Hypoxic conditioning suppresses nitric oxide production upon myocardial reperfusion

Physiologically modulated concentrations of nitric oxide (NO) are generally beneficial, but excessive NO can injure myocardium by producing cytotoxic peroxynitrite. Recently we reported that intermittent, normobaric hypoxia conditioning (IHC) produced robust cardioprotection against infarction and lethal arrhythmias in a canine model of coronary occlusion-reperfusion. This study tested the hypothesis that IHC suppresses myocardial nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity and thereby dampens explosive, excessive NO formation upon reperfusion of occluded coronary arteries. Mongrel dogs were conditioned by a 20 d program of IHC (FIO(2) 9.5-10%; 5-10 min hypoxia/cycle, 5-8 cycles/d with intervening 4 min normoxia). One day later, ventricular myocardium was sampled for NOS activity assays, and immunoblot detection of the endothelial NOS isoform (eNOS). In separate experiments, myocardial nitrite (NO(2)(-)) release, an index of NO formation, was measured at baseline and during reperfusion following 1 h occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Values in IHC dogs were compared with respective values in non-conditioned, control dogs. IHC lowered left and right ventricular NOS activities by 60%, from 100-115 to 40-45 mU/g protein (P < 0.01), and decreased eNOS content by 30% (P < 0.05). IHC dampened cumulative NO(2)(-) release during the first 5 min reperfusion from 32 +/- 7 to 14 +/- 2 mumol/g (P < 0.05), but did not alter hyperemic LAD flow (15 +/- 2 vs. 13 +/- 2 ml/g). Thus, IHC suppressed myocardial NOS activity, eNOS content, and excessive NO formation upon reperfusion without compromising reactive hyperemia. Attenuation of the NOS/NO system may contribute to IHC-induced protection of myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury.     

Effects of long-term exposure to 900 megahertz electromagnetic field on heart morphology and biochemistry of male adolescent rats

The pathological effects of exposure to an electromagnetic field (EMF) during adolescence may be greater than those in adulthood. We investigated the effects of exposure to 900 MHz EMF during adolescence on male adult rats. Twenty-four 21-day-old male rats were divided into three equal groups: control (Cont-Gr), sham (Shm-Gr) and EMF-exposed (EMF-Gr). EMF-Gr rats were placed in an EMF exposure cage (Plexiglas cage) for 1 h/day between postnatal days 21 and 59 and exposed to 900 MHz EMF. Shm-Gr rats were placed inside the Plexiglas cage under the same conditions and for the same duration, but were not exposed to EMF. All animals were sacrificed on postnatal day 60 and the hearts were extracted for microscopic and biochemical analyses. Biochemical analysis showed increased levels of malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase, and reduced glutathione and catalase levels in EMF-Gr compared to Cont-Gr animals. Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections from EMF-Gr animals exhibited structural changes and capillary congestion in the myocardium. The percentage of apoptotic myocardial cells in EMF-Gr was higher than in either Shm-Gr or Cont-Gr animals. Transmission electron microscopy of myocardial cells of EMF-Gr animals showed altered structure of Z bands, decreased myofilaments and pronounced vacuolization. We found that exposure of male rats to 900 MHz EMF for 1 h/day during adolescence caused oxidative stress, which caused structural alteration of male adolescent rat heart tissue.     

Functional characterisation of the regulation of CAAT enhancer binding protein alpha by GSK-3 phosphorylation of Threonines 222/226

Background  

Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 (GSK3) activity is repressed following insulin treatment of cells. Pharmacological inhibition of GSK3 mimics the effect of insulin on Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase (PEPCK), Glucose-6 Phosphatase (G6Pase) and IGF binding protein-1 (IGFBP1) gene expression. CAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBPα) regulates these gene promoters in liver and is phosphorylated on two residues (T222/T226) by GSK3, although the functional outcome of the phosphorylation has not been established. We aimed to establish whether CEBPα is a link between GSK3 and these gene promoters.     

