Plant resistance to phytopathogenic microorganisms mainly relies on the activation of an innate immune response usually launched after recognition by the plant cells of microbe-associated molecular patterns. The plant hormones, salicylic acid (
SA), jasmonic acid, and ethylene have emerged as key players in the signaling networks involved in plant immunity. Rhamnolipids (
RLs) are glycolipids produced by bacteria and are involved in surface motility and biofilm development. Here we report that
RLs trigger an immune response in Arabidopsis (
Arabidopsis thaliana) characterized by signaling molecules accumulation and defense gene activation. This immune response participates to resistance against the hemibiotrophic bacterium
Pseudomonas syringae pv
tomato, the biotrophic oomycete
Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, and the necrotrophic fungus
Botrytis cinerea. We show that
RL-mediated resistance involves different signaling pathways that depend on the type of pathogen. Ethylene is involved in
RL-induced resistance to
H. arabidopsidis and to
P. syringae pv
tomato whereas jasmonic acid is essential for the resistance to
B. cinerea.
SA participates to the restriction of all pathogens. We also show evidence that
SA-dependent plant defenses are potentiated by
RLs following challenge by
B. cinerea or
P. syringae pv
tomato. These results highlight a central role for
SA in
RL-mediated resistance. In addition to the activation of plant defense responses, antimicrobial properties of
RLs are thought to participate in the protection against the fungus and the oomycete. Our data highlight the intricate mechanisms involved in plant protection triggered by a new type of molecule that can be perceived by plant cells and that can also act directly onto pathogens.In their environment, plants are challenged by potentially pathogenic microorganisms. In response, they express a set of defense mechanisms including preformed structural and chemical barriers, as well as an innate immune response quickly activated after microorganism perception (
Boller and Felix, 2009). Plant innate immunity is triggered after recognition by pattern recognition receptors of conserved pathogen- or microbe-associated molecular patterns (
PAMPs or
MAMPs, respectively) or by plant endogenous molecules released by pathogen invasion and called danger-associated molecular patterns (
Boller and Felix, 2009;
Dodds and Rathjen, 2010). This first step of recognition leads to the activation of
MAMP-triggered immunity (
MTI). Successful pathogens can secrete effectors that interfere or suppress
MTI, resulting in effector-triggered susceptibility. A second level of perception involves the direct or indirect recognition by specific receptors of pathogen effectors leading to effector-triggered immunity (
ETI;
Boller and Felix, 2009;
Dodds and Rathjen, 2010). Whereas
MTI and
ETI are thought to involve common signaling network,
ETI is usually quantitatively stronger than
MTI and associated with more sustained and robust immune responses (
Katagiri and Tsuda, 2010;
Tsuda and Katagiri, 2010).The plant hormones, salicylic acid (
SA), jasmonic acid (
JA), and ethylene (
ET) have emerged as key players in the signaling networks involved in
MTI and
ETI (
Robert-Seilaniantz et al., 2007;
Tsuda et al., 2009;
Katagiri and Tsuda, 2010;
Mersmann et al., 2010;
Tsuda and Katagiri, 2010;
Robert-Seilaniantz et al., 2011). Interactions between these signal molecules allow the plant to activate and/or modulate an appropriate spectrum of responses, depending on the pathogen lifestyle, necrotroph or biotroph (
Glazebrook, 2005;
Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008). It is assumed that
JA and
ET signaling pathways are important for resistance to necrotrophic fungi including
Botrytis cinerea and
Alternaria brassicicola (
Thomma et al., 2001;
Ferrari et al., 2003;
Glazebrook, 2005). Infection of Arabidopsis (
Arabidopsis thaliana) with
B. cinerea causes the induction of the
JA/
ET responsive gene
PLANT DEFENSIN1.2 (
PDF1.2;
Penninckx et al., 1996;
Zimmerli et al., 2001). Induction of
PDF1.2 by
B. cinerea is blocked in
ethylene-insensitive2 (
ein2) and
coronatine-insensitive1 (
coi1) mutants that are respectively defective in
ET and
JA signal transduction pathways. Moreover,
ein2 and
coi1 plants are highly susceptible to
B. cinerea infection (
Thomma et al., 1998;
Thomma et al., 1999).
