Unusual growth pattern in the Frasnian alveolitids (Tabulata) from the Holy Cross Mountains (Poland)

Abstract: Growth periodicity is a phenomenon occurring in fossil and modern corals. The most apparent feature is growth banding, and environmental changes are broadly accepted as controls on this phenomenon. If environment controls the growth, then all corallites within a colony should repeat the same growth pattern, as individuals are clones and must have shared the same environment. A study on several species of Alveolitidae (Anthozoa, Tabulata) from the Late Devonian (Early Frasnian) of the Holy Cross Mountains (Poland) shows that the growth pattern varies between neighbouring individuals within the same corallum. This contradicts observations of closely related Favositida as demonstrated on Pachyfavosites sp. from the Givetian of Avesnois, France, where neighbouring individuals repeat the same pattern. Therefore, environmental control on growth rhythm in Alveolitidae can be excluded; the causes of differences between individuals remain unknown.     

Krüppel-like factor 5 protects against murine colitis and activates JAK-STAT signaling in vivo

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which is characterized by chronic or recurring inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, affects 1.4 million persons in the United States alone. KLF5, a Krüppel-like factor (KLF) family member, is expressed within the epithelia of the gastrointestinal tract and has been implicated in rapid cell proliferation, migration, and remodeling in a number of tissues. Given these functions, we hypothesized that constitutive Klf5 expression would protect against the development of colitis in vivo. To examine the role of KLF5 in vivo, we used the Villin promoter to target Klf5 to the entire horizontal axis of the small intestine and colon. Villin-Klf5 transgenic mice were born at normal Mendelian ratios and appeared grossly normal to at least 1 year of age. Surprisingly, there were no significant changes in cell proliferation or in the differentiation of any of the intestinal lineages within the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon of Villin-Klf5 mice, compared to littermate controls. However, when Villin-Klf5 mice were treated with dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) to induce colitis, they developed less colonic injury and significantly reduced disease activity scores than littermate controls. The mechanism for this decreased injury may come via JAK-STAT signaling, the activation of which was increased in colonic mucosa of DSS treated Villin-Klf5 mice compared to controls. Thus, KLF5 and its downstream mediators may provide therapeutic targets and disease markers for IBD or other diseases characterized by injury and disruption of intestinal epithelia.     

Structural and Biophysical Characterization of the Proteins Interacting with the Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Origin of Replication

