Ultrastructural aspects of the myxosporean Henneguya astyanax n. sp. (Myxozoa: Myxobolidae), a parasite of the Amazonian teleost Astyanax keithi (Characidae)

This study reports light and electron microscopical aspects of a myxosporean found in the gills of the freshwater teleost Astyanax keithi Géry, Planquete & Le Bail, 1996 (family Characidae), collected from the estuarine region of the Amazon River, near Belém, Brazil. The prevalence of infection was 23%. In interlamellar spaces of the gills, ellipsoidal whitish cyst-like plasmodia structures were present, which contained spores. The spores had a spermatozoa-like appearance (47.8 +/- 0.71 microm in total length) with a fusiform body (15.2 +/- 0.77 pm in length, 5.7 +/- 0.71 microm in width and 4.2 +/- 0.31 microm in thickness), and each of the 2 valves presented a tapering tail (32.6 +/- 1.11 microm in length). The valves surrounded a binucleate sporoplasm cell and 2 polar capsules (5.0 +/- 0.13 microm in length, 1.5 +/- 0.07 microm in width) that contained 8 to 9 coils of the polar filament. In the sporoplasm, several unique sporoplasmosomes were visible. A synoptic table of spore measurements of known Brazilian Henneguya species is presented. The spores differed from those of previously described species. Based on spore morphology, it is concluded that this species belongs to the family Myxobolidae, genus Henneguya, and that it constitutes a new species: H. astyanax n. sp.     

Resistance of Oryza sativa and Oryza glaberrima Genotypes to RBe24 Isolate of Rice Yellow Mottle Virus in Benin and Effects of Silicon on Host Response

Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV) is the most harmful virus that affects irrigated and lowland rice in Africa. The RBe24 isolate of the virus is the most pathogenic strain in Benin. A total of 79 genotypes including susceptible IR64 (Oryza sativa) and the resistant TOG5681 (O. glaberrima) as checks were screened for their reactions to RBe24 isolate of RYMV and the effects of silicon on the response of host plants to the virus investigated. The experiment was a three-factor factorial consisting of genotypes, inoculation level (inoculated vs. non-inoculated), and silicon dose (0, 5, and 10 g/plant) applied as CaSiO₃ with two replications and carried out twice in the screen house. Significant differences were observed among the rice genotypes. Fifteen highly resistant and eight resistant genotypes were identified, and these were mainly O. glaberrima. Silicon application did not affect disease incidence and severity at 21 and 42 days after inoculation (DAI); it, however, significantly increased plant height of inoculated (3.6% for 5 g CaSiO₃/plant and 6.3% for 10 g CaSiO₃/plant) and non-inoculated (1.9% for 5 g CaSiO₃/plant and 4.9% for 10 g CaSiO₃/plant) plants at 42 DAI, with a reduction in the number of tillers (12.3% for both 5 and 10 g CaSiO₃/plant) and leaves (26.8% for 5 g CaSiO₃/plant and 28% for 10 g CaSiO₃/plant) under both inoculation treatments. Our results confirm O. glaberrima germplasm as an important source of resistance to RYMV, and critical in developing a comprehensive strategy for the control of RYMV in West Africa.     

