Social Spacing in Small Mammals: Patterns of Individual Variation

The pattern of social spacing in small mammals differs fromthat observed in many other vertebrates. Small mammals frequentlyhave non-exclusive territories and tolerate a large amount ofoverlap with other conspecifics. The determinant factors ofhome range or territory size in small mammals are not knownfor most species. We carried out a study of the determinantfactors of home range size in a model small mammal, the easternchipmunk, Tamias striatus. The population was studied for fiveyears. The effect of experimental perturbations on food supplyand population density offered strong evidence that the meanhome range size in the population was determined by resourceabundance. Changes in population density had little or no measurableeffect. We noted that even when mean home range size decreasedsignificantly in response to an increase in available food,a great deal of variability in individual home range sizes remained.We hypothesized that this pattern of variation among individualswas also resource related; large home ranges would be locatedin areas of low resource density and small home ranges wouldbe located in areas of high resource density. Our data to datedo not offer support for this hypothesis; however our researchhas shown that the data needed to convincingly reject the nullhypothesis are very complex. We discuss the evidence requiredto study patterns of individual variation, and how models ofoptimal territory size may be useful. Research that examinespatterns of individual variation are few in number, yet studiesof individual variation will ultimately provide the best insightson the dynamics of evolutionary ecology.     

Potential habitat dependence in deposition rate of presumptive annual lines in shells of the bivalve Protothaca staminea

Although repeating depositional features in shells of bivalve molluscs continue to be used in ecology and paleoecology to age individual specimens and thereby provide a potentially powerful tool for geochronological reconstruction of past events, few studies actually test the basic assumptions of growth line analysis: (1) that line deposition is truly periodic and (2) that the length of the period is one year. Recapture of marked individuals of the bivalve Protothaca staminea after 12 or 24 months in field plots in two habitats of Mugu Lagoon (California, U.S.A.) suggests a habitat-specific pattern of deposition of the major growth lines previously assumed to be annual. External (surface) and internal (cross-sectional) growth lines were in excellent agreement on any given specimen and showed that each specimen from a muddy-sand environment deposited a single annual line over 12 months, whereas all but one specimen from a clean-sand environment deposited several more major growth lines than predicted from the numbers of years of additional growth. Although more frequent handling or natural disturbance in the higher-energy, clean-sand habitat may explain these differences, the results demand caution in extrapolating tests of annual periodicity in growth line deposition across species or even across habitats for a single species.