康氏木霉纤维素酶系中C_x酶多分子型的分离纯化及某些性质

从康氐木霉(Trichoderma k(?)ningii)白色变异株As 3.4001的粗酶制剂中,获得了纤维素酶系中的一组C_x酶(C_(x1) C_(x2) C_(x3) C_(x4))。分离步骤包括Sephadex G-75凝胶过滤,DEAESephadex A-50离子交换层析,ConA-Sepharose亲合层析,SE-Sephadex C-50离子交换层析及聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳。C_(x1)与C_(x2)的分子量不同而所带电荷相同,它们的分子量各自为44,500和34,000。C_(x2)—C_(x4)的分子量相同而所带电荷不同。纯化的C_(x1)—C_(x4)经聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳鉴定为单带。比较它们对羧甲基纤维素钠(CMC-Na)的糖化力及液化力表明在作用方式的随机性上C_(x2)>C_(x3)>C_(x1)>C_(x4)。     

Multistage Friend erythroleukemia: independent origin of tumor clones with normal or rearranged p53 cellular oncogenes.

The erythroleukemia induced by Friend virus complex in adult mice is a multistage malignancy characterized by the emergence, late in the disease, of tumorigenic cell clones. We have previously shown that a significant proportion of these clones have unique rearrangements in their cellular p53 oncogene. The clonal relationships among Friend tumor cells isolated in the late stages of Friend erythroleukemia were analyzed by examining the unique integration site of Friend murine leukemia virus and the unique rearrangement in their cellular p53 oncogene. The majority of clones isolated from individual mice infected with Friend virus were clonally related as judged by the site of Friend murine leukemia virus integration. However, Southern gel analysis of DNA from individual Friend cell clones indicated that all of the clones with a normal p53 gene from the same mice were clonally related, but were unrelated to the Friend cell lines with a rearranged p53 gene. These results suggest that Friend tumor cells with rearrangements in their p53 gene arise as the result of a unique transformation event, rather than by progression from already existing tumor cells with a normal p53 gene. They also suggest that such rearrangements in the p53 gene confer a strong selective advantage to these cells in vivo.     

Repair of gamma-ray induced DNA strand breaks in the radiation-sensitive mutant rad18-2 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The repair of gamma-ray induced DNA single and double-strand breaks was looked at in wild type and rad18-2 strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae using sucrose gradient centrifugation. It was found that rad18-2 diploid cells could repair single and double-strand breaks induced by gamma-rays. It was also found that rad18-2 cells experienced a breakup of their DNA during post-irradiation incubation to a size smaller than seen in cells just receiving irradiation. This breakup of DNA in rad18-2 cells is not degradation due to cell death since wild type cells irradiated to similar low survival levels do not show this breakup of DNA with 8 h incubation. The breakup of DNA in rad18-2 cells is not due to replication gaps being formed by synthesis on a damaged template since treatment of rad18-2 a mating type cells with alpha factor, to prevent initiation of DNA synthesis, does not prevent breakup of the DNA.     

Expression of wild-type p53 is not compatible with continued growth of p53-negative tumor cells.

Inactivation of the cellular p53 gene is a common feature of Friend virus-induced murine erythroleukemia cell lines and may represent a necessary step in the progression of this disease. As well, frequent loss or mutation of p53 alleles in diverse human tumors is consistent with the view of p53 as a tumor suppressor gene. To examine the significance of p53 gene inactivation in tumorigenesis, we have attempted to express transfected wild-type p53 in three p53-negative tumor cell lines: murine DP16-1 Friend erythroleukemia cells, human K562 cells, and SKOV-3 cells. We found that aberrant p53 proteins, which differ from wild-type p53 by a single amino acid substitution, were expressed stably in these cells, whereas wild-type p53 expression was not tolerated. The inability of p53-negative tumor cell lines to support long-term expression of wild-type p53 protein is consistent with the view that p53 is a tumor suppressor gene.     

An international collaborative study on foot and mouth disease virus assay methods. 1. Virus infectivity and neutralizing antibody assays

In a collaborative study sponsored by the European Commission for the Control of Foot and Mouth Disease, workers in 19 laboratories participated in the early phases (1, 2 and 4). All three phases were devoted to assessments of virus infectivity and the neutralizing activity of sera. Virus preparations and antisera distributed from one laboratory were tested either by 'in house' or suggested methods. Analyses of the results clearly showed that whilst 'within' laboratory variation in the results of replicate tests was low, there were significant differences in the results from various laboratories. By attempting to standardize test conditions with distributed materials, e.g. media and cells, etc., the 'between' laboratory variation was reduced.     

Predicting Grizzly Bear Density in Western North America

Conservation of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) is often controversial and the disagreement often is focused on the estimates of density used to calculate allowable kill. Many recent estimates of grizzly bear density are now available but field-based estimates will never be available for more than a small portion of hunted populations. Current methods of predicting density in areas of management interest are subjective and untested. Objective methods have been proposed, but these statistical models are so dependent on results from individual study areas that the models do not generalize well. We built regression models to relate grizzly bear density to ultimate measures of ecosystem productivity and mortality for interior and coastal ecosystems in North America. We used 90 measures of grizzly bear density in interior ecosystems, of which 14 were currently known to be unoccupied by grizzly bears. In coastal areas, we used 17 measures of density including 2 unoccupied areas. Our best model for coastal areas included a negative relationship with tree cover and positive relationships with the proportion of salmon in the diet and topographic ruggedness, which was correlated with precipitation. Our best interior model included 3 variables that indexed terrestrial productivity, 1 describing vegetation cover, 2 indices of human use of the landscape and, an index of topographic ruggedness. We used our models to predict current population sizes across Canada and present these as alternatives to current population estimates. Our models predict fewer grizzly bears in British Columbia but more bears in Canada than in the latest status review. These predictions can be used to assess population status, set limits for total human-caused mortality, and for conservation planning, but because our predictions are static, they cannot be used to assess population trend.