Anthrax in Western and Central African great apes

During the period of December 2004 to January 2005, Bacillus anthracis killed three wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) and one gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) in a tropical forest in Cameroon. While this is the second anthrax outbreak in wild chimpanzees, this is the first case of anthrax in gorillas ever reported. The number of great apes in Central Africa is dramatically declining and the populations are seriously threatened by diseases, mainly Ebola. Nevertheless, a considerable number of deaths cannot be attributed to Ebola virus and remained unexplained. Our results show that diseases other than Ebola may also threaten wild great apes, and indicate that the role of anthrax in great ape mortality may have been underestimated. These results suggest that risk identification, assessment, and management for the survival of the last great apes should be performed with an open mind, since various pathogens with distinct characteristics in epidemiology and pathogenicity may impact the populations. An animal mortality monitoring network covering the entire African tropical forest, with the dual aims of preventing both great ape extinction and human disease outbreaks, will create necessary baseline data for such risk assessments and management plans.     

E2F factors rate controls the dual role of CDE/E2F composite element: a model of E2F-regulated gene expression in plant development

The promoters of several E2F-regulated genes identified in plants contain a variety of E2F motifs, notably a composite element consisting of a "CDE-like element" C/GGCGG on one strand, described as repressor in animals, associated with an E2F element on the complementary strand. This detailed study throughout plant development using ribonucleotide reductase promoters, allows us to propose a model, where E2F and composite elements play a dual role. Such regulation is mainly conditioned by the availability of E2F factors in tissues and during the cell cycle in tobacco.     

The endothelin system in human and monkey ovaries: in situ gene expression of the different components

The endothelin system is composed of three endothelin isoforms (ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3), the endothelin receptors ETA and ETB, and the endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE). Besides having a major vasoactive role, endothelins have roles in different cell types at a local level. We investigated the presence of the different components of the endothelin system in primate ovaries. Human ovaries and gonadotropin-stimulated monkey ovaries were studied using immunohistochemistry for endothelin, and in situ hybridization with probes for ET-1, ET-2, ET-3, ETA and ETB receptors, and ECE. ET-1 and ETA receptors were detected in endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells, respectively, in stromal vessels adjacent to follicles and corpora lutea. ETB receptors and ET-1 were found in the endothelial cells of capillaries of corpora lutea. ECE was present in internal theca cells of secondary, de Graaf, atretic follicles, and in luteinized granulosa cells of the corpora lutea. The endothelin system components are present in or around the follicles of human and monkey ovaries. Although the components are not expressed in the same cell types, they are synthesized, mainly in follicles, by cells that are in close proximity. Thus, the endothelin system could act in a paracrine manner. ECE expression in steroid-producing cells changes its compartmentalization during follicle maturation.     

The expression of a hunchback ortholog in the polychaete annelid Platynereis dumerilii suggests an ancestral role in mesoderm development and neurogenesis

Orthologs of the Drosophila gap gene hunchback have been isolated so far only in protostomes. Phylogenetic analysis of recently available genomic data allowed us to confirm that hunchback genes are widely found in protostomes (both lophotrochozoans and ecdysozoans). In contrast, no unequivocal hunchback gene can be found in the genomes of deuterostomes and non-bilaterians. We cloned hunchback in the marine polychaete annelid Platynereis dumerilii and analysed its expression during development. In this species, hunchback displays an expression pattern indicative of a role in mesoderm formation and neurogenesis, and similar to the expression found for hunchback genes in arthropods. These data suggest altogether that these functions are ancestral to protostomes.Pierre Kerner and Fabiola Zelada González contributed equally to this work.     

Meiotic Recombination Analyses in Pigs Carrying Different Balanced Structural Chromosomal Rearrangements

