Using Affordable LED Arrays for Photo-Stimulation of Neurons

Standard slice electrophysiology has allowed researchers to probe individual components of neural circuitry by recording electrical responses of single cells in response to electrical or pharmacological manipulations^1,2. With the invention of methods to optically control genetically targeted neurons (optogenetics), researchers now have an unprecedented level of control over specific groups of neurons in the standard slice preparation. In particular, photosensitive channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) allows researchers to activate neurons with light^3,4. By combining careful calibration of LED-based photostimulation of ChR2 with standard slice electrophysiology, we are able to probe with greater detail the role of adult-born interneurons in the olfactory bulb, the first central relay of the olfactory system. Using viral expression of ChR2-YFP specifically in adult-born neurons, we can selectively control young adult-born neurons in a milieu of older and mature neurons. Our optical control uses a simple and inexpensive LED system, and we show how this system can be calibrated to understand how much light is needed to evoke spiking activity in single neurons. Hence, brief flashes of blue light can remotely control the firing pattern of ChR2-transduced newborn cells.Download video file.^{(48M, mov)}     

Roles of the equatorial tyrosyl iron ligand of protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase in catalysis

The active site Fe(III) of protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase (3,4-PCD) from Pseudomonas putida is ligated axially by Tyr447 and His462 and equatorially by Tyr408, His460, and OH(-). Tyr447 and OH(-) are displaced as protocatechuate (3,4-dihydroxybenzoate, PCA) chelates the iron and appear to serve as in situ bases to promote this process. The role(s) of Tyr408 is (are) explored here using mutant enzymes that exhibit less than 0.1% wild-type activity. The X-ray crystal structures of the mutants and their PCA complexes show that the new shorter residues in the 408 position cannot ligate the iron and instead interact with the iron through solvents. Moreover, PCA binds as a monodentate rather than a bidentate ligand, and Tyr447 fails to dissociate. Although the new residues at position 408 do not directly bind to the iron, large changes in the spectroscopic and catalytic properties are noted among the mutant enzymes. Resonance Raman features show that the Fe-O bond of the monodentate 4-hydroxybenzoate (4HB) inhibitor complex is significantly stronger in the mutants than in wild-type 3,4-PCD. Transient kinetic studies show that PCA and 4HB bind to 3,4-PCD in a fast, reversible step followed by a step in which coordination to the metal occurs; the latter process is at least 50-fold slower in the mutant enzymes. It is proposed that, in wild-type 3,4-PCD, the Lewis base strength of Tyr408 lowers the Lewis acidity of the iron to foster the rapid exchange of anionic ligands during the catalytic cycle. Accordingly, the increase in Lewis acidity of the iron caused by substitution of this residue by solvent tends to make the iron substitution inert. Tyr447 cannot be released to allow formation of the usual dianionic PCA chelate complex with the active site iron, and the rate of electrophilic attack by O(2) becomes rate limiting overall. The structures of the PCA complexes of these mutant enzymes show that hydrogen-bonding interactions between the new solvent ligand and the new second-sphere residue in position 408 allow this residue to significantly influence the spectroscopic and kinetic properties of the enzymes.     

The S Helix Mediates Signal Transmission as a HAMP Domain Coiled-Coil Extension in the NarX Nitrate Sensor from Escherichia coli K-12

