Correction to: Description of desferrioxamine-producing bacterium Chitinophaga agrisoli sp. nov., isolated from soil

Antonie van Leeuwenhoek -     

FTO-rs9939609 Polymorphism is a Predictor of Future Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Prospective Study

Biochemical Genetics - The study aimed to evaluate the contribution of the FTO A/T polymorphism (rs9939609) to the prediction of the future type 2 diabetes (T2D). A population-based prospective...     

A new sensitive and selective detection of Ga3+ by thiophene-based ‘turn-on’ fluorescent chemosensor

We designed a thiophene-based fluorescent chemosensor DHTC ((E)-2-([3,5-dichloro-2-hydroxybenzylidene]amino)thiophene-3-carboxamide) for detecting gallium (Ga³⁺). DHTC could probe Ga³⁺ using fluorescence enhancement. The limit of detection for Ga³⁺ by DHTC was 0.39 μM. The binding mode of DHTC to Ga³⁺ was determined as a 1:1 ratio from analysis by Job’s plot and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). In addition, DHTC could selectively detect Ga³⁺ using test kits. The sensing process of Ga³⁺ by DHTC was presented using ultraviolet–visible light titration, Job’s plot, ESI-MS, ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance titration, and density functional theory calculation.     

Distinct Requirements for HIV-Cell Fusion and HIV-mediated Cell-Cell Fusion

Whether HIV-1 enters cells by fusing with the plasma membrane or with endosomes is a subject of active debate. The ability of HIV-1 to mediate fusion between adjacent cells, a process referred to as “fusion-from-without” (FFWO), shows that this virus can fuse with the plasma membrane. To compare FFWO occurring at the cell surface with HIV-cell fusion through a conventional entry route, we designed an experimental approach that enabled the measurements of both processes in the same sample. The following key differences were observed. First, a very small fraction of viruses fusing with target cells participated in FFWO. Second, whereas HIV-1 fusion with adherent cells was insensitive to actin inhibitors, post-CD4/coreceptor binding steps during FFWO were abrogated. A partial dependence of HIV-cell fusion on actin remodeling was observed in CD4⁺ T cells, but this effect appeared to be due to the actin dependence of virus uptake. Third, deletion of the cytoplasmic tail of HIV-1 gp41 dramatically enhanced the ability of the virus to promote FFWO, while having a modest effect on virus-cell fusion. Distinct efficiencies and actin dependences of FFWO versus HIV-cell fusion are consistent with the notion that, except for a minor fraction of particles that mediate fusion between the plasma membranes of adjacent cells, HIV-1 enters through an endocytic pathway. We surmise, however, that cell-cell contacts enabling HIV-1 fusion with the plasma membrane could be favored at the sites of high density of target cells, such as lymph nodes.     

Physical and functional interaction between the α- and γ-secretases: A new model of regulated intramembrane proteolysis

Many single-transmembrane proteins are sequentially cleaved by ectodomain-shedding α-secretases and the γ-secretase complex, a process called regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP). These cleavages are thought to be spatially and temporally separate. In contrast, we provide evidence for a hitherto unrecognized multiprotease complex containing both α- and γ-secretase. ADAM10 (A10), the principal neuronal α-secretase, interacted and cofractionated with γ-secretase endogenously in cells and mouse brain. A10 immunoprecipitation yielded γ-secretase proteolytic activity and vice versa. In agreement, superresolution microscopy showed that portions of A10 and γ-secretase colocalize. Moreover, multiple γ-secretase inhibitors significantly increased α-secretase processing (r = −0.86) and decreased β-secretase processing of β-amyloid precursor protein. Select members of the tetraspanin web were important both in the association between A10 and γ-secretase and the γ→α feedback mechanism. Portions of endogenous BACE1 coimmunoprecipitated with γ-secretase but not A10, suggesting that β- and α-secretases can form distinct complexes with γ-secretase. Thus, cells possess large multiprotease complexes capable of sequentially and efficiently processing transmembrane substrates through a spatially coordinated RIP mechanism.