Where to sleep in a rural landscape? A comparative study of resting sites pattern in two syntopic Martes species

The niche‐complementarity hypothesis predicts that two sympatric species must differ in their requirements for one of the three main ecological dimensions (i.e. habitat use, diet, and activity time) to coexist. European pine marten Martes martes and stone marten M. foina are syntopic medium‐sized mustelids with very similar morphology and ecology for which resting sites are a key resource. To better understand how these species coexist, we investigated whether key features of their resting site pattern (number of resting sites, area over which they are distributed, main habitat type used for resting) differed. We used diurnal telemetry to identify resident individuals (e.g. spatially stable individuals over time) and to locate them during resting periods in a fragmented forested area in France. Stone marten used fewer resting sites distributed over a smaller surface area than pine marten. Most stone marten resting sites were located in open habitat (83%) in the proximity of human habitations, whereas pine martens rested almost exclusively in forest (98%). Sex, age, and season explained some variability in both the number of resting sites and the probability of resting within forested habitat for stone marten but not pine marten. The area covered by resting sites was larger in males than in females, but age modulated this difference in an opposite way for the two species. Such a pattern was expected given the intra‐sexual territoriality and the reproductive phenology of these species. Overall, stone marten showed higher inter‐individual variability in resting site pattern than pine marten. The particular pattern observed in subadult male stone martens during summer (increase in resting site surface area and in the probability to rest in forest) may reflect an attempt to settle in forests, and we discuss these implications in the context of interspecific competition.     

Socio-economic and ecological impacts of global protected area expansion plans

Several global strategies for protected area (PA) expansion have been proposed to achieve the Convention on Biological Diversity''s Aichi target 11 as a means to stem biodiversity loss, as required by the Aichi target 12. However, habitat loss outside PAs will continue to affect habitats and species, and PAs may displace human activities into areas that might be even more important for species persistence. Here we measure the expected contribution of PA expansion strategies to Aichi target 12 by estimating the extent of suitable habitat available for all terrestrial mammals, with and without additional protection (the latter giving the counterfactual outcome), under different socio-economic scenarios and consequent land-use change to 2020. We found that expanding PAs to achieve representation targets for ecoregions under a Business-as-usual socio-economic scenario will result in a worse prognosis than doing nothing for more than 50% of the world''s terrestrial mammals. By contrast, targeting protection towards threatened species can increase the suitable habitat available to over 60% of terrestrial mammals. Even in the absence of additional protection, an alternative socio-economic scenario, adopting progressive changes in human consumption, leads to positive outcomes for mammals globally and to the largest improvements for wide-ranging species.     

