Age-dependent population diffusion with external constraint

We present a simple model for age dependent population diffusion when the dynamics is submitted to external constraints. Existence, uniqueness and dependence on the parameters of the solution are discussed.This work has been done within the framework of the cultural agreement between the Universities of Bordeaux and Rome     

Influence du traitement sylvicole sur la flore forestiere: Cas de la futaie et du taillis-sous-futaie

Summary In a previous study, 772 floristics relevés, made in a large forest on calcareous soils (north-east France), had been treated by factorial analysis of correspondences in order to establish a site typology. The third axis separated chiefly Fagus and Quercus, which are very common in the forest, and various other ligneous or herbaceous species (see fig. 1). Two groups of relevés, homogeneous as for edaphic conditions, were choosen, having a significant position on this axis (with either positive or negative values). From this, floristic tables have been elaborated; they show clearly the influence of silvi culture (here high forest or coppice-with-standards) on part of both ligneous and herbaceous flora. Considering plant sociology, it appears that treating a stand as a coppice-with-standards can convert a Melico-Fagetum typicum (Eu-Fagion) into a Querceto Carpinetum typicum (Fraxino-Carpinion), and a Carici-Fagetum (Cephalanthero-Fagion) into a Querceto-Carpinetum primuletosum (Fraxino-Carpinion). Fortunately a large number of species are not influenced by the silviculture; this allows the identification of isopotential sites. Possible ecological causes are briefly discussed.

Nomenclature suivant: P. Fournier, 1961. Les quatre flores de France. Edition P. Le Chevalier, Paris. 1154 p.     

On the nature of biochemically generated hydroxyl radicals. Studies using the bleaching of p-nitrosodimethylaniline as a direct assay method.

An efficient scavenger for radiolytically generated hydroxyl (OH) radicals, p-nitrosodimethylaniline, was used to try to substantiate the presence of this oxygen radical species in several biochemical systems. Most of these systems which were investigated had previously been assumed to generate OH radicals, e.g. the autoxidation of 6-hydroxydopamine, the hydroxylating system NADH/phenazine methosulfate, and the oxidation of xanthine or acetaldehyde by xanthine oxidase. We did not observe inhibition of the bleaching of p-nitrosodimethylaniline in oxygenated solutions by other scavengers of OH radicals nor, in the case of xanthine/xanthine oxidase, by catalase and superoxide dismutase. We therefore conclude that, under biochemical conditions as opposed to radiolysis or photolysis, no freely diffusable OH radicals are formed. Rather, a strongly oxidizing OH-analogous complex is considered to represent the p-nitrosodimethylaniline-detectable species formed under these conditions.     

Planktonic ecosystems. The effects of dystrophic conditions on structure and function in the gulf of fos

In the areas studied, an unusual structure and dynamic behavior was exhibited by the plankton ecosystems, due for the most part to industrial and natural effluents from the Rhǒne and Durance. The ecosystem was kept at a low state of maturity, which is characterized by frequent periods of intense multiplication by small species with high metabolic rates, such as the diatom, Skeletonema costatum, and the dinoflagellates, Exuviaella and Prorocentrum. Brackish water seems congenial to that type of proliferation. The turnover rate of these populations decreases as they become older and cell size increases. A lack of competition by species of the same genus is a characteristic of the photo-autotrophic organisms in these environments. Secondary production follows the same cycle as the primary production by the dinoflagellate population. Zooplankton species of the genus Acartia have periods of intensive development in these areas.     

The breakthrough paradox: How focusing on one form of innovation jeopardizes the advancement of science

Research needs a balance of risk‐taking in “breakthrough projects” and gradual progress. For building a sustainable knowledge base, it is indispensable to provide support for both. Subject Categories: Careers, Economics, Law & Politics, Science Policy & Publishing

Science is about venturing into the unknown to find unexpected insights and establish new knowledge. Increasingly, academic institutions and funding agencies such as the European Research Council (ERC) explicitly encourage and support scientists to foster risky and hopefully ground‐breaking research. Such incentives are important and have been greatly appreciated by the scientific community. However, the success of the ERC has had its downsides, as other actors in the funding ecosystem have adopted the ERC’s focus on “breakthrough science” and respective notions of scientific excellence. We argue that these tendencies are concerning since disruptive breakthrough innovation is not the only form of innovation in research. While continuous, gradual innovation is often taken for granted, it could become endangered in a research and funding ecosystem that places ever higher value on breakthrough science. This is problematic since, paradoxically, breakthrough potential in science builds on gradual innovation. If the value of gradual innovation is not better recognized, the potential for breakthrough innovation may well be stifled.

While continuous, gradual innovation is often taken for granted, it could become endangered in a research and funding ecosystem that places ever higher value on breakthrough science.

Concerns that the hypercompetitive dynamics of the current scientific system may impede rather than spur innovative research have been voiced for many years (Alberts et al, 2014). As performance indicators continue to play a central role for promotions and grants, researchers are under pressure to publish extensively, quickly, and preferably in high‐ranking journals (Burrows, 2012). These dynamics increase the risk of mental health issues among scientists (Jaremka et al, 2020), dis‐incentivise relevant and important work (Benedictus et al, 2016), decrease the quality of scientific papers (Sarewitz, 2016) and induce conservative and short‐term thinking rather than risk‐taking and original thinking required for scientific innovation (Alberts et al, 2014; Fochler et al, 2016). Against this background, strong incentives for fostering innovative and daring research are indispensable.