The C terminus of the herpes simplex virus type 1 origin-binding protein, UL9ct, interacts directly with the viral single-stranded DNA-binding protein ICP8. We show that a 60-amino acid C-terminal deletion mutant of ICP8 (ICP8ΔC) also binds very strongly to UL9ct. Using small angle x-ray scattering, the low resolution solution structures of UL9ct alone, in complex with ICP8ΔC, and in complex with a 15-mer double-stranded DNA containing Box I of the origin of replication are described. Size exclusion chromatography, analytical ultracentrifugation, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays, backed up by isothermal titration calorimetry measurements, are used to show that the stoichiometry of the UL9ct-dsDNA_15-mer complex is 2:1 at micromolar protein concentrations. The reaction occurs in two steps with initial binding of UL9ct to DNA (K_d ∼ 6 nm) followed by a second binding event (K_d ∼ 0.8 nm). It is also shown that the stoichiometry of the ternary UL9ct-ICP8ΔC-dsDNA_15-mer complex is 2:1:1, at the concentrations used in the different assays. Electron microscopy indicates that the complex assembled on the extended origin, oriS, rather than Box I alone, is much larger. The results are consistent with a simple model whereby a conformational switch of the UL9 DNA-binding domain upon binding to Box I allows the recruitment of a UL9-ICP8 complex by interaction between the UL9 DNA-binding domains.The initiation of DNA replication for most double-stranded DNA (dsDNA)⁶ viral genomes begins with the recognition of the origin by specific origin-binding proteins. The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) genome encodes seven proteins required for origin-dependent DNA replication. These are the DNA polymerase (UL30) and its accessory protein (UL42), a heterotrimeric helicase-primase complex (UL5, UL8, and UL52), the single-stranded DNA-binding protein (ICP8 or UL29), and the origin-binding protein (UL9) (reviewed in Ref. 1). HSV-1 contains three functional origins, oriL and two copies of oriS. OriS, which is about 80 bp in length, consists of three UL9 recognition sites, in Boxes I, II, and III, which are arranged in two overlapping palindromes (2). Box I and Box III are part of an evolutionarily conserved palindrome that forms a stable hairpin in single-stranded DNA, which may be important in the origin rearrangement (3) during initiation of replication. Box I and II are separated by an AT-rich spacer sequence, which varies in length and nucleotide composition between the different members of the α-herpesvirus subfamily (2, 4–6).UL9 is a homodimer in solution, and EM studies, with UL9 bound to oriS, indicate the existence of a dimer or pair of dimers assembled on oriS (7). Several reports indicate that UL9 can physically interact not only with ICP8 (8) but also with other members of the HSV-1 replication complex, including UL8 (9) and UL42 (10). Thus UL9 functions as a docking protein to recruit these essential replication proteins to the viral origins. ICP8 stimulates the helicase activity of UL9 (11, 12) and binds to its C-terminal 27-aa residues (13). In the presence of ICP8, UL9 will open dsDNA containing Box I, leading to a conformational change in the origin, thus facilitating unwinding (14–16). As stated above, the changes in DNA conformation in the complete oriS may be more complex (3). Recently, it has been suggested that single-stranded oriS folds into a unique and evolutionarily conserved conformation, oriS*, which is stably bound by UL9. oriS* contains a hairpin formed by complementary base pairing between Box I and Box III in oriS (17). UL9, in the presence of the single-stranded DNA-binding protein ICP8, can convert an 80-bp double-stranded