Long-Term Safety of Repeated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening via Focused Ultrasound with Microbubbles in Non-Human Primates Performing a Cognitive Task

Focused Ultrasound (FUS) coupled with intravenous administration of microbubbles (MB) is a non-invasive technique that has been shown to reliably open (increase the permeability of) the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in multiple in vivo models including non-human primates (NHP). This procedure has shown promise for clinical and basic science applications, yet the safety and potential neurological effects of long term application in NHP requires further investigation under parameters shown to be efficacious in that species (500kHz, 200–400 kPa, 4–5μm MB, 2 minute sonication). In this study, we repeatedly opened the BBB in the caudate and putamen regions of the basal ganglia of 4 NHP using FUS with systemically-administered MB over 4–20 months. We assessed the safety of the FUS with MB procedure using MRI to detect edema or hemorrhaging in the brain. Contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI sequences showed a 98% success rate for openings in the targeted regions. T2-weighted and SWI sequences indicated a lack edema in the majority of the cases. We investigated potential neurological effects of the FUS with MB procedure through quantitative cognitive testing of’ visual, cognitive, motivational, and motor function using a random dot motion task with reward magnitude bias presented on a touchpanel display. Reaction times during the task significantly increased on the day of the FUS with MB procedure. This increase returned to baseline within 4–5 days after the procedure. Visual motion discrimination thresholds were unaffected. Our results indicate FUS with MB can be a safe method for repeated opening of the BBB at the basal ganglia in NHP for up to 20 months without any long-term negative physiological or neurological effects with the parameters used.     

Interaction of soil moisture and elevated CO2 on the above-ground growth rate, root length density and gas exchange of turves from temperate pasture

Interactions between water availability and elevated atmosphericCO₂ concentrations have the potential to be important factorsin determining future forage supply from temperate pastures.Using large turves from an established pasture, the responseof these communities at 350 or 700 l l^–1 CO₂ to a soilmoisture deficit and to recovery from the deficit in comparisonto turves that were well-watered throughout was measured. Priorto this experiment the turves had been exposed to the CO₂ treatmentsfor 324 d. Net CO₂ exchange continued at elevated CO₂ even when the volumetricsoil moisture content was less than 0.10 m³ m^–3 soil;at the same moisture deficit gas exchange at ambient CO₂ waszero. The additional carbon fixed by the elevated CO₂ turveswas primarily allocated below-ground as shown by the maintenanceof root length density at the same level as in well-wateredturves. When the dry turves were rewatered there was compensatorygrowth at ambient CO₂ so that the above-ground growth rate exceededthat of turves that had not experienced a moisture deficit.At the start of this experiment, the turves that were growingat 700 l I^–1 CO₂ had a greater proportion of legume (principallywhite clover, Trifolium repens L.) in the harvested herbage.There was a trend for the legume content at elevated CO₂ tobe reduced under a soil moisture deficit. The results indicate different strategies in response to soilmoisture deficits depending on the CO₂ concentration. At ambientCO₂, growth stopped, but plants were able to respond stronglyon rewatering; while at elevated CO₂ growth continued (particularlybelow-ground), but no additional growth was evident on rewatering.Ecosystem gas exchange measurements taken at the end of theexperiment (after 429 d of exposure to CO₂) showed 33% moreCO₂ was fixed at elevated CO₂ with only a small (12%) and nonsignificantdownward regulation. Key words: Carbon dioxide, climate change, grassland, gas exchange, soil moisture deficit     

Evidence for the expression of two distinct MHC class II DRβ like molecules in the sheep

This study used monoclonal antibodies to sheep MHC class II molecules as well as an L cell transfectant (T8.1) which expresses DRA and DRB genes to show that two distinct DRβ chains are expressed in the sheep. Two anti-β chain specific monoclonal antibodies VPM37 and VPM43 react with DR antigen but not DQ antigen by ELISA. These two antibodies do not react with the DRβ chain expressed in the T8.1 cell line. Two-dimensional immunoblotting shows that these antibodies recognize a subgroup of the spots recognized by the DR-specific monoclonal antibody VPM57 which does react with the T8.1 β chain. Amino-terminal sequence analysis of the α chain associated with VPM37β chain shows that this α chain is homologous to the human DRα chain strongly indicating that the β chain is DR-like. VPM37 and VPM43 are shown to be directed against different epitopes on sheep MHC class II molecules so it is highly unlikely that the data can be explained by the presence of posttranslational modifications or the existence of a very common allele. These data provide clear evidence for the expression of two distinct DRP chains in the sheep.     

How Multidisciplinary Are the Multidisciplinary Journals Science and Nature?

Interest in cross-disciplinary research knowledge interchange runs high. Review processes at funding agencies, such as the U.S. National Science Foundation, consider plans to disseminate research across disciplinary bounds. Publication in the leading multidisciplinary journals, Nature and Science, may signify the epitome of successful interdisciplinary integration of research knowledge and cross-disciplinary dissemination of findings. But how interdisciplinary are they? The journals are multidisciplinary, but do the individual articles themselves draw upon multiple fields of knowledge and does their influence span disciplines? This research compares articles in three fields (Cell Biology, Physical Chemistry, and Cognitive Science) published in a leading disciplinary journal in each field to those published in Nature and Science. We find comparable degrees of interdisciplinary integration and only modest differences in cross-disciplinary diffusion. That said, though the rate of out-of-field diffusion might be comparable, the sheer reach of Nature and Science, indicated by their potent Journal Impact Factors, means that the diffusion of knowledge therein can far exceed that of leading disciplinary journals in some fields (such as Physical Chemistry and Cognitive Science in our samples).