Biological species and variation in arthroderma

Summary The distinctive peridial appendages ofArthroderma were of little value for the delimitation of species. The peridial appendages as well as the conidia of certain species were so similar as to be value-less for the delimitation of species. Further, morphological and physiological variation was found to be as great within, as between, species. The usual morphological methods for classifying species were, therefore, inadequate and the concept of biological species was considered.The following points were found to favor the applicability of biological species concepts. Nine of ten species were heterothallic which assured crossing. A gene pool, the result of sexual reproduction and an essential requirement of a biological species, was maintained. This was evidenced by complete fertility between isolates of the same species from diverse geographic areas. Finally, no hybridization between species was evident in over one hundred attempted crosses.Strains which were readily compatible and produced viable ascospores were considered to be members of the same species. Conversely, incompatible strains were differentiated into separate species. In this way over fifty strains from more than one hundred isolations were found to be members of ten species. Six of the species correlated with species previously described on morphological bases, and confirmed their validity. Four species were considered to be new. All four were previously confused withA. quadrifidum orA. cuniculi because they possessed similar types of conidia. Once separated on an incompatibility basis, they were found to possess characteristics of distinct species. The only reliable method for their differentiation, however, was found to be interspecific incompatibility.Several strains, some pathogens, were crossed with soil borne species ofArthroderma. Some mated but others did not. Several incompatible strains possessedArthroderma-like appendages and partial compatibility was indicated. Partial compatibility also occurred in certain interspecific crosses.     

Microbial toxins, their functional role and phylogenetic validity

Microbially produced toxins, which appear to lack a role in microbial survival, may be antimicrobial compounds of significance to the producers. These toxin/antibiotics may act against cell metabolism shared by man or animals and other microorganisms. Protein toxin/antibiotics are produced by single species of bacteria. Those from fungi and algae are nonprotein secondary metabolites and several microorganisms may make the same or similar toxin/antibiotics.     

Taxonomic implications of Prototheca and Chlorella cell wall polysaccharide characterization

Summary Four polysaccharide fractions were obtained by acid and alkaline degradation of purified cell walls of Prototheca spp. and Chlorella spp. These fractions were further hydrolyzed and the component sugars identified. Five Prototheca strains and two Chlorella protothecoides strains have essentially similar polysaccharide compositions, which significantly differ from those of C. vulgaris and C. pyrenoidosa. This emphasizes the close affinity of C. protothecoides to Prototheca spp. not shared by other Chlorella spp.     

Expression of the antibacterial peptide, cecropin, in cultured mammalian cells

We have stably transfected a Chinese hamster lung cell line V79 with a recombinant gene construct where the Drosophila cecropin A2 cDNA is under the control of Rous sarcoma virus, long terminal repeat (RSV LTR). We have not only been able to demonstrate expression at the RNA level by Northern analysis but also have detected an unprocessed peptide using an antiserum raised against Hyalophora cecropin.