In the nitrate-responsive, homodimeric NarX sensor, two cytoplasmic membrane α-helices delimit the periplasmic ligand-binding domain. The HAMP domain, a four-helix parallel coiled-coil built from two α-helices (HD1 and HD2), immediately follows the second transmembrane helix. Previous computational studies identified a likely coiled-coil-forming α-helix, the signaling helix (S helix), in a range of signaling proteins, including eucaryal receptor guanylyl cyclases, but its function remains obscure. In NarX, the HAMP HD2 and S-helix regions overlap and apparently form a continuous coiled-coil marked by a heptad repeat stutter discontinuity at the distal boundary of HD2. Similar composite HD2-S-helix elements are present in other sensors, such as Sln1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We constructed deletions and missense substitutions in the NarX S helix. Most caused constitutive signaling phenotypes. However, strongly impaired induction phenotypes were conferred by heptad deletions within the S-helix conserved core and also by deletions that remove the heptad stutter. The latter observation illuminates a key element of the dynamic bundle hypothesis for signaling across the heptad stutter adjacent to the HAMP domain in methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (Q. Zhou, P. Ames, and J. S. Parkinson, Mol. Microbiol. 73:801-814, 2009). Sequence comparisons identified other examples of heptad stutters between a HAMP domain and a contiguous coiled-coil-like heptad repeat sequence in conventional sensors, such as CpxA, EnvZ, PhoQ, and QseC; other S-helix-containing sensors, such as BarA and TorS; and the Neurospora crassa Nik-1 (Os-1) sensor that contains a tandem array of alternating HAMP and HAMP-like elements. Therefore, stutter elements may be broadly important for HAMP function.Transmembrane signaling in homodimeric bacterial sensors initiates upon signal ligand binding to the extracytoplasmic domain. In methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), the resulting conformational change causes a displacement of one transmembrane α-helix (TM α-helix) relative to the other. This motion is conducted by the HAMP domain to control output domain activity (reviewed in references 33 and 39).Certain sensors of two-component regulatory systems share topological organization with MCPs. For example, the paralogous nitrate sensors NarX and NarQ contain an amino-terminal transmembrane signaling module similar to those in MCPs, in which a pair of TM α-helices delimit the periplasmic ligand-binding domain (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (24) (reviewed in references 32 and 62). The second TM α-helix connects to the HAMP domain. Hybrid proteins in which the NarX transmembrane signaling module regulates the kinase control modules of the MCPs Tar, DifA, and FrzCD demonstrate that NarX and MCPs share a mechanism for transmembrane signaling (73, 74, 81, 82).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.NarX modular structure. Linear representation of the NarX protein sequence, from the amino (N) to carboxyl (C) termini, drawn to scale. The four modules are indicated at the top of the figure and shown in bold typeface, whereas domains within each module are labeled with standard (lightface) typeface. The nomenclature for modules follows that devised by Swain and Falke (67) for MCPs. Overlap between the HAMP domain HD2 and S-helix elements is indicated in gray. The three conserved Cys residues within the central module (62) are indicated. TM1 and TM2 denote the two transmembrane helices. Helices H1 to H4 of the periplasmic domain (24), and the transmitter domain H, N, D, G (79), and X (41) boxes, are labeled. The HPK 7 family of transmitter sequences, including NarX, have no F box and an unconventional G box (79). The scale bar at the bottom of the figure shows the number of aminoacyl residues.The HAMP domain functions as a signal conversion module in a variety of homodimeric proteins, including histidine protein kinases, adenylyl cyclases, MCPs, and certain phosphatases (12, 20, 77). This roughly 50-residue domain consists of a pair of amphiphilic α-helices, termed HD1 and HD2 (formerly AS1 and AS2) (67), joined by a connector (Fig. ​(Fig.2A).2A). Results from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, Cys and disulfide scanning, and mutational analysis converge on a model in which the HD1 and HD2 α-helices form a four-helix parallel coiled-coil (7, 20, 30, 42, 67, 75, 84). The mechanisms through which HAMP domains mediate signal conduction remain to be established (30, 42, 67, 84) (for commentary, see references 43, 49, and 50).Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.HAMP domain extensions. (A) Sequences from representative MCPs (E. coli Tsr and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium Tar) and S-helix-containing sensors (E. coli NarX, NarQ, and BarA, and S. cerevisiae Sln1p). The HAMP domain, S-helix element, and the initial sequence of the MCP adaptation region are indicated. Flanking numbers denote positions of the terminal residues within the overall sequence. Sequential heptad repeats are indicated in alternating bold and standard (lightface) typeface. Numbering for heptad repeats in the methylation region and S-helix sequences has been described previously (4, 8). Numbers within the HD1 and HD2 helices indicate interactions within the HAMP domain (42). Residues at heptad positions a and d are enclosed within boxes, residues at the stutter position a/d are enclosed within a thickly outlined box, and residues in the S-helix ERT signature are in bold typeface. (B) NarX mutational alterations. Deletions are depicted as boxes, and missense substitutions are shown above the sequence. Many of these deletions were reported previously (10) and are presented here for comparison. The phenotypes conferred by the alterations are indicated as follows: impaired induction, black box; constitutive and elevated basal, light gray box; reversed response, dark gray box; wild-type, white box; null, striped box.Coiled-coils result from packing of two or more α-helices (27). The primary sequence of coiled-coils exhibits a characteristic heptad repeat pattern, denoted as a-b-c-d-e-f-g (52, 61), in which positions a and d are usually occupied by nonpolar residues (reviewed in references 1, 47, and 80). For example, the coiled-coil nature of the HAMP domain can be seen in the heptad repeat patterns within the HD1 and HD2 sequences (Fig. ​(Fig.2A2A).Coiled-coil elements adjacent to the HAMP domain have been identified in several sensors, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sln1p (69) and Escherichia coli NarX (60). Recently, this element was defined as a specific type of dimeric parallel coiled-coil, termed the signaling helix (S helix), present in a wide range of signaling proteins (8). Sequence comparisons delimit a roughly 40-residue element with a conserved heptad repeat pattern (Fig. ​(Fig.2A).2A). Based on mutational analyses of Sln1p and other proteins, the S helix is suggested to function as a switch that prevents constitutive activation of adjacent output domains (8).The term “signaling helix” previously was used to define the α4-TM2 extended helix in MCPs (23, 33). Here, we use the term S helix to denote the element described by Anantharaman et al. (8).The NarX and NarQ sensors encompass four distinct modules (Fig. ​(Fig.1):1): the amino-terminal transmembrane signaling module, the signal conversion module (including the HAMP domain and S-helix element), the central module of unknown function, and the carboxyl-terminal transmitter module (62). The S-helix element presumably functions together with the HAMP domain in conducting ligand-responsive motions from the transmembrane signaling module to the central module, ultimately regulating transmitter module activity.Regulatory output by two-component sensors reflects opposing transmitter activities (reviewed in reference 55). Positive function results from transmitter autokinase activity; the resulting phosphosensor serves as a substrate for response regulator autophosphorylation. Negative function results from transmitter phosphatase activity, which accelerates phosphoresponse regulator autodephosphorylation (reviewed in references 64 and 65). We envision a homogeneous two-state model for NarX (17), in which the equilibrium between these mutually exclusive conformations is modulated by ligand-responsive signaling.Previous work from our laboratory concerned the NarX and other HAMP domains (9, 10, 26, 77) and separately identified a conserved sequence in NarX and NarQ sensors, the Y box, that roughly corresponds to the S helix (62). Therefore, we were interested to explore the NarX S helix and to test some of the predictions made for its function. Results show that the S helix is critical for signal conduction and suggest that it functions as an extension of the HAMP HD2 α-helix in a subset of sensors exemplified by Sln1p and NarX. Moreover, a stutter discontinuity in the heptad repeat pattern was found to be essential for the NarX response to signal and to be conserved in several distinct classes of HAMP-containing sensors.     

