Continuous <Emphasis Type="SmallCaps">d</Emphasis>-lactic acid production by a novelthermotolerant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Lactobacillus delbrueckii</Emphasis> subsp. <Emphasis Type="Italic">lactis</Emphasis> QU 41

We isolated and characterized a d-lactic acid-producing lactic acid bacterium (d-LAB), identified as Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis QU 41. When compared to Lactobacillus coryniformis subsp. torquens JCM 1166 ^T and L. delbrueckii subsp. lactis JCM 1248 ^T, which are also known as d-LAB, the QU 41 strain exhibited a high thermotolerance and produced d-lactic acid at temperatures of 50 °C and higher. In order to optimize the culture conditions of the QU 41 strain, we examined the effects of pH control, temperature, neutralizing reagent, and initial glucose concentration on d-lactic acid production in batch cultures. It was found that the optimal production of 20.1 g/l d-lactic acid was acquired with high optical purity (>99.9% of d-lactic acid) in a pH 6.0-controlled batch culture, by adding ammonium hydroxide as a neutralizing reagent, at 43 °C in MRS medium containing 20 g/l glucose. As a result of product inhibition and low cell density, continuous cultures were investigated using a microfiltration membrane module to recycle flow-through cells in order to improve d-lactic acid productivity. At a dilution rate of 0.87 h⁻¹, the high cell density continuous culture exhibited the highest d-lactic acid productivity of 18.0 g/l/h with a high yield (ca. 1.0 g/g consumed glucose) and a low residual glucose (<0.1 g/l) in comparison with systems published to date.     

Phenotypic Plasticity in Photosynthetic Temperature Acclimation among Crop Species with Different Cold Tolerances

