Effect of testosterone on the susceptibility of C57BL/6 mice to infection with Brugia pahangi with reference to inflammatory cell response

Effects of testosterone on the susceptibility and inflammatory cell responses of C57BL/6 mice infected intraperitoneally with Brugia pahangi larvae were examined. On day 15 postinfection, female mice showed significantly greater resistance than did males, and peritoneal cell responses (lymphocytes, macrophages, and eosinophils) were great in females. Castration of highly susceptible male mice increased their resistance and peritoneal cell responses to the level of female mice; whereas, castration of female mice did not affect the susceptibility and cell responses. Furthermore, testosterone treatment at a physiological dose in the castrated male mice or a pharmacological dose in female mice suppressed resistance and inflammatory cell responses. These results suggest that male sex hormone, testosterone, but not female sex hormone has a regulatory role in the susceptibility and cellular response of C57BL/6 mice to infection with B. pahangi, and it causes differences between sexes in susceptibility.     

A distinct type of cyclin D, CYCD4;2, involved in the activation of cell division in Arabidopsis

The Arabidopsis genome encodes 10 D-type cyclins (CYCD); however, their differential role in cell cycle control is not well known. Among them, CYCD4;2 is unique in the amino acid sequence; namely, it lacks the Rb-binding motif and the PEST sequence that are conserved in CYCDs. Here, we have shown that CYCD4;2 suppressed G1 cyclin mutations in yeast and formed a kinase complex with CDKA;1, an ortholog of yeast Cdc28, in insect cells. Hypocotyl explants of CYCD4;2 over-expressing plants showed faster induction of calli than wild-type explants on a medium containing lower concentration of auxin. These results suggest that CYCD4;2 has a promotive function in cell division by interacting with CDKA;1 regardless of the unusual primary sequence.     

Increased biological potency of hexafluorinated analogs of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on bovine parathyroid cells

1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ (1,25-(OH)₂D₃) is known to be involved in regulating the proliferation of parathyroid cells and PTH synthesis through reactions involving its nuclear receptor. We evaluated the effects of 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ and its hexafluorinated analog, 26,26,26,27,27,27-hexafluoro-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ (26,27-F₆-1,25-(OH)₂D₃), on parathyroid cells. The 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ and 26,27-F₆-1,25-(OH)₂D₃ each inhibited [³H]thymidine incorporation and ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity, which is important in cell proliferation, in primary cultured bovine parathyroid cells. The inhibitory effect of 26,27-F₆-1,25-(OH)₂D₃ on PTH secretion from parathyroid cells was significantly more potent than that of 1,25-(OH)₂D ₃ between 10⁻¹¹ M and 10⁻⁸ M. Study of 26,27-F₆-1,25-(OH)₂D₃ metabolism in parathyroid cells in vitro elucidated its slower degradation than that of 1,25-(OH)₂D₃. After 48 h of incubation with [1β-³H]26,27-F₆-1,25-(OH)₂D₃, two HPLC peaks, one for [1β-³H]26,27-F₆-1,25-(OH)₂D₃, and a second larger peak for [1β-³H]26,27-F₆-1,23(S),25-(OH)₃D₃, were detected. No metabolites were detected after the same period of incubation with 1,25-(OH)₂[26,27-³H]D₃. We observed that 26,27-F₆-1,23(S),25-(OH)₃D₃ was as potent as 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ in inhibiting the proliferation of parathyroid cells.Data suggest that the greater biological activity of 26,27-F₆-1,25-(OH)₂D₃ is explained by its slower metabolisms and by the retention of the biological potency of 26,27-F₆-1,25-(OH)₂D₃ even after 23(S)-hydroxylation.     

A leucine zipper-based peptide hybrid delivers functional Nanog protein inside the cell nucleus

We synthesized a pair of compounds containing leucine zipper peptides to deliver protein cargo into cells. One is a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) with Lz(E), a leucine zipper peptide containing negatively charged amino acids, and the other is a Nanog protein with Lz(K), a leucine zipper peptide containing positively charged amino acids. When cells were treated with these equimolar mixtures, Nanog-Lz(K) hybridized with Lz(E)-CPP was successfully delivered into the cells. Furthermore, Nanog-Lz(K) exerted its proper function after nuclear transport.     