4-Hydroxykigelin and 6-demethylkigelin, root growth promoters, produced by Aspergillus terreus

Root growth promoters, 4-hydroxykigelin (1) and 6-demethylkigelin (2), together with 6-hydroxymellein (3) were isolated from cultures of the fungus Aspergillus terreus and their structures were identified by spectroscopic analysis. The biological activities of the three dihydroisocoumarins, 1, 2, and 3, have been examined using a bioassay method with lettuce seedlings. Furthermore, interactions between the dihydroisocoumarins and indole-3-acetic acid against the root growth have been examined.     

Controlling gene expression in mycobacteria with anhydrotetracycline and Tet repressor

Gene expression systems that allow the regulation of bacterial genes during an infection are valuable molecular tools but are lacking for mycobacterial pathogens. We report the development of mycobacterial gene regulation systems that allow controlling gene expression in fast and slow-growing mycobacteria, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, using anhydrotetracycline (ATc) as inducer. The systems are based on the Escherichia coli Tn10-derived tet regulatory system and consist of a strong tet operator (tetO)-containing mycobacterial promoter, expression cassettes for the repressor TetR and the chemical inducer ATc. These systems allow gene regulation over two orders of magnitude in Mycobacterium smegmatis and M.tuberculosis. TetR-controlled gene expression was inducer concentration-dependent and maximal with ATc concentrations at least 10- and 20-fold below the minimal inhibitory concentration for M.smegmatis and M.tuberculosis, respectively. Using the essential mycobacterial gene ftsZ, we showed that these expression systems can be used to construct conditional knockouts and to analyze the function of essential mycobacterial genes. Finally, we demonstrated that these systems allow gene regulation in M.tuberculosis within the macrophage phagosome.     