minimal oriS fragment to oriS* and form a UL9-oriS* complex. The formation of a UL9-oriS* complex requires ATP hydrolysis (18). Therefore, the UL9-oriS* complex may serve as an assembly site for the herpesvirus replisome. Macao et al. (3) proposed a model in which full-length UL9 would be required to adopt a different conformation when binding to oriS or oriS*. The implication is that UL9 partially unwinds and introduces a hairpin into the origin of replication and that the formation of oriS* is aided, in some way, by ICP8 and requires ATP hydrolysis. Macao et al. (3) suggest that the length of the single-stranded tail of the probe DNA determines the stoichiometry of the UL9-DNA complex. oriS may bind two molecules of UL9, whereas oriS* may only bind one because the hairpin formation prevents the second interaction.Photo-cross-linking studies have shown that, although the UL9 protein binds Box I as a dimer, only one of the two monomers contacts Box I, suggesting that the C terminus of UL9 undergoes a conformational change upon binding to Box I (19). The results reported here are consistent with this observation. To date there is no three-dimensional structural information available on the full-length UL9 or either of the functionally characterized (helicase and DNA binding) domains. The ability to adopt different conformations and a tendency to proteolytic degradation may be responsible for this. It has been shown that UL9 binds with very high specificity to the Box I through its DNA-binding domain, consisting of the C-terminal 317 aa (UL9ct) (20, 21). Although the importance of the binding between UL9ct and oriS for the viral life cycle is well established, the mechanism behind this interaction still remains unclear. Even though UL9ct exists as a monomer in solution, uncertainty remains as to whether one or two molecules bind to a single Box I recognition sequence. Some reports have suggested that one UL9ct molecule binds to a single copy of the sequence (22–24), whereas others have proposed that UL9ct forms a dimer when bound to DNA (25, 26). This apparent difference may well result from the different protein concentrations used in different assays/experiments, which in turn highlights the difficulty of translating in vitro equilibrium experiments into cellular nonequilibrium situations.A few years ago, the crystal structure of a 60-residue C-terminal deletion mutant of ICP8 (ICP8ΔC) was determined to 3 Å resolution (Protein Data Bank code 1URJ (27)). The structure of ICP8ΔC consists of a large N-terminal domain (aa 9–1038) and a smaller entirely helical C-terminal domain (aa 1049–1120) connected to the N-terminal domain by a disordered linker (aa 1038–1049) spanning around 18 Å in the crystal structure. ICP8 preferentially binds ssDNA over dsDNA in a nonsequence-specific and cooperative manner (28). ICP8 is a zinc metalloprotein containing one zinc atom per molecule, which is coordinated by three cysteines (Cys-499, Cys-502, and Cys-510) and a histidine (His-512) (27).In this study, we show that the 60-amino acid C-terminal deletion of ICP8 (ICP8ΔC) binds strongly to UL9ct. We present three low resolution structures in solution using small angle x-ray scattering as follows: that of the UL9ct alone, in complex with ICP8ΔC, and in complex with a 15-mer dsDNA (dsDNA_15-mer) containing the Box I sequence. Using these data and a variety of biophysical techniques, we demonstrate that the stoichiometries of the UL9ct-dsDNA_15-mer and UL9ct-ICP8ΔC-dsDNA_15-mer complexes are 2:1 and 2:1:1, respectively, at the micromolar protein concentrations used in this study. Using EM we visualize the assembly of the ICP8ΔC-UL9ct complex on oriS and estimate the size of the complex.     