Correct pairing, synapsis and recombination between homologous chromosomes are essential for normal meiosis. All these events are strongly regulated, and our knowledge of the mechanisms involved in this regulation is increasing rapidly. Chromosomal rearrangements are known to disturb these processes. In the present paper, synapsis and recombination (number and distribution of MLH1 foci) were studied in three boars (Sus scrofa domestica) carrying different chromosomal rearrangements. One (T34he) was heterozygote for the t(3;4)(p1.3;q1.5) reciprocal translocation, one (T34ho) was homozygote for that translocation, while the third (T34Inv) was heterozygote for both the translocation and a pericentric inversion inv(4)(p1.4;q2.3). All three boars were normal for synapsis and sperm production. This particular situation allowed us to rigorously study the impact of rearrangements on recombination. Overall, the rearrangements induced only minor modifications of the number of MLH1 foci (per spermatocyte or per chromosome) and of the length of synaptonemal complexes for chromosomes 3 and 4. The distribution of MLH1 foci in T34he was comparable to that of the controls. Conversely, the distributions of MLH1 foci on chromosome 4 were strongly modified in boar T34Inv (lack of crossover in the heterosynaptic region of the quadrivalent, and crossover displaced to the chromosome extremities), and also in boar T34ho (two recombination peaks on the q-arms compared with one of higher magnitude in the controls). Analyses of boars T34he and T34Inv showed that the interference was propagated through the breakpoints. A different result was obtained for boar T34ho, in which the breakpoints (transition between SSC3 and SSC4 chromatin on the bivalents) seemed to alter the transmission of the interference signal. Our results suggest that the number of crossovers and crossover interference could be regulated by partially different mechanisms.     

The Siva protein is a novel intracellular ligand of the CD4 receptor that promotes HIV-1 envelope-induced apoptosis in T-lymphoid cells

In addition to its positive signaling function in the antigen presentation process, CD4 acts as the primary receptor for HIV-1. Contact between CD4 and the viral envelope leads to virus entry, but can also trigger apoptosis of uninfected CD4⁺ T-cells through a mechanism that is poorly understood. We show that Siva-1, a death domain-containing proapoptotic protein, associates with the cytoplasmic domain of CD4. This interaction is mediated by the cysteine-rich region found in the C-terminal part of the Siva-1 protein. Expression of Siva-1 specifically increases the susceptibility of both T-cell lines and unstimulated human primary CD4⁺ T-lymphocytes to CD4-mediated apoptosis triggered by the HIV-1 envelope, and results in activation of a caspase-dependent mitochondrial pathway. The same susceptibility is observed in T-cells expressing a truncated form of CD4 that is able to recruit Siva-1 but fails to associate with p56^Lck, indicating that Siva-1 participates in a pathway independent of the p56^Lck kinase activity. Altogether, these results suggest that Siva-1 might participate in the CD4-initiated signaling apoptotic pathway induced by the HIV-1 envelope in T-lymphoid cells. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Widespread Infection with Homologues of Human Parvoviruses B19, PARV4, and Human Bocavirus of Chimpanzees and Gorillas in the Wild

