首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   547篇
  免费   28篇
  2023年   4篇
  2021年   7篇
  2020年   7篇
  2019年   4篇
  2018年   9篇
  2017年   2篇
  2016年   16篇
  2015年   24篇
  2014年   24篇
  2013年   34篇
  2012年   54篇
  2011年   36篇
  2010年   36篇
  2009年   24篇
  2008年   34篇
  2007年   34篇
  2006年   34篇
  2005年   25篇
  2004年   17篇
  2003年   14篇
  2002年   21篇
  2001年   5篇
  2000年   3篇
  1999年   5篇
  1998年   10篇
  1997年   5篇
  1995年   6篇
  1994年   5篇
  1993年   6篇
  1992年   4篇
  1991年   5篇
  1990年   3篇
  1989年   4篇
  1988年   6篇
  1987年   6篇
  1985年   4篇
  1980年   3篇
  1978年   2篇
  1977年   3篇
  1975年   4篇
  1974年   3篇
  1972年   2篇
  1964年   2篇
  1961年   4篇
  1958年   1篇
  1955年   1篇
  1954年   1篇
  1944年   1篇
  1943年   1篇
  1932年   1篇
排序方式: 共有575条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
141.
Translation elongation is an accurate and rapid process, dependent upon efficient juxtaposition of tRNAs in the ribosomal A- and P-sites. Here, we sought evidence of A- and P-site tRNA interaction by examining bias in codon pair choice within open reading frames from a range of genomes. Three distinct and marked effects were revealed once codon and dipeptide biases had been subtracted. First, in the majority of genomes, codon pair preference is primarily determined by a tetranucleotide combination of the third nucleotide of the P-site codon, and all 3 nt of the A-site codon. Second, pairs of rare codons are generally under-used in eukaryotes, but over-used in prokaryotes. Third, the analysis revealed a highly significant effect of tRNA-mediated selection on codon pairing in unicellular eukaryotes, Bacillus subtilis, and the gamma proteobacteria. This was evident because in these organisms, synonymous codons decoded in the A-site by the same tRNA exhibit significantly similar P-site pairing preferences. Codon pair preference is thus influenced by the identity of A-site tRNAs, in combination with the P-site codon third nucleotide. Multivariate analysis identified conserved nucleotide positions within A-site tRNA sequences that modulate codon pair preferences. Structural features that regulate tRNA geometry within the ribosome may govern genomic codon pair patterns, driving enhanced translational fidelity and/or rate.  相似文献   
142.
The mechanism of pancreatitis-induced pain is unknown. In other tissues, inflammation activates transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) on sensory nerves to liberate CGRP and substance P (SP) in peripheral tissues and the dorsal horn to cause neurogenic inflammation and pain, respectively. We evaluated the contribution of TRPV1, CGRP, and SP to pancreatic pain in rats. TRPV1, CGRP, and SP were coexpressed in nerve fibers of the pancreas. Injection of the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin into the pancreatic duct induced endocytosis of the neurokinin 1 receptor in spinal neurons in the dorsal horn (T10), indicative of SP release upon stimulation of pancreatic sensory nerves. Induction of necrotizing pancreatitis by treatment with L-arginine caused a 12-fold increase in the number of spinal neurons expressing the proto-oncogene c-fos in laminae I and II of L1, suggesting activation of nociceptive pathways. L-arginine also caused a threefold increase in spontaneous abdominal contractions detected by electromyography, suggestive of referred pain. Systemic administration of the TRPV1 antagonist capsazepine inhibited c-fos expression by 2.5-fold and abdominal contractions by 4-fold. Intrathecal, but not systemic, administration of antagonists of CGRP (CGRP(8-37)) and SP (SR140333) receptors attenuated c-fos expression in spinal neurons by twofold. Thus necrotizing pancreatitis activates TRPV1 on pancreatic sensory nerves to release SP and CGRP in the dorsal horn, resulting in nociception. Antagonism of TRPV1, SP, and CGRP receptors may suppress pancreatitis pain.  相似文献   
143.
Severina E  Nunez L  Baker S  Matsuka YV 《Biochemistry》2006,45(6):1870-1880
