The what,how and why of doing macroecology

Macroecology is a growing and important subdiscipline of ecology, but it is becoming increasingly diffuse, without an organizing principle that is widely agreed upon. I highlight two main current views of macroecology: as the study of large‐scale systems and as the study of emergent systems. I trace the history of both these views through the writings of the founders of macroecology. I also highlight the transmutation principle that identifies serious limitations to the study of large‐scale systems with reductionist approaches. And I suggest that much of the underlying goal of macroecology is the pursuit of general principles and the escape from contingency. I highlight that there are many intertwined aspects of macroecology, with a number of resulting implications. I propose that returning to a focus on studying assemblages of a large number of particles is a helpful view. I propose defining macroecology as “the study at the aggregate level of aggregate ecological entities made up of large numbers of particles for the purposes of pursuing generality”.     

Selectively bred oysters can alter their biomineralization pathways,promoting resilience to environmental acidification

Commercial shellfish aquaculture is vulnerable to the impacts of ocean acidification driven by increasing carbon dioxide (CO₂) absorption by the ocean as well as to coastal acidification driven by land run off and rising sea level. These drivers of environmental acidification have deleterious effects on biomineralization. We investigated shell biomineralization of selectively bred and wild‐type families of the Sydney rock oyster Saccostrea glomerata in a study of oysters being farmed in estuaries at aquaculture leases differing in environmental acidification. The contrasting estuarine pH regimes enabled us to determine the mechanisms of shell growth and the vulnerability of this species to contemporary environmental acidification. Determination of the source of carbon, the mechanism of carbon uptake and use of carbon in biomineral formation are key to understanding the vulnerability of shellfish aquaculture to contemporary and future environmental acidification. We, therefore, characterized the crystallography and carbon uptake in the shells of S. glomerata, resident in habitats subjected to coastal acidification, using high‐resolution electron backscatter diffraction and carbon isotope analyses (as δ¹³C). We show that oyster families selectively bred for fast growth and families selected for disease resistance can alter their mechanisms of calcite crystal biomineralization, promoting resilience to acidification. The responses of S. glomerata to acidification in their estuarine habitat provide key insights into mechanisms of mollusc shell growth under future climate change conditions. Importantly, we show that selective breeding in oysters is likely to be an important global mitigation strategy for sustainable shellfish aquaculture to withstand future climate‐driven change to habitat acidification.     

Long-term changes in temperate marine fish assemblages are driven by a small subset of species

The species composition of plant and animal assemblages across the globe has changed substantially over the past century. How do the dynamics of individual species cause this change? We classified species into seven unique categories of temporal dynamics based on the ordered sequence of presences and absences that each species contributes to an assemblage time series. We applied this framework to 14,434 species trajectories comprising 280 assemblages of temperate marine fishes surveyed annually for 20 or more years. Although 90% of the assemblages diverged in species composition from the baseline year, this compositional change was largely driven by only 8% of the species' trajectories. Quantifying the reorganization of assemblages based on species shared temporal dynamics should facilitate the task of monitoring and restoring biodiversity. We suggest ways in which our framework could provide informative measures of compositional change, as well as leverage future research on pattern and process in ecological systems.     

Fidelity of mitotic double-strand-break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a role for SAE2/COM1

Errors associated with the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) include point mutations caused by misincorporation during repair DNA synthesis or novel junctions made by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). We previously demonstrated that DNA synthesis is approximately 100-fold more error prone when associated with DSB repair. Here we describe a genetic screen for mutants that affect the fidelity of DSB repair. The substrate consists of inverted repeats of the trp1 and CAN1 genes. Recombinational repair of a site-specific DSB within the repeat yields TRP1 recombinants. Errors in the repair process can be detected by the production of canavanine-resistant (can1) mutants among the TRP1 recombinants. In wild-type cells the recombinational repair process is efficient and fairly accurate. Errors resulting in can1 mutations occur in <1% of the TRP1 recombinants and most appear to be point mutations. We isolated several mutant strains with altered fidelity of recombination. Here we characterize one of these mutants that revealed an approximately 10-fold elevation in the frequency of can1 mutants among TRP1 recombinants. The gene was cloned by complementation of a coincident sporulation defect and proved to be an allele of SAE2/COM1. Physical analysis of the can1 mutants from sae2/com1 strains revealed that many were a novel class of chromosome rearrangement that could reflect break-induced replication (BIR) and NHEJ. Strains with either the mre11s-H125N or rad50s-K81I alleles had phenotypes in this assay that are similar to that of the sae2/com1Delta strain. Our data suggest that Sae2p/Com1p plays a role in ensuring that both ends of a DSB participate in a recombination event, thus avoiding BIR, possibly by regulating the nuclease activity of the Mre11p/Rad50p/Xrs2p complex.     

