Equine Welfare in England and Wales: Exploration of Stakeholders' Understanding

Investigating how those responsible for the care of nonhuman animals understand the concept of animal welfare is important for animal welfare improvement. In-depth interviews with 31 equine stakeholders were used to explore their perceptions and understanding of welfare. The results showed the stakeholders understood the concept of welfare in 4 ways. Firstly, welfare was understood in terms of the provision of resources—for example, food. Secondly, a “horse-centered” understanding of welfare was articulated; this understanding included the horses' mental state and was linked to natural behavior. Thirdly, the word welfare had negative connotations, and for some, good welfare was achieved through avoidance of negative states. Finally, interviewees discussed incidents that occurred in their own familiar contexts but suggested that these were not welfare problems. Evidence indicated that the ways in which equine stakeholders understood the concept of welfare might have been acting as a barrier to the alleviation of some equine welfare problems. There is a need for strategies aimed at improving equine welfare to consider stakeholder constructs of welfare and the ways in which these constructs are generated and acted upon.     

On the role of anionic lipids in charged protein interactions with membranes

We investigate the role of anionic lipids in the binding to, and subsequent movement of charged protein groups in lipid membranes, to help understand the role of membrane composition in all membrane-active protein sequences. We demonstrate a small effect of phosphatidylglycerol (PG) lipids on the ability of an arginine (Arg) side chain to bind to, and cross a lipid membrane, despite possessing a neutralizing charge. We observe similar membrane deformations in lipid bilayers composed of phosphatidylcholine (PC) and PC/PG mixtures, with comparable numbers of water and lipid head groups pulled into the bilayer hydrocarbon core, and prohibitively large ~20 kcal/mol barriers for Arg transfer across each bilayer, dropping by just 2-3 kcal/mol due to the binding of PG lipids. We explore the causes of this small effect of introducing PG lipids and offer an explanation in terms of the limited membrane interaction for the choline groups of PC lipids bound to the translocating ion. Our calculations reveal a surprising lack of preference for Arg binding to PG lipids themselves, but a small increase in interfacial binding affinity for lipid bilayers containing PG lipids. These results help to explain the nature of competitive lipid binding to charged protein sequences, with implications for a wide range of membrane binding domains and cell perturbing peptides.     

Why are most rhizobia beneficial to their plant hosts, rather than parasitic?

Multiple strains per plant and root-to-root (not seed-borne) transmission should favor rhizobia that invest in their own reproduction, rather than symbiotic N2 fixation, as analogous factors may favor pathogen virulence. But legumes can select for greater mutualism, controlling nodule O2 supply and reducing reproduction of rhizobia that fix less N2.     

Inclusive fitness in agriculture

Trade-offs between individual fitness and the collective performance of crop and below-ground symbiont communities are common in agriculture. Plant competitiveness for light and soil resources is key to individual fitness, but higher investments in stems and roots by a plant community to compete for those resources ultimately reduce crop yields. Similarly, rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi may increase their individual fitness by diverting resources to their own reproduction, even if they could have benefited collectively by providing their shared crop host with more nitrogen and phosphorus, respectively. Past selection for inclusive fitness (benefits to others, weighted by their relatedness) is unlikely to have favoured community performance over individual fitness. The limited evidence for kin recognition in plants and microbes changes this conclusion only slightly. We therefore argue that there is still ample opportunity for human-imposed selection to improve cooperation among crop plants and their symbionts so that they use limited resources more efficiently. This evolutionarily informed approach will require a better understanding of how interactions among crops, and interactions with their symbionts, affected their inclusive fitness in the past and what that implies for current interactions.