Plasminogen: A cellular protein cofactor for PrPSc propagation

The biochemical essence of prion replication is the molecular multiplication of the disease-associated misfolded isoform of prion protein (PrP), termed PrP^Sc, in a nucleic acid-free manner. PrP^Sc is generated by the protein misfolding process facilitated by conformational conversion of the host-encoded cellular PrP to PrP^Sc. Evidence suggests that an auxiliary factor may play a role in PrP^Sc propagation. We and others previously discovered that plasminogen interacts with PrP, while its functional role for PrP^Sc propagation remained undetermined. In our recent in vitro PrP conversion study, we showed that plasminogen substantially stimulates PrP^Sc propagation in a concentration-dependent manner by accelerating the rate of PrP^Sc generation while depletion of plasminogen, destabilization of its structure and interference with the PrP-plasminogen interaction hinder PrP^Sc propagation. Further investigation in cell culture models confirmed an increase of PrP^Sc formation by plasminogen. Although molecular basis of the observed activity for plasminogen remain to be addressed, our results demonstrate that plasminogen is the first cellular protein auxiliary factor proven to stimulate PrP^Sc propagation.Key words: prion, PrP^Sc, protein misfolding, auxiliary factor, plasminogen, PMCA, cell culture modelPrions are unique infectious particles that replicate in the absence of nucleic acids¹ and cause fatal neurologic disorders in mammals.² In fact, the prion particle is composed of an alternatively folded form of the cellular prion protein (PrP^C) encoded by the Prnp gene. The misfolded form of PrP^C, referred to as PrP^Sc, shares the same primary structure with PrP^C,³ but exhibits distinctively different biochemical and biophysical properties.^4,5 Moreover, animals lacking expression of the Prnp gene are resistant to prion infection,⁶ suggesting that PrP^C serves as a precursor for PrP^Sc.The essence of prion biosynthesis is based on the protein-only hypothesis that postulates self-perpetuating replication of the prion protein.¹ Although the exact replication process remains elusive, the template-assisted conversion model proposes an idea that PrP^Sc serves as a template to convert α-helices of PrP^C into the β-sheets of PrP^Sc during prion replication.⁷ According to many lines of evidence, there exists an unidentified auxiliary factor, designated protein X, which favorably interacts with PrP^C to produce a thermodynamically stable intermediate conformation called PrP*.⁸ By introducing PrP^Sc to a host, dimers will readily form between PrP* and PrP^Sc. This interaction induces PrP* to take on the conformation of PrP^Sc and results in a complex consisting of the template and the newly formed PrP^Sc molecules. Once the dimer disassociates protein X and the two PrP^Sc molecules are released and allowed to continue replicating in an exponential fashion. Recent observations that infectious material can be generated in vitro using recombinant PrP have authenticated the protein-only hypothesis.^9,10 However, the infectivity of these in vitro generated PrP^Sc products is lower than that of brain-derived PrP^Sc, leading to the possibility that insufficient levels of the unidentified auxiliary factor are the limiting factor for these in vitro assays.To date, non-mammalian chaperone proteins, sulfated glycans and certain polyanionic macromolecules, such as RNA, have shown to increase the level of PrP^Sc in several different in vitro assays.^11–14 However, defining these molecules as cellular auxiliary factors that promote the conversion of PrP^C to PrP^Sc has been prevented for several reasons. First, overexpression of yeast heat shock protein Hsp 104 in transgenic mice does not modulate the incubation time of disease and PrP^Sc accumulation upon prion inoculation.¹⁵ Although mammalian Hsp 70 is upregulated in humans and animals with prion diseases,^16,17 it participates in downregulation, but not upregulation, of PrP^Sc accumulation.¹⁸ Second, the effect of sulfated glycans on PrP^Sc formation has been inconsistent^11–13 and certain sulfated glycans inhibit PrP^Sc propagation in animals and cultured cells.^19–21 Lastly, although RNA is able to increase PrP^Sc propagation and induce the formation of PrP^Sc de novo from purified PrP^C in the absence of a PrP^Sc seed,²² its specificity is in question. Thus, an auxiliary factor that positively assists PrP^Sc replication and is composed of a mammalian cellular protein remains to be identified.Our approach to identify an auxiliary factor relies on the idea that the auxiliary factor interacts with PrP^C as proposed in the protein X hypothesis.⁷ Therefore, we considered PrP ligands as the best candidates for this unidentified factor. By screening a phage display cDNA expression library from ScN2a cells, we identified kringle domains of plasminogen that interact with recombinant PrP folded in an α-helical conformation (α-PrP).²³ In vitro binding assays showed that interaction between plasminogen and α-PrP that represents the conformational state of PrP^C was enhanced by the introduction of a dominant negative mutation and the presence of the basic N-terminal sequences in PrP.