Prostaglandins do not mediate the actions of cholera toxin on pancreatic acini or gastric chief cells from the guinea pig

Recent reports suggest that prostaglandins, rather than cAMP, play a major role in mediating cholera toxin-induced water and electrolyte secretion from rabbit intestinal loops. We examined the role of prostaglandins in mediating toxin-induced pancreatic and gastric exocrine secretion. In these tissues, indomethacin, a potent inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis, did not alter the stimulatory effects of cholera toxin on increases in cellular cAMP or enzyme secretion. Moreover, the addition of cholera toxin did not alter prostaglandin E2 release from either tissue. In contrast to their effects in rabbit intestinal loops, prostaglandins do not regulate cholera toxin-induced enzyme secretion from the guinea pig pancreas or stomach.     

Transfer of reducing equivalents into mitochondria by the interconversions of proline and Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate

Direct evidence is presented for a proline cycle using a cell-free experimental system which sequentially transfers ³H from [1-³H]glucose to NADP⁺ to Δ¹-pyrroline-5-carboxylate and yields [³H]proline. The formation of [³H]proline depends on the presence of NADP, Δ¹-pyrroline-5-carboxylate, and the enzymes glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and Δ¹-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase. The production of [³H]proline from unlabeled proline in the presence of mitochondria provides direct evidence for one complete turn of a proline cycle which transfers reducing equivalents produced by glucose oxidation in the pentose pathway into mitochondria. In this cycle, proline is oxidized to Δ¹-pyrroline-5-carboxylate by mitochondrial proline oxidase. Δ¹-pyrroline-5-carboxylate is released from mitochondria and is recycled back to proline by Δ¹-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase with concomitant oxidation of NADPH. At the maximal rate observed, 60% of Δ¹-pyrroline-5-carboxylate produced is recycled back to proline. This cycle provides a mechanism for transferring reducing equivalents from NADPH into mitochondria and is linked to glucose oxidation in the pentose pathway by NADPH turnover.     

Reproductive biology of the male bent-winged bat, Miniopterus schreibersii (Vespertilionidae) in southeast South Australia

The seasonal chronology of the events of the reproductive cycle, and changes in the structure and function of the primary and accessory organs of the male bent-winged bat, Miniopterus schreibersii, were studied at latitude 37 degrees S in temperate southeastern Australia. The testicular cycle commenced in late spring (November), and sperm appeared in the seminiferous tubules and epididymides in early fall (March). The cycle of the accessory sex gland complex generally paralleled the testicular cycle, reaching maximum hypertrophy at the time of insemination in late fall (April/May). Thereafter, the primary and secondary sex glands (except the ampullary gland) involuted as the animals entered winter torpor. However, a cauda epididymal store of sperm persisted until late spring, and sperm were often observed, as well, in the ampullary gland duct and alveoli throughout winter. This study has confirmed that male Miniopterus differs from other vespertilionids in that accessory gland activity declines following the fall breeding in keeping with the fact that, unlike in other vespertilionids, insemination, ovulation and conception are concurrent events in the fall in this species. The reduced secretory status of the Leydig cells and exceptionally low levels of circulating androgens throughout the year, in combination with the presence of viable epididymidal sperm for most of gestation, are all interesting features of this reproductive cycle.     

Broomrape (Orobanche) seed germination inhibitors from plant roots

Two species (tomato and cucumber) which are not hosts to Orobanche crenata but which are hosts to other species of Orobanche not only failed to produce the compound required to trigger O. crenata to germinate but produced germination inhibitors which stopped germination even in the presence of a suitable stimulant. This suggested the possibility of using germination inhibitors to control at least some species of Orobanche. The question whether host species produce inhibitors as well as stimulants has not however been resolved.