Cellular distribution and contribution of cyclooxygenase COX-2 to diabetogenesis in NOD mouse

Unlike most other mammalian cells, beta-cells of Langerhans constitutively express cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 rather than COX-1. COX-2 is also constitutively expressed in type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients' periphery blood monocytes and macrophage. To understand the role of COX-2 in the beta-cell, we investigated COX-2 expression in beta-cells and islet infiltrates of NOD and BALB/c mice using fluorescence immunohistochemistry and cytochemical confocal microscopy and Western blotting. Immunostaining showed that COX-2 is expressed in islet-infiltrating macrophages, and that the expression of insulin and COX-2 disappeared concomitantly from the beta-cells when NOD mice progressed toward overt diabetes. Also cultured INS-1E cells coexpressed insulin and COX-2 but clearly in different subcellular compartments. Treatment with celecoxib increased insulin release from these cells in a dose-dependent manner in glucose concentrations ranging from 5 to 17 mM. Excessive COX-2 expression by the islet-infiltrating macrophages may contribute to the beta-cell death during insulitis. The effects of celecoxib on INS-1E cells suggest that PGE(2) and other downstream products of COX-2 may contribute to the regulation of insulin release from the beta-cells.     

Disabling a C-terminal autoinhibitory control element in endothelial nitric-oxide synthase by phosphorylation provides a molecular explanation for activation of vascular NO synthesis by diverse physiological stimuli

Calmodulin-dependent activation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase is generally considered to follow a transient increase in intracellular calcium levels. However, a number of physiological stimuli (e.g. endothelial shear-stress, insulin) are known to activate endothelial nitric oxide (eNOS) via a non-classical, "calcium-independent" pathway. Recent findings demonstrate that such stimuli elicit the phosphorylation of a C-terminal residue in eNOS (Ser(1179) in the bovine isoform), rendering eNOS active at resting levels of intracellular calcium. However, the mechanistic basis for this mode of eNOS activation remains unknown. Protein modeling led us to consider that the C terminus of eNOS may fulfill an autoinhibitory function that can be disrupted by phosphorylation of serine 1179. To test this possibility we contrasted the phenotype of wild type bovine eNOS with that of a mutant lacking C-terminal residues 1179-1205 (CDelta27 eNOS). Despite no observed difference in calmodulin affinity, CDelta27 eNOS exhibited a 5-fold reduction in EC(50) for calcium and a 2-4-fold increase in maximal catalytic activities. In these phenotypic properties, CDelta27 accurately mimics phospho-Ser(1179) wild type eNOS. We conclude that the C terminus imposes a significant barrier to the activation of eNOS by calmodulin binding and that this barrier can be functionally disabled by Ser(1179) phosphorylation-elicited enzyme activation.     

Initial structure-activity relationship studies of a novel series of pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrimid-7-ones as GnRH receptor antagonists

Initial SAR studies on 1-aminomethyl-2-aryl-3-cyano-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrimid-7-one-6-carboxylates as human GnRH receptor antagonists were discussed. 2-(2-Methylaminoethyl)pyridine was discovered to be a key feature for generating active compounds. The best compound from the series had 25 nM (K(i)) binding affinity to human GnRH receptor.     

The Herpes Simplex Virus US11 Protein Effectively Compensates for the γ134.5 Gene if Present before Activation of Protein Kinase R by Precluding Its Phosphorylation and That of the α Subunit of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 2

