topology. This has resulted in the identification of 174 cross-linked peptides of the yeast 19S RP, representing 43 unique lysine-lysine linkages within 24 nonredundant pair-wise subunit interactions. To map the spatial organization of the 19S RP, we have developed and utilized a rigorous probabilistic framework to derive maximum likelihood (ML) topologies based on cross-linked peptides determined from our analysis. Probabilistic modeling of the yeast 19S AAA-ATPase ring (i.e., Rpt1–6) has produced an ML topology that is in excellent agreement with known topologies of its orthologs. In addition, similar analysis was carried out on the 19S lid subcomplex, whose predicted ML topology corroborates recently reported electron microscopy studies. Together, we have demonstrated the effectiveness and potential of probabilistic modeling for unraveling topologies of protein complexes using cross-linking data. This report describes the first study of the 19S RP topology using a new integrated strategy combining chemical cross-linking, mass spectrometry, and probabilistic modeling. Our results have provided a solid foundation to advance our understanding of the 19S RP architecture at peptide level resolution. Furthermore, our methodology developed here is a valuable proteomic tool that can be generalized for elucidating the structures of protein complexes.Basic cellular homeostasis depends on the regulated protein degradation and turnover by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (1, 2). Central to this pathway is the 26S proteasome complex, which is responsible for ubiquitin/ATP-dependent protein degradation (3–5). The 26S holocomplex is a megadalton-sized protein assembly consisting of the 20S catalytic core particle (CP)¹ and the 19S regulatory particle (RP). The eukaryotic 20S CP is composed of two copies of 14 nonidentical subunits (α_1–7 and β_1–7) arranged into four stacked heptameric rings in an order of α₇β₇β₇α₇. The crystal structure and topology of the highly ordered 20S CP has been resolved and is evolutionarily conserved (6). Although α subunits of the 20S CP are essential for the assembly of the complex and its interactions with the regulatory complex, three catalytic β subunits (β1, β2, and β5) harbor various catalytic activities responsible for regulated proteasomal degradation. The 19S RP is composed of 19 subunits, which forms two subcomplexes, the base consisting of six related AAA-ATPase (Rpt1–6) and four non-ATPase (Rpn1, Rpn2, Rpn10, and Rpn13) subunits and the lid containing nine non-ATPase subunits (Rpn3, Rpn5–9, Rpn11, Rpn12, and Rpn15/Sem1) (7, 8). In comparison with the 20S core, the function and structure of the 19S RP is much less well understood. Nevertheless, it is believed that the 19S RP is involved in multiple functions including recognition of polyubiquitinated substrates (9, 10), cleavage of the polyubiquitin chains to recycle ubiquitin (11), unfolding of substrates, assisting in opening the gate of the 20S chamber, and subsequently translocating the unfolded substrates into the catalytic chamber (4, 12–14). The six AAA-ATPase subunits (Rpt1–6), which directly interact with the 20S α-ring, function as a molecular chaperone responsible for protein unfolding and are involved in substrate translocation and modulating gating of the CP (5, 15). Although detailed functions for most of the 19S non-ATPase subunits remain elusive, Rpn11 is known to carry an Mpr1p and Pad1p N-termini (MPN) domain, which harbors an essential deubiquitination activity responsible for cleaving polyubiquitin chains from proteasomal substrates (11, 16). In addition, two proteasome subunits, Rpn10 and Rpn13, have been identified as ubiquitin receptors, which are important in docking ubiquitinated substrates to the proteasome for degradation (4). Moreover, the two largest proteasome subunits, Rpn1 and Rpn2, interact with a variety of proteins including ubiquitin receptors and deubiquitinases and thus may function as scaffolding proteins to assist proteasomal degradation. Thus far, no atomic resolution structures are available for either the 19S RP or the 26S holocomplex. New insights of the overall topology of the 19S RP will illuminate protein interactions within, thus providing evidence for its otherwise unknown functions.Although many studies have been performed to characterize the 19S structure utilizing various techniques including cryo-EM (17, 18) and native mass spectrometry (19), details on spatial interfaces and subunit interconnectivity of the 19S RP remain to be unraveled. During the course of our study, the rough topology of the 19S RP was determined by cryo-EM alone (20) or coupled with other approaches (21); nevertheless more detailed information at the peptide or atomic level is still required. In addition to technological limitations in current approaches, the highly dynamic and heterogeneous nature of the 19S RP may attribute to the difficulty in obtaining its high resolution structure. In recent years, chemical cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry (XL-MS) has become an attractive alternative for structure analysis of proteins and protein complexes (22, 23). The ability of XL-MS to identify interaction interfaces between proteins allows us to define low resolution protein topology. In addition to protein interaction networks and the site of protein interactions at binding interfaces, cross-linking analysis can reveal information about the spatial distance between cross-linked amino acids on the surface of folded proteins. Although such knowledge only reveals the maximum distance given by the length of the cross-linker and can be influenced by protein conformational flexibility, it can be used as the distance constraint for molecular modeling of protein folds and complex topologies, i.e., the arrangement of the constituents of a complex in space. A recent study by Chen et al. (24) on yeast RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) complex has exemplified the power of XL-MS in elucidating the architecture of large multisubunit complexes. Although effective, cross-linking studies have been challenging because of the low abundance of cross-linked products and the inherent complexity of sequencing interlinked peptides by MS for unambiguous identification. To facilitate MS detection and identification of cross-linked products, we have recently developed a novel homobifunctional amine reactive, low energy MS-cleavable cross-linker, disuccinimidyl sulfoxide (DSSO), and successfully applied it to cross-link the yeast 20S proteasome for rapid, accurate, and simplified determination of protein interaction interfaces within the complex (25). The unique functionality of our cross-linking reagent and specialized bioinformatics tools significantly increase our confidence and speed in the identification of cross-linked products when compared with cross-linking studies using traditional noncleavable reagents. Current cross-linking studies have been focused on protein complexes with known crystal structures, but topological structures of protein complexes based primarily on cross-linking data have not yet been reported. This is due to the lack of computational tools that use cross-linking data to deduce the spatial organization of subunits in a given complex. To define the architecture of the yeast 19S RP, we have characterized the proximity and interconnectivity of the subunits by employing our newly developed cross-linking strategy. The resulting cross-linking information serves as a basis for a rigorous probabilistic analysis to obtain the maximum likelihood (ML) topology. This strategy is developed by first analyzing our cross-linking data for the 19S six-member AAA-ATPase base ring, as the topology ordering of yeast orthologs has been recently determined (14, 26–28). The effectiveness of this new probabilistic platform is supported by the agreement between our derived ML topology of the AAA-ATPase base ring and previous reports. When the same probabilistic approach is applied to the 19S lid subcomplex, the resulting topology is also in agreement with recently proposed models (20, 21). This work represents the first application of probabilistic modeling of protein complexes based solely on cross-link data, establishing a new workflow for future structural analysis of large protein complexes using XL-MS.