In the present study we investigated the role of factor XIIIa reactive Gln and Lys sites of staphylococcal FnbA receptor in cross-linking reaction with alpha chains of fibrin. For this purpose we produced two recombinant FnbA mutants in which either a single Gln103 site (1Q FnbA) or all identified reactive Gln103, 105, 783, 830 and Lys157, 503, 620, 762 sites (4Q4K FnbA) were substituted with Ala residues. The results of FXIIIa-catalyzed incorporation of dansylcadaverine and dansylated peptide patterned on the NH2-terminal segment of fibronectin revealed that the reactivity of Gln substrate sites was drastically reduced in 1Q FnbA and 4Q4K FnbA mutants, while the reactivity of Lys substrate sites was only moderately decreased in 4Q4K FnbA. When it was tested in the FXIIIa-mediated fibrin cross-linking reaction, the 1Q FnbA mutant exhibited about 70-85% reduction in reactivity compared to that of the wild-type FnbA. These results demonstrate that FnbA participates in cross-linking to alpha chains of fibrin predominantly via its Gln103 reactive site. Several minor sites, including residues replaced in 4Q4K FnbA mutant, contributed to an additional 15-30% of the total fibrin cross-linking reactivity of FnbA. Comparison of amino acid sequences that follow the major reactive Gln site in FnbA and several known substrate proteins revealed that FXIIIa displays a preference for the glutamine residue in an xQAxBxPx sequence, where Q represents reactive glutamine, x is any amino acid residue, A is a polar residue, B is either valine or leucine, and P is proline.  相似文献   
144.
Lignin is a major determinant of the decomposition of plant materials in soils. Advances in transgenic technology have led to the possibility of modifying lignin to improve the pulping properties of plant materials for papermaking. Previous studies have shown that lignin modifications also affect the rate of plant material decay in soil. The aim of this work was to investigate short-term changes in soil microbial community structures when tobacco residues with reduced activity of enzymes in the monolignol pathway decompose. The residues from lignin-modified plants all decomposed faster than unmodified plant materials. The relative proportions of some of the structural groups of microbial phospholipid fatty acids were affected by genetic modifications, especially the proportion of double unsaturated chain fatty acids, indicative of fungi.  相似文献   
145.
146.
Conformational changes due to externally applied physiochemical parameters, including pH, temperature, solvent composition, and mechanical forces, have been extensively reported for numerous proteins. However, investigations on the effect of fluid shear flow on protein conformation remain inconclusive despite its importance not only in the research of protein dynamics but also for biotechnology applications where processes such as pumping, filtration, and mixing may expose protein solutions to changes in protein structure. By combining particle image velocimetry and Raman spectroscopy, we have successfully monitored reversible, shear-induced structural changes of lysozyme in well-characterized flows. Shearing of lysozyme in water altered the protein's backbone structure, whereas similar shear rates in glycerol solution affected the solvent exposure of side-chain residues located toward the exterior of the lysozyme α-domain. The results demonstrate the importance of measuring conformational changes in situ and of quantifying fluid stresses by the three-dimensional shear tensor to establish reversible unfolding or misfolding transitions occurring due to flow exposure.  相似文献   
147.
148.
This article considers professionalization as a governance strategy for synthetic biology, reporting on social science interviews done with scientists, science journal editors, members of science advisory boards and authors of nongovernmental policy reports on synthetic biology. After summarizing their observations about the potential advantages and disadvantages of the professionalization of synthetic biology, we analyze professionalization as a strategy that overcomes dichotomies found in the current debates about synthetic biology governance, specifically “top down” versus “bottom up” governance and scientific fact versus public values. Professionalization combines community and state, fact and value. Like all governance options, professionalization has limitations, particularly regarding war and peace. It is best conceptualized as potentially part of a wider range of governance mechanisms working in concert: a “web of prevention”.  相似文献   
149.

