Do pollen beetles need pollen? The effect of pollen on oviposition,survival, and development of a flower‐feeding herbivore

Abstract.  1. Pollen is considered to be an important dietary component for many species of flower-feeding herbivores. Its influence on oviposition site selection by the pollen beetle Meligethes aeneus , and on the development of its larvae was investigated.
2. The effects of pollen presence and absence on adult, egg, and larval incidence in the field, and on larval development in the laboratory were compared through the use of Synergy, a composite hybrid oilseed rape Brassica napus variety comprising male-fertile (with pollen) and male-sterile (without pollen) plants.
3. In the field, adult females were more abundant on male-fertile plants during flowering, and a greater proportion of male-fertile than male-sterile buds were accepted for oviposition. These data indicate a possible role of pollen in oviposition site selection by female pollen beetles.
4. The numbers of first instar larvae on the two plant lines did not differ; however, more second instars were found on male-fertile than on male-sterile flowers. This suggests a greater larval survival on male-fertile plants, possibly due to the more readily available food resources and better nutrition afforded by the presence of pollen.
5. Laboratory experiments confirmed that a diet which included pollen improved survival to adulthood and resulted in heavier pupae and adults; however, pollen was not obligatory for larval survival and development.
6. The pollen beetle, previously thought to be an obligate pollen feeder, is therefore more generalist in its requirements for development. These findings may relate to the nutritional and behavioural ecology of other flower-feeding herbivores.     

Thermal properties of chemically modified cytochrome c

Differential scanning calorimetry was used as a probe to follow structural disturbances in cytochrome c with electrostatic modification. At 51.7% maleylation, the Td decreased 14.1 degrees C; however, relatively stable delta H values reflected minor structural variations. With 77.5 and 96.4% modification, a significant decrease in delta H was more indicative of major conformational change. On this basis, a critical labelling point was considered. Extensive maleylation (96.4%) did not result in complete cytochrome denaturation. In general, assessment of cytochrome thermal parameters by DSC provided a conformational perspective for the influence of specific electrostatic parameters on molecular integrity.     

5-Amino-4-imidazolecarboxamide is a mutagen in E. coli

5-Amino-4-imidazolecarboxamide (5A4IC), the base moiety of a common intermediate in de novo purine biosynthesis, was found to be mutagenic in E. coli. Using a series of mutants in the tryptophan synthetase A gene, 5A4IC was observed to cause transition and transversion mutations at similar levels. At 400 micrograms/ml in the growth medium, it stimulates the base substitution GC----AT 4.8-fold; AT----GC 20-fold; AT----CG (2 sites) an average of 6.0-fold; AT----TA 7.8-fold; and GC----CG 6.1-fold. The transversion GC----TA was not tested. In contrast to the base, 5-amino-4-imidazolecarboxamide riboside is not mutagenic at a similar molar concentration.     

Phytochrome Regulation of the Response to Exogenous Gibberellins by Epicotyls of Vigna sinensis

The elongation rate of cowpea epicotyls from whole cowpea (Vigna sinensis) seedlings and derooted and debladed plants (explants) increased after the main light period (8-hour duration) was extended with either continuous low intensity tungsten light or brief (5 minutes) far-red (FR) irradiation. This end-of-day FR effect was reversed by red (R) irradiation suggesting the involvement of phytochrome. These results confirm and extend those obtained previously with other species. Localization studies indicate the epicotyl to be the site of the photoreceptor. Treatment of cowpea seedlings with paclobutrazol, a gibberellin (GA) biosynthetic inhibitor, abolished the FR promoted epicotyl elongation, indicating a role for GAs in this process. There was no significant difference in epicotyl elongation rates of R plus FR irradiated explants treated with GA₁ or GA₂₀ and R irradiated explants treated with GA₁. However, R irradiation inhibited subsequent epicotyl elongation of GA₂₀ treated explants. Moreover, the observation, using GC-MS, that GA₁ and GA₂₀ are native GAs in cowpea lends support to the concept that phytochrome may control the conversion of endogenous GA₂₀ to GA₁ in cowpea.