THE ENDOCRINE BASIS OF PAIR-FORMATION BEHAVIOUR IN THE MALE EIDER SOMATERIA MOLLISSIMA

Pair-formation behaviour among the Eiders began after the annual moult, in late September. There was a small peak of display in October and November and a large one in the following April and May. As a result, the female population became paired in two phases, up to 50% in the autumn and the remainder in the following spring. The seasonal cycle of the abundance of Leydig cells was bimodal, with a peak in October and a large one in April-May. That the peaks represent increased androgen production was supported by the cycles of Leydig cell enzyme activity and lipid content and of penis weight. The monthly means of Leydig cell abundance and of the rate of display were statistically correlated. Experiments with sexually quiescent males in eclipse plumage demonstrated that testosterone was capable of inducing pair-formation behaviour. Relatively advanced stages of spermatogenesis were found in autumn, and were maintained through the winter, complete development occurring in the spring. Seasonal changes in the production of pituitary gonadotropin followed a bimodal pattern with peaks in autumn and in the spring. Field evidence is presented which suggests that Follicle Stimulating Hormone and Luteinizing Hormone were produced at different phases of a circadian rhythm of photosensitivity.     

Effects of amino acids and derivatives of cyclic adenosine 3′, 5′-monophosphate on the production of three exoenzymes by Staphylococcus, simulans biovar staphylolyticus

The extracellular protease, endopeptidase, and hexosaminidase produced by $\text{Staphylococcus}\text{,}\text{simulans}\text{biovar}\text{staphylolyticus}$ were neither induced nor repressed by amino acids but required a tryptic digest of casein for their production. Catabolite repression of exoenzyme production by glucose was not affected by exogenous cyclic adenosine 3′, 5′-monophosphate but was partially relieved by di- or monobutyryl derivatives of this compound.     

The Emperor's new clothes? A comment on

Many diatom-based methods have been proposed in recent years. Besse-Lototskaya et al. (2011) compare some of those developed for assessing inorganic nutrients. However, they fail to address the two questions of greatest interest to those who wish to use such metrics to inform decision-making. These questions are: what is the role of diatom-based trophic metrics in environmental management in Europe in the twenty-first century and do these indices represent causal relationships with underlying pressure gradients? The present economic climate means that Member States of the European Union will look more critically at all methods for assessing freshwater quality and developers need to ensure that their methods are “fit-for-purpose”.