While interspecific variation in the temperature response of photosynthesis is well documented, the underlying physiological mechanisms remain unknown. Moreover, mechanisms related to species-dependent differences in photosynthetic temperature acclimation are unclear. We compared photosynthetic temperature acclimation in 11 crop species differing in their cold tolerance, which were grown at 15°C or 30°C. Cold-tolerant species exhibited a large decrease in optimum temperature for the photosynthetic rate at 360 μL L⁻¹ CO₂ concentration [Opt (A₃₆₀)] when growth temperature decreased from 30°C to 15°C, whereas cold-sensitive species were less plastic in Opt (A₃₆₀). Analysis using the C₃ photosynthesis model shows that the limiting step of A₃₆₀ at the optimum temperature differed between cold-tolerant and cold-sensitive species; ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylation rate was limiting in cold-tolerant species, while ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate regeneration rate was limiting in cold-sensitive species. Alterations in parameters related to photosynthetic temperature acclimation, including the limiting step of A₃₆₀, leaf nitrogen, and Rubisco contents, were more plastic to growth temperature in cold-tolerant species than in cold-sensitive species. These plastic alterations contributed to the noted growth temperature-dependent changes in Opt (A₃₆₀) in cold-tolerant species. Consequently, cold-tolerant species were able to maintain high A₃₆₀ at 15°C or 30°C, whereas cold-sensitive species were not. We conclude that differences in the plasticity of photosynthetic parameters with respect to growth temperature were responsible for the noted interspecific differences in photosynthetic temperature acclimation between cold-tolerant and cold-sensitive species.The temperature dependence of leaf photosynthetic rate shows considerable variation between plant species and with growth temperature (Berry and Björkman, 1980; Cunningham and Read, 2002; Hikosaka et al., 2006). Plants native to low-temperature environments and those grown at low temperatures generally exhibit higher photosynthetic rates at low temperatures and lower optimum temperatures, compared with plants native to high-temperature environments and those grown at high temperatures (Mooney and Billings, 1961; Slatyer, 1977; Berry and Björkman, 1980; Sage, 2002; Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004b). For example, the optimum temperature for photosynthesis differs between temperate evergreen species and tropical evergreen species (Hill et al., 1988; Read, 1990; Cunningham and Read, 2002). Such differences have been observed even among ecotypes of the same species (Björkman et al., 1975; Pearcy, 1977; Slatyer, 1977).Temperature dependence of the photosynthetic rate has been analyzed using the biochemical model proposed by Farquhar et al. (1980). This model assumes that the photosynthetic rate (A) is limited by either ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylation (A_c) or RuBP regeneration (A_r). The optimum temperature for photosynthetic rate in C₃ plants is thus potentially determined by (1) the temperature dependence of A_c, (2) the temperature dependence of A_r, or (3) both, at the colimitation point of A_c and A_r (Fig. 1; Farquhar and von Caemmerer, 1982; Hikosaka et al., 2006).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.A scheme illustrating the shift in the optimum temperature for photosynthesis depending on growth temperature. Based on the C₃ photosynthesis model, the A₃₆₀ (white and black circles) is limited by A_c (solid line) or A_r (broken line). The optimum temperature for the photosynthetic rate is potentially determined by temperature dependence of A_c (A), temperature dependence of A_r (B), or the intersection of the temperature dependences of A_c and A_r (C). When the optimum temperature for the photosynthetic rate shifts to a higher temperature, there are also three possibilities determining the optimum temperature: temperature dependence of A_c (D), temperature dependence of A_r (E), or the intersection of the temperature dependences of A_c and A_r (F). Especially in the case that the optimum temperature is determined by the intersection of the temperature dependences of A_c and A_r, the optimum temperature can shift by changes in the balance between A_c and A_r even when the optimum temperatures for these two partial reactions do not change.In many cases, the photosynthetic rate around the optimum temperature is limited by A_c, and thus the temperature dependence of A_c determines the optimum temperature for the photosynthetic rate (Hikosaka et al., 1999, 2006; Yamori et al., 2005, 2006a, 2006b, 2008; Sage and Kubien, 2007; Sage et al., 2008). As the temperature increases above the optimum, A_c is decreased by increases in photorespiration (Berry and Björkman, 1980; Jordan and Ogren, 1984; von Caemmerer, 2000). Furthermore, it has been suggested that the heat-induced deactivation of Rubisco is involved in the decrease in A_c at high temperature (Law and Crafts-Brandner, 1999; Crafts-Brandner and Salvucci, 2000; Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004a; Yamori et al., 2006b). Numerous previous studies have shown changes in the temperature dependence of A_c with growth temperature (Hikosaka et al., 1999; Bunce, 2000; Yamori et al., 2005). Also, the temperature sensitivity of Rubisco deactivation may differ between plant species (Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004b) and with growth temperature (Yamori et al., 2006b), which may explain variation in the optimum temperature for photosynthesis (Fig. 1, A and D).A_r is more responsive to temperature than A_c and often limits photosynthesis at low temperatures (Hikosaka et al., 1999, 2006; Sage and Kubien, 2007; Sage et al., 2008). Recently, several researchers indicated that A_r limits the photosynthetic rate at high temperature (Schrader et al., 2004; Wise et al., 2004; Cen and Sage, 2005; Makino and Sage, 2007). They suggested that the deactivation of Rubisco at high temperatures is not the cause of decreased A_c but a result of limitation by A_r. However, it remains unclear whether limitation by A_r is involved in the variation in the optimum temperature for the photosynthetic rate (Fig. 1, B and E).A shift in the optimum temperature for photosynthesis can result from changes in the balance between A_r and A_c, even when the optimum temperatures for these two partial reactions do not change (Fig. 1, C and F; Farquhar and von Caemmerer, 1982). The balance between A_r and A_c has been shown to change depending on growth temperature (Hikosaka et al., 1999; Hikosaka, 2005; Onoda et al., 2005a; Yamori et al., 2005) and often brings about a shift in the colimitation temperature of A_r and A_c. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that plasticity in this balance differs among species or ecotypes (Onoda et al., 2005b; Atkin et al., 2006; Ishikawa et al., 2007). Plasticity in this balance could explain interspecific variation in the plasticity of photosynthetic temperature dependence (Farquhar and von Caemmerer, 1982; Hikosaka et al., 2006), although there has been no evidence in the previous studies that the optimum temperature for photosynthesis occurs at the colimitation point of A_r and A_c.Temperature tolerance differs between species and, with growth temperature, even within species from the same functional group (Long and Woodward, 1989). Bunce (2000) indicated that the temperature dependences of A_r and A_c to growth temperature were different between species from cool and warm climates and that the balance between A_r and A_c was independent of growth temperature for a given plant species. However, it was not clarified what limited the photosynthetic rate or what parameters were important in temperature acclimation of photosynthesis. Recently, we reported that the extent of temperature homeostasis of leaf respiration and photosynthesis, which is assessed as a ratio of rates measured at their respective growth temperatures, differed depending on the extent of the cold tolerance of the species (Yamori et al., 2009b). Therefore, comparisons of several species with different cold tolerances would provide a new insight into interspecific variation of photosynthetic temperature acclimation and their underlying mechanisms. In this study, we selected 11 herbaceous crop species that differ in their cold tolerance (Yamori et al., 2009b) and grew them at two contrasting temperatures, conducting gas-exchange analyses based on the C₃ photosynthesis model (Farquhar et al., 1980). Based on these results, we addressed the following key questions. (1) Does the plasticity in photosynthetic temperature acclimation differ between cold-sensitive and cold-tolerant species? (2) Does the limiting step of photosynthesis at several leaf temperatures differ between plant species and with growth temperature? (3) What determines the optimum temperature for the photosynthetic rate among A_c, A_r, and the intersection of the temperature dependences of A_c and A_r?     

