The Genetics of Leaf Flecking in Maize and Its Relationship to Plant Defense and Disease Resistance

Physiological leaf spotting, or flecking, is a mild-lesion phenotype observed on the leaves of several commonly used maize (Zea mays) inbred lines and has been anecdotally linked to enhanced broad-spectrum disease resistance. Flecking was assessed in the maize nested association mapping (NAM) population, comprising 4,998 recombinant inbred lines from 25 biparental families, and in an association population, comprising 279 diverse maize inbreds. Joint family linkage analysis was conducted with 7,386 markers in the NAM population. Genome-wide association tests were performed with 26.5 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the NAM population and with 246,497 SNPs in the association population, resulting in the identification of 18 and three loci associated with variation in flecking, respectively. Many of the candidate genes colocalizing with associated SNPs are similar to genes that function in plant defense response via cell wall modification, salicylic acid- and jasmonic acid-dependent pathways, redox homeostasis, stress response, and vesicle trafficking/remodeling. Significant positive correlations were found between increased flecking, stronger defense response, increased disease resistance, and increased pest resistance. A nonlinear relationship with total kernel weight also was observed whereby lines with relatively high levels of flecking had, on average, lower total kernel weight. We present evidence suggesting that mild flecking could be used as a selection criterion for breeding programs trying to incorporate broad-spectrum disease resistance.The plant hypersensitive response (HR) is a form of programmed cell death (PCD) characterized by rapid, localized cell death at the point of attempted pathogen penetration, usually resulting in disease resistance (Coll et al., 2011). It is often associated with other responses, including ion fluxes, an oxidative burst, lipid peroxidation, and cell wall fortification (Hammond-Kosack and Jones, 1996). van Doorn et al. (2011) suggested that HR is a type of PCD sharing features with, but distinct from, both vacuolar cell death and necrosis.HR has been associated with resistance to almost every class of pathogen and pest, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, nematodes, insects, and parasitic plants (Wu and Baldwin, 2010), and generally is most effective against biotrophic pathogens, since biotrophs require a long-term feeding relationship with living host cells. It is generally mediated by dominant resistance (R) genes whose activation is triggered by the direct or indirect detection of specific pathogen-derived effector proteins (Bent and Mackey, 2007). R proteins are maintained in their inactive state if their corresponding effector is not present. Mutants in which HR is constitutively active have been identified in many plant species, including maize/corn (Zea mays; Walbot et al., 1983; Johal, 2007), Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Lorrain et al., 2003), barley (Hordeum vulgare; Wolter et al., 1993), and rice (Oryza sativa; Yin et al., 2000).One well-known class of plant mutants spontaneously form lesions (patches of dead or chlorotic cells) in the absence of any obvious injury, stress, or infection to the plant. Since these lesions in some cases resemble HR, they have been termed disease-lesion mimics (Neuffer and Calvert, 1975). These mutants, which we will here collectively term Les mutants, have been studied extensively, especially in maize (Walbot et al., 1983; Johal et al., 1995; Johal, 2007) and Arabidopsis (Coll et al., 2011). While some of these lesion phenotypes are indeed caused by perturbations in the plant defense response (Hu et al., 1996; Rustérucci et al., 2001), some of the genes underlying this mutant class affect various other pathways that cause cell death if their function is perturbed (Johal, 2007). For instance, the Arabidopsis gene acd2 and the maize gene lls1 are defective in chlorophyll degradation (Gray et al., 1997; Mach et al., 2001).We have defined leaf flecking as the mild, genetically determined spotting observed on many maize inbred cultivars (Vontimitta et al., 2015; Fig. 1). The trait is qualitatively and visually similar to, but quantitatively less severe than, Les mutant phenotypes. The distinction between what constitutes a flecking versus a mild Les trait is necessarily somewhat arbitrary, but for our purposes, we have defined any nonproliferating and distinct leaf-spotting phenotype as flecking.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.A, Examples of variation in the flecking phenotype among inbred lines, with severity increasing from left to right (flecking scores in parentheses, from 0 to 4, scored on a scale of 1–10). B, Leaves of the lines nearly isogenic to inbred Mo20W, into which specific indicated dominant Les mutant genes have been introgressed (Rp1-D21 mutation in an H95 inbred background). Photographs were taken in Clayton, North Carolina, 12 weeks after planting. This figure is adapted from Figure 1 of Vontimitta et al. (2015).Leaf flecking is familiar to most corn breeders, appearing in such well-known and widely used lines such as Mo17 (Zehr et al., 1994) and in several other species such as barley (Makepeace et al., 2007), wheat (Triticum aestivum; Nair and Tomar, 2001), and oat (Avena sativa; Ferdinandsen and Winge, 1930). Flecking tends to be more noticeable in inbreds compared with their derived hybrids (M. Goodman and W. Dolezal, personal communication). Anecdotally, it is often thought to be indicative of a constitutive low-level defense response and as a marker for increased disease resistance.In previous work, we and others have defined the genetic architectures associated with resistance to several maize diseases, including southern leaf blight (SLB; causal agent, Cochliobolus heterostrophus), northern leaf blight (NLB; causal agent, Exserohilum turcicum), and gray leaf spot (GLS; causal agent, Cercospora zeae-maydis; Kump et al., 2011; Poland et al., 2011; Wisser et al., 2011; Benson et al., 2015), and with the control of the maize HR (Chintamanani et al., 2010; Chaikam et al., 2011; Olukolu et al., 2013). For much of this work, we used two powerful mapping populations: the maize association population (Flint-Garcia et al., 2005), a collection of 302 diverse inbred lines with low linkage disequilibrium, and the 5,000-line nested association mapping (NAM) population (McMullen et al., 2009), which is made up of 25 200-line recombinant inbred line (RIL) subpopulations derived from crosses between the common parent B73 and 25 diverse inbreds. Using these populations, it is possible to both sample a diverse array of germplasm and map quantitative trait loci (QTLs) precisely, in some cases to the gene level (Tian et al., 2011; Cook et al., 2012; Hung et al., 2012; Larsson et al., 2013; Olukolu et al., 2013; Wang and Balint-Kurti, 2016).A recent study using 300 lines from the maize intermated B73 × Mo17 population advanced intercross line mapping population identified low but moderately significant positive correlations between increased flecking and increased disease resistance and defense response (Vontimitta et al., 2015). Loci associated with variation in flecking were mapped, although these loci did not colocalize with QTLs identified previously for disease resistance and defense response traits (Balint-Kurti et al., 2007, 2008, 2010; Olukolu et al., 2013). In this study, we have extended this work to examine the genetic basis of leaf flecking over a much more diverse set of maize germplasm using a substantially larger population. We mapped loci associated with variation in leaf flecking and identified candidate genes and pathways that may be involved in this phenotype. Additionally, we have examined the correlations between leaf flecking and disease resistance, the hypersensitive defense response, and total kernel weight.     