Phenotypic Plasticity in Photosynthetic Temperature Acclimation among Crop Species with Different Cold Tolerances

While interspecific variation in the temperature response of photosynthesis is well documented, the underlying physiological mechanisms remain unknown. Moreover, mechanisms related to species-dependent differences in photosynthetic temperature acclimation are unclear. We compared photosynthetic temperature acclimation in 11 crop species differing in their cold tolerance, which were grown at 15°C or 30°C. Cold-tolerant species exhibited a large decrease in optimum temperature for the photosynthetic rate at 360 μL L⁻¹ CO₂ concentration [Opt (A₃₆₀)] when growth temperature decreased from 30°C to 15°C, whereas cold-sensitive species were less plastic in Opt (A₃₆₀). Analysis using the C₃ photosynthesis model shows that the limiting step of A₃₆₀ at the optimum temperature differed between cold-tolerant and cold-sensitive species; ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylation rate was limiting in cold-tolerant species, while ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate regeneration rate was limiting in cold-sensitive species. Alterations in parameters related to photosynthetic temperature acclimation, including the limiting step of A₃₆₀, leaf nitrogen, and Rubisco contents, were more plastic to growth temperature in cold-tolerant species than in cold-sensitive species. These plastic alterations contributed to the noted growth temperature-dependent changes in Opt (A₃₆₀) in cold-tolerant species. Consequently, cold-tolerant species were able to maintain high A₃₆₀ at 15°C or 30°C, whereas cold-sensitive species were not. We conclude that differences in the plasticity of photosynthetic parameters with respect to growth temperature were responsible for the noted interspecific differences in photosynthetic temperature acclimation between cold-tolerant and cold-sensitive species.The temperature dependence of leaf photosynthetic rate shows considerable variation between plant species and with growth temperature (Berry and Björkman, 1980; Cunningham and Read, 2002; Hikosaka et al., 2006). Plants native to low-temperature environments and those grown at low temperatures generally exhibit higher photosynthetic rates at low temperatures and lower optimum temperatures, compared with plants native to high-temperature environments and those grown at high temperatures (Mooney and Billings, 1961; Slatyer, 1977; Berry and Björkman, 1980; Sage, 2002; Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004b). For example, the optimum temperature for photosynthesis differs between temperate evergreen species and tropical evergreen species (Hill et al., 1988; Read, 1990; Cunningham and Read, 2002). Such differences have been observed even among ecotypes of the same species (Björkman et al., 1975; Pearcy, 1977; Slatyer, 1977).Temperature dependence of the photosynthetic rate has been analyzed using the biochemical model proposed by Farquhar et al. (1980). This model assumes that the photosynthetic rate (A) is limited by either ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylation (A_c) or RuBP regeneration (A_r). The optimum temperature for photosynthetic rate in C₃ plants is thus potentially determined by (1) the temperature dependence of A_c, (2) the temperature dependence of A_r, or (3) both, at the colimitation point of A_c and A_r (Fig. 1; Farquhar and von Caemmerer, 1982; Hikosaka et al., 2006).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.A scheme illustrating the shift in the optimum temperature for photosynthesis depending on growth temperature. Based on the C₃ photosynthesis model, the A₃₆₀ (white and black circles) is limited by A_c (solid line) or A_r (broken line). The optimum temperature for the photosynthetic rate is potentially determined by temperature dependence of A_c (A), temperature dependence of A_r (B), or the intersection of the temperature dependences of A_c and A_r (C). When the optimum temperature for the photosynthetic rate shifts to a higher temperature, there are also three possibilities determining the optimum temperature: temperature dependence of A_c (D), temperature dependence of A_r (E), or the intersection of the temperature dependences of A_c and A_r (F). Especially in the case that the optimum temperature is determined by the intersection of the temperature dependences of A_c and A_r, the optimum temperature can shift by changes in the balance between A_c and A_r even when the optimum temperatures for these two partial reactions do not change.In many cases, the photosynthetic rate around the optimum temperature is limited by A_c, and thus the temperature dependence of A_c determines the optimum temperature for the photosynthetic rate (Hikosaka et al., 1999, 2006; Yamori et al., 2005, 2006a, 2006b, 2008; Sage and Kubien, 2007; Sage et al., 2008). As the temperature increases above the optimum, A_c is decreased by increases in photorespiration (Berry and Björkman, 1980; Jordan and Ogren, 1984; von Caemmerer, 2000). Furthermore, it has been suggested that the heat-induced deactivation of Rubisco is involved in the decrease in A_c at high temperature (Law and Crafts-Brandner, 1999; Crafts-Brandner and Salvucci, 2000; Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004a; Yamori et al., 2006b). Numerous previous studies have shown changes in the temperature dependence of A_c with growth temperature (Hikosaka et al., 1999; Bunce, 2000; Yamori et al., 2005). Also, the temperature sensitivity of Rubisco deactivation may differ between plant species (Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner, 2004b) and with growth temperature (Yamori et al., 2006b), which may explain variation in the optimum temperature for photosynthesis (Fig. 1, A and D).A_r is more responsive to temperature than A_c and often limits photosynthesis at low temperatures (Hikosaka et al., 1999, 2006; Sage and Kubien, 2007; Sage et al., 2008). Recently, several researchers indicated that A_r limits the photosynthetic rate at high temperature (Schrader et al., 2004; Wise et al., 2004; Cen and Sage, 2005; Makino and Sage, 2007). They suggested that the deactivation of Rubisco at high temperatures is not the cause of decreased A_c but a result of limitation by A_r. However, it remains unclear whether limitation by A_r is involved in the variation in the optimum temperature for the photosynthetic rate (Fig. 1, B and E).A shift in the optimum temperature for photosynthesis can result from changes in the balance between A_r and A_c, even when the optimum temperatures for these two partial reactions do not change (Fig. 1, C and F; Farquhar and von Caemmerer, 1982). The balance between A_r and A_c has been shown to change depending on growth temperature (Hikosaka et al., 1999; Hikosaka, 2005; Onoda et al., 2005a; Yamori et al., 2005) and often brings about a shift in the colimitation temperature of A_r and A_c. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that plasticity in this balance differs among species or ecotypes (Onoda et al., 2005b; Atkin et al., 2006; Ishikawa et al., 2007). Plasticity in this balance could explain interspecific variation in the plasticity of photosynthetic temperature dependence (Farquhar and von Caemmerer, 1982; Hikosaka et al., 2006), although there has been no evidence in the previous studies that the optimum temperature for photosynthesis occurs at the colimitation point of A_r and A_c.Temperature tolerance differs between species and, with growth temperature, even within species from the same functional group (Long and Woodward, 1989). Bunce (2000) indicated that the temperature dependences of A_r and A_c to growth temperature were different between species from cool and warm climates and that the balance between A_r and A_c was independent of growth temperature for a given plant species. However, it was not clarified what limited the photosynthetic rate or what parameters were important in temperature acclimation of photosynthesis. Recently, we reported that the extent of temperature homeostasis of leaf respiration and photosynthesis, which is assessed as a ratio of rates measured at their respective growth temperatures, differed depending on the extent of the cold tolerance of the species (Yamori et al., 2009b). Therefore, comparisons of several species with different cold tolerances would provide a new insight into interspecific variation of photosynthetic temperature acclimation and their underlying mechanisms. In this study, we selected 11 herbaceous crop species that differ in their cold tolerance (Yamori et al., 2009b) and grew them at two contrasting temperatures, conducting gas-exchange analyses based on the C₃ photosynthesis model (Farquhar et al., 1980). Based on these results, we addressed the following key questions. (1) Does the plasticity in photosynthetic temperature acclimation differ between cold-sensitive and cold-tolerant species? (2) Does the limiting step of photosynthesis at several leaf temperatures differ between plant species and with growth temperature? (3) What determines the optimum temperature for the photosynthetic rate among A_c, A_r, and the intersection of the temperature dependences of A_c and A_r?     