Crystal structures of nitroalkane oxidase: insights into the reaction mechanism from a covalent complex of the flavoenzyme trapped during turnover

Nitroalkane oxidase (NAO) from Fusarium oxysporum catalyzes the oxidation of neutral nitroalkanes to the corresponding aldehydes or ketones with the production of H(2)O(2) and nitrite. The flavoenzyme is a new member of the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (ACAD) family, but it does not react with acyl-CoA substrates. We present the 2.2 A resolution crystal structure of NAO trapped during the turnover of nitroethane as a covalent N5-FAD adduct (ES*). The homotetrameric structure of ES* was solved by MAD phasing with 52 Se-Met sites in an orthorhombic space group. The electron density for the N5-(2-nitrobutyl)-1,5-dihydro-FAD covalent intermediate is clearly resolved. The structure of ES was used to solve the crystal structure of oxidized NAO at 2.07 A resolution. The c axis for the trigonal space group of oxidized NAO is 485 A, and there are six subunits (1(1)/(2) holoenzymes) in the asymmetric unit. Four of the active sites contain spermine (EI), a weak competitive inhibitor, and two do not contain spermine (E(ox)). The active-site structures of E(ox), EI, and ES* reveal a hydrophobic channel that extends from the exterior of the protein and terminates at Asp402 and the N5 position on the re face of the FAD. Thus, Asp402 is in the correct position to serve as the active-site base, where it is proposed to abstract the alpha proton from neutral nitroalkane substrates. The structures for NAO and various members of the ACAD family overlay with root-mean-square deviations between 1.7 and 3.1 A. The homologous region typically spans more than 325 residues and includes Glu376, which is the active-site base in the prototypical member of the ACAD family. However, NAO and the ACADs exhibit differences in hydrogen-bonding patterns between the respective active-site base, substrate molecules, and FAD. These likely differentiate NAO from the homologues and, consequently, are proposed to result in the unique reaction mechanism of NAO.     

Phenotyping for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Maize

The ability to quickly develop germplasm having tolerance to several complex polygenic inherited abiotic and biotic stresses combined is critical to the resilience of cropping systems in the face of climate change.Molecular breeding offers the tools to accelerate cereal breeding;however,suitable phenotyping proto-cols are essential to ensure that the much-anticipated benefits of molecular breeding can be realized.To facilitate the full potential of molecular tools,greater emphasis needs to be given to reducing the within-experimental site variability,application of stress and characterization of the environment and appropriate phenotyping tools.Yield is a function of many processes throughout the plantcycle,and thus integrative traits that encompass crop performance over time or organization level(i.e.canopy level) will provide a better alternative to instantaneous measurements which provide only a snapshot of a given plant process.Many new phenotyping tools based on remote sensing are now available including non-destructive measurements of growth-related parameters based on spectral reflectance and infrared thermometry to estimate plant water status.Here we describe key field phenotyping protocols for maize with emphasis on tolerance to drought and low nitrogen.     

Human attitudes towards herpetofauna: The influence of folklore and negative values on the conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Portugal

Background

Human values and folklore of wildlife strongly influence the effectiveness of conservation efforts. These values and folklore may also vary with certain demographic characteristics such as gender, age, or education. Reptiles and amphibians are among the least appreciated of vertebrates and are victims of many negative values and wrong ideas resulting from the direct interpretation of folklore. We try to demonstrate how these values and folklore can affect the way people relate to them and also the possible conservation impacts on these animals.

Methods

A questionnaire survey distributed to 514 people in the district of Évora, Portugal, was used to obtain data regarding the hypothesis that the existence of wrong ideas and negative values contributes to the phenomenon of human-associated persecution of these animals. A structural equation model was specified in order to confirm the hypothesis about the possible relationships between the presence of perceptions and negative values about amphibians and reptiles and persecution and anti-conservation attitudes. Sociodemographic variables were also added.

Results

The results of the model suggest that the presence of folklore and negative values clearly predicts persecution and anti-conservation attitudes towards amphibians and reptiles. Also, the existence of folklore varies sociodemographically, but negative values concerning these animals are widespread in the population.

Conclusions

With the use of structural equation models, this work is a contribution to the study of how certain ideas and values can directly influence human attitudes towards herpetofauna and how they can be a serious conservation issue.     

