To include or not to include (the invader in community analyses)? That is the question

An increasing number of studies report impacts from invasive species on community metrics or ecosystem functions. We draw attention to an issue arising whenever impact is measured on a community where the invader is an integrated part: should or shouldn’t the attributes of the invader itself be included in the data-analysis? We identify many examples from the published literature showing inconsistency in whether or not data for the invader is included or excluded, and discuss potential implications for ecological interpretations. We also provide a case study to show that the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida can be interpreted to have strong or no impact on seaweed communities, depending on its inclusion or exclusion in the data analysis. We conclude that it is critical for studies to (1) clearly state in the methods section, if the invaders are included or excluded from the data-analysis, (2) acknowledge potential differences in outcomes when comparing results based on different methods, and (3) analyze, if possible, impacts both with and without the invader. Finally, we note that this ‘inclusion versus exclusion’ conundrum is not only relevant to invasion biology, but to any field where the test-object of interest can be an integrated part of the response, such as when impact of seaweed blooms are analysed on community productivity or community effects are quantified over time from ecological pulse-perturbation experiments.     

The harvesting of macroalgae in New Zealand

Several species of algae have been commercially harvested in New Zealand, mainly for extraction of agar and alginates. In the past, the harvest was comprised mostly of shore-cast plants. There has been more recent interest, however, in harvesting attached plants of Pterocladia spp., Porphyra spp., Gracilaria sordida, Durvillaea spp., Macrocystis pyrifera, and Ecklonia radiata. The ecological effects of harvesting attached algae depend largely on the sizes of plants, the season of removal, the patch size of clearances, and the proximity and identity of mature plants. These have not been well-studied for seaweeds in New Zealand, but population and life history studies indicate that harvesting methods affect the continuity of algal resources, at least on a local scale, and are crucial factors in their management.     

CONTRASTING LIFE HISTORIES AND DEMOGRAPHIES OF LAMINARIAN AND FUCOID ALGAE

Introductions of non-native macroalgae and the subsequent displacement of native species are globally becoming more frequent. The algal genera Undaria, Sargassum , Caulerpa and Codium have been identified as being particularly invasive. An overview on the present knowledge on macroalgal introductions in the Australian region is presented and options for management are discussed, mostly using examples from studies on the introduced Japanese kelp, Undaria pinnatifida. Undaria pinnatifida was first detected in Tasmania, Australia in the early 1980's. Since then, its range has expanded despite eradication efforts. Long distance jumps appear to be the major mode of spread of U. pinnatifida in Tasmania. Studies are underway to distinguish the relative importance of spore dispersal, drift of adult plants and anthropogenic factors in spreading this invasive kelp. Although information on the real impacts of U. pinnatifida and other introduced macroalgae is sparse, the development of management and control strategies is of vital importance to prevent further spread and translocation of these "pest" species.     

The Maintenance of Traditions in Marmosets: Individual Habit,Not Social Conformity? A Field Experiment

Background

Social conformity is a cornerstone of human culture because it accelerates and maintains the spread of behaviour within a group. Few empirical studies have investigated the role of social conformity in the maintenance of traditions despite an increasing body of literature on the formation of behavioural patterns in non-human animals. The current report presents a field experiment with free-ranging marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) which investigated whether social conformity is necessary for the maintenance of behavioural patterns within groups or whether individual effects such as habit formation would suffice.

Methods

Using a two-action apparatus, we established alternative behavioural patterns in six family groups composed of 36 individuals. These groups experienced only one technique during a training phase and were thereafter tested with two techniques available. The monkeys reliably maintained the trained method over a period of three weeks, despite discovering the alternative technique. Three additional groups were given the same number of sessions, but those 21 individuals could freely choose the method to obtain a reward. In these control groups, an overall bias towards one of the two methods was observed, but animals with a different preference did not adjust towards the group norm. Thirteen of the fifteen animals that discovered both techniques remained with the action with which they were initially successful, independent of the group preference and the type of action (Binomial test: exp. proportion: 0.5, p<0.01).

Conclusions

The results indicate that the maintenance of behavioural patterns within groups 1) could be explained by the first rewarded manipulation and subsequent habit formation and 2) do not require social conformity as a mechanism. After an initial spread of a behaviour throughout a group, this mechanism may lead to a superficial appearance of conformity without the involvement of such a socially and cognitively complex mechanism. This is the first time that such an experiment has been conducted with free-ranging primates.     

Community regulation: the relative importance of recruitment and predation intensity of an intertidal community dominant in a seascape context

Predicting the strength and context-dependency of species interactions across multiple scales is a core area in ecology. This is especially challenging in the marine environment, where populations of most predators and prey are generally open, because of their pelagic larval phase, and recruitment of both is highly variable. In this study we use a comparative-experimental approach on small and large spatial scales to test the relationship between predation intensity and prey recruitment and their relative importance in shaping populations of a dominant rocky intertidal space occupier, mussels, in the context of seascape (availability of nearby subtidal reef habitat). Predation intensity on transplanted mussels was tested inside and outside cages and recruitment was measured with standard larval settlement collectors. We found that on intertidal rocky benches with contiguous subtidal reefs in New Zealand, mussel larval recruitment is usually low but predation on recruits by subtidal consumers (fish, crabs) is intense during high tide. On nearby intertidal rocky benches with adjacent sandy subtidal habitats, larval recruitment is usually greater but subtidal predators are typically rare and predation is weaker. Multiple regression analysis showed that predation intensity accounts for most of the variability in the abundance of adult mussels compared to recruitment. This seascape-dependent, predation-recruitment relationship could scale up to explain regional community variability. We argue that community ecology models should include seascape context-dependency and its effects on recruitment and species interactions for better predictions of coastal community dynamics and structure.     

Wave-related mortality in zygotes of habitat-forming algae from different exposures in southern New Zealand: the importance of ‘stickability’

Using field and laboratory experiments, we investigated the relative ability of zygotes of three species of habitat-forming large brown algae from southern New Zealand to survive wave action and remain attached after settling times of 1, 6, and 12 h. Zygotes of Hormosira banksii (Turner) Decaisne and Cystophora torulosa (R. Brown) J. Agardh, intertidal algae common on sheltered and semi-protected shores in southern New Zealand, had between 24% and 35% survival 1 h after settlement and exposed to a single wave in the lab and field. In contrast, Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot, an exposed-shore species, had up to 75% survival under the same conditions. Survival increased with post-settlement time for all three species. When given 6 h to attach under the same conditions, the survival of Hormosira and Cystophora zygotes ranged between 50% and 60% and between 80% and 90% when given 12 h to attach. Durvillaea, in contrast, had between 90% and 100% survival at both 6- and 12-h setting times. In other experiments, H. banksii and D. antarctica zygotes were given either 1, 6, or 12 h to attach and then placed for 12 h into sites within three levels of wave exposure (sheltered, intermediate and exposed). Survival of Hormosira zygotes given 1 and 6 h to attach was poor, ranging from 1% to 8%. If given 12 h to set, however, 5–8% of Hormosira zygotes survived, even at the exposed sites. Under similar conditions, Durvillaea survival was significantly higher, ranging from 70% to 100% at all post-settlement times, in sites of all exposures. Wave action clearly affects the ability of sheltered shore species to settle in exposed sites. However, our study highlights the importance of factors other than wave action in determining the distribution and abundance of post-settlement stages of D. antarctica across exposures.