Infections with human parvoviruses B19 and recently discovered human bocaviruses (HBoVs) are widespread, while PARV4 infections are transmitted parenterally and prevalent specifically in injecting drug users and hemophiliacs. To investigate the exposure and circulation of parvoviruses related to B19 virus, PARV4, and HBoV in nonhuman primates, plasma samples collected from 73 Cameroonian wild-caught chimpanzees and gorillas and 91 Old World monkey (OWM) species were screened for antibodies to recombinant B19 virus, PARV4, and HBoV VP2 antigens by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Moderate to high frequencies of seroreactivity to PARV4 (63% and 18% in chimpanzees and gorillas, respectively), HBoV (73% and 36%), and B19 virus (8% and 27%) were recorded for apes, while OWMs were uniformly negative (for PARV4 and B19 virus) or infrequently reactive (3% for HBoV). For genetic characterization, plasma samples and 54 fecal samples from chimpanzees and gorillas collected from Cameroonian forest floors were screened by PCR with primers conserved within Erythrovirus, Bocavirus, and PARV4 genera. Two plasma samples (chimpanzee and baboon) were positive for PARV4, while four fecal samples were positive for HBoV-like viruses. The chimpanzee PARV4 variant showed 18% and 15% nucleotide sequence divergence in NS and VP1/2, respectively, from human variants (9% and 7% amino acid, respectively), while the baboon variant was substantially more divergent, mirroring host phylogeny. Ape HBoV variants showed complex sequence relationships with human viruses, comprising separate divergent homologues of HBoV1 and the recombinant HBoV3 species in chimpanzees and a novel recombinant species in gorillas. This study provides the first evidence for widespread circulation of parvoviruses in primates and enables future investigations of their epidemiology, host specificity, and (co)evolutionary histories.Autonomous parvoviruses known to infect humans comprise parvovirus B19 (18) and the recently discovered PARV4 (22) and human bocavirus (HBoV) (3). Members of the family Parvoviridae are genetically and biologically diverse and are classified into several genera or groups, showing marked differences in host range, pathology, and tissue/cellular tropisms (18). Human parvovirus B19, a member of the Erythrovirus genus, is transmitted primarily by the respiratory route but causes systemic infections. Erythroid progenitor cells are specifically targeted through expression of globoside P antigen, which acts as the B19 virus receptor for entry (5). In common with infections by most parvoviruses, B19 virus infections are acute; a period of intense viremia is followed by seroconversion for antibody to B19 virus and lifelong immunity from reinfection (29). Despite the clearance of viremia and seroconversion for antibody, lifelong persistence of viral DNA in tissues has been shown to occur (12, 20, 26, 28, 43, 58). Three genotypes of B19 virus have been described, differing in nucleotide sequence by approximately 13 to 14% (7, 21, 41, 53); genotypes 1 and 2 have been found in Europe, the United States, and other Western countries, while genotype 3 is restricted to sub-Saharan Africa and South America (7, 47, 49). B19 virus widely circulates in human populations worldwide; in Western countries, several studies have documented increasing frequencies of B19 virus seropositivity with age, rising to approximately 60 to 70% by adulthood (15, 39, 48, 61).Another human parvovirus, PARV4, shows markedly different epidemiology and transmission routes. It was originally detected in plasma from an individual with an “acute infection syndrome” resembling that of primary human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (22). While this clinical presentation has not been observed again, infection with PARV4 is known to be widespread specifically in individuals with a history of parenteral exposure (injecting drug users [IDUs], hemophiliacs, polytransfused individuals), with a strikingly higher incidence in those infected with HIV-1 (13, 14, 30, 35, 54). These observations suggest that PARV4 is primarily transmitted though parenteral routes in Western countries (54, 56). In common with infection with the better-characterized human parvovirus B19, infection with PARV4 is associated with a period of acute viremia, followed by seroconversion for antibody and long-term persistence of viral DNA sequences in lymphoid and other tissue (33, 37, 52). Circulating variants of PARV4 have been classified into three distinct genotypes exhibiting approximately 8% nucleotide sequence divergence from each other. Genotypes 1 and 2 circulate in Western countries, while genotype 3 has to date been recorded only in sub-Saharan Africa (45, 55).The third human parvovirus, HBoV (3), shows a number of epidemiological and clinical attributes different from those of both B19 virus and PARV4. HBoV was originally found in the respiratory tract of young children and has been the subject of intense investigation as a potential cause of human respiratory disease (reviewed in references 1, 51, and 62). Although it is frequently detected by PCR in the nasopharynx of viremic individuals with primary infections with lower respiratory tract disease, other coinfecting respiratory viruses are frequently detected (19). HBoV additionally shows long-term, low-level carriage in the respiratory tract after primary infection, which further complicates PCR-based etiological studies (2, 38) and warrants the use of other diagnostic strategies, such as serology (30, 32, 59). In contrast to the rather minimal genetic diversity of B19 virus and PARV4 genotypes, bocaviruses infecting humans are now known to comprise three to four major genetic variants (termed types or species 1 to 4) (23, 24). HBoV1 and HBoV2 show 22%, 33%, and 20% amino acid sequence divergence from each other in the encoded viral nonstructural (NS), NP-1, and structural VP1/VP2 proteins, respectively, the latter potentially leading to antigenic diversity and some loss of antigenic cross-reactivity. A third type/species of HBoV is a chimeric form with a nonstructural gene region (NS, NP1) most similar to HBoV1, a recombination breakpoint in the intergenic region between NP1 and VP1, and structural genes related to those of HBoV2 (4, 23). Current data suggest that only HBoV1 is capable of infecting the respiratory tract; most published large-scale screening studies have failed to detect HBoV2 (or HBoV3) in respiratory samples (10, 11, 60), while all three types/species are detectable in fecal samples, indicating the existence of an alternative or additional site of virus replication (23). Despite extensive inquiry, the exact role of HBoV1 in respiratory disease remains unclear, as is the proposed etiological role of HBoV2 (and possibly HBoV3) in gastroenteritis (4, 11, 23, 50). Very recently, a fourth species/type, HBoV4, has been detected in fecal samples; genetically it also shows evidence for past recombination, with NS and NP1 region sequences grouping with HBoV2, while VP1/VP2 is more closely related to HBoV3 (23).We have little understanding of the past epidemiology, evolution, and origins of human parvoviruses. For both B19 virus and PARV4, evidence has been obtained for a temporal succession of genotypes over time (37, 43); in Europe, B19 virus genotype 1 largely replaced type 2 in the 1960 and 1970s (43), while current data indicate that a similar replacement of PARV4 genotypes occurred within the last 20 years (37). The highly restricted sequence diversity of currently circulating variants of PARV4 and B19 virus and of HBoV1 variants supports the hypothesis of a relatively recent emergence and spread of these viruses in human populations (36, 42, 64).The existence and evolution of parvoviruses on a much longer time scale is suggested by the observations that members of the Erythrovirus and Parvovirus genera both contain viruses that are highly host species specific and that the molecular phylogenies of both genera are largely congruent with those of their hosts (34). This has led to the hypothesis of long-term coevolution of parvoviruses with their host over the 90 million years of mammalian evolution and perhaps beyond. Among erythroviruses, simian homologues of B19 virus have been found in cynomolgus monkeys (44) and rhesus and pig-tailed macaques (16) and more genetically distant viruses have been characterized in chipmunks and cows (9, 63). Divergent homologues of PARV4 in pigs and cows have been described (31), while the bovine and canine parvoviruses distantly related to HBoV are the originally described members of the Bocavirus genus. However, the process of virus-host codivergence is known to be punctuated by occasional cross-species transmissions, including the well-documented spread of feline parvovirus to dogs (46). Based on serological evidence, the possible transmission of simian erythroviruses to animal handlers has been proposed (6).To gain further insights into the origins and evolution of human parvoviruses, we have performed large-scale serological and PCR-based screening of nonhuman primates (chimpanzees and gorillas) and of several species of Old World monkeys (OWMs) for evidence of infection with parvoviruses that are antigenically related to the human B19, PARV4, and HBoV viruses. By PCR, we have sought to genetically characterize homologues of the three autonomous human parvoviruses in apes and Old World monkey species and to analyze their evolutionary relationship to human and other mammalian homologues of these viruses.     

