Cytokeratin expression in simple epithelia

To study the regulation of the expression of cytokeratins characteristic of simple epithelia, i.e., human cytokeratins nos. 7, 8, 18, and 19, we prepared several cDNA clones coding for these proteins and their bovine counterparts. In the present study, we describe a cDNA clone of the mRNA coding for human cytokeratin no. 18, which was isolated from an expression library using the monoclonal antibody, KG 8.13. This clone (756 nucleotides, excluding the polyA portion), encodes approximately one-half of the mRNA (approximately 1.4 kb), identifies one mRNA band in Northern-hybridization blots, and specifically selects one mRNA species coding for cytokeratin no. 18, as demonstrated by translation in vitro. Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence--confirmed by direct amino-acid-sequence analyses of some polypeptide fragments produced by cleavage with cyanogen bromide--indicated that cytokeratin no. 18 is a member of the acidic (type I) subfamily of cytokeratins. It has only limited sequence homologies in common with other intermediate-sized filament proteins, and these are essentially restricted to certain domains of the alpha-helical rod portion. The carboxyterminal tail sequence does not contain glycine-rich elements, thus distinguishing this cytokeratin from those acidic (type I) cytokeratins that are characterized by this feature. The similarities and differences between cytokeratin no. 18 and previously described epidermal cytokeratins are discussed in relation to the differences in the stability of the complexes which this cytokeratin forms with basic (type II) cytokeratins, as well as in relation to possible functional differences of cytokeratins in simple and stratified epithelia.     

Molecular cloning of the F8 fimbrial antigen from Escherichia coli

Abstract The genetic determinant coding for the P-specific F8 fimbriae was cloned from the chromosome of the Escherichia coli wild-type strain 2980 (O18:K5:H5:F1C, F8). The F8 determinant was further subcloned into the Pst I site of pBR322 and a restriction map was established. In a Southern hybridization experiment identity between the chromosomally encoded F8 determinant of 2980 and its cloned counterpart was demonstrated. The cloned F8 fimbriae and those of the wild type strain consist of a protein subunit of nearly 20 kDa. F8 fimbriated strains were agglutinated by an F8 polyclonal antiserum, caused mannose-resistant hemagglutination and attached to human uroepithelial cells. The cloned F8 determinant was well expressed in a variety of host strains.     

Guaianolides from Saussurea affinis

Cynaropicrin, 11βH-11,13-dihydrodesacylcynaropicrin, aguerins A and B, isoamberboin and the new guaianolides saussureolide and 11βH-11,13-dihydrodesacylcynaropicrin 8-β-d-glucoside were isolated from Saussurea affinis.     

Junctional membrane permeability

Summary Substitution of extracellular Na⁺ by Li⁺ causes depression of junctional membrane permeability inChironomus salivary gland cells; within 3 hr, permeability falls to so low a level that neither fluorescein nor the smaller inorganic ions any longer traverse the junctional membrane in detectable amounts (uncoupling). The effect is Li-specific: if choline⁺ is the Na⁺ substitute, coupling is unchanged. The Li-produced uncoupling is not reversed by restitution of Na⁺. Long-term exposure (>1 hr) of the cells to Ca, Mg-free medium leads also to uncoupling. This uncoupling is fully reversible by early restitution of Ca⁺⁺ or Mg⁺⁺. Coupling is maintained in the presence of either Ca⁺⁺ or Mg⁺⁺, so long as the total divalent concentration is about 12mm. The uncoupling in Ca, Mg-free medium ensues regardless of whether the main monovalent cation is Na, Li or choline.The uncouplings are accompanied by cell depolarization. Repolarization of the cells by inward current causes restoration of coupling; the junctional conductance rises again to its normal level. The effect was shown for Li-produced uncoupling, for uncoupling by prolonged absence of external Ca⁺⁺ and Mg⁺⁺, and for uncoupling produced by dinitrophenol. In all cases, the recoupling has the same features: (1) it develops rapidly upon application of the polarizing current; (2) it is cumulative; (3) it is transient, but outlasts the current; and (4) it appears not to depend on the particular ions carrying the current from the electrodes to the cell. The recoupling is due to repolarization of nonjunctional cell membrane; recoupling can be produced at zero net currernt through the junctional membrane. Recoupling takes place also as a result of chemically produced repolarization; restoration of theK gradients in uncoupled cells causes partial recoupling during the repolarization phase.An explanation of the results on coupling is proposed in terms of known mechanisms of regulation of Ca⁺⁺ flux in cells. The uncouplings are explained by actions raising the Ca⁺⁺ level in the cytoplasmic environment of the junctional membranes; the recoupling is explained by actions lowering this Ca⁺⁺ level.     

Ionic channels through the axon membrane (a review)

Ionic channels are discrete sites at which the passive movement of ions takes place during nervous excitation. Three types of channels are distinguished. 1. Leakage channels that are permanently open to various cations. 2. Na channels that open promptly on depolarization but slowly close again (inactivate) on sustained depolarization and that are predominantly permeable to Na⁺ ions. 3. K channels that on depolarization open after some delay but stay open and that are mainly passed by K⁺ ions. The selectivity sequence of the Na channels of the squid axon (or frog nerve) is as follows: Na⁺ ≈ Li⁺>(T1+)>NH⁺ ₄?K⁺> Rb⁺, Cs⁺; that of K channels is: (T1+)>K⁺>Rb⁺>NH⁺ ₄?Na⁺, Cs⁺, Na channels are selectively blocked by tetrodotoxin (TTX) or saxitoxin (STX), K channels by tetraethylammonium ions (TEA). Either channel type is reversibly blocked when one drug molecule binds to one site per channel, the equilibrium dissociation constant of these reactions being about 3×10^?9 MTTX (or STX) and 4×10^?4 M TEA, respectively. Because of their specificity and high affinity, TTX and STX are used to “titrate” the Na channels whose density appears to be of the order of 100/Μm². The “gates” of the channels operate as a function of potential and time but independent of the permeating ion species. Drugs (e.g. veratridine) and enzymes (e.g. pronase, applied intraaxonally) cause profound changes in the gating function of the Na channels without influencing their selectivity. This points to separate structures for gating and ion discrimination. The latter is thought to be, in part, brought about by a “selectivity filter” of which detailed structural ideas exist. Recent experiments suggest that the gates of the Na channels are controlled by charged particles moving within the membrane under the influence of the electrical field.