Structure of NADH:Q oxidoreductase from bovine heart mitochondria studied by electron microscopy

Two-dimensional crystalline arrays of NADH:Q oxidoreductase preparations have been obtained by microdiffusion of protein dissolved in detergent against a 15 mM sodium acetate buffer of pH 5.5 containing 10% ($\text{w}\text{v}$) ammonium sulphate. Electron microscopy was used to study the structure of negatively stained crystals. Computer-reconstructed images were obtained by the Fourier peak filtering method. The crystals have p4 symmetry and a square unit cell with dimensions of 15.2 ± 0.5 nm. The four asymmetric units in the unit cell form a single tetrameric molecule with a dimension in the third direction of 8.2 nm. It is concluded on the basis of the estimated molecular mass that each tetramer cannot contain more than only one FMN molecule. This implies that the tetramers possibly are only a part of Complex I, since there is much evidence that one functional enzyme molecule of Complex I contains two FMN molecules.     

The evolution of the protonephridial terminal organ across Rotifera with particular emphasis on Dicranophorus forcipatus,Encentrum mucronatum and Erignatha clastopis (Rotifera: Dicranophoridae)

Riemann, O. and Ahlrichs, W.H. 2009. The evolution of the protonephridial terminal organ across Rotifera with particular emphasis on Dicranophorus forcipatus, Encentrum mucronatum and Erignatha clastopis (Rotifera: Dicranophoridae). —Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 91 : 199–211 We report on the ultrastructure of the protonephridial terminal organ in three species of dicranophorid rotifers (Dicranophorus forcipatus, Encentrum mucronatum and Erignatha clastopis). Differences between the three species relate to shape and size, the morphology of the filter region and the number of microvilli and cilia inside the terminal organ. A comparison across Rotifera indicates that the terminal organs in D. forcipatus display a number of plesiomorphic characters, but are modified in E. mucronatum and Er. clastopis. This is in accordance with the results of phylogenetic analyses suggesting a basal position of D. forcipatus compared with the more derived species E. mucronatum and Er. clastopis. Moreover, we survey available data on the terminal organ in Rotifera and discuss its evolutionary transformations. The protonephridial terminal organ in the common ancestor of Rotifera consisted of a cytoplasmic cylinder with cilia united into a vibratile flame and a single circle of circumciliary microvilli. Depending on the topology on which characters are optimized, the site of ultrafiltration was formed by longitudinal cytoplasmic columns spanned by a fine filter diaphragm or by pores in the wall of the terminal organ. In several taxa of Rotifera, the terminal organ – probably independently – lost its circumciliary microvilli.     

Rapid bioassay of aluminum toxicity in soil

Fifty-five acid soil horizons from 19 profiles were evaluated for aluminum toxicity using root elongation as a criterion in a two-day petri dish bioassay. The method proved to be simple, efficient, and precise enough to clearly distinguish aluminum toxicity differences among horizons within and between profiles. Although toxicity patterns within profiles differed, it was common for surface horizons to be less toxic even when very acid. The R² for correlations of relative root lengths with pH in H₂O, pH in KCl, soluble and exchangeable aluminum and percent aluminum saturation were only 0.42, 0.45, 0.52, 0.66, and 0.54, respectively, which indicates the need for a bioassay. In a further use of the method, and to demonstrate its efficiency, 243 horizons from 26 profiles were screened. Approximately half of the horizons with a pH of 5.0 or below showed Al toxicity. When used by different operators, with a variety of soil and treatment parameter changes, the two-day bioassay in petri dishes gave consistent rankings of soils by degree of aluminum toxicity. Journal Paper 11690, Purdue University, Agricultural Experiment Station, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. Contribution from the Agronomy Department.