Critical Evaluation of the Volumetric “Bottle Effect” on Microbial Batch Growth

We have analyzed the impact of surface-to-volume ratio on final bacterial concentrations after batch growth. We examined six bottle sizes (20 to 1,000 ml) using three independent enumeration methods to quantify growth. We found no evidence of a so-called volumetric bottle effect, thus contradicting numerous previous reports.Microbial batch growth during confined incubation in bottles of various sizes is used daily in a broad variety of microbiological studies and methods, including bioassays such as the assimilable organic carbon (AOC) assay (6, 10, 18) and the analysis of pure culture or microbial community growth in freshwater (3, 11, 19, 20). In this context, “bottle effect” or “volume effect” is a term that has cropped up frequently in aquatic microbiology papers (e.g., references 12, 13, and 21) during the last 100 years to explain inexplicable phenomena and variations in results obtained from such batch growth studies. The uncertainty surrounding this apparent effect was clearly summarized in a recent paper by Pernthaler and Amann (16): “Such investigations are often plagued by the mysterious ‘bottle effect’, a hard-to-define concept that reflects the worry of whether phenomena observed in confined assemblages are nonspecific consequences of the confinement rather than a result of the planned manipulation.” The “bottle effect” alludes to an apparent reaction of bacteria to batchwise incubation in a confined environment, and this concept has intermittently been linked to influences on final cell concentrations (3) and grazing/bacterivory (13), a change in viability/activity parameters (9), a change in cultivability (5), and a change in population composition (1).The fact that microbiological processes during confined incubation differ from those in the environment is indisputable. However, a particular section of “bottle effect” literature focuses specifically on a volumetric “bottle effect”, where the above-mentioned effects are linked specifically to the size (or surface-to-volume ratio) of the incubation vessel (3, 8, 11-13, 15, 21). One of the oldest and best-known studies summarized clearly: “It will be observed that the densest bacterial populations appear in the bottles of water which offer the largest area of glass surface per unit volume of water” (21). This idea has established itself as dogma during the last century, with only a few differing opinions (4). However, precious little empirical data that actually quantify and explain the volumetric “bottle effect” are ever presented. In one example, Bischofberger et al. (3) observed that incubation of groundwater led to significantly more growth (about 2 log units) in small bottles (100 ml) than in big ones (10 liters). More often, however, the “bottle effect” is merely mentioned, as if it is self-explanatory and indisputable (2, 11, 12). In the present study, we took a simple but detailed look at the effect of bottle size on the outcome of short-term (<5-day) batch growth assays and compared the data critically to information in the literature and current opinion on this topic.Three batch growth experiments were conducted to assess the volumetric bottle effect on final cell concentrations after growth into stationary phase. Six different bottle sizes were used, covering the ranges most often reported in “bottle effect” literature. All glassware and Teflon-coated caps were cleaned comprehensively as described elsewhere (6) to remove any traces of organic carbon that might have been present on surfaces. The bottle sizes were as follows (water volumes and surface area-to-volume ratios [square centimeters to milliliters] are respectively included in parentheses): 1,000 ml (900 ml, 0.3:1), 500 ml (400 ml, 0.4:1), 250 ml (200 ml, 0.6:1), 100 ml (90 ml, 0.8:1), 40 ml (35 ml, 1.5:1), and 20 ml (15 ml, 2.4:1). In the first experiment, a sample of natural river water (dissolved organic carbon [DOC], 3.8 mg/liter; AOC, 0.3 mg/liter) from a small oligotrophic stream was obtained, filter sterilized with a 50-kDa dialysis filter (Fresenius Medical Care), and inoculated (at 10³ cells/ml) with a microbial community used for AOC assays (19). In the second experiment, a sample of the effluent (DOC, 1.2 mg/liter; AOC, 0.03 mg/liter; total cell concentration [TCC], 3 × 10⁵ cells/ml) from a granulated active carbon filter situated in a drinking water pilot plant (7) was collected and used directly for the experiment without additional treatment or inoculation. For the third experiment, sterile Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (diluted 1:10,000; DOC, 0.7 mg/liter; AOC, 0.46 mg/liter) was inoculated with Vibrio cholerae O1 (10³ cells/ml) as described previously (19). The water from each experiment was distributed into triplicate flasks of each size and incubated (at 30°C) until stationary phase was reached. Stationary phase was indicated by no significant increase in the TCC (measured after 3, 4, and 5 days) on consecutive days. Samples from all experiments were analyzed (i) for TCCs after being stained with SYBR green I and subjected to flow cytometry (7, 19), (ii) for ATP by using a commercial luciferin-luciferase assay (Promega Corporation) (7), and (iii) for heterotrophic plate counts (HPC) on R2A agar by a pour plate method with incubation at 30°C for 10 days. Possible biofilm growth was checked by applying sonication to selected samples. However, no wall growth in bottles of any size was observed.Growth was observed in all three experiments. The results show the net growth after subtraction of the initial cell/ATP/HPC concentrations from the final concentrations (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The proposed concept of the volumetric bottle effect implies that more growth should occur in smaller bottles. All data sets were subjected to regression analysis, and we observed no significant correlation (P < 0.01) between bottle size and final growth in any of the experiments by any of the three independent methods used for quantification. Figure ​Figure1A1A shows the batch growth results for a natural microbial community in prefiltered river water. This experimental setup is reflective of a typical AOC assay (6) or batch cultivation of natural microbial communities (20). Figure ​Figure1B1B shows the results for direct incubation of a treated drinking water sample. This sample and experimental setup were chosen specifically to assess any potential volumetric “bottle effect” on an indigenous microbial community in a biologically stable water sample, where only limited growth is expected. Indeed, the final cell concentration in the sample was only about 25% higher than the original cell concentration. The cultivability (HPC/TCC × 100) at day 0 was 0.4%, and at the end of the experimental period it had increased to 2.5%. This points to increased cultivability as a result of growth during confinement (5), yet it does not relate at all to the size of the incubation vessel. Figure ​Figure1C1C shows the data for V. cholerae grown in sterile LB medium (diluted 1:10,000) to stationary phase. Again, this particular setup is of specific relevance since a recently published paper on the growth of V. cholerae referred directly to the volumetric “bottle effect” to explain rather large differences between growth results from two separate studies (11, 19). The data from Fig. ​Fig.1C1C suggest at least that a “bottle effect” should be ruled out as an interfering factor in this case.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Effects of bottle size on bacterial batch growth of a natural microbial community in filter-sterilized surface water (A), growth of bacteria during direct incubation of water from a drinking water treatment plant (B), and batch growth of a V. cholerae pure culture in diluted LB medium (C). Growth (expressed as the net growth) was quantified by flow cytometric total cell counting (circles), total ATP analysis (diamonds), and conventional plating (squares). All data points represent averages of triplicate measurements.The results presented in this study clearly dispute the concept of a volumetric “bottle effect” on the outcome of short-term batch growth assays, be it for pure cultures or natural microbial communities. These findings contradict evidence reported by many other researchers (3, 8, 11-13, 15, 21). Although the volumetric “bottle effect” is often cited as a somewhat mysterious occurrence, it is imperative that clear experimental data are required for the critical appraisal thereof. The main experimental theory behind the phenomenon is that organic carbon adsorbs to clean glass surfaces, thus locally concentrating the carbon and creating more favorable growth conditions (2, 14). This adsorption and the fact that bacteria can utilize such adsorbed carbon have been demonstrated experimentally (14). What has, in our opinion, not been shown conclusively is that these effects can be so dramatic that they would alter the growth of samples to the extent that different sizes of bottles would render different final cell numbers after growth. Since we have not observed any volumetric “bottle effect” in our work, we can only speculate on the possible reasons why this has been observed previously. One explanation may be that glassware contaminated with organic carbon can contribute to the perception of a volumetric “bottle effect,” as large surface-to-volume ratios (found in small bottles) would account for increased contamination compared to that in bottles with smaller ratios. Hence, more additional available carbon would be introduced into smaller bottles, giving rise to higher final cell numbers after growth. In this context, it is essential that a comprehensive glassware-cleaning protocol be followed, including heating to a high temperature (>500°C) and storage away from volatile organics (6). In addition, it is important that such experiments at low carbon concentrations are complemented with the inclusion of correct and sensitive controls to assess potential organic carbon contamination. For example, the use of deionized water as a negative control should be avoided, since the absence of inorganic nutrients is bound to lead to no growth and thus false-negative results (10). A good negative control would be water that is only carbon limited, e.g., bottled drinking water (17). Moreover, the use of multiple tools for analyzing growth, including cultivation-independent methods, is encouraged.In conclusion, we did not observe evidence of a volumetric bottle effect on short-term (<5-day) batch incubations. The findings of this study suggest that reference to the so-called volumetric bottle effect should be considered carefully unless supported by clear experimental data. This study does not dispute the fact that many authors have observed results implying apparent bottle effects during growth studies, but it questions the interpretation and understanding of this concept and the random use of the term “bottle effect” to explain uncertainty in results, specifically in relation to bottle size. Hopefully, these data will assist with experimental setups and comparison of data among different groups and stimulate discussion of and future research on this interesting, but slightly controversial, topic.     

