Sex-ratio distorter of Drosophila simulans reduces male productivity and sperm competition ability

The aim of the present study was to determine whether the effects of sex-ratio segregation distorters on the fertility of male Drosophila simulans can explain the contrasting success of these X-linked meiotic drivers in different populations of the species. We compared the fertility of sex-ratio and wild-type males under different mating conditions. Both types were found to be equally fertile when mating was allowed, with two females per male, during the whole period of egg laying. By contrast sex-ratio males suffered a strong fertility disadvantage when they were offered multiple mates for a limited time, or in sperm competition conditions. In the latter case only, the toll on male fertility exceeded the segregation advantage of the distorters. These results indicate that sex-ratio distorters can either spread or disappear from populations, depending on the mating rate. Population density is therefore expected to play a major role in the evolution of sex-ratio distorters in this Drosophila species.     

Interspecific transfer of P elements by crosses between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana

Interspecific crosses were carried out between P element-transformed strains of D. simulans and a strain of D. mauritiana, a species devoid of this transposable element family. Four lines were established from hybrid females backcrossed with D. mauritiana males for four generations, and then maintained by intra-line mass mating. In situ hybridization of polytene chromosomes and southern blots showed that full-length and deleted P elements were present in all of the lines after 15 generations. We conclude that at least some of the P elements observed in two lines result from their transposition into D. mauritiana genome. Gonadal sterility, induced at 29°C in D. melanogaster by P elements also occurred with these two latter lines.     

Rapid rise and fall of selfish sex-ratio X chromosomes in Drosophila simulans: spatiotemporal analysis of phenotypic and molecular data

Sex-ratio drive, which has been documented in several Drosophila species, is induced by X-linked segregation distorters. Contrary to Mendel's law of independent assortment, the sex-ratio chromosome (X(SR)) is inherited by more than half the offspring of carrier males, resulting in a female-biased sex ratio. This segregation advantage allows X(SR) to spread in populations, even if it is not beneficial for the carriers. In the cosmopolitan species D. simulans, the Paris sex-ratio is caused by recently emerged selfish X(SR) chromosomes. These chromosomes have triggered an intragenomic conflict, and their propagation has been halted over a large area by the evolution of complete drive suppression. Previous molecular population genetics analyses revealed a selective sweep indicating that the invasion of X(SR) chromosomes was very recent in Madagascar (likely less than 100 years ago). Here, we show that X(SR) chromosomes are now declining at this location as well as in Mayotte and Kenya. Drive suppression is complete in the three populations, which display little genetic differentiation and share swept haplotypes, attesting to a common and very recent ancestry of the X(SR) chromosomes. Patterns of DNA sequence variation also indicate a fitness cost of the segmental duplication involved in drive. The data suggest that X(SR) chromosomes started declining first on the African continent, then in Mayotte, and finally in Madagascar and strongly support a scenario of rapid cycling of X chromosomes. Once drive suppression has evolved, standard X(ST) chromosomes locally replace costly X(SR) chromosomes in a few decades.     

Population transcriptomics: insights from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila simulans,</Emphasis><Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila sechellia</Emphasis> and their hybrids

Sequence differentiation has been widely studied between populations and species, whereas interest in expression divergence is relatively recent. Using microarrays, we compared four geographically distinct populations of Drosophila simulans and a population of Drosophila sechellia, and interspecific hybrids. We observed few differences between populations, suggesting a slight population structure in D. simulans. This structure was observed in direct population comparisons, as well as in interspecific comparisons (hybrids vs. parents, D. sechellia vs. D. simulans). Expression variance is higher in the French and Zimbabwean populations than in the populations from the ancestral range of D. simulans (Kenya and Seychelles). This suggests a large scale phenomenon of decanalization following the invasion of a new environment. Comparing D. simulans and D. sechellia, we revealed 304 consistently differentially expressed genes, with striking overrepresentation of genes of the cytochrome P450 family, which could be related to their role in detoxification as well as in hormone regulation. We also revealed differences in genes involved in Juvenile hormone and Dopamine differentiation. We finally observed very few differentially expressed genes between hybrids and parental populations, with an overrepresentation of X-linked genes.     