Carbohydrate-recognition domains of galectin-9 are involved in intermolecular interaction with galectin-9 itself and other members of the galectin family

Galectin-9 (Gal-9) is a tandem-repeat-type member of the galectin family associated with diverse biological processes, such as apoptosis, cell aggregation, and eosinophil chemoattraction. Although the detailed sugar-binding specificity of Gal-9 has been elucidated, molecular mechanisms that underlie these functions remain to be investigated. During the course of our binding study by affinity chromatography and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis, we found that human Gal-9 interacts with immobilized Gal-9 in the protein-protein interaction mode. Interestingly, this intermolecular interaction strongly depended on the activity of the carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD), because the addition of potent saccharide inhibitors abolished the binding. The presence of multimers was also confirmed by Ferguson plot analysis of result of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS). Moreover, this intermolecular interaction was observed between Gal-9 and other galectin members, such as Gal-3 and Gal-8, but not Gal-1. Because such properties have not been reported yet, they may explain an unidentified mechanism underlying the diverse functions of Gal-9.     

Structure and specific detection of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type VII

Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type VII, found in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus belonging to multilocus sequence type (ST) 59 from Taiwan, was 41,347 bp in size and flanked by 19-bp attL and attR sequences. It was inserted into the att site at the 3′-end of orfX in the orfX-orfY (putative tRNA dihydrouridine synthase) region in ST59 S. aureus. The 5′-end side 9911-bp core region of SCCmecVII, which contained attL and the cassette chromosome recombinase gene (ccrC8), was shared by other SCC structures, SCCmercury and mosaic SCCmec from Switzerland, indicating its important role in SCC evolution. The central 21,245-bp core region contained mec complex (C2b) and another ccrC gene (ccrC2), and was highly homologous to SCCmecV, but with substitutions, insertion and replacement. The 3′-end side 10,191-bp sequence was unique. Therefore, SCCmecVII has emerged through recombination and insertion events. Multiplex and real-time PCR assays were developed for specific detection of SCCmecVII.     

Histone chaperone activity of Fanconi anemia proteins, FANCD2 and FANCI, is required for DNA crosslink repair

Fanconi anaemia (FA) is a rare hereditary disorder characterized by genomic instability and cancer susceptibility. A key FA protein, FANCD2, is targeted to chromatin with its partner, FANCI, and plays a critical role in DNA crosslink repair. However, the molecular function of chromatin-bound FANCD2-FANCI is still poorly understood. In the present study, we found that FANCD2 possesses nucleosome-assembly activity in vitro. The mobility of histone H3 was reduced in FANCD2-knockdown cells following treatment with an interstrand DNA crosslinker, mitomycin C. Furthermore, cells harbouring FANCD2 mutations that were defective in nucleosome assembly displayed impaired survival upon cisplatin treatment. Although FANCI by itself lacked nucleosome-assembly activity, it significantly stimulated FANCD2-mediated nucleosome assembly. These observations suggest that FANCD2-FANCI may regulate chromatin dynamics during DNA repair.     

