THE ENDOCRINE BASIS OF PAIR-FORMATION BEHAVIOUR IN THE MALE EIDER SOMATERIA MOLLISSIMA

Pair-formation behaviour among the Eiders began after the annual moult, in late September. There was a small peak of display in October and November and a large one in the following April and May. As a result, the female population became paired in two phases, up to 50% in the autumn and the remainder in the following spring. The seasonal cycle of the abundance of Leydig cells was bimodal, with a peak in October and a large one in April-May. That the peaks represent increased androgen production was supported by the cycles of Leydig cell enzyme activity and lipid content and of penis weight. The monthly means of Leydig cell abundance and of the rate of display were statistically correlated. Experiments with sexually quiescent males in eclipse plumage demonstrated that testosterone was capable of inducing pair-formation behaviour. Relatively advanced stages of spermatogenesis were found in autumn, and were maintained through the winter, complete development occurring in the spring. Seasonal changes in the production of pituitary gonadotropin followed a bimodal pattern with peaks in autumn and in the spring. Field evidence is presented which suggests that Follicle Stimulating Hormone and Luteinizing Hormone were produced at different phases of a circadian rhythm of photosensitivity.     

The potential diagram for oxygen at pH 7.

Successive one-electron reductions of molecular oxygen yield the superoxide radical (O2-) H2O2, the hydroxyl radical (OH) and water. Redox potentials at pH 7 for one-, two- and four-electron couples involving these states are presented as a potential diagram. The significance of each of these potentials is explained. The complete potential diagram enables complex systems to be rationalized, such as production of OH by H2O2 plus Fe3+.     

The Emperor's new clothes? A comment on

Many diatom-based methods have been proposed in recent years. Besse-Lototskaya et al. (2011) compare some of those developed for assessing inorganic nutrients. However, they fail to address the two questions of greatest interest to those who wish to use such metrics to inform decision-making. These questions are: what is the role of diatom-based trophic metrics in environmental management in Europe in the twenty-first century and do these indices represent causal relationships with underlying pressure gradients? The present economic climate means that Member States of the European Union will look more critically at all methods for assessing freshwater quality and developers need to ensure that their methods are “fit-for-purpose”.