Background

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short, noncoding RNAs that regulate the expression of multiple target genes. Deregulation of miRNAs is common in human tumorigenesis. The miRNAs, MIR-15a/16-1, at chromosome band 13q14 are down-regulated in the majority of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).

Methodology/Principal Findings

We have measured the expression of MIR-15a/16-1, and 92 computationally-predicted MIR-15a/16-1 target genes in CLL patients and in normal controls. We identified 35 genes that are deregulated in CLL patients, 5 of which appear to be specific targets of the MIR-15a/16-1 cluster. These targets included 2 genes (BAZ2A and RNF41) that were significantly up-regulated (p<0.05) and 3 genes (RASSF5, MKK3 and LRIG1) that were significantly down-regulated (p<0.05) in CLL patients with down-regulated MIR-15a/16-1 expression.

Significance

The genes identified here as being subject to MIR-15a/16-1 regulation could represent direct or indirect targets of these miRNAs. Many of these are good biological candidates for involvement in tumorigenesis and as such, may be important in the aetiology of CLL.  相似文献   
150.
Interactions between endothelial cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix are continuously adapted during angiogenesis, from early sprouting through to lumen formation and vessel maturation. Regulated control of these interactions is crucial to sustain normal responses in this rapidly changing environment, and dysfunctional endothelial cell behaviour results in angiogenic disorders. The proteoglycan decorin, an extracellular matrix component, is upregulated during angiogenesis. While it was shown previously that the absence of decorin leads to dysregulated angiogenesis in vivo, the molecular mechanisms were not clear. These abnormal endothelial cell responses have been attributed to indirect effects of decorin; however, our recent data provides evidence that decorin directly regulates endothelial cell-matrix interactions. This data will be discussed in conjunction with findings from previous studies, to better understand the role of this proteoglycan in angiogenesis.Key words: decorin, angiogenesis, motility, α2β1 integrin, insulin-like growth factor I receptor, Rac GTPaseLed by appropriate cues, the vascular system undergoes postnatal remodelling (angiogenesis), to maintain tissue homeostasis. Thus while much of the mature endothelium is quiescent, locally activated endothelial cells re-enter the cell cycle, and assume a motile phenotype essential for sprouting and neo-vessel formation. Concomitantly, the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM) is significantly altered through de novo protein expression, deposition of plasma components and protease-mediated degradation. The latter liberates cryptic binding sites and sequestered growth factors in addition to intact and degraded ECM components, which themselves possess pro- and anti-angiogenic signalling properties. For supported blood flow, endothelium quiescence and integrity is re-established, and the ECM is organized into mature, cross-linked networks. In short, endothelial cells regulate ECM synthesis, assembly and turnover while the structure and composition of ECM in turn influences cellular phenotype. The ECM therefore, plays a critical role in control of endothelial cell behaviour during angiogenesis.Decorin is a member of the small leucine-rich repeat proteoglycan (SLRP) family, which was first discovered ‘decorating’ collagen I fibrils and was subsequently shown to regulate fibrillogenesis.1,2 Both the protein core and the single, covalently attached glycosaminoglycan (GAG) moieties of decorin are involved in this function, the relevance of which is demonstrated by the phenotype of the decorin null mouse, which exhibits loose, fragile skin due to dysregulated fibrillogenesis.2 Interestingly, a role for decorin in postnatal angiogenesis was also revealed by studies in the decorin null background. Corneal neoangiogenesis was reduced.3 Conversely, neo-angiogenesis was enhanced during dermal wound healing, although surprisingly this led to delayed wound closure.4 In this case, skin fragility due to the absence of decorin may have hindered wound closure, despite an increased blood supply. It is apparent however, that decorin plays a role in inflammation-associated angiogenesis. Indeed, endothelial cells undergoing angiogenic morphogenesis in this environment express decorin, while quiescent endothelial cells do not,36 indicating that decorin modulates endothelial cell behaviour specifically during inflammatory-associated remodelling of the vascular system.To understand decorin effects on angiogenic morphogenesis within a minimalist environment, various in vitro models of angiogenesis have been employed (6 Similarly, decorin expression enhanced tube formation on matrigel,8 but in other studies utilising this substrate was found to either have no influence9 or to inhibit tubulogenesis induced by growth factors.10 In yet another study, decorin inhibited tube formation when presented as a substrate prior to addition of collagen I.7 These contrasting observations may reflect the importance of the micro-environment within which decorin is presented. Alternatively, controversial results could result from different sources of decorin since cell types differ in their post-translational modifications of the GAG moiety. Hence, varying length or sulfation patterns of GAG chains may account for different biological activities of decorin. Discrepancies can also be explained as artefacts due to different purification protocols, such as when denaturing conditions are used to extract decorin from tissue. Taken together however, these observations suggest that decorin is neither a pro- nor an anti-angiogenic factor per se, but rather a regulator of angiogenesis, dependent on local cues for different activities. Further, that decorin is capable of both enhancing and inhibiting tubulogenesis may suggest a role in balancing vessel regression versus persistence. Immature vessels have a period of plasticity prior to maturation, during which they can be remodelled, and either regress, or given the appropriate signals, proceed to maturity.11 As a modulator of tube formation, it is tempting to speculate that decorin could influence the switch from immature to mature vessels, favouring one or the other in conjunction with signals from the local environment.