Neutral and non-neutral macroecology

Because of the multiscalar nature of processes underlying biodiversity dynamics, macroecology has emerged as a discipline that seeks to build an understanding of this complexity by examining statistical patterns in large assemblages of species in geographic space and ecological time. Models that assume individual organisms within trophically defined assemblages are ecologically equivalent can produce many patterns identified by macroecology. Neutral models predict two important dynamical patterns that can be tested in real assemblages. First, they predict that species diversity will decline within an assemblage over time. The rate of this decay in species diversity can be predicted from estimates of migration rates from a “metacommunity” or species pool. Second, neutral models predict a divergence of species composition among local communities over time. The rate and degree of divergence among communities also depend on the migration rate. The few studies that have been done to date imply that the rate of migration in real species assemblages is much lower than that required to explain the degree of community similarity maintained in space and time. There are at least two alternative ways to extend neutral models to incorporate more biological realism. First, competitive asymmetries among species may be introduced to allow for the possibility that individuals of some species may have an advantage in replacing individuals that die. Second, environmental heterogeneity can be introduced by assuming sites available to individuals differ in quality to individuals of different species. The neutral model, because of its conceptual simplicity and rigor, should be considered as a null model for baseline comparison to actual patterns of distribution, abundance, species composition, and beta diversity.

Zusammenfassung

Wegen der multiskalaren Natur der Prozesse, die der Biodiversitätsdynamik zugrunde liegen, entstand die Makroökologie als eine Disziplin, die anstrebt ein Verständnis dieser Komplexität zu schaffen, indem sie statistische Muster in großen Vergesellschaftungen von Arten im geografischen Raum und ökologischer Zeit untersucht. Modelle, die davon ausgehen, dass individuelle Organismen innerhalb trophisch definierter Vergesellschaftungen ökologisch äquivalent sind, können viele Muster erzeugen, die durch die Makroökologie indentifiziert werden. Neutrale Modelle sagen zwei wichtige dynamische Muster vorher, die in realen Vergesellschaftungen getestet werden können. Als Erstes sagen sie vorher, dass die Artendiversität in einer Vergesellschaftung mit der Zeit abnehmen wird. Die Rate der Abnahme der Artendiversität kann über Schätzungen der Migrationsraten aus einer Metagemeinschaft bzw. einem Artenpool vorhergesagt werden. Als Zweites sagen neutrale Modelle eine Divergenz der Artenzusammensetzung zwischen den lokalen Gemeinschaften mit der Zeit vorher. Die Rate und der Grad der Divergenz zwischen den Gemeinschaften hängt ebenfalls von der Migrationsrate ab. Die wenigen Untersuchungen, die bis heute gemacht wurden, implizieren, dass die Rate der Migration in realen Artenvergesellschaftungen viel geringer als erforderlich sind, um den Grad der Gemeinschaftsähnlichkeit zu erklären, der in Raum und Zeit aufrecht erhalten wird. Es gibt mindestens zwei alternative Weisen neutrale Modelle zu erweitern, um mehr biologische Realität mit einzubeziehen. Als Erstes können Asymmetrien der Konkurrenz unter Arten einbezogen werden, um die Möglichkeit zu zulassen, dass Individuen einiger Arten einen Vorteil bei der Ersetzung von sterbenden Individuen haben. Als Zweites kann die Umweltheterogenität mit einbezogen werden, indem angenommen wird, dass sich die verfügbaren Standorte in ihrer Qualität für Individuen verschiedener Arten unterscheiden. Wegen seiner konzeptuellen Einfachheit und Starrheit sollte das neutrale Modell als Null-Modell für grundlegende Vergleiche von Verbreitung, Abundanz, Artenzusammensetzung und Betadiversität angesehen werden.