The quest for spatio-temporal control of CAR T cells

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are synthetic receptors capable of directing potent antigen-specific anti-tumor T cell responses. A recent report by Wu et al. extends a series of strategies aiming to curb excessive T cell activity, utilizing in this instance a chemical dimerizer to aggregate antigen-binding, T cell-activating and costimulatory domains.Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy relies on T cell engineering to generate tumor-targeted T cells with enhanced anti-tumor functions¹. CAR therapy has so far achieved its most remarkable clinical successes against CD19-positive hematological malignancies and is now on the verge of being developed for solid tumors². Two safety concerns have, however, emerged from the CD19 experience, which should be addressed for CAR therapy to be broadly applicable. One is the eventual on-target/off-tumor effect of CAR T cells on normal tissues. Even though this concern may be mitigated in the case of CD19 CAR T cell-induced B cell aplasia, strategies designed to reduce or prevent its potential occurrence with other targets are needed². The other concern is a severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS), arising from large-scale synchronized T cell activation upon engaging the target antigen in some CAR T cell recipients².Several innovative strategies have been recently proposed to address these safety concerns. These strategies make use of remote or cell autonomous controls (Figure 1), utilizing small molecules, antibodies or synthetic receptors to regulate T cell activity. One approach is to activate a latent suicide switch, such as the inducible caspase-9 (iCasp9) enzyme, through the administration of a small molecule to induce T cell apoptosis³ (Figure 1a). Bifunctional small molecules that mediate the binding between antigen and CAR have also been developed to regulate target engagement⁴ (Figure 1b). A variation on this approach uses antibodies to mediate antigen recognition on target cells and binding of T cells expressing a synthetic Fc receptor⁵ (Figure 1b). These designs enable remote temporal control of T cell activity but do not provide a means to enhance tumor selectivity of the CAR T cells. To this end, combinatorial approaches integrating two autonomous antigen inputs to control CAR T cell functions have been developed to spatially discriminate between normal and tumor cells expressing a common target. One such approach utilizes synthetic inhibitory receptors, termed iCARs, which are derived from the PD-1 or CTLA-4 receptors, to protect normal cells based on the iCAR''s recognition of an antigen present on the normal cells but not the tumor cells⁶ (Figure 1c). Another approach utilizes complementary signals split between two receptors — a CAR for T cell activation and a chimeric costimulatory receptor (CCR) providing costimulation — such that they are both expressed by the tumor cells but found alone on normal cells⁷ (Figure 1d). Acting in cell autonomous fashion, the required co-engagement of the CCR and the CAR upon recognition of two independent antigens reinforces tumor selectivity in vivo⁷.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Building controls into engineered T cells. (a) The small molecule AP1903 can dimerize the suicide switch iCasp9 to induce T cell apoptosis. (b) Bifunctional small molecule bridging the binding between antigen and CAR or antibody mediating the interaction between antigen and synthetic Fc receptor can be remote controls of CAR T cells. (c) iCAR can inhibit CAR function in the presence of an antigen present in normal cells but not tumor cells. (d) CCR binding to a second antigen in tumor cells is required for full T cell activation. (e) The small molecule AP21976 can dimerize two independent signaling entities through an FKBP-FRB module to control T cell activation. (a, b, e) Strategies employing one remote control (antibody or small molecule) in addition to one autonomous control (antigen A). (c, d) Strategies with two autonomous controls (antigen A and antigen B). Negative regulation involves inducing apoptosis (a) or turning off T cell activation (c) by input 2 while positive regulation (b, d, e) results in T cell activation by input 2.In a recent paper published in Science, Wu et al.⁸ showed a novel design incorporating a remote control of CAR T cells, whereby a small molecule is used to dimerize antigen-binding and signaling domains (Figure 1e). At variance with the small molecule-controlled suicide switch, this ON-switch design represents a positive reversible regulation, as it does not eliminate T cells but rather restricts their activities. The remote control takes advantage of well-established chemically induced dimerization (CID) modules developed in the 1990s, where two proteins bind only in the presence of a third chemical, such as a small molecule⁹. One such widely used CID module is the FKBP and FRB_T2098L that heterodimerize in the presence of rapamycin or its less immunosuppressive analog AP21976. The receptor for antigen and a dual-signaling, costimulatory and activating domain analogous to that of a second generation CAR, were independently fused to FKBP and FRB_T2098L so that AP21976-induced FKBP and FRB_T2098L dimerization could aggregate these entities (Figure 1e). This design controls intracellular assembly of a signaling complex without affecting the antigen binding properties as afforded by the bifunctional small molecules or antibodies at the interface of T cells and target cells (Figure 1b). After screening various domain configurations in leukemic Jurkat cells with AP21976-dependent NFAT activation and IL-2 production assays, a design that worked with both the FKBP-FRB_T2098L and the gibberellin-induced GID1-GAI heterodimerization modules was identified. Single molecule imaging of ON-switch CAR assembly in Jurkat cells showed that two molecular parts are equally constrained to immobilized antigens only in the presence of AP21976. Subsequent characterization of the ON-switch CAR in primary human CD4⁺ T cells showed that both AP21976 and antigen are required for the induction of CD69 expression, a biomarker of T cell activation, the secretion of both IL-2 and IFNγ, and the proliferation of CD4⁺ cells. Most gratifyingly, there was a positive correlation between these responses and the AP21976 dosage, suggesting the possibility of achieving titratable control of T cells. Human primary CD8⁺ T cells with ON-switch CAR in three different cytotoxicity assays also demonstrated antigen- and AP21976-dependent killing of tumor cells, which was also titratable by AP21976. The killing ability of ON-switch CAR CD8⁺ T cells was reversible, as removal of AP21976 abrogated tumor cell lysis.Wu et al. proceeded to explore in vivo activity in a mouse xenograft model. Due to the short plasma half-life and the high cost of AP21976, the study is limited to a very short-term protocol of 39 h. Tumor cells were injected into the peritoneal cavity 14 h prior to the injection of the engineered T cells. Four injections of AP21976 in the subsequent 25 h were required to induce anti-tumor activity in this intraperitoneal cytotoxicity assay. Further investigations with a more relevant protocol allowing for tumor engraftment and longer term follow-up of T cell effectiveness will be needed to establish whether AP21976 can remotely control ON-switch CAR T cells to reject a tumor.Wu and coauthors have thus engineered a novel ON-switch CAR design and demonstrated titratable, reversible and antigen-dependent T cell functions controlled by a dimerizing small molecule. Another group is also conducting preclinical studies exploring a variant small molecule-controlled CAR design for solid tumor rejection¹⁰. However, there are still challenges to address before future clinical applications. The authors pointed out the need to develop controller chemicals that have clinically optimized pharmacokinetic properties, as the half-life of AP21976 is short and impractical for clinical application. Thus, how many injections per day, for how many weeks or months, would be required to achieve tumor rejection? Another unresolved question is whether a small molecule with optimal pharmacokinetic properties could effectively curb CRS and off-tumor reactivity. Overall, this elegant study provides valuable insights for further refining spatio-temporal control of cell therapy and applying it to CAR T cell technology.     