In herpes simplex virus-infected cells, viral γ₁34.5 protein blocks the shutoff of protein synthesis by activated protein kinase R (PKR) by directing the protein phosphatase 1α to dephosphorylate the α subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF-2α). The amino acid sequence of the γ₁34.5 protein which interacts with the phosphatase has high homology to a domain of the eukaryotic protein GADD34. A class of compensatory mutants characterized by a deletion which results in the juxtaposition of the α47 promoter next to U_S11, a γ₂ (late) gene in wild-type virus-infected cells, has been described. In cells infected with these mutants, protein synthesis continues even in the absence of the γ₁34.5 gene. In these cells, PKR is activated but eIF-2α is not phosphorylated, and the phosphatase is not redirected to dephosphorylate eIF-2α. We report the following: (i) in cells infected with these mutants, U_S11 protein was made early in infection; (ii) U_S11 protein bound PKR and was phosphorylated; (iii) in in vitro assays, U_S11 blocked the phosphorylation of eIF-2α by PKR activated by poly(I-C); and (iv) U_S11 was more effective if present in the reaction mixture during the activation of PKR than if added after PKR had been activated by poly(I-C). We conclude the following: (i) in cells infected with the compensatory mutants, U_S11 made early in infection binds to PKR and precludes the phosphorylation of eIF-2α, whereas U_S11 driven by its natural promoter and expressed late in infection is ineffective; and (ii) activation of PKR by double-stranded RNA is a common impediment countered by most viruses by different mechanisms. The γ₁34.5 gene is not highly conserved among herpesviruses. A likely scenario is that acquisition by a progenitor of herpes simplex virus of a portion of the cellular GADD34 gene resulted in a more potent and reliable means of curbing the effects of activated PKR. U_S11 was retained as a γ₂ gene because, like many viral proteins, it has multiple functions.The herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) genome encodes two sets of functions. The first and paramount are functions related to viral gene expression, replication of viral DNA, synthesis of virion proteins, assembly, packaging, and egress of the virus from the infected cell. The second set of functions, no less important in the survival of the virus in the human population, is creation of the environment necessary to maximize the yield and spread of virus from cell to cell and from infected to uninfected individuals (reviewed in reference 38). Of these known genes, several play a significant role in abating or delaying a host response to infection. The earliest to be expressed is the U_L41 gene which encodes a protein that is introduced into the cell in virions during infection (26, 27). This protein reduces the synthesis of host proteins by causing the destruction of mRNA in a rather nonspecific manner and therefore could be expected to reduce the synthesis of cellular proteins deleterious to viral replication (26, 27, 44).A second and very different approach to blocking host defense mechanisms is exemplified by infected cell protein 47 (ICP47). Proteosomal degradation of viral proteins could be expected to produce antigenic peptides which, if presented on the cell surface, could provoke a cytotoxic cell response early in infection and thus reduce viral yield. ICP47, an α protein made immediately after infection, blocks the presentation of antigenic peptides on the surface of the infected cells (20).The focus of this laboratory has been on a third viral pathway designed to block cellular response to infection. In cells infected with most viruses, the synthesis of complementary mRNA leads to activation of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase R (PKR). This enzyme phosphorylates the α subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF-2α) (23). A consequence of this phosphorylation is total shutoff of protein synthesis. This would be an example of a noble sacrifice of the infected cell for the sake of survival of the organism were it not for the fact that viruses, while activating the PKR kinase pathway by making double-stranded RNA, also express functions which block this host defense system (2–4, 6, 7, 10, 28, 30, 34). In the case of HSV-1, more than 50% of the viral DNA is represented late in infection in the form of cRNA (21, 25), and the gene whose product blocks the consequences of activation of PKR is γ₁34.5 (7). In the absence of the gene, eIF-2α is phosphorylated and protein synthesis is impaired beginning approximately 5 h after infection (7, 9). In its presence, protein synthesis continues unabated even though PKR is activated (9). Recent studies have shown that the carboxyl terminus of the γ₁34.5 gene binds to the protein phosphatase 1α (PP1) and redirects it to dephosphorylate eIF-2α (19). The effectiveness of the γ₁34.5-PP1 complex is apparent from the observation that the rate of dephosphorylation of eIF-2α in cells infected with wild-type virus is more than 1000 times that of uninfected cells or cells infected with the γ₁34.5⁻ virus (5, 19).The studies described in this report concern another aspect of virus-induced block of the consequence of activation of PKR. Briefly, Mohr and Gluzman reported that serial passage of a γ₁34.5⁻ mutant resulted in the selection of a compensatory mutation capable of sustained protein synthesis (35). A characteristic of the compensatory mutants isolated by Mohr and Gluzman is a deletion in the α47 gene resulting in the juxtaposition of the promoter of the α47 gene next to the 5′ end of U_S11, a late (γ₂) viral gene. Preliminary studies of those mutants revealed that PKR was activated in cells infected with either the wild-type parent or the γ₁34.5⁻ virus, but protein synthesis was unaffected in cells infected with wild-type virus or the mutant carrying the compensatory mutations (5, 18).In an attempt to define the phenotype of the virus carrying the compensatory mutation, we constructed a mutant lacking the γ₁34.5 and the U_S8 to -12 genes. This mutant, designated R5103, activated PKR and caused a shutoff of protein synthesis (5). We then inserted into the R5103 genome a DNA fragment consisting of the intact U_S10 gene and the U_S11 open reading frame fused to the α47 promoter. This virus, designated R5104, activated PKR but did not induce the shutoff of protein synthesis. Consistent with the conclusion of Mohr and Gluzman (35), the mutation maps in the domain inserted into the R5104 virus (5). Further studies yielded two significant observations. First, in stark contrast to lysates of cells infected with R5103 and other γ₁34.5⁻ mutants, the lysates of R5104 virus failed to phosphorylate the α subunit of eIF-2 (5). Second, in striking contrast to lysates of wild-type virus-infected cells, the phosphatase activity of lysates of R5104 virus-infected cells specific for eIF-2α could not be differentiated from that of mock-infected cells or those of cells infected with other γ₁34.5⁻ mutants (5). These results indicated that the compensatory mutation blocks PKR from phosphorylating eIF-2α.The studies summarized in this report focused on U_S11 protein. We report that in cells infected with the R5104 recombinant the U_S11 protein is made early in infection, that U_S11 protein interacts with PKR and blocks the phosphorylation of eIF-2α by activated PKR in in vitro assays, and that the effectiveness of the U_S11 protein is greater if the protein is present in the reaction before activation of PKR than if it is after PKR has been activated by the addition of poly(I-C). We also found that U_S11 is phosphorylated in the presence of activated PKR but not in its absence. We conclude that U_S11 may have been an ancient mechanism for blocking the effects of activated PKR and that it has been supplanted by acquisition of the carboxyl-terminal domain of the γ₁34.5 protein from a cellular gene. We also note that U_S11 protein made late in infection, after PKR has been activated, is ineffective.Relevant to this report are some of the properties of the U_S11 protein. U_S11 is one of the most abundant viral proteins expressed at late times in viral infection (22, 31). It binds mRNA in a sequence- and conformation-specific fashion (39–41). In HSV-1-infected cells, U_S11 suppresses the synthesis of a truncated RNA colinear with the 5′ domain of the U_L34 mRNA (40). The protein accumulates in nucleoli, in the cytoplasm in association with the 60S ribosomal subunit, and it is also packaged in virions (31, 37, 41). In newly infected cells, the U_S11 protein has been found associated with ribosomes (41).Recently a plethora of reports suggested that U_S11 may have novel functions not readily apparent from its localization in the infected cell. Thus, U_S11 protein has been reported to have functions similar to those of human immunodeficiency Tat and Rev proteins and has also been reported to complement Rev function in a Rev⁻ human immunodeficiency virus mutant (11). The U_S11 protein has been reported to confer thermotolerance and help restore protein synthesis in HeLa cells subjected to thermal injury (12).     