Identification of aquaporin-5 and lipid rafts in human resting saliva and their release into cevimeline-stimulated saliva

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether AQP5 and lipid rafts are released into human unstimulated (resting) saliva and saliva in response to secretagogues. METHODS: In order to quantitate the salivary concentration of AQP5, we produced a polyclonal antibody for human AQP5 and developed an enzyme-like immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: AQP5 and lipid rafts were identified in human resting saliva. The amount of AQP5 in resting saliva showed a diurnal variation with high levels during waking hours, and an age-related decrease in AQP5 was coincident with the volume of resting saliva. Cevimeline, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonist, induced the release of AQP5 with lipid rafts, amylase, mucin, and lysozyme. Changes in saliva AQP5 levels after cevimeline administration occurred simultaneously with changes in saliva flow rates. Confocal microscopy revealed that AQP5 was located in the apical plasma membrane and showed a diffuse pattern in parotid glands under resting conditions. Following cevimeline administration, AQP5 was predominantly associated with the APM and was localized in the lumen. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: AQP5 and lipid rafts were released with salivary proteins from human salivary glands by the stimulation of M3 mAChRs, and that changes in saliva AQP5 levels can be used as an indicator of salivary flow rate and also as a useful index of M3 mAChR agonist's action on human salivary glands.     

