The Pragmatic Approach to Masking

This paper advocates the use of a pragmatic approach to the problem of masking in real-life situations involving an abrupt change in the timing of sleep, i.e. shiftwork and “jet-lag” situations. Although “pure” chronobiological research has pointed to the importance of taking masking effects into account, the techniques that it has provided for doing so are extremely difficult to apply in real-life situations. The approach advocated here is based on Wever's pioneering work, and involves estimating the normative endogenous and exogenous components of the circadian rhythm in body temperature. These estimates are then used to: (a) simulate the results of shiftwork studies; and (b) to “remove” the exogenous component in “jet-lag” studies to allow analysis of the estimated endogenous component. The simulated curves obtained cross-correlated extremely highly with published night-shift temperature curves, while the “removal” of the exogenous component resulted in very similar findings to those obtained in temporal isolation studies. It is concluded that this pragmatic approach to masking may prove extremely useful in interpreting the results of field studies of shiftwork and “jet-lag”.     

Evidence for the presence of disulfide bridges in opioid receptors essential for ligand binding. Possible role in receptor activation

The mobility of purified mu opioid binding protein in SDS-polyacrylamide gek electrophoresis is sensitive to the presence of reducing agents. In the presence of increasing concentrations of DTT the apparent molecular weight increases in a stepwise fashion from 53 kDa to 65 kDa. This reduction in mobility is attributed to the successive breakage of disulfide bridges, resulting in an increasingly asymmetric molecule. Treatment of cell membranes from various brain areas with reducing agents, such as DTT, produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of opioid binding. Sensitivity to DTT inhibition varied between receptor types, mu greater than delta much greater than kappa. For mu receptors, agonist binding was considerably more sensitive to DTT than antagonist binding. Inhibition by DTT is readily reversible and is unaffected by Na+ and/or Mg2+ ions. Reversibility may be partially prevented by the inclusion of a low concentration of a reducing reagent such as glutathione which does not inhibit binding but blocks reformation of disulfide bonds. Scatchard analysis of saturation data shows that DTT causes a pronounced decrease in binding affinity with little effect on receptor number. It is suggested that disulfide bonds are essential for ligand binding and that cleavage of one or more of these bonds may play a role in opioid receptor activation by agonists.