Higher‐order assemblies of oligomeric cargo receptor complexes form the membrane scaffold of the Cvt vesicle

Selective autophagy is the mechanism by which large cargos are specifically sequestered for degradation. The structural details of cargo and receptor assembly giving rise to autophagic vesicles remain to be elucidated. We utilize the yeast cytoplasm‐to‐vacuole targeting (Cvt) pathway, a prototype of selective autophagy, together with a multi‐scale analysis approach to study the molecular structure of Cvt vesicles. We report the oligomeric nature of the major Cvt cargo Ape1 with a combined 2.8 Å X‐ray and negative stain EM structure, as well as the secondary cargo Ams1 with a 6.3 Å cryo‐EM structure. We show that the major dodecameric cargo prApe1 exhibits a tendency to form higher‐order chain structures that are broken upon interaction with the receptor Atg19 in vitro. The stoichiometry of these cargo–receptor complexes is key to maintaining the size of the Cvt aggregate in vivo. Using correlative light and electron microscopy, we further visualize key stages of Cvt vesicle biogenesis. Our findings suggest that Atg19 interaction limits Ape1 aggregate size while serving as a vehicle for vacuolar delivery of tetrameric Ams1.     

Regulation of rat ovarian cell growth and steroid secretion

A cultured rat ovarian cell line (31 A-F(2)) was used to study the effect of growth factors (epidermal growth factor [EGF] and fibroblast growth factor [FGF]), a survival factor (ovarian growth factor [OGF]), a hormone (insulin), and an iron-binding protein (transferring) on cell proliferation and steroid production under defined culture conditions. EGF and insulin were shown to be mitogenic (half-maximal response at 0.12 nM and 0.11 muM, respectively) for 31A-F(2) cells incubated in serum-free medium. EGF induced up to three doublings in the cell population, whereas insulin induced an average of one cell population doubling. FGF, OGF, and transferrin were found not to have any prominent effect on cell division when incubated individually with 31A-F(2) cells in serum-free medium. However, a combination of EGF, OGF, insulin, and transferrin stimulated cell division to the same approximate extent as cells incubated in the presence of 5 percent fetal calf serum. EGF or insulin did not significantly affect total cell cholesterol levels (relative to cells incubated in serum-free medium) when incubated individually with 31A-F(2) cells. However, cell cholesterol levels were increased by the addition of OGF (250 percent), FGF (370 percent), or a combination of insulin and EGF (320 percent). Progesterone secretion from 31A-F(2) cells was enhanced by EGF (25 percent), FGF (80 percent), and insulin (115 percent). However, the addition of a mitogenic mixture of EGF, OGF, insulin, and transferrin suppressed progesterone secretion 150 percent) below that of control cultures. These studies have permitted us to determine that EGF and insulin are mitogenic factors that are required for the growth of 31A-F(2) cells and that OGF and transferrin are positive cofactors that enhance growth. Also, additional data suggest that cholesterol and progesterone production in 31A-F(2) cells can be regulated by peptide growth factors and the hormone insulin.     

No evidence of modulation of indirect plant resistance of Brassica rapa plants by volatiles from soil-borne fungi

1. Upon herbivory, plants emit specific herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) that can attract natural enemies of the herbivore thus serving as indirect plant resistance. Not only insect herbivores, but microorganisms may also affect HIPV emission before or after plant colonisation, which in turn can affect behaviour of natural enemies of the herbivore. Yet, it remains elusive whether volatiles from microorganisms influence HIPV emission and indirect plant resistance.
2. In this study, we investigated whether exposure of Brassica rapa roots to volatiles from soil-borne fungi influence HIPV emission and the recruitment of natural enemies of Pieris brassicae larvae.
3. Using a two-compartment pot system, we performed greenhouse and common-garden experiments, and we profiled plant HIPV emission.
4. We found that exposure of plant roots to fungal volatiles did not affect the number of P. brassicae larvae recollected from the plants, suggesting a neutral effect of the fungal volatiles on natural predation. Likewise, in a greenhouse, similar numbers of larvae were parasitised by Cotesia glomerata wasps on control plants as on fungal volatile-exposed plants. Additionally, chemical analysis of HIPV profiles revealed no qualitative and quantitative differences between control plants and fungal volatile-exposed plants that were both infested with P. brassicae larvae.
5. Together, our data indicate that root exposure to fungal volatiles did not affect indirect plant resistance to an insect herbivore. These findings provide new insight into the influence of indirect plant resistance by fungal volatiles that are discussed together with the effects of fungal volatiles on direct plant resistance.

     

X-ray structures of progesterone receptor ligand binding domain in its agonist state reveal differing mechanisms for mixed profiles of 11β-substituted steroids

We present here the x-ray structures of the progesterone receptor (PR) in complex with two mixed profile PR modulators whose functional activity results from two differing molecular mechanisms. The structure of Asoprisnil bound to the agonist state of PR demonstrates the contribution of the ligand to increasing stability of the agonist conformation of helix-12 via a specific hydrogen-bond network including Glu(723). This interaction is absent when the full antagonist, RU486, binds to PR. Combined with a previously reported structure of Asoprisnil bound to the antagonist state of the receptor, this structure extends our understanding of the complex molecular interactions underlying the mixed agonist/antagonist profile of the compound. In addition, we present the structure of PR in its agonist conformation bound to the mixed profile compound Org3H whose reduced antagonistic activity and increased agonistic activity compared with reference antagonists is due to an induced fit around Trp(755), resulting in a decreased steric clash with Met(909) but inducing a new internal clash with Val(912) in helix-12. This structure also explains the previously published observation that 16α attachments to RU486 analogs induce mixed profiles by altering the binding of 11β substituents. Together these structures further our understanding of the steric and electrostatic factors that contribute to the function of steroid receptor modulators, providing valuable insight for future compound design.     

