Competition for nectar resources does not affect bee foraging tactic constancy

1. Competition alters animal foraging, including promoting the use of alternative resources. It may also impact how animals feed when they are able to handle the same food with more than one tactic. Competition likely impacts both consumers and their resources through its effects on food handling, but this topic has received little attention. 2. Bees often use two tactics for extracting nectar from flowers: they can visit at the flower opening, or rob nectar from holes at the base of flowers. Exploitative competition for nectar is thought to promote nectar robbing. If so, higher competition among floral visitors should reduce constancy to a single foraging tactic as foragers will seek food using all possible tactics. To test this prediction, field observations and two experiments involving bumble bees visiting three montane Colorado plant species (Mertensia ciliata, Linaria vulgaris, Corydalis caseana) were used under various levels of inter- and intra-specific competition for nectar. 3. In general, individual bumble bees remained constant to a single foraging tactic, independent of competition levels. However, bees that visited M. ciliata in field observations decreased their constancy and increased nectar robbing rates as visitation rates by co-visitors increased. 4. While tactic constancy was high overall regardless of competition intensity, this study highlights some intriguing instances in which competition and tactic constancy may be linked. Further studies investigating the cognitive underpinnings of tactic constancy should provide insight on the ways in which animals use alternative foraging tactics to exploit resources.     

Mouse specific-locus test for the induction of heritable gene mutations by dibromochloropropane (DBCP)

The nematocide DBCP (1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane) produced negative results in a specific-locus test for gene-mutation induction in the germline of male (101 X C3H)F1 mice, most of which were treated with 5 daily intraperitoneal injections of 80 mg/kg (total exposure, 400 mg/kg); a few received lower exposures. For treated spermatogonial stem cells, the finding of 2 mutations among 39519 offspring--a rate almost identical to the control rate--rules out (at the 5% significance level) an induced mutation frequency greater than 2.0 times the historical control rate. From treated poststem-cell stages, no mutants were found among 6240 offspring, ruling out (at the 5% significance level) a multiple of 8.0 times the control for these cell types. A multiple rearrangement (7 chromosomes involved in 3 translocations) found in one of the mutants probably arose as a postmeiotic event not associated with the DBCP treatment. The fertility of DBCP-treated males was not disturbed, in keeping with the absence of germ-cell toxicity and dominant lethals found by other investigators in these mice, and in contrast to results in certain other species. While the treated (101 X C3H)F1 mice are Ah-responsive, other findings make it questionable whether biotransformation of DBCP to reactive intermediates is accomplished via the Ah-receptor system.