AT1 receptor mutant lacking heterotrimeric G protein coupling activates the Src-Ras-ERK pathway without nuclear translocation of ERKs.

Angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptors (AT1Rs) activate tyrosine kinases, including Src. Whether or not tyrosine kinase activation by AT1R occurs independently of heterotrimeric G protein coupling and, if so, the cellular function of such a mechanism are unknown. To address these questions, we used an AT1aR intracellular second loop mutant, which lacks heterotrimeric G protein coupling (AT1a-i2m). Surprisingly, Ang II-induced Src activation was preserved in AT1a-i2m, which was not attenuated by inhibiting protein kinase C and Ca(2+) or by inhibiting Galpha(i) or Galpha(q) in CHO-K1 cells. By contrast, Ang II-induced Src activation was abolished in a C-terminally truncated AT1a-(1--309), where Ang II-induced inositol phosphate response was preserved. Ang II activates ERKs via a Src-Ras-dependent mechanism in AT1a-i2m. ERKs activated by AT1a-i2m phosphorylate their cytoplasmic targets, including p90(RSK), but fail to translocate into the nucleus or to cause cell proliferation. Ang II-induced nuclear translocation of ERKs by wild type AT1aR was inhibited by overexpression of nuclear exportin Crm-1, while that by AT1a-i2m was restored by leptomycin B, an inhibitor of Crm-1. In summary, while Src and ERKs are activated by Ang II even without heterotrimeric G protein coupling, the carboxyl terminus of the AT1 receptor is required for activation of Src. Interestingly, ERKs activated by heterotrimeric G protein-independent mechanisms fail to phosphorylate nuclear targets due to lack of inhibition of Crm-1-induced nuclear export of ERKs. These results suggest that heterotrimeric G protein-dependent and -independent signaling mechanisms play distinct roles in Ang II-mediated cellular responses.     

Real-time analysis of G protein-coupled receptor reconstitution in a solubilized system

Receptor based signaling mechanisms are the primary source of cellular regulation. The superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors is the largest and most ubiquitous of the receptor mediated processes. We describe here the analysis in real-time of the assembly and disassembly of soluble G protein-coupled receptor-G protein complexes. A fluorometric method was utilized to determine the dissociation of a fluorescent ligand from the receptor solubilized in detergent. The ligand dissociation rate differs between a receptor coupled to a G protein and the receptor alone. By observing the sensitivity of the dissociation of a fluorescent ligand to the presence of guanine nucleotide, we have shown a time- and concentration-dependent reconstitution of the N-formyl peptide receptor with endogenous G proteins. Furthermore, after the clearing of endogenous G proteins, purified Galpha subunits premixed with bovine brain Gbetagamma subunits were also able to reconstitute with the solubilized receptors. The solubilized N-formyl peptide receptor and Galpha(i3) protein interacted with an affinity of approximately 10(-6) m with other alpha subunits exhibiting lower affinities (Galpha(i3) > Galpha(i2) > Galpha(i1) Galpha(o)). The N-formyl peptide receptor-G protein interactions were inhibited by peptides corresponding to the Galpha(i) C-terminal regions, by Galpha(i) mAbs, and by a truncated form of arrestin-3. This system should prove useful for the analysis of the specificity of receptor-G protein interactions, as well as for the elucidation and characterization of receptor molecular assemblies and signal transduction complexes.     

ANG II type 1 receptor downregulation does not require receptor endocytosis or G protein coupling

ANG II type 1 (AT₁) receptors respond to sustained exposure to ANG II byundergoing downregulation of absolute receptor numbers. It has beenassumed previously that downregulation involves endocytosis. Thepresent study hypothesized that AT₁ receptor downregulation occurs independently of receptor endocytosis or G protein coupling. Mutant AT₁ receptors with carboxy-terminal deletionsinternalized <5% of radioligand compared with 65% for wild-typeAT₁ receptors. The truncated AT₁ receptorsretained the ability to undergo downregulation. These data suggest theexistence of an alternative pathway to AT₁ receptordegradation that does not require endocytosis, per se. Point mutationsin either the second transmembrane region or second intracellular loopimpaired G protein (G_q) coupling. These receptors exhibiteda biphasic pattern of downregulation. The earliest phase ofdownregulation (0-2 h) was independent of coupling toG_q, but no additional downregulation was observed after2 h of ANG II exposure in the receptors with impaired coupling toG_q. These data suggest that coupling to G_q isrequired for the later phase (2-24 h) of AT₁ receptor downregulation.

     

Inverse agonist activity of agouti and agouti-related protein

Agouti and agouti-related protein (AgRP) are endogenous antagonists of the melanocortin receptors (MCxR). Previous data showed that recombinant full-length agouti and a synthetic fragment of AgRP, AgRP (83-132), are inverse agonists at the MC1R and MC4R, respectively. This study demonstrates the smaller analogs AgRP (87-120) and ASIP [90-132 (L89Y)], and short peptides Yc[CRFFNAFC]Y and Qc[CRFFRSAC]S are also MC4R inverse agonists. Furthermore, the relative affinity of the series of MC4R ligands for displacement of radiolabeled antagonist 125I-AgRP (86-132) versus radiolabeled agonist 125I-NDP-MSH did not correlate with ligand efficacy, which is more consistent with an induced-fit model than a simple two-state model of MC4R activation. These data shed new light on the determinants and mechanism of inverse agonism at the MC4R.     

