The inhibitory chloride channel activated by glutamate as well asγ-amino-butyric acid (GABA)

Summary Outside-out and inside-out patches of membrane were excised from different muscles of crayfish (Austropotamobius torrentium) and single channel currents elicited by synaptic transmitters and their analogues were measured with the patchclamp technique. If the Cl^–-concentration was high on both sides of the membrane, glutamate even at concentrations <1 M elicited low amplitude single channel currents, which were identified to be Cl^–-currents. The same channels were also activated by 10 M GABA. Glutamate and GABA showed competition in activating these inhibitory channels. Amplitude histograms of the single channel currents presented well defined peaks corresponding to 3 channel substatesI ₁,I ₂ andI ₃, with conductances of about(I₁)=22 pS in high chloride corresponding to a permeability _Cl(I₁)=3.5× 10^–14 cm³/s),(I₂)=2(I₁) and(I₃)=3(I₁). Glutamate activated preferably stateI ₁, and GABA stateI ₂, but both could activate all states at sufficient concentration. Distributions of the open times in the different states were plotted and could be fitted each with one or two exponentials described by time constants of(I₁) of 1 and 6 ms,(I₂) of 2 to 3 ms, and(I₃) or 1 to 2 ms. The burst durations had components of 3 to 4 and of 30 to 40 ms. All these durations were approximately the same when the channels were activated by glutamate and GABA. The analogue quisqualate of glutamate, as well as the GABA analogue-guanidino propionic acid also elicited the respective patterns of states of the inhibitory channel. Quisqualate is by far the most effective agonist and glutamate is more effective than GABA at the inhibitory receptor. Picrotoxin blocked activation of the inhibitory channel by GABA more effectively than by glutamate. The importance of the activation of the inhibitory channel by glutamate as well as by GABA and their analogues is discussed. Elements of a tentative reaction schema are proposed.     

Molecular cloning of the F8 fimbrial antigen from Escherichia coli

Abstract The genetic determinant coding for the P-specific F8 fimbriae was cloned from the chromosome of the Escherichia coli wild-type strain 2980 (O18:K5:H5:F1C, F8). The F8 determinant was further subcloned into the Pst I site of pBR322 and a restriction map was established. In a Southern hybridization experiment identity between the chromosomally encoded F8 determinant of 2980 and its cloned counterpart was demonstrated. The cloned F8 fimbriae and those of the wild type strain consist of a protein subunit of nearly 20 kDa. F8 fimbriated strains were agglutinated by an F8 polyclonal antiserum, caused mannose-resistant hemagglutination and attached to human uroepithelial cells. The cloned F8 determinant was well expressed in a variety of host strains.     

Guaianolides from Saussurea affinis

Cynaropicrin, 11βH-11,13-dihydrodesacylcynaropicrin, aguerins A and B, isoamberboin and the new guaianolides saussureolide and 11βH-11,13-dihydrodesacylcynaropicrin 8-β-d-glucoside were isolated from Saussurea affinis.     

De novo synthesis and specific assembly of keratin filaments in nonepithelial cells after microinjection of mRNA for epidermal keratin

Poly(A)+ RNA isolated from bovine muzzle epidermis was microinjected into nonepithelial cells containing only intermediate-sized filaments of the vimentin type. In recipient cells keratin polypeptides are synthesized and assemble into intermediate-sized filaments at multiple dispersed sites. We describe the time course and the pattern of de novo assembly of keratin filaments within living cells. These filaments were indistinguishable, by immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopic criteria, from keratin filament arrays present in true epithelial cells. The presence of extended keratin fibril meshworks in these injected cells is compatible with cell growth and mitosis. Double immunolabeling revealed that newly assembled keratin was not codistributed with microfilament bundles, microtubules or vimentin filaments. We suggest that assembly mechanisms exist which in vivo sort out newly synthesized cytokeratin polypeptides from vimentin.     

Junctional membrane permeability

Summary Substitution of extracellular Na⁺ by Li⁺ causes depression of junctional membrane permeability inChironomus salivary gland cells; within 3 hr, permeability falls to so low a level that neither fluorescein nor the smaller inorganic ions any longer traverse the junctional membrane in detectable amounts (uncoupling). The effect is Li-specific: if choline⁺ is the Na⁺ substitute, coupling is unchanged. The Li-produced uncoupling is not reversed by restitution of Na⁺. Long-term exposure (>1 hr) of the cells to Ca, Mg-free medium leads also to uncoupling. This uncoupling is fully reversible by early restitution of Ca⁺⁺ or Mg⁺⁺. Coupling is maintained in the presence of either Ca⁺⁺ or Mg⁺⁺, so long as the total divalent concentration is about 12mm. The uncoupling in Ca, Mg-free medium ensues regardless of whether the main monovalent cation is Na, Li or choline.The uncouplings are accompanied by cell depolarization. Repolarization of the cells by inward current causes restoration of coupling; the junctional conductance rises again to its normal level. The effect was shown for Li-produced uncoupling, for uncoupling by prolonged absence of external Ca⁺⁺ and Mg⁺⁺, and for uncoupling produced by dinitrophenol. In all cases, the recoupling has the same features: (1) it develops rapidly upon application of the polarizing current; (2) it is cumulative; (3) it is transient, but outlasts the current; and (4) it appears not to depend on the particular ions carrying the current from the electrodes to the cell. The recoupling is due to repolarization of nonjunctional cell membrane; recoupling can be produced at zero net currernt through the junctional membrane. Recoupling takes place also as a result of chemically produced repolarization; restoration of theK gradients in uncoupled cells causes partial recoupling during the repolarization phase.An explanation of the results on coupling is proposed in terms of known mechanisms of regulation of Ca⁺⁺ flux in cells. The uncouplings are explained by actions raising the Ca⁺⁺ level in the cytoplasmic environment of the junctional membranes; the recoupling is explained by actions lowering this Ca⁺⁺ level.