HIV-1 Vpr induces apoptosis through caspase 9 in T cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Human immunodeficiency virus, type 1 (HIV-1), vpr gene encodes a 14-kDa virion-associated protein, which exhibits significant effects on human cells. One important property of Vpr is its ability to induce apoptosis during infection. Apoptotic induction is likely to play a role in the pathogenesis of AIDS. However, the pathway of apoptosis is not clearly defined. In this report we investigate the mechanism of apoptosis induced by HIV-1 Vpr using a Vpr pseudotype viral infection system or adeno delivery of Vpr in primary human lymphoid cells and T-cells. With either vector, HIV-1 Vpr induced cell cycle arrest at the G(2)/M phase and apoptosis in lymphoid target cells. Furthermore, we observed that with both vectors, caspase 9, but not caspase 8, was activated following infection of human peripheral blood mononuclear cell with either Vpr-positive HIV virions or adeno-delivered Vpr. Activation of the caspase 9 pathway resulted in caspase 3 activation and apoptosis in human primary cells. These effects were coincident with the disruption of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential and induction of cytochrome c release by Vpr. The Vpr-induced signaling pathway did not induce CD95 or CD95L expression. Bcl-2 overexpressing cells succumb to Vpr-induced apoptosis. These studies illustrate that Vpr induces a mitochondria-dependent apoptotic pathway that is distinct from apoptosis driven by the Fas-FasL pathway.     

Hoxc12 expression pattern in developing and cycling murine hair follicles

We examine the Hoxc12 RNA expression pattern during both hair follicle morphogenesis and cycling in direct comparison to its only upstream neighbor, Hoxc13. Expression of both genes is restricted to the epidermal part of the follicle excluding the outer root sheath and interfollicular epidermis in a distinct stage-dependent and cyclical manner. During the progressive growth phase (anagen) of developing and cycling follicles, the distinct proximo-distal expression domain of Hoxc12 overlaps only proximally, at the upper-most region of the bulb, with the more proximally restricted Hoxc13 domain. This arrangement of the expression domains of the two genes along the proximal-toward-distal axis of increasing follicular differentiation correlates with the sequential expression of first Hoxc13 and then Hoxc12. This indicates a reversal of the typical temporal colinearity of Hox gene activation otherwise observed along the anterior-posterior morphogenetic axis of the embryo (review: Cell 78 (1994) 191).     

Primary structural features of the<Emphasis Type="Italic"> S</Emphasis> haplotype-specific F-box protein,SFB, in<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Prunus</Emphasis>

The gene SFB encodes an F-box protein that has appropriate S-haplotype-specific variation to be the pollen determinant in the S-RNase-based gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI) reaction in Prunus (Rosaceae). To further characterize Prunus SFB, we cloned and sequenced four additional alleles from sweet cherry (P. avium), SFB ¹ , SFB ² , SFB ⁴ , and SFB ⁵ . These four alleles showed haplotype-specific sequence diversity similar to the other nine SFB alleles that have been cloned. In an amino acid alignment of Prunus SFBs, including the four newly cloned alleles, 121 out of the 384 sites were conserved and an additional 65 sites had only conservative replacements. Amino acid identity among the SFBs ranged from 66.0% to 82.5%. Based on normed variability indices (NVI), 34 of the non-conserved sites were considered to be highly variable. Most of the variable sites were located at the C-terminal region. A window-averaged plot of NVI indicated that there were two variable and two hypervariable regions. These variable and hypervariable regions appeared to be hydrophilic or at least not strongly hydrophobic, which suggests that these regions may be exposed on the surface and function in the allele specificity of the GSI reaction. Evidence of positive selection was detected using maximum likelihood methods with sites under positive selection concentrated in the variable and hypervariable regions.K. Ikeda and B. Igic contributed equally to this paperNucleotide sequence data reported will appear in the EMBL, GenBank and DDBJ nucleotide sequence databases under the accession numbers AB111518, AB111519, AB111520, and AB111521, for SFB ¹, SFB ², SFB ⁵, and SFB ⁴, respectively     

Exposure to herbivores increases seedling growth and survival of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) through decreased interspecific competition in canopy gaps