²³ Interaction of PrP^C and plasminogen was further confirmed by the ability of plasminogen and its kringle domains to readily interact with α-PrP.^24–29 However, despite greater interaction with α-PrP, plasminogen also interacted with PrP in β-sheet conformations.²³ Prior to our study, it was shown that PrP^Sc was immunoprecipitated with beads linked to plasminogen, its first three kringle domains [K(1+2+3)], and more recently the repeating YRG motif found within the plasminogen kringle domains.^30–33 However, the ability of plasminogen to bind to PrP^Sc was dependent on conditions of the lipid rafts and plasminogen was actually associated with PrP^C in the intact lipid rafts.³⁴To determine the functional relevance of this interaction for PrP^Sc replication, we explored whether plasminogen enhances PrP^Sc propagation using cell culture models and the in vitro PrP conversion assay, termed protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA).³⁵ The addition of plasminogen in PMCA resulted in the generation of significantly more PrP^Sc in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1A), suggesting that plasminogen stimulates the conversion of PrP^C to PrP^Sc. Indeed, our kinetic studies showed that plasminogen accelerates the rate of PrP^Sc generation during the early stages of the in vitro PrP conversion reaction (reviewed in ref. ³⁵). In contrast, the addition of plasminogen in PMCA lacking either PrP^C or PrP^Sc failed to generate PrP^Sc (Fig. 1B and C). These results suggest that both PrP^C and PrP^Sc are required for PrP^Sc replication stimulated by plasminogen and that plasminogen facilitates neither spontaneous PrP conversion nor PrP^Sc augmentation through aggregating pre-existing PrP^Sc. Incubation of plasminogen with pre-formed PrP^Sc followed by treatments with proteinase K failed to either increase or decrease the PrP^Sc level compared to controls (Fig. 1D and E), suggesting that plasminogen is not involved in stabilization of PrP^Sc, enhancement of PrP^Sc resistance to protease or promotion of PrP^Sc binding to the membrane for western blotting. The activity to stimulate PrP conversion was a specific property of plasminogen and was not shared with other proteins such as a known PrP ligand and proteins abundantly found in the serum or at the extracellular matrices where plasminogen is present (reviewed in ref. ³⁵). In addition, we found that the ability of plasminogen to assist in PrP^Sc propagation is preserved in its kringle domains (reviewed in ref. ³⁵). Furthermore, the activity associated with plasminogen under cell-free conditions was reproduced in cell culture models. Plasminogen and its kringle domains increased PrP^Sc propagation in cultured cells chronically infected with mouse-adapted scrapie or chronic wasting disease prions (Fig. 2A–D). This suggests that the activity of plasminogen in PrP^Sc replication has biological relevance.Open in a separate windowFigure 1The role of plasminogen in PrP^Sc propagation. The effect of plasminogen (Plg) was assessed by PMCA using normal brain material supplemented with or without 0.5 µM human Glu-Plg (A–D) or using Plg-deficient (Plg^-/-) brain material (F and G). Pre- (−) and post- (+) PMCA samples were treated with proteinase K (PK) and analyzed by western blotting. Seeds for PMCA were diluted either as indicated or 1:900 (G) −8,100 (F). (A) Stimulation of PrP^Sc propagation by Plg. (B) Plg-supplemented PMCA in the absence of SBH seeds. (C) Plg-supplemented PMCA in the absence of NBH. (D) Comparison of PrP^Sc levels in Plg-supplemented PMCA samples (during) vs. PMCA samples only incubated with Plg prior to PK digestion (after). (E) Comparison of PrP^Sc levels of ScN2a cell lysate after incubation with or without Plg prior to PK digestion. (F) PMCA with brain material of Plg^-/- mice and genetically unaltered littermate controls (C). (G) Restoration of PMCA using Plg^-/- brain material with Plg-supplementation. NBH, normal brain homogenate; SBH, sick brain homogenate; PrPKOBH, brain homogenate of PrP^C-deficient mice; CL, cell lysate. Reproduced with permission from The FASEB Journal, Mays and Ryou 2010.³⁵Open in a separate windowFigure 2PrP^Sc propagation increased by plasminogen in prion-infected cells. (A) The levels of PrP in ScN2a cells incubated with 0–0.5 µM human Glu-plasminogen (Plg) for two days. (B) The levels of PrP in ScN2a cells incubated with 0, 0.1 and 1.0 µM Plg or the first three kringle domains of Plg [K(1+2+3)] for six days. (C) The levels of 3F4-tagged PrP^C and nascent PrP^Sc formation in ScN2a cells transiently transfected (Tfx) with plasmids encoding the 3F4-tagged PrP gene (PrP-3F4) and with an empty vector (mock). The transfected cells were treated with 0 or 1 µM K (1+2+3) for three days. (D) The levels of PrP in Elk21⁺ cells incubated with 0 and 0.5 µM Plg for two days. PrP was detected by anti-PrP antibody D13 (A and B), 3F4 (C) or 6H4 (D) before (−) and after (+) PK treatment. Reproduced by permission of the The FASEB Journal, Mays and Ryou 2010.