JA/
ET-dependent responses do not seem to be usually induced during resistance to biotrophs, but they can be effective if they are stimulated prior to pathogen challenge (
Glazebrook, 2005). Plants impaired in
SA signaling are highly susceptible to biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens. Following pathogen infection, SA hydroxylase (NahG),
enhanced disease susceptibility5 (
eds5), or
SA induction-deficient2 (
sid2) plants are unable to accumulate high
SA levels and they display heightened susceptibility to
Pseudomonas syringae pv
tomato (
Pst),
Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, or
Erysiphe orontii (
Delaney et al., 1994;
Lawton et al., 1995;
Wildermuth et al., 2001;
Nawrath et al., 2002;
Vlot et al., 2009). Mutants that are insensitive to
SA, such as
nonexpressor of PATHOGENESIS-RELATED (
PR)
genes1 (
npr1), have enhanced susceptibility to these pathogens (
Cao et al., 1994;
Glazebrook et al., 1996;
Shah et al., 1997;
Dong, 2004). According to some reports, plant defense against necrotrophs also involves
SA. Arabidopsis plants expressing the
nahG gene and infected with
B. cinerea show larger lesions compared with wild-type plants (
Govrin and Levine, 2002). In tobacco (
Nicotiana tabacum), acidic isoforms of
PR3 and
PR5 gene that are specifically induced by
SA (
Ménard et al., 2004) are up-regulated after challenge by
B. cinerea (
El Oirdi et al., 2010). Resistance to some necrotrophs like
Fusarium graminearum involves both
SA and
JA signaling pathways (
Makandar et al., 2010). It is assumed that
SA and
JA signaling can be antagonistic (
Bostock, 2005;
Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008;
Pieterse et al., 2009;
Thaler et al., 2012). In Arabidopsis,
SA inhibits
JA-dependent resistance against
A. brassicicola or
B. cinerea (
Spoel et al., 2007;
Koornneef et al., 2008). Recent studies demonstrated that
ET modulates the
NPR1-mediated antagonism between
SA and
JA (
Leon-Reyes et al., 2009;
Leon-Reyes et al., 2010a) and suppression by
SA of
JA-responsive gene expression is targeted at a position downstream of the
JA biosynthesis pathway (
Leon-Reyes et al., 2010b). Synergistic effects of
SA- and
JA-dependent signaling are also well documented (
Schenk et al., 2000;
van Wees et al., 2000;
Mur et al., 2006) and induction of some defense responses after pathogen challenge requires intact
JA,
ET, and
SA signaling pathways (
Campbell et al., 2003).Isolated
MAMPs trigger defense responses that also require the activation of
SA,
JA, and
ET signaling pathways (
Tsuda et al., 2009;
Katagiri and Tsuda, 2010). For instance, treatment with the flagellin peptide flg22 induces many
SA-related genes including
SID2,
EDS5,
NPR1, and
PR1 (
Ferrari et al., 2007;
Denoux et al., 2008), causes
SA accumulation (
Tsuda et al., 2008;
Wang et al., 2009), and activates
ET signaling (
Bethke et al., 2009;
Mersmann et al., 2010). Local application of lipopolysaccharides elevates the level of
SA (
Mishina and Zeier, 2007). The oomycete Pep13 peptide induces defense responses in potato (
Solanum tuberosum) that require both
SA and
JA (
Halim et al., 2009). Although signaling networks induced by isolated
MAMPs are well documented, the contribution of
SA,
JA, and
ET in
MAMP- or
PAMP-induced resistance to biotrophs and necrotrophs is poorly understood.Rhamnolipids (
RLs) are glycolipids produced by various bacteria species including some
Pseudomonas and
Burkholderia species. They are essential for bacterial surface motility and biofilm development (
Vatsa et al., 2010;
Chrzanowski et al., 2012).
RLs are potent stimulators of animal immunity (
Vatsa et al., 2010). They have recently been shown to elicit plant defense responses and to induce resistance against
B. cinerea in grapevine (
Vitis vinifera;
Varnier et al., 2009). They also participate to biocontrol activity of the plant beneficial bacteria
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PNA1 against oomycetes (
Perneel et al., 2008). However, the signaling pathways used by
RLs to stimulate plant innate immunity are not known. To gain more insights into
RL-induced
MTI, we investigated
RL-triggered defense responses and resistance to the necrotrophic fungus
B. cinerea, the biotroph oomycete
H. arabidopsidis, and the hemibiotroph bacterium
Pst in Arabidopsis. Our results show that
RLs trigger an innate immune response in Arabidopsis that protects the plant against these different lifestyle pathogens. We demonstrate that
RL-mediated resistance involves separated signaling sectors that depend on the type of pathogen. In plants challenged by
RLs,
SA has a central role and participates to the restriction of the three pathogens.
ET is fully involved in
RL-induced resistance to the biotrophic oomycete and to the hemibiotrophic bacterium whereas
JA is essential for the resistance to the necrotrophic fungus.
相似文献