Different regulation of leaf respiration between Spinacia oleracea, a sun species, and Alocasia odora, a shade species

Mature leaves of shade species exhibit lower respiratory rates than those of sun species. To elucidate the mechanism underlying different respiratory rates between sun and shade species, we examined respiratory properties of leaves in Spinacia oleracea L., a sun species, and Alocasia odora (Lodd.) Spach, a shade species, with special reference to changes in the respiratory rate throughout the night. In S. oleracea , rates of both CO₂ efflux and O₂ uptake decreased with time during the night, whereas in A. odora both rates were virtually constant at lower levels. The rates of O₂ uptake in S . oleracea increased upon addition of sucrose, and the rates attained were virtually identical throughout the night. However, the addition of an uncoupler [carbonyl cyanide p -(trifluoromethoxy)-phenylhydrazone; FCCP] did not alter the rates. In contrast, the rates of O₂ uptake in A. odora were enhanced by the addition of FCCP, but not by sucrose. The concentrations of carbohydrates in the tissue decreased throughout the night in both species and the ATP/ADP ratio was always greater in A. odora. These results indicate that, in S. oleracea , the availability of respiratory substrate determines the respiratory rate, while the low respiratory rate in A. odora is ascribed to its low demand for ATP.     

Levamisole in postoperative adjuvant immunochemotherapy for gastric cancer

Summary The usefulness of LMS in postoperative immunochemotherapy of gastric cancer was investigated. In compliance with the protocol, MMC was given at a dose of 20 mg on the day of gastrectomy, and an additional 10 mg on the next day IV. The patients receiving 600 mg Tegafur daily were then divided into two groups according to whether LMS was also given or not. LMS was administered for 3 days before the operation in a daily dose of 150 mg and for 1 year or more after operation according to a schedule of 3 days' administration followed by an 11-day interval. The 2-year follow-up demonstrated that in stage III patients, the LMS (+) regimen was superior to the LMS (–) regimen, since the former prolonged the relapse-free interval significantly. The survival rate for stage III disease was also significantly higher in the LMS (+) than in the LMS (–) group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of subjective or objective side-effects between two groups. The incidence of agranulocytosis was comparable in the two groups.Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Group, Japan Levamisole Research AssociationChairmen of the Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Group, Japan LMS Research AssociationController of the Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Group, Japan LMS Research AssociationMembers of the Data Collection and Analysis SubcommitteeThis study was carried out by the Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Group, Japan LMS Research Association (directed by Prof. Kiyoshi Inokuchi, Dept. of Surgery, Kyushu University and Prof. Eiro Tsubura, Dept. of Internal Medicine, Tokushima University). The results were presented in part at the 19th General Meeting of the Japanese Society for Gastroenterological Surgery in February, 1982     

Cyclin‐dependent kinase‐activating kinases CDKD;1 and CDKD;3 are essential for preserving mitotic activity in Arabidopsis thaliana

For the full activation of cyclin‐dependent kinases (CDKs), not only cyclin binding but also CDK phosphorylation is required. This activating phosphorylation is mediated by CDK‐activating kinases (CAKs). Arabidopsis has four genes showing similarity to vertebrate‐type CAKs, three CDKDs (CDKD;1‐CDKD;3) and one CDKF (CDKF;1). We previously found that the cdkf;1 mutant is defective in post‐embryonic development, even though the kinase activities of core CDKs remain unchanged relative to the wild type. This raised a question about the involvement of CDKDs in CDK activation in planta. Here we report that the cdkd;1 cdkd;3 double mutant showed gametophytic lethality. Most cdkd;1‐1 cdkd;3‐1 pollen grains were defective in pollen mitosis I and II, producing one‐cell or two‐cell pollen grains that lacked fertilization ability. We also found that the double knock‐out of CDKD;1 and CDKD;3 caused arrest and/or delay in the progression of female gametogenesis at multiple steps. Our genetic analyses revealed that the functions of CDKF;1 and CDKD;1 or CDKD;3 do not overlap, either during gametophyte and embryo development or in post‐embryonic development. Consistent with these analyses, CDKF;1 expression in the cdkd;1‐1 cdkd;3‐1 mutant could not rescue the gametophytic lethality. These results suggest that, in Arabidopsis, CDKD;1 and CDKD;3 function as CAKs controlling mitosis, whereas CDKF;1 plays a distinct role, mainly in post‐embryonic development. We propose that CDKD;1 and CDKD;3 phosphorylate and activate all core CDKs, CDKA, CDKB1 and CDKB2, thereby governing cell cycle progression throughout plant development.