Coupling efficacy and selectivity of the human mu-opioid receptor expressed as receptor-Galpha fusion proteins in Escherichia coli

Two constructs encoding the human micro-opioid receptor (hMOR) fused at its C terminus to either one of two Galpha subunits, Galpha(o1) (hMOR-Galpha(o1)) and Galpha(i2) (hMOR-Galpha(i2)), were expressed in Escherichia coli at levels suitable for pharmacological studies (0.4-0.5 pmol/mg). Receptors fused to Galpha(o1) or to Galpha(i2) maintained high-affinity binding of the antagonist diprenorphine. Affinities of the micro-selective agonists morphine, [D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO), and endomorphins as well as their potencies and intrinsic activities in stimulating guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thiotriphosphate) ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding were assessed in the presence of added purified Gbetagamma subunits. Both fusion proteins displayed high-affinity agonist binding and agonist-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. In the presence of Gbetagamma dimers, the affinities of DAMGO and endomorphin-1 and -2 were higher at hMOR-Galpha(i2) than at hMOR-Galpha(o1), whereas morphine displayed similar affinities at the two chimeras. Potencies of the four agonists in stimulating [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding at hMOR-Galpha(o1) were similar, whereas at hMOR-Galpha(i2), endomorphin-1 and morphine were more potent than DAMGO and endomorphin-2. The intrinsic activities of the four agonists at the two fusion constructs were similar. The results confirm hMOR coupling to Galpha(o1) and Galpha(i2) and support the hypothesis of the existence of multiple receptor conformational states, depending on the nature of the G protein to which it is coupled.     

Timing is everything the role of kinetics in G protein activation

The binding of a drug to a G-protein coupled receptor initiates a complex series of dynamic events that ultimately leads to a cellular response. In addition to the concentrations of receptor, drug and G-protein, important determinants of the cellular response are the rates at which these species interact. However, most models for G-protein coupled receptor signaling are equilibrium models that neglect the role of reaction kinetics. A kinetic ternary-complex model of signaling through G-protein coupled receptors is presented. We demonstrate that this kinetic model can make significantly different predictions than an equilibrium ternary complex model, which provides a different perspective on multiple aspects of the signal transduction cascade, such as agonist efficacy, the effect of precoupled receptors, and the role of RGS proteins. Incorporation of the reaction kinetics is critical for a complete understanding of signal transduction and will ultimately impact the fields of drug discovery and drug design.     

Under the microscope: single molecule symposium at the University of Michigan, 2006

In recent years, a revolution has occurred in the basic sciences, which exploits novel single molecule detection and manipulation tools to track and analyze biopolymers in unprecedented detail. A recent Gordon Research Conference style meeting, hosted by the University of Michigan, highlighted current status and future perspectives of this rising field as researchers begin to integrate it with mainstream biology and nanotechnology.     

Regulation of Protease-activated Receptor 1 Signaling by the Adaptor Protein Complex 2 and R4 Subfamily of Regulator of G Protein Signaling Proteins

The G protein-coupled protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) is irreversibly proteolytically activated by thrombin. Hence, the precise regulation of PAR1 signaling is important for proper cellular responses. In addition to desensitization, internalization and lysosomal sorting of activated PAR1 are critical for the termination of signaling. Unlike most G protein-coupled receptors, PAR1 internalization is mediated by the clathrin adaptor protein complex 2 (AP-2) and epsin-1, rather than β-arrestins. However, the function of AP-2 and epsin-1 in the regulation of PAR1 signaling is not known. Here, we report that AP-2, and not epsin-1, regulates activated PAR1-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis via two different mechanisms that involve, in part, a subset of R4 subfamily of “regulator of G protein signaling” (RGS) proteins. A significantly greater increase in activated PAR1 signaling was observed in cells depleted of AP-2 using siRNA or in cells expressing a PAR1 ⁴²⁰AKKAA⁴²⁴ mutant with defective AP-2 binding. This effect was attributed to AP-2 modulation of PAR1 surface expression and efficiency of G protein coupling. We further found that ectopic expression of R4 subfamily members RGS2, RGS3, RGS4, and RGS5 reduced activated PAR1 wild-type signaling, whereas signaling by the PAR1 AKKAA mutant was minimally affected. Intriguingly, siRNA-mediated depletion analysis revealed a function for RGS5 in the regulation of signaling by the PAR1 wild type but not the AKKAA mutant. Moreover, activation of the PAR1 wild type, and not the AKKAA mutant, induced Gα_q association with RGS3 via an AP-2-dependent mechanism. Thus, AP-2 regulates activated PAR1 signaling by altering receptor surface expression and through recruitment of RGS proteins.