New targeted therapies for treatment of thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies (Abs) are associated with thrombosis and pregnancy loss in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), a disorder initially characterised in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) but now known to occur in the absence of other autoimmune disease. There is strong evidence that aPL Abs are pathogenic in vivo, from studies of animal models of thrombosis, endothelial cell activation and pregnancy loss. In recent years, progress has been made in characterising the molecular basis of this pathogenicity, which includes direct effects on platelets, endothelial cells and monocytes as well as activation of complement. This review summarises the clinical manifestations of APS and current modalities of treatment, and explains recent advances in understanding the molecular events triggered by aPL Abs on target cells in coagulation pathways as well as effects of aPL Abs on complement activation. Based on this information and on additional scientific evidence using in vitro and in vivo models, new potential targeted therapies for treatment and/or prevention of thrombosis in APS are proposed and discussed.     

Glucocorticoid-induced activation of caspase-8 protects the glucocorticoid-induced protein Gilz from proteasomal degradation and induces its binding to SUMO-1 in murine thymocytes

In this study, we evaluated the possible cross-talk between glucocorticoid (GC)-induced leucine zipper (Gilz) and caspase-8 in dexamethasone (Dex)-treated thymocytes. We determined that expression of Dex-induced Gilz protein was reduced when caspase-8 activity was inhibited, and this effect was not partially due to altered Gilz mRNA expression. Inhibition of the proteasome abrogated this reduction in Gilz expression, suggesting that Dex-induced caspase-8 activation protects Gilz from degradation. We hypothesized that the caspase-8-dependent protection of Gilz could be due to caspase-8-driven sumoylation. As a putative small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO)-binding site was identified in the Gilz sequence, we assessed whether SUMO-1 interacted with Gilz. We identified a 30-kDa protein that was compatible with the size of a Gilz–SUMO-1 complex and was recognized by the anti-SUMO-1 and anti-Gilz antibodies. In addition, Gilz bound to SUMO ubiquitin-conjugating (E2)-conjugating enzyme Ube21 (Ubc9), the specific SUMO-1 E2-conjugating enzyme, in vitro and coimmunoprecipitated with Ubc9 in vivo. Furthermore, Gilz coimmunoprecipitated with SUMO-1 both in vitro and in vivo, and this interaction depended on caspase-8 activation. This requirement for caspase-8 was further evaluated in caspase-8-deficient thymocytes and lymphocytes in which Gilz expression was reduced. In summary, our results suggest that caspase-8 activation protects Gilz from proteasomal degradation and induces its binding to SUMO-1 in GC-treated thymocytes.     