Structural Insights into the Epimerization of β-1,4-Linked Oligosaccharides Catalyzed by Cellobiose 2-Epimerase,the Sole Enzyme Epimerizing Non-anomeric Hydroxyl Groups of Unmodified Sugars

Cellobiose 2-epimerase (CE) reversibly converts d-glucose residues into d-mannose residues at the reducing end of unmodified β1,4-linked oligosaccharides, including β-1,4-mannobiose, cellobiose, and lactose. CE is responsible for conversion of β1,4-mannobiose to 4-O-β-d-mannosyl-d-glucose in mannan metabolism. However, the detailed catalytic mechanism of CE is unclear due to the lack of structural data in complex with ligands. We determined the crystal structures of halothermophile Rhodothermus marinus CE (RmCE) in complex with substrates/products or intermediate analogs, and its apo form. The structures in complex with the substrates/products indicated that the residues in the β5-β6 loop as well as those in the inner six helices form the catalytic site. Trp-322 and Trp-385 interact with reducing and non-reducing end parts of these ligands, respectively, by stacking interactions. The architecture of the catalytic site also provided insights into the mechanism of reversible epimerization. His-259 abstracts the H2 proton of the d-mannose residue at the reducing end, and consistently forms the cis-enediol intermediate by facilitated depolarization of the 2-OH group mediated by hydrogen bonding interaction with His-200. His-390 subsequently donates the proton to the C2 atom of the intermediate to form a d-glucose residue. The reverse reaction is mediated by these three histidines with the inverse roles of acid/base catalysts. The conformation of cellobiitol demonstrated that the deprotonation/reprotonation step is coupled with rotation of the C2-C3 bond of the open form of the ligand. Moreover, it is postulated that His-390 is closely related to ring opening/closure by transferring a proton between the O5 and O1 atoms of the ligand.     

Disruption of normal meiosis in artificial inter-populational hybrid females of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Misgurnus</Emphasis> loach

Artificial cross between two genetically different populations of Japanese Misgurnus loach was made to examine the reproductive capacity of the artificial inter-populational hybrid females. Ploidy status and microsatellite genotypes of the eggs laid by these hybrids were inferred from those determined in progenies developed by normal fertilization with haploid loach sperm, induced gynogenesis with UV-irradiated goldfish sperm and/or hybridization with intact goldfish sperm. Some hybrid females laid unreduced diploid eggs genetically identical to the mother. However, these diploid eggs could not develop by spontaneous gynogenesis, but grow to triploid by incorporation of a sperm nucleus. Other hybrid females laid haploid eggs together with diploid eggs and/or various aneuploid and polyploid eggs. Thus, a disruption of normal meiosis occurred in inter-populational hybrid females. The results suggested that the two populations should be so distant as to give rise to atypical formation of unreduced and other unusual eggs in their hybrids.     

Enhancing coral larval supply and seedling production using a special bundle collection system “coral larval cradle” for large‐scale coral restoration

Larval recruitment is essential for sustaining coral communities and a fundamental tool in some interventions for reef restoration. To improve larval supply and post‐settlement survival in sexually assisted coral restoration efforts, an integrated in situ collector system, the larval cradle, was designed to collect spawned gametes then culture the resulting larvae until settled on artificial substrates. The final design of the larval cradle was cylindrical, a nylon mesh structure with a volume of 9 m³, suspended in the sea and extending vertically toward the seabed. We found three key design features that improved the efficiency of the apparatus: (1) an open area of sea surface and mesh size of less than 100 μm produced high fertilization and optimal survival (>90%), (2) a special skirt‐shaped net (3 m in diameter) with a connection hose for attaching the cradle to collect bundles from many adult colonies over a wide area and at various depths, and (3) adding short square tube pieces, called square hollow sections, as a substrate for enhancing larval settlement and survival, to a larval cradle at 4 days after spawning was optimal for uniform settlement. This system allowed not only the collection of several million eggs, but also subsequent production of several thousand settled juvenile corals, without land facilities. Our design achieved several hundred times higher survival for early life stages of Acropora tenuis compared to nature.