³⁵Corresponding to the results that plasminogen positively assists in PrP^Sc replication by stimulating conversion of PrP^C to PrP^Sc, depletion of plasminogen from the PMCA reaction by using brain material derived from plasminogen-deficient mice restricted PrP^Sc replication to the basal level (Fig. 1F). Supplementation with plasminogen for PMCA using plasminogen-deficient brain homogenate restored PrP^Sc propagation to levels equivalent to that of control PMCA in which only brain material of their non-genetically altered littermates was used (Fig. 1G). Furthermore, structural destabilization of plasminogen affected the activity of plasminogen that enhances PrP^Sc propagation. Because intact disulfide bonds are critical in maintaining structural integrity and the binding activity of plasminogen, we conducted PMCA supplemented with either structurally intact or modified plasminogen to investigate the functionality of plasminogen. The result showed that plasminogen pre-treated sequentially with chemical agents that disrupt disulfide bonds and modify free sulfhydryl groups failed to stimulate PrP^Sc propagation (reviewed in ref. ³⁵). In addition, we showed that interference with the plasminogen-PrP interaction using L-lysine abolished the plasminogen-mediated stimulation of PrP^Sc propagation in PMCA (reviewed in ref. ³⁵). Because previous observations in immunoprecipitation³⁰ and ELISA binding assays²³ described that L-lysine specifically inhibited formation of the PrP-plasminogen complex, the presence of L-lysine in PMCA is considered to saturate the lysine binding motifs of kringle domains, which competitively prevents the kringle domains of plasminogen from interacting with PrP and inhibited PrP conversion. These various inhibition studies of PrP^Sc propagation provides confirmatory evidence that plasminogen plays an important role in PrP^Sc replication.Despite our progress in understanding the role of plasminogen in PrP^Sc propagation, we are still unable to address mechanistic details by which plasminogen exerts its function. In fact, plasminogen shares a number of the expected characteristics of the previously proposed auxiliary factor, although there are minor but distinctive discrepancies in their properties (summarized in Fig. 3). First, plasminogen may control conformational rearrangement of PrP^C to PrP*, resembling a molecular chaperone. This scenario is identical to the protein X hypothesis, in which plasminogen replaces protein X to assist the conversion process. Second, plasminogen may promote aggregation of PrP^Sc already converted from PrP^C. This will result in efficient formation of PrP^Sc multimers. Third, plasminogen may stabilize the pre-existing PrP^Sc aggregates so that stabilized aggregates are better protected from degradation or processing by the intrinsic clearance mechanism. This will result in increased accumulation and stability of PrP^Sc. In the second and third scenarios, the function of plasminogen is not involved in PrP^C or its conversion process, but limited to the interaction with pre-formed PrP^Sc. Fourth, plasminogen may play a role as a scaffolding molecule that simply brings both PrP^C and PrP^Sc together within a proximity. This will increase the frequency of interaction between PrP^C and PrP^Sc for conversion. This scenario is distinguished from the other three by postulating plasminogen interaction with both isoforms of PrP. In contrast, plasminogen is assumed to interact with only PrP^C or PrP^Sc in other cases. Although accumulating data including our recent studies provide critical pieces of evidence to envision described mechanistic insights, it is still premature to conclude the mechanism involved in plasminogen-mediated stimulation of PrP^Sc propagation.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Plausible mechanisms for plasminogen to enhance PrP^Sc propagation. Plasminogen may stimulate PrP^Sc propagation via conformational alteration of PrP^C to PrP* (i), enhancement of PrP^Sc aggregation (ii), stabilization of pre-exisiting PrP^Sc aggregates (iii) or scaffolding to gather PrP^C and PrP^Sc together (iv).

Table 1

Properties of plasminogen as an auxiliary factor for PrP^Sc propagation

Reversing the Warburg Effect as a Treatment for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), like most cancers, possesses a unique bioenergetic state of aerobic glycolysis known as the Warburg effect. Here, we documented that methylene blue (MB) reverses the Warburg effect evidenced by the increasing of oxygen consumption and reduction of lactate production in GBM cell lines. MB decreases GBM cell proliferation and halts the cell cycle in S phase. Through activation of AMP-activated protein kinase, MB inactivates downstream acetyl-CoA carboxylase and decreases cyclin expression. Structure-activity relationship analysis demonstrated that toluidine blue O, an MB derivative with similar bioenergetic actions, exerts similar action in GBM cell proliferation. In contrast, two other MB derivatives, 2-chlorophenothiazine and promethazine, exert no effect on cellular bioenergetics and do not inhibit GBM cell proliferation. MB inhibits cell proliferation in both temozolomide-sensitive and -insensitive GBM cell lines. In a human GBM xenograft model, a single daily dosage of MB does not activate AMP-activated protein kinase signaling, and no tumor regression was observed. In summary, the current study provides the first in vitro proof of concept that reversal of Warburg effect might be a novel therapy for GBM.