Sex Chromosome Drive

Sex chromosome drivers are selfish elements that subvert Mendel''s first law of segregation and therefore are overrepresented among the products of meiosis. The sex-biased progeny produced then fuels an extended genetic conflict between the driver and the rest of the genome. Many examples of sex chromosome drive are known, but the occurrence of this phenomenon is probably largely underestimated because of the difficulty to detect it. Remarkably, nearly all sex chromosome drivers are found in two clades, Rodentia and Diptera. Although very little is known about the molecular and cellular mechanisms of drive, epigenetic processes such as chromatin regulation could be involved in many instances. Yet, its evolutionary consequences are far-reaching, from the evolution of mating systems and sex determination to the emergence of new species.Meiotic drivers are selfish genetic elements that subvert Mendelian segregation during gametogenesis for their own benefit. They are passed on to most, if not all, of the functional gametes produced by heterozygotes. Therefore, drivers can increase in frequency and invade populations even if they reduce individual fitness, which is usually the case. The drivers are typically expressed in one sex, of which fertility is impaired. This also has deleterious consequences for the opposite sex and is expected to promote adaptations to counteract drive through sexual selection and sexual conflict. Furthermore, sex-linked meiotic drivers expressed in the heterogametic sex typically lead to biased offspring sex ratios, which represents an additional cost and can exacerbate the sexual conflict.Morgan et al. (1925) were the first to observe sex-biased offspring, which turned out to be caused by a sex-linked meiotic driver. Unfortunately, the Drosophila affinis strain was lost before any conclusive study could be performed. Later, Gershenson (1928) found that the offspring of some Drosophila obscura males were female biased. He showed that these males carried an X-linked genetic element (hereafter “sex ratio” or SR) responsible for the sex-ratio distortion, and showed that the SR did not affect the viability of the male offspring but acted as a gametic killer of Y-bearing sperm. Gamete killing or disabling is observed in males; in females, meiotic drive is usually a result of centromere competition for access to the egg.In its original definition (from Gershenson''s work and others), the term meiotic drive applies to the consequences of the mechanics of the meiotic divisions (Sandler and Novitski 1957). Here, under the term “sex chromosome drive,” we will include more broadly any case of preferential transmission that results directly or indirectly from an event that took place before, during, or after meiosis. Sex chromosome drive is different from sex-ratio adjustment, in which the favored chromosome is not the actor of its drive (West and Sheldon 2002). As emphasized by Sandler and Novitski (1957), it is also different from selection in the haploid phase as a consequence of the gamete''s intrinsic fitness.Only a few dozen cases of sex chromosome drive have been described, mainly in Drosophila and other Diptera (reviewed in Jaenike 2001; Burt and Trivers 2006). One possible explanation for the rarity of reported cases is that a biased sex ratio is not evolutionarily stable. Fisher (1930) predicted that natural selection will favor a 1:1 sex ratio, and that any deviation will be counterselected. This means that variants with counteracting effects can be selected at unlinked loci. Consistent with this prediction, autosomal drive suppressors and resistant Y chromosomes have been found in several Drosophila species (De Carvalho and Klaczko, 1994; Carvalho et al. 1997; Cazemajor et al. 1997). Three different cryptic X-linked SR systems have been described in the same species (Drosophila simulans: Paris, Winters, and Durham systems), showing that they can evolve repeatedly and be completely neutralized in the wild, remaining undetectable unless appropriate genetic crosses are performed (Merçot et al. 1995; Tao et al. 2001, 2007a). D. simulans also teaches us that the time window leading up to neutralization can be very narrow (Bastide et al. 2013). However, variants that enhance distortion can be selected if they are linked to the distorter. Inversions should prevent recombination with nondriving X chromosomes and keep together the loci that interact to induce drive, as found in D. pseudoobscura (Wu and Beckenbach 1983). These examples illustrate the extended genetic conflict that can result from the evolution of sex chromosome drive.Among the known cases of sex chromosome drive, X chromosome drive is much more common than Y chromosome drive. This may be because Y-linked drivers are always expressed, at each generation, unlike X-linked drivers. All else being equal, Y chromosome drive spreads faster and leads to a higher risk of extinction owing to the lack of females (Hamilton 1967). Furthermore, when the sex chromosomes are well differentiated, the Y chromosome usually has many fewer genes, which may provide fewer opportunities for a driver to evolve. On the other hand, heteromorphic sex chromosomes are expected to facilitate the evolution of meiotic drive. Indeed, the more divergent the sex chromosomes are, the less they recombine, reducing the risk of producing a suicide chromosome that carries both the driver and a sensitive allele at the target locus (Charlesworth and Hartl 1978; Frank 1991; Hurst and Pomiankowski 1991).     

