IL-1 serves as a secondary signal for IL-9 expression.

IL-9 is produced in vitro by activated CD4+ T cell lines of the Th2 subtype and by naive CD4+ T cells. Here we show that T cell lines stimulated with Con A in the presence of accessory cells (AC) such as irradiated spleen cells or bone marrow-derived macrophages produced substantially more IL-9 than T cells stimulated with Con A alone. These data suggest that AC influence the production of IL-9 through accessory signals that result in an at least 10-fold increase of IL-9 secretion by the respective T cells. Addition of IL-1 to T cells activated by Con A, PHA, or anti-CD3 antibodies revealed that this monokine was responsible for the potentiation of IL-9 production. This finding was confirmed by applying anti-IL-1 antibodies. The production of other lymphokines, namely, IL-3, IL-4, and IL-6, by activated T cells was not or only marginally enhanced in the presence of AC or IL-1, thus indicating that the synthesis of IL-9 is regulated differently from that of other Th2-derived lymphokines. Furthermore, it was demonstrated by Northern blot analysis that IL-1 increases IL-9 expression at the pretranslational level. Because IL-1 alone failed to induce the production of IL-9 by T cells, this monokine acts as a costimulator in combination with a T cell receptor-mediated signal.     

Stereospecific activity of 1-O-alkyl-2-O-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine and comparison of analogs in the degranulation of platelets and neutrophils

1-O-Hexadecyl-2-O-acetyl-$\text{sn}$-glycero-3-phosphocholine (platelet activating factor) stimulated the degranulation of rabbit platelets and human neutrophils, whereas the enantiomer, 3-O-hexadecyl-2-O-acetyl-$\text{sn}$-glycero-1-phosphocholine, was inactive. The analogs compared had the following relative potencies in degranulating platelets and neutrophils: 1-O-hexadecyl-2-O-acetyl-$\text{sn}$-glycero-3-phosphocholine > 1-O-hexadecyl-2-O-ethyl-$\text{sn}$-glycero-3-phosphocholine >$\text{rac}$-1-O-octadecyl-2-O-ethylglycero-3-phosphocholine = 1-O-hexadecyl-2-O-methyl-$\text{sn}$-glycero-3-phosphocholine >$\text{rac}$-1-O-dodecyl-2-O-ethyl-glycero-3-phosphocholine. The deacetylated compound, 1-O-hexadecyl-2-lyso-$\text{sn}$-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and 1-O-hexadecyl-2,2-dimethylpropanediol-3-phosphocholine were inactive. The active analogs selectively desensitized the response to each other in the neutrophils. It is suggested that these compounds may activate cells through interaction with a stereospecific receptor.     

Oxidase (donor: oxygen oxidoreductase) activity by peroxidase and alpha2-macroglobulin interaction.

The interaction between peroxidase (donor: hydrogenperoxide oxidoreductase, EC 1.11.1.7) and human alpha2-macroglobulin has been studied by employing starch gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometric assay analysis.     

Genetic analysis of the pyruvate decarboxylase reaction in yeast glycolysis.

Six different pyruvate decarboxylase mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae were isolated. They belong to two unlinked complementation groups. Evidence is presented that one group is affected in a structural gene. The fact that five of the six mutants had residual pyruvate decarboxylase activity provided the opportunity for an intensive physiological characterization. It was shown that the loss of enzyme activity in vitro is reflected in a lower fermentation rate, an increased pyruvate secretion, and slower growth on a 2% glucose medium. The different effects of antimycin A on leaky mutants grown on ethanol versus the same mutants grown on glucose support the view that glucose induces some of the glycolytic enzymes, especially pyruvate decarboxylase.     

Innate defense against influenza A virus: activity of human neutrophil defensins and interactions of defensins with surfactant protein D

Surfactant protein D (SP-D) plays important roles in innate host defense against influenza A virus (IAV) infection, in part by modifying interactions with neutrophils. Human neutrophil defensins (HNPs) inhibit infectivity of enveloped viruses, including IAV. Our goal in this study was to characterize antiviral interactions between SP-D and HNPs. Recombinant and/or natural forms of SP-D and related collectins and HNPs were tested for antiviral activity against two different strains of IAV. HNPs 1 and 2 did not inhibit viral hemagglutination activity, but they interfered with the hemagglutination-inhibiting activity of SP-D. HNPs had significant viral neutralizing activity against divergent IAV strains. However, the HNPs generally had competitive effects when combined with SP-D in assays using an SP-D-sensitive IAV strain. In contrast, cooperative antiviral effects were noted in some instances when relatively SP-D-resistant strains were treated with SP-D and HNPs. HNPs were found to bind to the neck and/or carbohydrate recognition domain of SP-D. This binding was specific because no, or minimal, binding to other collectins was found. HNPs precipitated SP-D from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and reduced the antiviral activity of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. HNP-1 and -2 differed somewhat in their independent antiviral activity and their binding to SP-D. These results are relevant to the early phase of host defense against IAV, and suggest a complex interplay between SP-D and HNPs at sites of active inflammation.