The causes of epistasis in genetic networks

Epistasis refers to the nonadditive interactions between genes in determining phenotypes. Considerable efforts have shown that, even for a given organism, epistasis may vary both in intensity and sign. Recent comparative studies supported that the overall sign of epistasis switches from positive to negative as the complexity of an organism increases, and it has been hypothesized that this change shall be a consequence of the underlying gene network properties. Why should this be the case? What characteristics of genetic networks determine the sign of epistasis? Here we show, by evolving genetic networks that differ in their complexity and robustness against perturbations but that perform the same tasks, that robustness increased with complexity and that epistasis was positive for small nonrobust networks but negative for large robust ones. Our results indicate that robustness and negative epistasis emerge as a consequence of the existence of redundant elements in regulatory structures of genetic networks and that the correlation between complexity and epistasis is a byproduct of such redundancy, allowing for the decoupling of epistasis from the underlying network complexity.     

Relationships of hepatic and pancreatic biomarkers with the cholestatic syndrome and tumor stage in pancreatic cancer

We analyzed relationships of hepatic and pancreatic biomarkers with the cholestatic syndrome and tumor stage in exocrine pancreatic cancer (N = 183). Information on laboratory tests and on signs and symptoms was obtained from medical records and patient interviews. Bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase were lower in tumor stage IV. The association was due to the relationship between cholestatic syndrome and earlier presentation of patients. There was no association between hepatic biomarkers and stage when adjusting by cholestatic syndrome. Relationships of hepatic and pancreatic biomarkers with pancreatic symptoms and tumor stage must be controlled in "-omics" and other studies using biomarkers.     

Functional clustering of mutations in the dimer interface of the nucleotide binding folds of the sulfonylurea receptor

ATP-sensitive K(+) (K(ATP)) channels modulate their activity as a function of inhibitory ATP and stimulatory Mg-nucleotides. They are constituted by two proteins: a pore-forming K(+) channel subunit (Kir6.1, Kir6.2) and a regulatory sulfonylurea receptor (SUR) subunit, an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter that confers MgADP stimulation to the channel. Channel regulation by MgADP is dependent on nucleotide interaction with the cytoplasmic nucleotide binding folds (NBF1 and NBF2) of the SUR subunit. Crystal structures of bacterial ABC proteins indicate that NBFs form as dimers, suggesting that NBF1-NBF2 heterodimers may form in SUR and other eukaryotic ABC proteins. We have modeled SUR1 NBF1 and NBF2 as a heterodimer, and tested the validity of the predicted dimer interface by systematic mutagenesis. Engineered cysteine mutations in this region have significant effects, both positive and negative, on MgADP stimulation of K(ATP) channels in excised patches and on macroscopic channel activity in intact cells. Additionally, the mutations cluster in the model structure according to their functional effect, such that patterns of alteration emerge. Of note, three gain-of-function mutations, leading to MgADP hyperstimulation of the channel, are located in the D-loop region at the center of the predicted dimer interface. Overall, the data support the idea that SUR1 NBFs assemble as heterodimers and that this interaction is functionally critical.     

Kinetic implications of the occurrence of several relaxations in the conformational transition of mnemonical enzymes

If the conformational transition involved in enzyme memory occurs in several elementary steps, the time constant of the overall 'slow' relaxation is mostly determined by the individual values of the rate constants pertaining to the overall transconformation. The extent of kinetic co-operativity of the enzyme reaction, however, is mostly controlled by the degree of reversibility of the elementary steps of the conformational transition. There is then no simple relation between the time scale of the 'slow' transition and the extent of kinetic co-operativity of the enzyme reaction. A slow transition of about 10(-3) s-1 is therefore perfectly compatible with a strong positive or negative co-operativity and in particular with the negative co-operativity observed with wheat germ hexokinase LI. The relationship that has been established recently [Pettersson, G. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 154, 167-170] between the 'slow' enzyme relaxation and the extent of kinetic co-operativity holds only in the specific case where the transconformation occurs in one step. Owing to the possible occurrence of a multistep conformation change, the lack of this relationship means nothing as to the validity, or the invalidity, of the concept of mnemonical transition. More informative than the time scale of the 'slow' transition is its dependence with respect to glucose and glucose 6-phosphate, which both react with the enzyme. The effect of reaction products on the modulation of kinetic co-operativity is also of cardinal importance in the diagnosis of enzyme memory. Since an alternative model has been recently proposed by Pettersson (cited above) to explain the mechanistic origin of kinetic co-operativity of monomeric enzymes, the effect of products on the kinetic co-operativity predicted by this alternative model has been studied theoretically, in order to determine whether it is consistent with the experimental results obtained with wheat germ hexokinase LI. This analysis shows that the predictions of this model are in total disagreement with both the predictions of the mnemonical model and the experimental results obtained with wheat germ hexokinase LI, as well as with other enzymes. This alternative model cannot therefore be considered as a sensible explanation of the mechanistic origin of co-operativity of monomeric enzymes. It is therefore concluded that the mnemonical model which rests on numerous experimental results, obtained by different research groups, on different enzymes is the simplest and most likely explanation of the kinetic subtleties displayed by some monomeric enzymes, and in particular wheat germ hexokinase LI.