Rapid selective priming of FcalphaR on eosinophils by corticosteroids

Preactivation or priming of eosinophils by (proinflammatory) cytokines is important in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases. Several priming-dependent eosinophil responses, such as migration and adhesion, are reduced by treatment with corticosteroids. Many inhibitory effects of corticosteroids are mediated by the glucocorticoid receptor via genomic mechanisms, which are evident only after prolonged interaction (>30 min). However, also faster actions of corticosteroids have been identified, which occur in a rapid, nongenomic manner. In this study, fast effects of corticosteroids were investigated on the function of eosinophil opsonin receptors. Short term corticosteroid treatment of eosinophils for maximal 30 min with dexamethasone (Dex) did not influence eosinophil cell surface CD11b/CD18 expression, adhesion, and/or chemokinesis. In marked contrast, incubation with Dex resulted in a rapid increase in binding of IgA-coated beads to human eosinophils, showing that Dex can up-regulate the activation of FcalphaR (CD89). This priming response by Dex was dose dependent and optimal between 10(-8) and 10(-6) M and was mediated via the glucocorticoid receptor as its selective antagonist RU38486 (10(-6) M) blocked the priming effect. In contrast to FcalphaR, eosinophil FcgammaRII (CD32) was not affected by Dex. Further characterization of the Dex-induced inside-out regulation of FcalphaR revealed p38 MAPK as the central mediator. Dex dose dependently enhanced p38 MAPK phosphorylation and activation in situ as measured by phosphorylation of its downstream target mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2. The dose responses of the Dex-induced activation of these kinases were similar as seen for the priming of FcalphaR. This work demonstrates that corticosteroids selectively activate the FcalphaR on eosinophils by activation of p38 MAPK.     

Cyclic lipopeptide production by plant-associated Pseudomonas spp.: diversity, activity, biosynthesis, and regulation

Cyclic lipopeptides (CLPs) are versatile molecules produced by a variety of bacterial genera, including plant-associated Pseudomonas spp. CLPs are composed of a fatty acid tail linked to a short oligopeptide, which is cyclized to form a lactone ring between two amino acids in the peptide chain. CLPs are very diverse both structurally and in terms of their biological activity. The structural diversity is due to differences in the length and composition of the fatty acid tail and to variations in the number, type, and configuration of the amino acids in the peptide moiety. CLPs have received considerable attention for their antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and surfactant properties. For plant-pathogenic Pseudomonas spp., CLPs constitute important virulence factors, and pore formation, followed by cell lysis, is their main mode of action. For the antagonistic Pseudomonas sp., CLPs play a key role in antimicrobial activity, motility, and biofilm formation. CLPs are produced via nonribosomal synthesis on large, multifunctional peptide synthetases. Both the structural organization of the CLP synthetic templates and the presence of specific domains and signature sequences within peptide synthetase genes will be described for both pathogenic and antagonistic Pseudomonas spp. Finally, the role of various genes and regulatory mechanisms in CLP production by Pseudomonas spp., including two-component regulation and quorum sensing, will be discussed in detail.     

Specificity in Ras and Rap Signaling

Ras and Rap proteins are closely related small GTPases. Whereas Ras is known for its role in cell proliferation and survival, Rap1 is predominantly involved in cell adhesion and cell junction formation. Ras and Rap are regulated by different sets of guanine nucleotide exchange factors and GTPase-activating proteins, determining one level of specificity. In addition, although the effector domains are highly similar, Rap and Ras interact with largely different sets of effectors, providing a second level of specificity. In this review, we discuss the regulatory proteins and effectors of Ras and Rap, with a focus on those of Rap.Ras-like small G-proteins are ubiquitously expressed, conserved molecular switches that couple extracellular signals to various cellular responses. Different signals can activate GEFs² that induce the small G-protein to switch from the inactive, GDP-bound state to the active, GTP-bound state. This induces a conformational change that allows downstream effector proteins to bind specifically to and be activated by the GTP-bound protein to mediate diverse biological responses. Small G-proteins are returned to the GDP-bound state by hydrolyzing GTP with the help of GAPs. Ras (Ha-Ras, Ki-Ras, and N-Ras) and Rap proteins (Rap1A, Rap1B, Rap2A, Rap2B, and Rap2C) have similar effector-binding regions that interact predominantly with RA domains or the structurally similar RBDs present in a variety of different proteins. Both protein families operate in different signaling networks. For instance, Ras is central in a network controlling cell proliferation and cell survival, whereas Rap1 predominantly controls cell adhesion, cell junction formation, cell secretion, and cell polarity. These different functions are reflected in a largely different set of GEFs and GAPs. Also the downstream effector proteins operate in a selective manner in either one of the networks.