Phytoene production utilizing the isoprenoid biosynthesis capacity of Thermococcus kodakarensis

Phytoene (C₄₀H₆₄) is an isoprenoid and a precursor of various carotenoids which are of industrial value. Archaea can be considered to exhibit a relatively large capacity to produce isoprenoids, as they are components of their membrane lipids. Here, we aimed to produce isoprenoids such as phytoene in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakarensis. T. kodakarensis harbors a prenyltransferase gene involved in the biosynthesis of farnesyl pyrophosphate and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, which are precursors of squalene and phytoene, respectively. However, homologs of squalene synthase and phytoene synthase, which catalyze their condensation reactions, are not found on the genome. Therefore, a squalene/phytoene synthase homolog from an acidothermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, Saci_1734, was introduced into the T. kodakarensis chromosome under the control of a strong promoter. Production of the Saci_1734 protein was confirmed in this strain, and the generation of phytoene was detected (0.08–0.75 mg L⁻¹ medium). We then carried out genetic engineering in order to increase the phytoene production yield. Disruption of an acetyl-CoA synthetase I gene involved in hydrolyzing acetyl-CoA, the precursor of phytoene, together with the introduction of a second copy of Saci_1734 led to a 3.4-fold enhancement in phytoene production.

     

The pH dependence of the allosteric response of human liver pyruvate kinase to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, ATP, and alanine

The allosteric regulation of human liver pyruvate kinase (hL-PYK) by fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (Fru-1,6-BP; activator), ATP (inhibitor) and alanine (Ala; inhibitor) was monitored over a pH range from 6.5 to 8.0 at 37 °C. As a function of increasing pH, hL-PYK’s affinity for the substrate phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), and for Fru-1,6-BP decreases, while affinities for ATP and alanine slightly increases. At pH 6.5, Fru-1,6-BP and ATP elicit only small allosteric impacts on PEP affinity. As pH increases, Fru-1,6-BP and ATP elicit greater allosteric responses, but the response to alanine is relatively constant. Since the magnitudes of the allosteric coupling for ATP and for alanine inhibition are different and the pH dependences of these magnitudes are not similar, these inhibitors likely elicit their responses using different molecular mechanisms. In addition, our results fail to support a general correlation between pH dependent changes in effector affinity and pH dependent changes in the corresponding allosteric response.