“Unblocking” Serum Activity <Emphasis Type="Italic">in vitro</Emphasis> in the Polyoma System may Correlate with Antitumour Effects of Antiserum <Emphasis Type="Italic">in vivo</Emphasis>

In a variety of tumour systems, individuals carrying progressively growing neoplasms have lymphoid cells with a specific cytotoxic effect on cultured tumour cells from the same individual^1–4. Since the sera of tumour-bearing individuals have been shown to prevent tumour cell destruction by immune lymphocytes in vitro^2,5–8 and since this serum blocking activity appears early in primary and transplant tumour development^5,7, it has been suggested that the appearance of this serum blocking activity might be responsible for the progressive growth of tumours in individuals having cytotoxic lymphocytes. Counteraction of this blocking activity would thus be of primary importance in facilitating the function of an already existing or bolstered cell-mediated immunity. The serum blocking activity might be inhibited in various ways, by preventing the formation of blocking antibody or by interfering with its action (“unblocking”), as demonstrated in Moloney sarcoma regressor sera⁹. This type of serum also has a therapeutic effect on Moloney sarcomas in vivo^10,11, which has been tentatively attributed to its unblocking activity^8,9 or, possibly, to a complement-dependent cytotoxicity¹⁰. Tumour growth in the Moloney sarcoma system, however, might be due in part to continuous recruitment of neoplastic cells by virus-induced transformation and so the therapeutic effect could be due to a virus-neutralizing serum activity^9,10.     

The regulation of pea-seed phosphofructokinase by phosphoenolpyruvate

1. Pea-seed phosphofructokinase was purified 27-fold by a combination of fractionation with ethanol and ammonium sulphate. Under the conditions of assay, the enzyme was strongly inhibited by phosphoenolpyruvate. This inhibition was reversed by increasing the concentration of fructose 6-phosphate or magnesium chloride, or by lowering the ATP concentration. 2. Citrate, ADP and AMP inhibited phosphofructokinase and increased the sensitivity to phosphoenolpyruvate inhibition. Sulphate and inorganic phosphate stimulated the enzyme activity and decreased the sensitivity to phosphoenolpyruvate. 3. In the presence of inorganic phosphate and low concentrations of ATP, inhibition by phosphoenolpyruvate ceased and phosphoenolpyruvate became stimulatory. 4. The possible significance of these results in the control of plant carbohydrate metabolism is discussed.