Nerve growth factor increases in pancreatic beta cells after streptozotocin-induced damage in rats

We investigated short-term in vivo and in vitro effects of streptozotocin (STZ) on pancreatic beta cells. Male Wistar rats were treated with 75 mg/kg STZ, and, after 4 hrs blood glucose and insulin were measured and islet cells were isolated, cultured for 16 hrs, and challenged with 5.6 and 15.6 mM glucose. Treated rats showed hyperglycemia (approximately 14 mM) and a 70% decrease in serum insulin levels as compared with controls. Although insulin secretion by isolated beta cells from STZ-treated rats was reduced by more than 80%, in both glucose concentrations, nerve growth factor (NGF) secretion by the same cells increased 10-fold. Moreover, NGF messenger RNA (mRNA) expression increased by 30% as compared with controls. Similar results were obtained in an in vitro model of islet cells, in which cells were exposed directly to STZ for 1, 2, and 4 hrs and then challenged for 3 hrs with the same glucose concentrations. Our data strongly suggest that an early increase in NGF production and secretion by beta cells could be an endogenous protective response to maintain cell survival and that diabetes mellitus may occur when this mechanism is surpassed.     

Intranigral LPS Administration Produces Dopamine,Glutathione but not Behavioral Impairment in Comparison to MPTP and 6-OHDA Neurotoxin Models of Parkinson’s Disease

The current investigation compared intranigral lipopolysaccharide (LPS), 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) administrations, in the light of neurochemical, behavioral and endogenous antioxidant glutathione alterations. All the results were collected 1, 3 and 7 days after the lesions. LPS produced a delayed reduction of striatal dopamine, whereas homovanillic acid was drastically increased at the first time-point. Comparatively, MPTP promoted dopamine reduction 3 and 7 days with increase of homovanillic acid. Whilst, 6-OHDA generated initial increase of dopamine and homovanillic acid followed by subsequent decrease of this neurotransmitter accompanied by reductions of dopamine metabolites at the same periods. Furthermore, nigral glutathione demonstrated to be a far more sensitive target for LPS than for MPTP or 6-OHDA. Behavioral data indicated impairments induced by MPTP, 6-OHDA but not LPS. In conclusion, it is suggested that intranigral LPS can provide new insights about neuroinflammation, simulating features of the pre-motor phase of Parkinson’s disease.     

Diversity and physiological characterization of d-xylose-fermenting yeasts isolated from the brazilian amazonian forest

Background

This study is the first to investigate the Brazilian Amazonian Forest to identify new D-xylose-fermenting yeasts that might potentially be used in the production of ethanol from sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolysates.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A total of 224 yeast strains were isolated from rotting wood samples collected in two Amazonian forest reserve sites. These samples were cultured in yeast nitrogen base (YNB)-D-xylose or YNB-xylan media. Candida tropicalis, Asterotremella humicola, Candida boidinii and Debaryomyces hansenii were the most frequently isolated yeasts. Among D-xylose-fermenting yeasts, six strains of Spathaspora passalidarum, two of Scheffersomyces stipitis, and representatives of five new species were identified. The new species included Candida amazonensis of the Scheffersomyces clade and Spathaspora sp. 1, Spathaspora sp. 2, Spathaspora sp. 3, and Candida sp. 1 of the Spathaspora clade. In fermentation assays using D-xylose (50 g/L) culture medium, S. passalidarum strains showed the highest ethanol yields (0.31 g/g to 0.37 g/g) and productivities (0.62 g/L·h to 0.75 g/L·h). Candida amazonensis exhibited a virtually complete D-xylose consumption and the highest xylitol yields (0.55 g/g to 0.59 g/g), with concentrations up to 25.2 g/L. The new Spathaspora species produced ethanol and/or xylitol in different concentrations as the main fermentation products. In sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic fermentation assays, S. stipitis UFMG-XMD-15.2 generated the highest ethanol yield (0.34 g/g) and productivity (0.2 g/L·h), while the new species Spathaspora sp. 1 UFMG-XMD-16.2 and Spathaspora sp. 2 UFMG-XMD-23.2 were very good xylitol producers.

Conclusions/Significance

This study demonstrates the promise of using new D-xylose-fermenting yeast strains from the Brazilian Amazonian Forest for ethanol or xylitol production from sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolysates.