Synthesis, structure-activity relationships and molecular modeling studies of new indole inhibitors of monoamine oxidases A and B

New monoamine oxidase inhibitors were synthesized as indole analogues of a previously reported pyrrole series. Several compounds were potent MAO-A (12, 17, 19-22, 31, 36, and 37) or MAO-B (14, 20, 24, 38, 44, and 46) inhibitors, and had K(i) values in the nanomolar concentration range. In particular, 22 (K(i)=0.00092 microM, and SI=68,478) was exceptionally potent and selective as MAO-A inhibitor. In molecular modeling studies, compounds 22, 24, 44, and 46 positioned the indole ring into an aromatic cavity of MAO-A, and established pi-pi stacking interactions with Tyr407, Tyr444, and FAD cofactor. However, only compound 22 was able to form hydrogen bonds with FAD, a finding which was in accordance with its potent anti-MAO-A activity. Conversely, 22/MAOB complex was highly unstable during the MD simulation.     

Triterpenoid saponins from a cytotoxic root extract of Sideroxylonfoetidissimum subsp. gaumeri

Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of an ethanolic root extract of Sideroxylonfoetidissimum subsp. gaumeri (Sapotaceae) revealed activity against the murine macrophage-like cell line RAW 264.7. Systematic bioassay-guided fractionation of this extract gave an active saponin-containing fraction from which four saponins were isolated. Use of 1D (¹H, ¹³C, DEPT135) and 2D (COSY, TOCSY, HSQC, and HMBC) NMR, mass spectrometry and sugar analysis gave their structures as 3-O-(β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 6)-β-d-glucopyranosyl)-28-O-(α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 3)[β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)]-β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-α-l-arabinopyranosyl)-16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid, 3-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-28-O-(α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 3)[β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)]-β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-α-l-arabinopyranosyl)-16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid, 3-O-(β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 6)-β-d-glucopyranosyl)-28-O-(α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 3)-β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)[β-d-apiofuranosyl-(1 → 3)]-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-α-l-arabinopyranosyl)-16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid, and the known compound, 3-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-28-O-(α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 3)[β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)]-β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-α-l-arabinopyranosyl)-protobassic acid. Two further saponins were obtained from the same fraction, but as a 5:4 mixture comprising 3-O-(β-d-glucopyranosyl)-28-O-(α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 3)-β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)[β-d-apiofuranosyl-(1 → 3)]-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-α-l-arabinopyranosyl)-16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid and 3-O-(β-d-apiofuranosyl-(1 → 3)-β-d-glucopyranosyl)-28-O-(α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 3)[β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)]-β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-α-l-arabinopyranosyl)-16α-hydroxyprotobassic acid, respectively. This showed greater cytotoxicity (IC₅₀ = 11.9 ± 1.5 μg/ml) towards RAW 264.7 cells than the original extract (IC₅₀ = 39.5 ± 4.1 μg/ml), and the saponin-containing fraction derived from it (IC₅₀ = 33.7 ± 6.2 μg/ml).     

Evolution of the Schlafen genes,a gene family associated with embryonic lethality,meiotic drive,immune processes and orthopoxvirus virulence

Genes of the Schlafen family, first discovered in mouse, are expressed in hematopoietic cells and are involved in immune processes. Previous results showed that they are candidate genes for two major phenomena: meiotic drive and embryonic lethality (DDK syndrome). However, these genes remain poorly understood, mostly due to the limitations imposed by their similarity, close location and the potential functional redundancy of the gene family members.     

Dynamin2 GTPase and Cortactin Remodel Actin Filaments

The large GTPase dynamin, best known for its activities that remodel membranes during endocytosis, also regulates F-actin-rich structures, including podosomes, phagocytic cups, actin comet tails, subcortical ruffles, and stress fibers. The mechanisms by which dynamin regulates actin filaments are not known, but an emerging view is that dynamin influences F-actin via its interactions with proteins that interact directly or indirectly with actin filaments. We show here that dynamin2 GTPase activity remodels actin filaments in vitro via a mechanism that depends on the binding partner and F-actin-binding protein, cortactin. Tightly associated actin filaments cross-linked by dynamin2 and cortactin became loosely associated after GTP addition when viewed by transmission electron microscopy. Actin filaments were dynamically unraveled and fragmented after GTP addition when viewed in real time using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Cortactin stimulated the intrinsic GTPase activity of dynamin2 and maintained a stable link between actin filaments and dynamin2, even in the presence of GTP. Filaments remodeled by dynamin2 GTPase in vitro exhibit enhanced sensitivity to severing by the actin depolymerizing factor, cofilin, suggesting that GTPase-dependent remodeling influences the interactions of actin regulatory proteins and F-actin. The global organization of the actomyosin cytoskeleton was perturbed in U2-OS cells depleted of dynamin2, implicating dynamin2 in remodeling actin filaments that comprise supramolecular F-actin arrays in vivo. We conclude that dynamin2 GTPase remodels actin filaments and plays a role in orchestrating the global actomyosin cytoskeleton.Controlled assembly and disassembly of actin filaments underlies movement, shape, division, trafficking of lipids and proteins of the cell and pathogenesis by infectious bacteria and viruses. Several proteins and signaling circuits modulate actin filament dynamics, including proteins that nucleate formation of new filaments, filament cross-linking proteins that stabilize branched and bundled filament arrays, and depolymerizing factors that promote filament disassembly (1). Studies with reconstituted systems show that a single actin nucleating factor, such as the Arp2/3 complex together with a nucleation-promoting factor, a barbed end capping protein to preserve the actin monomer pool and promote nucleation, and a filament disassembly factor, such as ADF/cofilin, are sufficient to establish a dynamic dendritic actin network in vitro that mimics many properties of actin networks at the leading edge of migrating cells (2–4). However, the mechanisms for coordinating the organization and dynamics of actin filaments associated with higher-order cellular structures such as the subcortical F-actin network, F-actin at focal adhesions, and actomyosin arrays are not as well understood.Considerable evidence indicates that the large GTPase dynamin, a key mediator of membrane remodeling and fission, also influences actin filaments (reviewed in Refs. 5–7). Although the mechanisms are unknown, dynamin could influence actin filaments via its interactions with a number of proteins that directly or indirectly regulate actin filament assembly, filament stability, or filament organization. For example, several protein scaffolds biochemically link dynamin and the Arp2/3 complex activating factor, N-WASP, suggesting that the machinery for de novo actin assembly may be targeted or activated by dynamin (6, 8, 9). Dynamin2 is associated with several dynamic F-actin-containing structures in vivo, including podosomes, F-actin comet tails, phagocytic cups, dynamic cortical ruffles, and pedestal structures elaborated by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (10–20). Cortactin, which directly binds both dynamin and actin filaments, is associated with many of the same dynamic actin structures as dynamin (5, 7) and is required for both clathrin-dependent and -independent endocytosis (21, 22). Thus, dynamin-cortactin interaction may be an important link between actin filaments and dynamin during formation or turnover of F-actin-rich structures.Considerable evidence supports the notion that GTP hydrolysis by dynamin catalyzes membrane fission activity via GTPase-dependent changes in conformation (23, 24) or via GTPase-dependent cycles of assembly and disassembly (25, 26). We hypothesize that GTPase-dependent changes in dynamin linked via its interacting proteins to actin filaments or actin regulators could similarly influence actin filaments. Overexpressed, dominant negative dynamin mutant proteins impaired in binding or hydrolyzing GTP (most often the dynamin-K44A mutation) perturb a variety of F-actin-rich cellular structures, including stress fibers and focal adhesions (27, 28), dendritic spines of neurons (29), podosomes (12, 30), actin comet tails (13, 14), phagocytic cups and bacteria-induced pedestal structures (16, 19), and dynamic cortical ruffles (15, 17). In addition, F-actin of stress fibers and overall cell morphology were perturbed in Clone9 cells expressing a mutant dynamin2 protein lacking the C-terminal proline-rich domain, the domain through which dynamin2 interacts with actin regulatory factors (11). Whereas existing data indicates that the specific effects of dynamin GTPase activity on F-actin structures are cell type- and structure-specific, a general conclusion is that dynamin GTPase activity influences the organization or turnover of a subset of actin filaments.To determine the mechanisms by which dynamin2 GTPase activity influences actin filaments, we developed biochemical and microscopic approaches to quantitatively assess and observe GTPase-dependent effects on actin filaments formed in vitro with Arp2/3 complex, cortactin, and dynamin2. The activities of dynamin2 on actin filaments in vivo were examined in cells with disrupted dynamin2 function using siRNA²-mediated suppression or pharmacologic inhibition. We report that dynamin2 GTPase, together with cortactin, functions as a dynamic actin filament remodeling complex that influences the global organization of the actomyosin cytoskeleton.     

Efficient temporally-controlled targeted mutagenesis in smooth muscle cells of the adult mouse

To generate temporally-controlled targeted somatic mutations selectively and efficiently in smooth muscles, we have established a transgenic SMA-Cre-ER(T2) mouse line in which the expression of the Tamoxifen-dependent Cre-ER(T2) recombinase is under the control of a large genomic DNA segment of the mouse smooth muscle alpha actin (SMA) gene, contained in a Bacterial artificial chromosome (Bac). In this transgenic mouse line, Cre-ER(T2)-mediated recombination of LoxP-flanked target DNA is strictly Tamoxifen-dependent, and efficient in both vascular and visceral smooth muscle cells. Moreover, with the exception of few cardiomyocytes, LoxP-flanked DNA excision is restricted to smooth muscle cells. Thus, SMA-Cre-ER(T2) mice should be of great value to analyze gene function in smooth muscles, and to establish new animal models of human smooth muscle disorders.