Comparative effects of various classes of mouse interferons on macrophage activation for tumor cell killing

The effects of mouse interferon-alpha (MuIFN-alpha), -beta (MuIFN-beta), and -gamma (MuIFN-gamma) on macrophage activation for tumor cell killing were determined by using proteose peptone-elicited peritoneal macrophages from C3H/HeN and C3H/HeJ mice under conditions that either included or were free of detectable endotoxin. Alone, under the conditions used, none of the interferons was able to activate macrophages directly for tumor cell killing. However, with a second signal provided to responsive macrophages by contaminating endotoxin, added bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or heat-killed Listeria monocytogenes (HKLM), all three types of interferon induced cytolytic activity, with MuIFN-gamma approximately 500 to 1000-fold more active than either MuIFN-alpha or -beta. Thus, all three interferons were able to prime macrophages for killing but required a second signal before cytolytic activity could be expressed. When MuIFN-gamma was mixed with either MuIFN-alpha or -beta and placed on macrophages, little or no killing developed. Mixtures of MuIFN-gamma with either MuIFN-alpha or -beta did increase the sensitivity of macrophages to triggering by LPS, however, compared with macrophages treated with MuIFN-gamma alone. The results are collectively important because they i) confirm that significant quantitative differences exist between the various interferons with regard to their capacity to prime macrophages for tumor cell killing; ii) indicate that to be an efficient activator each type of interferon must be combined with a second stimulus, such as LPS or HKLM; iii) show that neither MuIFN-alpha nor -beta can provide an efficient second triggering signal for macrophages that are primed by MuIFN-gamma; and iv) document that mixtures of MuIFN-gamma with either MuIFN-alpha or -beta are most efficient at inducing priming, compared with any one of the interferons used alone.     

Cortical Plasticity Induced by Spike-Triggered Microstimulation in Primate Somatosensory Cortex

Electrical stimulation of the nervous system for therapeutic purposes, such as deep brain stimulation in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, has been used for decades. Recently, increased attention has focused on using microstimulation to restore functions as diverse as somatosensation and memory. However, how microstimulation changes the neural substrate is still not fully understood. Microstimulation may cause cortical changes that could either compete with or complement natural neural processes, and could result in neuroplastic changes rendering the region dysfunctional or even epileptic. As part of our efforts to produce neuroprosthetic devices and to further study the effects of microstimulation on the cortex, we stimulated and recorded from microelectrode arrays in the hand area of the primary somatosensory cortex (area 1) in two awake macaque monkeys. We applied a simple neuroprosthetic microstimulation protocol to a pair of electrodes in the area 1 array, using either random pulses or pulses time-locked to the recorded spiking activity of a reference neuron. This setup was replicated using a computer model of the thalamocortical system, which consisted of 1980 spiking neurons distributed among six cortical layers and two thalamic nuclei. Experimentally, we found that spike-triggered microstimulation induced cortical plasticity, as shown by increased unit-pair mutual information, while random microstimulation did not. In addition, there was an increased response to touch following spike-triggered microstimulation, along with decreased neural variability. The computer model successfully reproduced both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the experimental findings. The physiological findings of this study suggest that even simple microstimulation protocols can be used to increase somatosensory information flow.     

Vertical partitioning between sister species of Rhizopogon fungi on mesic and xeric sites in an interior Douglas‐fir forest

Understanding ectomycorrhizal fungal (EMF) community structure is limited by a lack of taxonomic resolution and autecological information. Rhizopogon vesiculosus and Rhizopogon vinicolor (Basidiomycota) are morphologically and genetically related species. They are dominant members of interior Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca) EMF communities, but mechanisms leading to their coexistence are unknown. We investigated the microsite associations and foraging strategy of individual R. vesiculosus and R. vinicolor genets. Mycelia spatial patterns, pervasiveness and root colonization patterns of fungal genets were compared between Rhizopogon species and between xeric and mesic soil moisture regimes. Rhizopogon spp. mycelia were systematically excavated from the soil and identified using microsatellite DNA markers. Rhizopogon vesiculosus mycelia occurred at greater depth, were more spatially pervasive, and colonized more tree roots than R. vinicolor mycelia. Both species were frequently encountered in organic layers and between the interface of organic and mineral horizons. They were particularly abundant within microsites associated with soil moisture retention. The occurrence of R. vesiculosus shifted in the presence of R. vinicolor towards mineral soil horizons, where R. vinicolor was mostly absent. This suggests that competition and foraging strategy may contribute towards the vertical partitioning observed between these species. Rhizopogon vesiculosus and R. vinicolor mycelia systems occurred at greater mean depths and were more pervasive in mesic plots compared with xeric plots. The spatial continuity and number of trees colonized by genets of each species did not significantly differ between soil moisture regimes.