The successful development of early stages of blight‐resistant hybrid stock has increased hopes for restoration of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) to eastern North American forests. However, these forests have undergone substantial ecological change in the century since the functional extirpation of American chestnut, and it remains unknown to what extent American chestnut will be able to recolonize contemporary forests. In particular, high densities of white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and competition with mesophytic tree species such as maple (Acer) may impede chestnut regeneration, much as they affect oak (Quercus). We used a split‐plot analysis of variance (ANOVA) design to examine the effects of canopy gaps and herbivory on survival and growth of third generation backcrossed (BC₃) hybrid chestnut seedlings over two growing seasons in central Indiana, U.S.A. Only 4 of 588 (0.7%) seedlings in closed‐canopy plots survived to the end of the study, as opposed to 264 of 589 (45%) seedlings in gap plots. Within the gap treatment, fencing was associated with reduced chestnut survival as well as reduced herbivory and increased cover of non‐chestnut vegetation. Our results indicate that herbivory may indirectly benefit chestnut regeneration by suppressing competition. However, this beneficial effect is likely context‐dependent and additional work is needed to establish the conditions under which it occurs.     

Segregating the Effects of Seed Traits and Common Ancestry of Hardwood Trees on Eastern Gray Squirrel Foraging Decisions

The evolution of specific seed traits in scatter-hoarded tree species often has been attributed to granivore foraging behavior. However, the degree to which foraging investments and seed traits correlate with phylogenetic relationships among trees remains unexplored. We presented seeds of 23 different hardwood tree species (families Betulaceae, Fagaceae, Juglandaceae) to eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and measured the time and distance travelled by squirrels that consumed or cached each seed. We estimated 11 physical and chemical seed traits for each species, and the phylogenetic relationships between the 23 hardwood trees. Variance partitioning revealed that considerable variation in foraging investment was attributable to seed traits alone (27–73%), and combined effects of seed traits and phylogeny of hardwood trees (5–55%). A phylogenetic PCA (pPCA) on seed traits and tree phylogeny resulted in 2 “global” axes of traits that were phylogenetically autocorrelated at the family and genus level and a third “local” axis in which traits were not phylogenetically autocorrelated. Collectively, these axes explained 30–76% of the variation in squirrel foraging investments. The first global pPCA axis, which produced large scores for seed species with thin shells, low lipid and high carbohydrate content, was negatively related to time to consume and cache seeds and travel distance to cache. The second global pPCA axis, which produced large scores for seeds with high protein, low tannin and low dormancy levels, was an important predictor of consumption time only. The local pPCA axis primarily reflected kernel mass. Although it explained only 12% of the variation in trait space and was not autocorrelated among phylogenetic clades, the local axis was related to all four squirrel foraging investments. Squirrel foraging behaviors are influenced by a combination of phylogenetically conserved and more evolutionarily labile seed traits that is consistent with a weak or more diffuse coevolutionary relationship between rodents and hardwood trees rather than a direct coevolutionary relationship.     

Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Exhibit Increased Levels of Lysosomal Proteolysis as Compared to Other Human Dendritic Cell Populations

Background

Fine control of lysosomal degradation for limited processing of internalized antigens is a hallmark of professional antigen presenting cells. Previous work in mice has shown that dendritic cells (DCs) contain lysosomes with remarkably low protease content. Combined with the ability to modulate lysosomal pH during phagocytosis and maturation, murine DCs enhance their production of class II MHC-peptide complexes for presentation to T cells.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In this study we extend these findings to human DCs and distinguish between different subsets of DCs based on their ability to preserve internalized antigen. Whereas DCs derived in vitro from CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells or isolated from peripheral blood of healthy donors are protease poor, DCs derived in vitro from monocytes (MDDCs) are more similar to macrophages (MΦs) in protease content. Unlike other DCs, MDDCs also fail to reduce their intralysosomal pH in response to maturation stimuli. Indeed, functional characterization of lysosomal proteolysis indicates that MDDCs are comparable to MΦs in the rapid degradation of antigen while other human DC subtypes are attenuated in this capacity.

