Interactions between an alpha-helix and a beta-sheet. Energetics of alpha/beta packing in proteins

Conformational energy computations have been carried out to determine the favorable ways of packing a right-handed alpha-helix on a right-twisted antiparallel or parallel beta-sheet. Co-ordinate transformations have been developed to relate the position and orientation of the alpha-helix to the beta-sheet. The packing was investigated for a CH3CO-(L-Ala)16-NHCH3 alpha-helix interacting with five-stranded beta-sheets composed of CH3CO-(L-Val)6-NHCH3 chains. All internal and external variables for both the alpha-helix and the beta-sheet were allowed to change during energy minimization. Four distinct classes of low-energy packing arrangements were found for the alpha-helix interacting with both the parallel and the anti-parallel beta-sheet. The classes differ in the orientation of the axis of the alpha-helix relative to the direction of the strands of the right-twisted beta-sheet. In the class with the most favorable arrangement, the alpha-helix is oriented along the strands of the beta-sheet, as a result of attractive non-bonded side-chain-side-chain interactions along the entire length of the alpha-helix. A class with nearly perpendicular orientation of the helix axis to the strands is also of low energy, because it allows similarly extensive attractive interactions. In the other two classes, the helix is oriented diagonally relative to the strands of the beta-sheet. In one of them, it interacts with the convex surface near the middle of the saddle-shaped twisted beta-sheet. In the other, it is oriented along the concave diagonal of the beta-sheet and, therefore, it interacts only with the corner regions of the sheet, so that this packing is energetically less favorable. The packing arrangements involving an antiparallel and a parallel beta-sheet are generally similar, although the antiparallel beta-sheet has been found to be more flexible. The major features of 163 observed alpha/beta packing arrangements in 37 proteins are accounted for in terms of the computed structural preferences. The energetically most favored packing arrangement is similar to the right-handed beta alpha beta crossover structure that is observed in proteins; thus, the preference for this connectivity arises in large measure from this energetically favorable interaction.     

Purine nucleoside synthesis, an efficient method employing nucleoside phosphorylases

An improved method for the enzymatic synthesis of purine nucleosides is described. Pyrimidine nucleosides were used as pentosyl donors and two phosphorylases were used as catalysts. One of the enzymes, either uridine phosphorylase (Urd Pase) or thymidine phosphorylase (dThd Pase), catalyzed the phosphorolysis of the pentosyl donor. The other enzyme, purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PN Pase), catalyzed the synthesis of the product nucleoside by utilizing the pentose 1-phosphate ester generated from the phosphorolysis of the pyrimidine nucleoside. Urd Pase, dThd Pase, and PN Pase were separated from each other in extracts of Escherichia coli by titration with calcium phosphate gel. Each enzyme was further purified by ion-exchange chromatography. Factors that affect the stability of these catalysts were studied. The pH optima for the stability of Urd Pase, dThd Pase, and PN Pase were 7.6, 6.5, and 7.4, respectively. The order of relative heat stability was Urd Pase greater than PN Pase greater than dThd Pase. The stability of each enzyme increased with increasing enzyme concentration. This dependence was strongest with dThd Pase and weakest with Urd Pase. Of the substrates tested, the most potent stabilizers of Urd Pase, dThd Pase, and PN Pase were uridine, 2'-deoxyribose 1-phosphate, and ribose 1-phosphate, respectively. Some general guidelines for optimization of yields are given. In a model reaction, optimal product formation was obtained at low phosphate concentrations. As examples of the efficiency of the method, the 2'-deoxyribonucleoside of 6-(dimethylamino)purine and the ribonucleoside of 2-amino-6-chloropurine were prepared in yields of 81 and 76%, respectively.