Amphidoma languida sp. nov. (Dinophyceae) reveals a close relationship between Amphidoma and Azadinium

Toxic algae such as Alexandrium and Azadinium have an important ecological impact and have originated several times independently within the dinophytes. Their closest relatives, however, are mostly unknown at present. A new dinophyte species, Amphidoma languida sp. nov., was isolated from Bantry Bay (Ireland) during a period of elevated azaspiracid toxicity in mussels. The new species was described in detail, and its phylogenetic position was analysed, by using a combination of light and electron microscopy, chemical detection methods, and sequence comparison of concatenated ribosomal RNA sequence data. Morphological similarities, such as cingular and hypothecal plates, the number and arrangement of sulcal plates, and the characteristic apical pore complex with a small X-plate centrally invading the first apical plate, indicated a close relationship between Amphidoma and Azadinium. However, no known azaspiracid analogues were detected in A. languida by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass-spectrometry. In a molecular phylogeny, the Amphidomataceae including Amphidoma and Azadinium were an independent lineage among other monophyletic major groups of the dinophytes such as the Suessiales, Prorocentrales, Gonyaulacales, and Peridiniales. Thus, the taxonomic affiliation of Azadinium is clarified, and our data may prove helpful in the development of specific and reliable molecular detection methods of toxic Azadinium.     

ATG16 mediates the autophagic degradation of the 19S proteasomal subunits PSMD1 and PSMD2

Autophagy and the ubiquitin proteasome system are the two major cellular processes for protein and organelle recycling and clearance in eukaryotic cells. Evidence is accumulating that these two pathways are interrelated through adaptor proteins. Here, we found that PSMD1 and PSMD2, both components of the 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome, directly interact with Dictyostelium discoideum autophagy 16 (ATG16), a core autophagosomal protein. ATG16 is composed of an N-terminal domain, which is responsible for homo-dimerization and binding to ATG5 and a C-terminal β-propeller structure. Deletion analysis of ATG16 showed that the N-terminal half of ATG16 interacted directly only with PSMD1, while the C-terminal half interacted with both, PSMD1 and PSMD2. RFP-tagged PSMD1 as well as PSMD2 were enriched in large puncta, reminiscent of autophagosomes, in wild-type cells. These puncta were absent in atg16￣ and atg9￣/16￣ cells and weaker and less frequent in atg9￣ cells, showing that ATG16 was crucial and the autophagic process important for their formation. Co-expression of ATG16-GFP or GFP-ATG8a(LC3) with RFP-PSMD1 or RFP-PSMD2, respectively, in atg16￣ or wild-type cells revealed many instances of co-localization, suggesting that RFP-PSMD1 or RFP-PSMD2 positive puncta constitute autophagosomes. LysoTracker^® labeling and a proteolytic cleavage assay confirmed that PSMD1 and PSMD2 were present in lysosomes in wild-type cells. In vivo, ATG16 is required for their enrichment in ATG8a positive puncta, which mature into autolysosomes. We propose that ATG16 links autophagy and the ubiquitin proteasome system.     

Aphyly: identifying the flotsam and jetsam of systematics

Many taxon names in any classification will be composed of taxa that have yet to be demonstrated as monophyletic, that is, characterized by synapomorphies. Such taxa might be called aphyletic, the flotsam and jetsam in systematics, simply meaning they require taxonomic revision. The term aphyly is, however, the same as, if not identical to, Hennig's “Restkörper” and Bernardi's merophyly. None of these terms gained common usage. We outline Hennig's use of “Restkörper” and Bernardi's use of merophyly and compare it to aphyly. In our view, application of aphyly would avoid the oft made assumption that when a monophyletic group is discovered from within an already known and named taxon, then the species left behind are rendered paraphyletic. By identifying the flotsam and jetsam in systematics, we can focus on taxa in need of attention and avoid making phylogenetic faux pas with respect to their phylogenetic status.     

Does aluminium affect root growth of maize through interaction with the cell wall – plasma membrane – cytoskeleton continuum?

The mechanism of aluminium-induced inhibition of root elongation is still not well understood. It is a matter of debate whether the primary lesions of Al toxicity are apoplastic or symplastic. The present paper summarises experimental evidence which offers new avenues in the understanding of Al toxicity and resistance in maize. Application of Al for 1 h to individual 1 mm sections of the root apex only inhibited root elongation if applied to the first 3 apical mm. The most Al-sensitive apical root zone appeared to be the 1–2 mm segment. Aluminium-induced prominent alterations in both the microtubular (disintegration) and the actin cytoskeleton (altered polymerisation patterns) were found especially in the apical 1–2 mm zone using monoclonal antibodies. Since accumulation of Al in the root apoplast is dependent on the properties of the pectic matrix, we investigated whether Al uptake and toxicity could be modulated by changing the pectin content of the cell walls through pre-treatment of intact maize plants with 150 mM NaCl for 5 days. NaCl-adapted plants with higher pectin content accumulated more Al in their root apices and they were more Al-sensitive as indicated by more severe inhibition of root elongation and enhanced callose induction by Al. This special role of the pectic matrix of the cell walls in the modulation of Al toxicity is also indicated by a close positive correlation between pectin, Al, and Al-induced callose contents of 1 mm root segments along the 5 mm root apex. On the basis of the presented data we suggest that the rapid disorganisation of the cytoskeleton leading to root growth inhibition may be mediated by interaction of Al with the apoplastic side of the cell wall – plasma membrane – cytoskeleton continuum. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Evolution of Classical Polyandry: Three Steps to Female Emancipation

Abstract In classical polyandry, sex roles are reversed and a female reproduces with several males, each of whom raises his offspring with little or no help from her. This mating system occurs in some fishes and birds, and it is of great interest in relation to parental investment, sex role and sexual selection theory. The evolution of classical polyandry, however, is debated and not well understood. It is here suggested to generally take place in three main steps. (1) First evolves male care for eggs, for reasons that differ between fishes and birds. (2) Second, a female becomes able to lay more eggs than a male can accommodate. This can happen, for example, by evolution of male pregnancy or smaller body size, or by female production of more or larger eggs, made possible by larger female body size or more food. Polyandry in several taxa is associated with shift to a habitat rich in food during the breeding season, to novel specialised foraging methods, or to both. A favourable food situation may be crucial for evolution of classical polyandry. (3) In step three, females compete to lay two or more clutches in sequence for different males. Successful polyandrous females obtain more offspring, spreading traits that enhance success in competition over males. Step three may be most likely in species with small body size, for reasons of reproductive constraints and seasonality. Evolution of classical polyandry appears to have followed these steps in shorebirds, coucals and pipefishes, but the reasons why certain species differ from their close phylogenetic relatives in being polyandrous are far from clear. Behavioural and ecological studies of additional species, and detailed phylogenies of taxa with diverse mating systems including polyandry, are needed for testing these ideas.