Evidence that the RdeA protein is a component of a multistep phosphorelay modulating rate of development in Dictyostelium.

We have isolated an insertional mutant of Dictyostelium discoideum that aggregated rapidly and formed spores and stalk cells within 14 h of development instead of the normal 24 h. We have shown by parasexual genetics that the insertion is in the rdeA locus and have cloned the gene. It encodes a predicted 28 kDa protein (RdeA) that is enriched in charged residues and is very hydrophilic. Constructs with the DNA for the c-Myc epitope or for the green fluorescent protein indicate that RdeA is not compartmentalized. RdeA displays homology around a histidine residue at amino acid 65 with members of the H2 module family of phosphotransferases that participate in multistep phosphoryl relays. Replacement of this histidine rendered the protein inactive. The mutant is complemented by transformation with the Ypd1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, itself an H2 module protein. We propose that RdeA is part of a multistep phosphorelay system that modulates the rate of development.     

Signal transduction and virulence regulation in human and animal pathogens

Abstract Pathogens have developed many strategies for survival in animals and humans which possess very effective defense mechanisms. Although there are many different ways, in which pathogenic bacteria solved the problem to overcome the host defense, some common features of virulence mechanisms can be detected even in phylogenetically very distant bacteria (Finlay and Falkow (1989) Microb. Rev. 6 1375–1383). One important feature is that the regulation of expression of virulence factors and the exact timing of their expression is very important for many of the pathogenic bacteria, as most of them have to encounter different growth situations during an infection cycle, which require a fast adaptation to the new situation by the expression of different factors. This review gives an overview about the mechanisms used by pathogenic bacteria to accomplish the difficult task of regulation of their virulence potential in response to environmental changes. In addition, the relationship of these virulence regulatory systems with other signal transduction mechanisms not involved in pathogenicity is discussed.     

Growth and Specific Nodule Activity of Soybean during Application and Recovery of a Leaf Moisture Stress

Soybean plants growing at day/night temperatures of 30/18, 26/18, and 22/18 C were subjected to a single drying and recovery cycle during an 18- to 19-day period in the early to midpod development stage. Leaf total electrochemical water potential was reduced to about −24 bars during the 4-day drying cycle at all temperatures, but recovered to control levels upon rewatering. The changes in dry matter accumulation in whole plants and plant parts, specific activity of nodules as measured by acetylene reduction, and levels of adenosine phosphates in nodules were measured periodically during stress and recovery.