RUN and FYVE domain–containing protein 4 enhances autophagy and lysosome tethering in response to Interleukin-4

Autophagy is a key degradative pathway coordinated by external cues, including starvation, oxidative stress, or pathogen detection. Rare are the molecules known to contribute mechanistically to the regulation of autophagy and expressed specifically in particular environmental contexts or in distinct cell types. Here, we unravel the role of RUN and FYVE domain–containing protein 4 (RUFY4) as a positive molecular regulator of macroautophagy in primary dendritic cells (DCs). We show that exposure to interleukin-4 (IL-4) during DC differentiation enhances autophagy flux through mTORC1 regulation and RUFY4 induction, which in turn actively promote LC3 degradation, Syntaxin 17–positive autophagosome formation, and lysosome tethering. Enhanced autophagy boosts endogenous antigen presentation by MHC II and allows host control of Brucella abortus replication in IL-4–treated DCs and in RUFY4-expressing cells. RUFY4 is therefore the first molecule characterized to date that promotes autophagy and influences endosome dynamics in a subset of immune cells.     

Finerenone Impedes Aldosterone-dependent Nuclear Import of the Mineralocorticoid Receptor and Prevents Genomic Recruitment of Steroid Receptor Coactivator-1

Aldosterone regulates sodium homeostasis by activating the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Hyperaldosteronism leads todeleterious effects on the kidney, blood vessels, and heart. Although steroidal antagonists such as spironolactone and eplerenone are clinically useful for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, they are associated with several side effects. Finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal MR antagonist, is presently being evaluated in two clinical phase IIb trials. Here, we characterized the molecular mechanisms of action of finerenone and spironolactone at several key steps of the MR signaling pathway. Molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches allowed identification of Ser-810 and Ala-773 as key residues for the high MR selectivity of finerenone. Moreover, we showed that, in contrast to spironolactone, which activates the S810L mutant MR responsible for a severe form of early onset hypertension, finerenone displays strict antagonistic properties. Aldosterone-dependent phosphorylation and degradation of MR are inhibited by both finerenone and spironolactone. However, automated quantification of MR subcellular distribution demonstrated that finerenone delays aldosterone-induced nuclear accumulation of MR more efficiently than spironolactone. Finally, chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that, as opposed to spironolactone, finerenone inhibits MR, steroid receptor coactivator-1, and RNA polymerase II binding at the regulatory sequence of the SCNN1A gene and also remarkably reduces basal MR and steroid receptor coactivator-1 recruitment, unraveling a specific and unrecognized inactivating mechanism on MR signaling. Overall, our data demonstrate that the highly potent and selective MR antagonist finerenone specifically impairs several critical steps of the MR signaling pathway and therefore represents a promising new generation MR antagonist.