QTLs for enzyme activities and soluble carbohydrates involved in starch accumulation during grain filling in maize

ADPglucose, the essential substrate for starch synthesis, is synthesized in maize by a pathway involving at least invertases, sucrose synthase, and ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase, as shown by the starch-deficient mutants, mn1, sh1, and bt2 or sh2, respectively. To improve understanding of the relationship between early grain-filling traits and carbohydrate composition in mature grain, QTLs linked to soluble invertase, sucrose synthase, and ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase activities and to starch, sucrose, fructose, and glucose concentrations were investigated. In order to take into account the specific time-course of each enzyme activity during grain filling, sampling was carried out at three periods (15, 25, and 35 d after pollination) on 100 lines from a recombinant inbred family, grown in the field. The MQTL method associated with QTL interaction analysis revealed numerous QTLs for all traits, but only one QTL was consistently observed at the three sampling periods. Some chromosome zones were heavily labelled, forming clusters of QTLs. Numerous possible candidate genes of the starch synthetic pathway co-located with QTLs. Four QTLs were found close to the locus Sh1 (bin 9.01) coding for the sucrose synthase. In order to confirm the importance of this locus, the CAPS polymorphism of the Sh1 gene was analysed in 45 genetically unrelated maize lines from various geographical origins. The DNA polymorphism was significantly associated with phenotypic traits related to grain filling (starch and amylose content, grain matter, and ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase activity at 35 DAP). Thus, the Sh1 locus could provide a physiologically pertinent marker for maize selection.     

A new Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with a mutant Smt3-deconjugating Ulp1 protein is affected in DNA replication and requires Srs2 and homologous recombination for its viability

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Srs2 protein is involved in DNA repair and recombination. In order to gain better insight into the roles of Srs2, we performed a screen to identify mutations that are synthetically lethal with an srs2 deletion. One of them is a mutated allele of the ULP1 gene that encodes a protease specifically cleaving Smt3-protein conjugates. This allele, ulp1-I615N, is responsible for an accumulation of Smt3-conjugated proteins. The mutant is unable to grow at 37 degrees C. At permissive temperatures, it still shows severe growth defects together with a strong hyperrecombination phenotype and is impaired in meiosis. Genetic interactions between ulp1 and mutations that affect different repair pathways indicated that the RAD51-dependent homologous recombination mechanism, but not excision resynthesis, translesion synthesis, or nonhomologous end-joining processes, is required for the viability of the mutant. Thus, both Srs2, believed to negatively control homologous recombination, and the process of recombination per se are essential for the viability of the ulp1 mutant. Upon replication, mutant cells accumulate single-stranded DNA interruptions. These structures are believed to generate different recombination intermediates. Some of them are fixed by recombination, and others require Srs2 to be reversed and fixed by an alternate pathway.