The challenge of CT and MRI imaging of obese individuals who present to the emergency department: a national survey

The objective of this study was to estimate the availability of large weight capacity computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) equipment in US hospitals with emergency departments (EDs) and to evaluate animal facilities as alternate sources of imaging. We conducted a telephone survey of radiology technicians from a random sample of all the US hospitals with EDs (n = 262) and all 136 primary hospitals of academic EDs, 145 zoos, and 28 veterinary schools. We measured the prevalence of large weight capacity (>450 lb) CT and MRI, stratified by hospital characteristics. Response rates were 94-100% across samples. Nationally, 10% (95% confidence interval, 7-15) of hospitals with EDs had large weight capacity CT and 8% (95% confidence interval, 5-13) had large weight capacity MRI. In academic hospitals, access to large capacity equipment was better for CT (28%), but similar for MRI (10%) (P < 0.001 and 0.51, respectively). Few rural (5%) and critical-access hospitals (3%) had large capacity CT. In addition, 34% of trauma centers, 23% of stroke centers, and 21% of bariatric surgery centers of excellence had large capacity CT. Only two zoos (1%) had CT scanners; both would not image human patients. Among veterinary schools, 16 (57%) had large weight capacity CT equipment, but only 4 (14%) would consider imaging human patients. Further, 23 (82%) veterinary schools reported policies that specifically prohibited imaging humans. For patients who weigh >450 lb, access to emergent CT and MRI is limited, even at academic and bariatric surgery centers. Animal facilities are not a viable alternative for diagnostic imaging of human patients.     

Histone variant macroH2A contains two distinct macrochromatin domains capable of directing macroH2A to the inactive X chromosome

Chromatin on the inactive X chromosome (Xi) of female mammals is enriched for the histone variant macroH2A that can be detected at interphase as a distinct nuclear structure referred to as a macro chromatin body (MCB). Green fluorescent protein-tagged and Myc epitope-tagged macroH2A readily form an MCB in the nuclei of transfected female, but not male, cells. Using targeted disruptions, we have identified two macrochromatin domains within macroH2A that are independently capable of MCB formation and association with the Xi. Complete removal of the non-histone C-terminal tail does not reduce the efficiency of association of the variant histone domain of macroH2A with the Xi, indicating that the histone portion alone can target the Xi. The non-histone domain by itself is incapable of MCB formation. However, when directed to the nucleosome by fusion to core histone H2A or H2B, the non-histone tail forms an MCB that appears identical to that of the endogenous protein. Mutagenesis of the non-histone portion of macroH2A localized the region required for MCB formation and targeting to the Xi to an ~190 amino acid region.     

ClpXP and ClpAP proteolytic activity on divisome substrates is differentially regulated following the Caulobacter asymmetric cell division

Proteolytic control of Caulobacter cell cycle proteins is primarily executed by ClpXP, a dynamically localized protease implicated in turnover of several factors critical for faithful cell cycle progression. Here, we show that the transient midcell localization of ClpXP that precedes cytokinesis requires the FtsZ component of the divisome. Although ClpAP does not exhibit subcellular localization, FtsZ is a substrate of both ClpXP and ClpAP in vivo and in vitro. A peptide containing the C‐terminal portion of the FtsA divisome protein is a substrate of both ClpXP and ClpAP in vitro but is primarily degraded by ClpAP in vivo. Caulobacter carries out an asymmetric division in which FtsZ and FtsA are stable in stalked cells but degraded in the non‐replicative swarmer cell where ClpAP alone degrades FtsA and both ClpAP and ClpXP degrade FtsZ. While asymmetric division in Caulobacter normally yields larger stalked and smaller swarmer daughters, we observe a loss of asymmetric size distribution among daughter cells when clpA is depleted from a strain in which FtsZ is constitutively produced. Taken together, these results suggest that the activity of both ClpXP and ClpAP on divisome substrates is differentially regulated in daughter cells.