Comparaison du polymorphisme à des locus homologues dans les espèces jumelles D. melanogaster et D. simulans

A comparison of polymorphism at homologous loci between the sibling species D. melanogaster and D. simulans. — Change in frequency of homologous mutant genes sepia and vermilion in the sibling species D. melanogaster and D. simulans in competition against their wild-type alleles was followed in population cages. For each locus, allelic frequencies reach the same equilibrium level in the two species: about 0.32 for sepia and 0.27 for vermilion.These results strongly support the conclusion that selection at the sepia and vermilion loci themselves is responsible for the maintenance and the level of polymorphism at these loci, since the same type of evolution can be observed in both species without the genetic differences between these sibling species appearing to interfere.

---

---

Equipe de Recherche associée au C.N.R.S. No 406: Analyse et mécanismes de maintien du polymorphisme.     

Variability within the Seychelles Cytoplasmic Incompatibility System in Drosophila Simulans

In Drosophila simulans, we described a cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) system (Seychelles) restricted to insular populations that harbor the mitochondrial type SiI. Since then, these populations have been shown to be heterogeneous, some being infected by one Wolbachia genetic variant only (wHa), while others are infected simultaneously by wHa and by another variant (wNo) always found in association with wHa. We have experimentally obtained two D. simulans strains only infected by the wNo variant. This variant determines its own cytoplasmic incompatibility type. In particular, the cross between wNo-bearing flies and wHa-bearing ones is bidirectionally incompatible. The Seychelles CI type, stricto sensu, is distinguished by being determined by the simultaneous presence of two Wolbachia variants that we found to be mutually incompatible. In addition, we observed incomplete maternal transmission of the Wolbachia.     

Geographic Distribution and Inheritance of Three Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Types in Drosophila Simulans

Wolbachia-like microorganisms have been implicated in unidirectional cytoplasmic incompatibility between strains of Drosophila simulans. Reduced egg eclosion occurs when females from uninfected strains (type W) are crossed with males from infected strains (type R). Here we characterize a third incompatibility type (type S) which is also correlated with the presence of Wolbachia-like microorganisms. Despite the fact that the symbionts cannot be morphologically distinguished, we observed complete bidirectional incompatibility between R and S strains. This indicates that the determinants of incompatibility are different in the two infected types. S/W incompatibility is unidirectional and similar to R/W incompatibility. A worldwide survey of D. simulans strains showed that type S incompatibility was found only in insular populations which harbor the mitochondrial type SiI. Both W and R types were found among mainland and island populations harboring the worldwide mitochondrial type SiII. Type S incompatibility could be involved in the reinforcement of the geographical isolation of SiI populations.     

Female-driven mechanisms,ejaculate size and quality contribute to the lower fertility of <Emphasis Type="Italic">sex-ratio</Emphasis> distorter males in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila simulans</Emphasis>

Background  

Sex-ratio meiotic drive refers to the preferential transmission of the X chromosome by XY males. The loss of Y-bearing sperm is caused by an X-linked distorter and results in female-biased progeny. The fertility of sex-ratio (SR) males expressing the distorter is usually strongly reduced compared to wild-type males, especially when they are in competition. The aim of this study was to identify the post-copulatory mechanisms that lower the fertility of SR males in Drosophila simulans. Parameters contributing to male fertility were measured in single and double mating conditions.     

Evolution of the chromosomal location of rDNA genes in two Drosophila species subgroups: ananassae and melanogaster

The evolution of the chromosomal location of ribosomal RNA gene clusters and the organization of heterochromatin in the Drosophila melanogaster group were investigated using fluorescence in situ hybridization and DAPI staining to mitotic chromosomes. The investigation of 18 species (11 of which were being examined for the first time) belonging to the melanogaster and ananassae subgroups suggests that the ancestral configuration consists of one nucleolus organizer (NOR) on each sex chromosome. This pattern, which is conserved throughout the melanogaster subgroup, except in D. simulans and D. sechellia, was observed only in the ercepeae complex within the ananassae subgroup. Both sex-linked NORs must have been lost in the lineage leading to D. varians and in the ananassae and bipectinata complexes, whereas new sites, characterized by intra-species variation in hybridization signal size, appeared on the fourth chromosome related to heterochromatic rearrangements. Nucleolar material is thought to be required for sex chromosome pairing and disjunction in a variety of organisms including Drosophila. Thus, either remnant sequences, possibly intergenic spacer repeats, are still present in the sex chromosomes which have lost their NORs (as observed in D. simulans and D. sechellia), or an alternative mechanism has evolved.