A model invalidation-based approach for elucidating biological signalling pathways,applied to the chemotaxis pathway in R. sphaeroides

Background  

Developing methods for understanding the connectivity of signalling pathways is a major challenge in biological research. For this purpose, mathematical models are routinely developed based on experimental observations, which also allow the prediction of the system behaviour under different experimental conditions. Often, however, the same experimental data can be represented by several competing network models.     

Biphasic ethylene production during the hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis: A window into defense priming mechanisms?

The hypersensitive response (HR) is a cell death phenomenon associated with localized resistance to pathogens. Biphasic patterns in the generation of H₂O₂, salicylic acid and ethylene have been observed in tobacco during the early stages of the HR. These biphasic models reflect an initial elicitation by pathogen-associated molecular patterns followed by a second phase, induced by pathogen-encoded avirulence gene products. The first phase has been proposed to potentiate the second, to increase the efficacy of plant resistance to disease. This potentiation is comparable to the “priming” of plant defenses which is seen when plants display systemic resistance to disease. The events regulating the generation of the biphasic wave, or priming, remains obscure, however recently we demonstrated a key role for nitric oxide in this process in a HR occurring in tobacco. Here we use laser photoacoustic detection to demonstrate that biphasic ethylene production also occurs during a HR occurring in Arabidopsis. We suggest that ethylene emanation during the HR represents a ready means of visualising biphasic events during the HR and that exploiting the genomic resources offered by this model species will facilitate the development of a mechanistic understanding of potentiating/priming processes.Key words: hypersensitive response, biphasic patterns, potentiation, defense priming, ethylene, ArabidopsisThe Hypersensitive Response (HR) is a cell death process which occurs at the site of attempted pathogen attack and which has been associated with host resistance.¹ Much work on the regulation of the HR has indicated the importance of H₂O₂,² and NO.³ A feature of H₂O₂ generation during the HR is its biphasic pattern (Fig. 1A). The first rise reflects elicitation by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)⁴ and the second reflects the interaction between a pathogen-encoded avirulence (avr) gene product with a plant resistance (R) gene. A key aspect of the first rise is the initiation of salicylic acid (SA) synthesis which potentiates the second rise and hence the potency of plant defense and the HR.⁵Open in a separate windowFigure 1Patterns of defense signal generation during the Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola elicited-hypersensitive response in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Generation of (A) H₂O₂ (●, Mur¹⁸); (B) nitric oxide (◇; Mur¹² (C) salicylic acid (SA, ■¹⁹) and (D) ethylene (○ Mur⁹) during a HR elicited by Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola (Psph) in tobacco cv. Samsun NN. In (A) a phase where SA acts to augment the second rise in H₂O₂—the potentiation phase—is highlighted. The potentiation phase is likely to be similar to defense “priming”.⁶ Methodological details are contained within the appropriate references. (E) A possible model for biphasic defense signal regulation during the Psph-elicited HR in tobacco. During an initial phase NO and H₂O₂ act to initiate SA biosynthesis, where SA and NO act to initiate a “H₂O₂ biphasic switch”. This could initially suppress both SA and the H₂O₂ generation but subsequently acts to potentiate a second phase of H₂O₂ generation. This in turn increases SA biosynthesis which could act with NO to initiate the “C₂H₄ biphasic switch” to potentiate ethylene production. These (and other) signals contribute to initiation of the HR and SAR.This potentiation mechanism appears to be similar to defense priming; when whole plants display systemic resistance to disease as opposed to a localized resistance against pathogens. Priming can be initiated (the “primary stimulus”) following attack with a necrotizing pathogen (leading to “systemic acquired resistance”, SAR) or non-pathogenic rhizosphere bacteria (to confer “induced systemic resistance”, ISR). In the primed state a plant stimulates a range of plant defense genes, produces anti-microbial phytoalexins and deposits cell wall strengthening molecules, but only on imposition of a “secondary stimulus”.⁶ Such secondary stimuli include SA³ or PAMPs⁷ and is likely to be mechanistically similar to the potentiation step in the biphasic pattern of H₂O₂ generation (shaded in Fig. 1A). Accordingly, the two phases in the biphasic wave represent primary and secondary stimuli in priming.Highlighting a similarity between local HR-based events and priming, adds further impetus to efforts aiming to describe the underlying mechanism(s), however both phenomena remain poorly understood. Besides SA, both jasmonates and abscisic acid (ABA) have been shown to prime defenses as have a range of non-plant chemicals, with β-aminobutyric acid (BABA) being perhaps most widely used.^6,8 Mutants which fail to exhibit BABA-mediated potentiation were defective in either a cyclin-dependent kinase-like protein, a polyphosphoinositide phosphatase or an ABA biosynthetic enzyme.⁸We have recently investigated biphasic ethylene production during the HR in tobacco elicited by the nonhost HR-eliciting bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola.⁹ As with H₂O₂ generation, this pattern reflected PAMP-and AVR-dependent elicitation events and included a SA-mediated potentiation stage. Crucially, we also showed that NO was a vital component in the SA-potentiation mechanism. When this finding is integrated with our other measurements of defense signal generation in the same host-pathogen system the complexity in the signaling network is revealed (Fig. 1). NO generation (Fig. 1B) appeared to be coincident with the first rise in H₂O₂ (Fig. 1A) which initiated SA biosynthesis^10,11 and together would contribute to the first small, but transient, rise in that hormone (Fig. 1C). In line with established models⁵ this momentary rise in SA coincides with the potentiation phase (shaded in Fig. 1A) required to augment the second rise in ROS. However, ethylene production seems to be correlated poorly with the patterns of NO, H₂O₂ and SA (Fig. 1D). Nevertheless, biphasic ethylene production was found to reflect PAMP and AVR-dependent recognition and included a SA-mediated potentiation step.⁹ Hence, ethylene production could be used as a post-hoc indicator of the potentiation mechanism. Therefore, our discovery that the second wave of ethylene production—a “biphasic switch”—is influenced by NO acting with SA could also be relevant to the H₂O₂ generation. Significantly, the second phases in both H₂O₂ and ethylene production occur exactly where SA and NO production coincides; in the case of H₂O₂ generation 2–4 h post challenge and with ethylene 6 h onwards (Fig. 1E).Thus, ethylene production represents a readily assayable marker to indicate perturbations in the underlying biphasic and possible priming mechanisms. As we have demonstrated, laser photoacoustic detection (LAPD) is a powerful on-line approach to determine in planta ethylene production in tobacco^9,12 but any mechanistic investigations would be greatly facilitated if the genetic resources offered by the model species Arabidopsis could be exploited.To address this, Arabidopsis Col-0 rosettes were vacuum infiltrated with either Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) avrRpm1 (HR-eliciting), the virulent Pst strain and the non-HR eliciting and non-virulent Pst hrpA strain. Ethylene production was monitored by LAPD (Fig. 2A). Significantly, Pst avrRpm1 initiated a biphasic pattern of ethylene production whose kinetics were very similar to that seen in tobacco (compare Figs. 2A with ​with1D).1D). Inoculations with Pst and Pst hrpA only displayed the first PAMP-dependent rise in ethylene production. Thus, these data establish that Arabidopsis can be used to investigate biphasic switch mechanism(s) in ethylene production during the HR and possibly defense priming. When considering such mechanisms, it is relevant to highlight the work of Foschi et al.¹³ who observed that biphasic activation of a monomeric G protein to cause phase-specific activation of different kinase cascades. Interestingly, ethylene has been noted to initiate biphasic activation of G proteins and kinases in Arabidopsis, although differing in kinetics to the phases seen during the HR.¹⁴ Further, plant defense priming has been associated with the increased accumulation of MAP kinase protein.⁶Open in a separate windowFigure 2Ethylene in the Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato elicited-hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis thaliana. (A) Ethylene production from 5 week old short day (8 h light 100 µmol.m².sec⁻¹) grown Arabidopsis rosette leaves which were vacuum infiltrated with bacterial suspensions (2 × 10⁶ colony forming units.ml⁻¹) of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) strains detected using laser photoacoustic detection (LAPD). Experimental details of the ethylene detection by LAPD are detailed in Mur et al.⁹ The intercellular spaces in leaves were infiltrated with the HR-eliciting strain Pst avrRpm1, (■), the virulent strain Pst (△) or the non-virulent and non-HR eliciting derivative, Pst hrpA (◇). (B) The appearance of Arabidopsis Col-0 and etr1-1 leaves at various h following injection with 2 × 10⁶ c.f.u.mL⁻¹ with of Pst avrRpm1. (C) Explants (1 cm diameter discs) from Arabidopsis leaf areas infiltrated with suspensions of Pst avrRpm1 were placed in a 1.5 cm diameter well, bathed in 1 mL de-ionized H₂O. Changes in the conductivity of the bathing solution, as an indicator of electrolyte leakage from either wild type Col-0 (◆), mutants which were compromised in ethylene signaling; etr1-1 (□), ein2-2 (▲) or which overproduced ethylene; eto2-1 (●) were measured using a conductivity meter. Methodological details are set out in Mur et al.⁹A further point requires consideration; the role of ethylene as a direct contributor to plant defense.¹⁵ The contribution of ethylene to the HR has been disputed,¹⁶ but in tobacco we have observed that altered ethylene production influenced the formation of a P. syringae pv. phaseolicola elicited HR.⁹ In Arabidopsis, cell death in the ethylene receptor mutant etr1-1 following inoculation with Pst avrRpm1 is delayed compared to wild type (Fig. 2B). When electrolyte leakage was used to quantify Pst avrRpm1 cell death, both etr1-1 and the ethylene insensitive signaling mutant ein2-1 exhibited slower death than wild-type but in the ethylene overproducing mutant eto2, cell death was augmented (Fig. 2C). These data indicate that ethylene influences the kinetics of the HR.Taking these data together we suggest that the complexity of signal interaction during the HR or in SAR/ISR could be further dissected by combining the genetic resources of Arabidopsis with measurements of ethylene production using such sensitive approaches as LAPD.