Quantitative Analysis of the Whole-Body Metabolic Fate of Branched-Chain Amino Acids

1. Download high-res image (203KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Ectonucleoside Triphosphate Diphosphohydrolase-3 Antibody Targets Adult Human Pancreatic β Cells for In Vitro and In Vivo Analysis

1. Download high-res image (183KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Unexpected equivalent potency of a constrained chromene enantiomeric pair rationalized by co-crystal structures in complex with estrogen receptor alpha

Despite tremendous progress made in the understanding of the ERα signaling pathway and the approval of many therapeutic agents, ER+?breast cancer continues to be a leading cause of cancer death in women. We set out to discover compounds with a dual mechanism of action in which they not only compete with estradiol for binding with ERα, but also can induce the degradation of the ERα protein itself. We were attracted to the constrained chromenes containing a tetracyclic benzopyranobenzoxepine scaffold, which were reported as potent selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). Incorporation of a fluoromethyl azetidine side chain yielded highly potent and efficacious selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), such as 16aa and surprisingly, also its enantiomeric pair 16ab. Co-crystal structures of the enantiomeric pair 16aa and 16ab in complex with ERα revealed default (mimics the A-D rings of endogenous ligand estradiol) and core-flipped binding modes, rationalizing the equivalent potency observed for these enantiomers in the ERα degradation and MCF-7 anti-proliferation assays.     

