The micronucleus assay as a test for the detection of aneugenic activity

The aim of this work was to determine the usefulness of the micronucleus assay for the detection of aneugenic potential. Chemicals affecting microtubule assembly, i.e., colchicine, vinblastine sulfate and tubulazole, and chemicals affecting targets other than microtubuli, i.e., mitomycin C, cyclophosphamide and miconazole, and the clastogens azathioprine and procarbazine were administered once orally or intraperitoneally to male and female mice. Bone marrow preparations were made at 24, 48 and 72 h after dosing. All the clastogens and aneugens, except miconazole, yielded positive results in the micronucleus test. Measurements of the area of the micronuclei and their distribution clearly showed that the chemicals affecting microtubule assembly produced larger micronuclei than did the clastogens. The pattern of area distribution of the micronuclei found with cyclophosphamide and mitomycin C was between those found for the tubulin inhibitors and the clastogens. These findings indicate that the micronucleus test not only detects chemicals affecting microtubule assembly, but also can discriminate them from clastogens by measurements of the area of the micronuclei.     

The graded and dichotomous nature of visual awareness

Is our visual experience of the world graded or dichotomous? Opposite pre-theoretical intuitions apply in different cases. For instance, when looking at a scene, one has a distinct sense that our experience has a graded character: one cannot say that there is no experience of contents that fall outside the focus of attention, but one cannot say that there is full awareness of such contents either. By contrast, when performing a visual detection task, our sense of having perceived the stimulus or not exhibits a more dichotomous character. Such issues have recently been the object of intense debate because different theoretical frameworks make different predictions about the graded versus dichotomous character of consciousness. Here, we review both relevant empirical findings as well as the associated theories (i.e. local recurrent processing versus global neural workspace theory). Next, we attempt to reconcile such contradictory theories by suggesting that level of processing is an often-ignored but highly relevant dimension through which we can cast a novel look at existing empirical findings. Thus, using a range of different stimuli, tasks and subjective scales, we show that processing low-level, non-semantic content results in graded visual experience, whereas processing high-level semantic content is experienced in a more dichotomous manner. We close by comparing our perspective with existing proposals, focusing in particular on the partial awareness hypothesis.