Conclusions/Significance

Human DCs are comparable to murine DCs in exhibiting a markedly reduced level of lysosomal proteolysis. However, as an important exception to this, human MDDCs stand apart from all other DCs by a heightened capacity for proteolysis that resembles that of MΦs. Thus, caution should be exercised when using human MDDCs as a model for DC function and cell biology.     

Molecular and Genetic Analyses of Four Nonfunctional S Haplotype Variants Derived from a Common Ancestral S Haplotype Identified in Sour Cherry (Prunus cerasus L.)

Tetraploid sour cherry (Prunus cerasus) has an S-RNase-based gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI) system; however, individuals can be either self-incompatible (SI) or self-compatible (SC). Unlike the situation in the Solanaceae, where self-compatibility accompanying polyploidization is often due to the compatibility of heteroallelic pollen, the genotype-dependent loss of SI in sour cherry is due to the compatibility of pollen containing two nonfunctional S haplotypes. Sour cherry individuals with the S₄S₆S_36aS_36b genotype are predicted to be SC, as only pollen containing both nonfunctional S_36a and S_36b haplotypes would be SC. However, we previously found that individuals of this genotype were SI. Here we describe four nonfunctional S₃₆ variants. Our molecular analyses identified a mutation that would confer loss of stylar S function for one of the variants, and two alterations that might cause loss of pollen S function for all four variants. Genetic crosses showed that individuals possessing two nonfunctional S₃₆ haplotypes and two functional S haplotypes have reduced self-fertilization due to a very low frequency of transmission of the one pollen type that would be SC. Our finding that the underlying mechanism limiting successful transmission of genetically compatible gametes does not involve GSI is consistent with our previous genetic model for Prunus in which heteroallelic pollen is incompatible. This provides a unique case in which breakdown of SI does not occur despite the potential to generate SC pollen genotypes.GAMETOPHYTIC self-incompatibility (GSI) is a widespread mechanism in flowering plants that prevents self-fertilization and promotes out-crossing (De Nettancourt 2001). In GSI plants, pollen tube growth is arrested if there is a match between the genes at the S-locus that control pollen and stylar specificity. The gene controlling stylar specificity in the Solanaceae, Rosaceae, and Plantaginaceae is known to encode a ribonuclease (S-RNase) (for a review see McClure 2009), while the gene controlling pollen specificity encodes an F-box protein [S haplotype-specific F-box protein (SFB) or S-locus F-box protein (SLF)] (Lai et al. 2002; Entani et al. 2003; Ushijima et al. 2003; Sijacic et al. 2004). As these two specificity genes are tightly linked and recombination between these two genes has never been observed (Ikeda et al. 2005), these two S-locus specificity genes are collectively termed the S haplotype.Characterization of the S haplotype is most advanced in Prunus (Rosaceae) due to the small physical size of the S haplotype region and the close proximity of the stylar S (S-RNase) and pollen S (SFB) genes (Entani et al. 2003; Ushijima et al. 2003; Yamane et al. 2003b; Ikeda et al. 2005). Within Prunus, sweet cherry (Prunus avium) and sour cherry (P. cerasus) represent a model diploid–tetraploid series that has been used to investigate the effects of polyploidy on GSI. Tetraploid sour cherry is considered to have arisen through hybridization between sweet cherry and tetraploid ground cherry (P. fruticosa) (Olden and Nybom 1968). Like sweet cherry, sour cherry exhibits an S-RNase-based GSI system (Yamane et al. 2001; Hauck et al. 2002; Tobutt et al. 2004) and interspecific crossing studies have demonstrated that sour cherry shares eight sweet cherry S haplotypes: S₁, S₄, S₆, S₉, S₁₂, S₁₃, S₁₄, and S₁₆ (Bošković et al. 2006; Hauck et al. 2006a,b; Tsukamoto et al. 2006, 2008). However, in contrast to sweet cherry, natural sour cherry selections include both self-incompatible (SI) and self-compatible (SC) types. A genetic model demonstrating that the genotype-dependent loss of SI in sour cherry is due to the accumulation of a minimum of two nonfunctional S haploytpes within a single individual was developed and validated (Hauck et al. 2006b). These