Assessing the utility of conserving evolutionary history

It is often claimed that conserving evolutionary history is more efficient than species‐based approaches for capturing the attributes of biodiversity that benefit people. This claim underpins academic analyses and recommendations about the distribution and prioritization of species and areas for conservation, but evolutionary history is rarely considered in practical conservation activities. One impediment to implementation is that arguments related to the human‐centric benefits of evolutionary history are often vague and the underlying mechanisms poorly explored. Herein we identify the arguments linking the prioritization of evolutionary history with benefits to people, and for each we explicate the purported mechanism, and evaluate its theoretical and empirical support. We find that, even after 25 years of academic research, the strength of evidence linking evolutionary history to human benefits is still fragile. Most – but not all – arguments rely on the assumption that evolutionary history is a useful surrogate for phenotypic diversity. This surrogacy relationship in turn underlies additional arguments, particularly that, by capturing more phenotypic diversity, evolutionary history will preserve greater ecosystem functioning, capture more of the natural variety that humans prefer, and allow the maintenance of future benefits to humans. A surrogate relationship between evolutionary history and phenotypic diversity appears reasonable given theoretical and empirical results, but the strength of this relationship varies greatly. To the extent that evolutionary history captures unmeasured phenotypic diversity, maximizing the representation of evolutionary history should capture variation in species characteristics that are otherwise unknown, supporting some of the existing arguments. However, there is great variation in the strength and availability of evidence for benefits associated with protecting phenotypic diversity. There are many studies finding positive biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships, but little work exists on the maintenance of future benefits or the degree to which humans prefer sets of species with high phenotypic diversity or evolutionary history. Although several arguments link the protection of evolutionary history directly with the reduction of extinction rates, and with the production of relatively greater future biodiversity via increased adaptation or diversification, there are few direct tests. Several of these putative benefits have mismatches between the relevant spatial scales for conservation actions and the spatial scales at which benefits to humans are realized. It will be important for future work to fill in some of these gaps through direct tests of the arguments we define here.     

Characterization of glycosomal RING finger proteins of trypanosomatids

The glycosomes of trypanosomatids are essential organelles that are evolutionarily related to peroxisomes of other eukaryotes. The peroxisomal RING proteins-PEX2, PEX10 and PEX12-comprise a network of integral membrane proteins that function in the matrix protein import cycle. Here, we describe PEX10 and PEX12 in Trypanosoma brucei, Leishmania major, and Trypanosoma cruzi. We expressed GFP fusions of each T. brucei coding region in procyclic form T. brucei, where they localized to glycosomes and behaved as integral membrane proteins. Despite the weak transmembrane predictions for TbPEX12, protease protection assays demonstrated that both the N and C termini are cytosolic, similar to mammalian PEX12. GFP fusions of T. cruzi PEX10 and L. major PEX12 also localized to glycosomes in T. brucei indicating that glycosomal membrane protein targeting is conserved across trypanosomatids.     

Acceptor specificity of the Pasteurella hyaluronan and chondroitin synthases and production of chimeric glycosaminoglycans

The hyaluronan (HA) synthase, PmHAS, and the chondroitin synthase, PmCS, from the Gram-negative bacterium Pasteurella multocida polymerize the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) sugar chains HA or chondroitin, respectively. The recombinant Escherichia coli-derived enzymes were shown previously to elongate exogenously supplied oligosaccharides of their cognate GAG (e.g. HA elongated by PmHAS). Here we show that oligosaccharides and polysaccharides of certain noncognate GAGs (including sulfated and iduronic acid-containing forms) are elongated by PmHAS (e.g. chondroitin elongated by PmHAS) or PmCS. Various acceptors were tested in assays where the synthase extended the molecule with either a single monosaccharide or a long chain (approximately 10(2-4) sugars). Certain GAGs were very poor acceptors in comparison to the cognate molecules, but elongated products were detected nonetheless. Overall, these findings suggest that for the interaction between the acceptor and the enzyme (a) the orientation of the hydroxyl at the C-4 position of the hexosamine is not critical, (b) the conformation of C-5 of the hexuronic acid (glucuronic versus iduronic) is not crucial, and (c) additional negative sulfate groups are well tolerated in certain cases, such as on C-6 of the hexosamine, but others, including C-4 sulfates, were not or were poorly tolerated. In vivo, the bacterial enzymes only process unsulfated polymers; thus it is not expected that the PmCS and PmHAS catalysts would exhibit such relative relaxed sugar specificity by acting on a variety of animal-derived sulfated or epimerized GAGs. However, this feature allows the chemoenzymatic synthesis of a variety of chimeric GAG polymers, including mimics of proteoglycan complexes.