nonfunctional S haplotypes were characterized as either pollen-part mutants or stylar-part mutants, depending on whether the pollen S or stylar S specificity was disrupted. In Prunus, pollen-part and stylar-part mutants are denoted by a prime symbol “′” or a subscribed “m,” respectively, following the S haplotype number (Tsukamoto et al. 2006). Molecular characterizations of five of the nonfunctional S haplotypes from sour cherry characterized to date support the genetic results because mutations were identified that affected the S-RNase and/or SFB. These changes in coding or regulatory regions included mutations within the S-RNase and/or SFB causing premature stop codons, transposable element insertions within SFB and upstream of the S-RNase, and a 23-bp deletion in a conserved region of the S-RNase (Yamane et al. 2003a; Hauck et al. 2006a; Tsukamoto et al. 2006).According to the genetic model, termed the “one-allele-match model,” sour cherry pollen is rejected if one or both of the functional S haplotypes in the 2x pollen grain match an S haplotype in the style (Hauck et al. 2006b). Therefore, only pollen containing two nonfunctional S haplotypes would be SC; thus, a sour cherry genotype is SC if it has a minimum of two nonfunctional S haplotypes. We previously tested the one-allele-match model using 92 sour cherry selections from four progeny populations (Hauck et al. 2006b). For all the progeny except three, their S genotype correctly predicted whether they were SI or SC. The three progeny individuals that were the exception all had the same genotype: S₄S₆S_aS_d. These individuals were predicted to be SC as the S_a and S_d haplotypes were shown to be nonfunctional in genetic studies and therefore S_aS_d pollen should be SC. However, these progeny were classified as SI on the basis of observations of self-pollen tube growth in the styles. The S_a and S_d haplotypes were originally distinguished on the basis of different RFLP fragment sizes using an S-RNase probe; the HindIII fragment sizes for S_a and S_d differed by ∼200 bp, 6.4-kb and 6.2-kb, respectively (Yamane et al. 2001; Hauck et al. 2002). However, partial S-RNase and SFB sequences from the S_a and S_d haplotypes were identical (N. R. Hauck and A. F. Iezzoni, unpublished results), suggesting that S_a and S_d represented different mutations of the same S haplotype. Therefore, we hypothesized that the SI phenotype of the S₄S₆S_aS_d individuals resulted from complementary pistil S and pollen S mutations in the nonfunctional S_a and S_d haplotypes, thus behaving genetically as one functional S haplotype.We previously reported that heteroallelic sour cherry pollen containing two different functional pollen S haplotypes is incompatible (Hauck et al. 2006b). This finding is counter to the well-documented phenomenon in the Solanaceae where SC accompanying polyploidization is frequently due to the SC of heteroallelic pollen (Lewis 1943; Golz et al. 1999, 2001; Tsukamoto et al. 2005; Xue et al. 2009). Therefore, models explaining the molecular basis of self-recognition in Prunus and the Solanaceae must be consistent with these differing genetic expectations. Recently, Huang et al. (2008) reported competitive interaction in a SC selection of tetraploid P. pseudocerasus, raising the possibility that the SC mechanism between these two tetraploid Prunus species could be different. However, although the data in Huang et al. (2008) are consistent with heteroallelic pollen being SC, homoallelic pollen (e.g., S₁S₁, S₅S₅, or S₇S₇) was not shown to be successful in compatible crosses and unsuccessful in incompatible ones. Therefore, it is possible that the SC in P. pseudocerasus could be caused by mutations in other genes critical for the SI reaction. Because of the importance of these differing genetic expectations for understanding S-RNase-based GSI, we sought to investigate our previously identified exceptions to the one-allele-match model. Specifically, our objective was to test our prior hypothesis that the nonfunctional S_a and S_d haplotypes interact in a complementary manner and therefore behave together genetically as a single functional S haplotype. In this work, the S_a and S_d haplotypes were renamed S_36a and S_36b, respectively, following the order of previously published S haplotypes (Tsukamoto et al. 2008; Vaughan et al. 2008) for reasons explained in the results.