Table 1

Summary of the key functions of decorin in controlling cell behaviour
Cell typeFunctionDecorin additionEnvironment/MechanismReferences
Endothelial (HUVEC derived)Enhanced tubulogenesisOverexpressionCollagen I lattices, enhanced survival potentially IGF-IR mediated6, 18
Mouse cerebral endothelial cellsEnhanced tubulogenesisOverexpressionMatrigel substrate, EGFR activation leads to VEGF upregulation8
HUVECNo effect on tubulogenesisExogenousMatrigel substrate9
HUVECInhibited tubulogenesisExogenousMatrigel substrate, growth factor induced10
HUVEC, HDMECInhibited tubulogenesisSubstrateCollagen I lattice overlay7
HUVECMinimal adhesionSubstrateDecorin substrate7
HUVECInhibited adhesionExogenousCollagen I and fibronectin10
HUVECInhibited migrationExogenousVEGF-mediated chemotaxis through gelatin10
Endothelial (HUVEC derived)Enhanced adhesionExogenousCollagen I, fibronectin17
BAEInhibited migrationOverexpressionCollagen I, enhanced fibronectin fibrilllogenesis by decorin12
Endothelial (HUVEC derived)Enhanced motilityExogenousCollagen I, Decorin activates IGF-IR/Rac-1 and α2β1 integrin activity17
Human lung fibroblastEnhanced motilityExogenousDecorin activates Rho GTPases, mediators of motility20
Human foreskin fibroblastInhibited adhesionExogenousDecorin GAG moiety competes with CD44 for binding to collagen XIV14
Mouse Fibroblast (3T3)Inhibited adhesionExogenousDecorin competes with cells for interaction with thrombospondin at the cell-binding domain15
Human fibroblastInhibits adhesionExogenousDecorin GAG competes with cell-surface heparin-sulphate for interaction with fibronectin16
PlateletsSupported adhesionSubstrateDecorin interacts with, and signals through α2β1 integrin on platelets19
Open in a separate windowDecorin has been demonstrated to influence cell adhesion and motility, in particular, its influence on endothelial cell adhesion, migration and tube formation is controversial, and is the main focus of this table. Some additional key effects of decorin on fibroblast and platelet adhesion and motility are also summarised. In each case, the extracellular matrix environment in which the assay was conducted is shown, and where known, the proposed mechanism is stated.What are the molecular mechanisms by which decorin influences tubulogenesis? Since endothelial cell-matrix interactions control all aspects of angiogenesis, from motility, sprouting and lumen formation, to survival and proliferation, the role of decorin should be considered in this regard. Indirectly, decorin could quite feasibly modulate cell-matrix interactions through regulation of matrix structure and organisation2,12 and growth factor activity.13 However in vitro studies have begun to unravel rather more direct mechanisms. Studies on fibroblasts indicate that decorin can inhibit cell-matrix interactions by binding to and masking integrin attachment sites in matrix substrates. For instance, decorin inhibits fibroblast adhesion by competing with cell-surface GAG-containing CD44 for GAG binding sites on collagen XIV;14 similarly, decorin inhibits fibroblast adhesion to thrombospondin by interacting with the cell-binding domain of this substrate15 and may compete with fibroblast cell-surface heparin sulphate proteoglycans for binding to fibronectin.16 While such studies are rather lacking in endothelial cell systems, any one of these interactions could be relevant to endothelial cells. However, that decorin slightly enhanced endothelial cell attachment to fibronectin and collagen I in our system points to the existence of alternative mechanisms.17Indeed, a recent study demonstrated that decorin is an important signalling molecule in endothelial cells, where it both signals through the insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-IR) and competes with the natural ligand for interaction.18 Further, decorin appears to be biologically available and relevant for interaction with this receptor in vivo. Increased receptor expression was observed in both native and neo-vessels in decorin knockout mouse cornea in conjunction with reduced neoangiogenesis. In accordance with this, decorin downregulates the IGF-IR in vitro,18 indicating that signalling through, and control of IGF-IR levels by decorin could be an important factor in regulating angiogenesis. Additionally, immobilised decorin supports platelet adhesion through interactions with the collagen I-binding integrin, α2β1.19 We have shown that decorin—α2β1 integrin interaction may play a part in modulating endothelial cell—collagen I interactions, and further, have demonstrated that decorin promotes motility in this context through activation of IGF-IR and the small Rho GTPase, Rac.17 Similarly, decorin stimulates fibroblast motility through activation of small Rho GTPases,20 supporting a direct mechanism by which decorin influences cell-matrix interactions and motility, via activation of key regulators of cytoskeleton and focal adhesion dynamics. It should also be noted that signalling by decorin directly through ErbB receptors has also been extensively demonstrated in cancer cell systems where these receptors are frequently overexpressed.21 This interaction was not relevant to human umbilical vein endothelial cells18 although a recent study found that decorin activated the epidermal growth factor receptor in mouse cerebral endothelial cells.8 These differences presumably depend on cell-specific factors such as receptor availability as well as relative receptor affinities. In a complex system such as angiogenesis, multiple mechanisms doubtlessly are involved. However, it is clear that modulation of cell-matrix interactions by decorin could certainly be expected to play a key role in contributing to regulation of postnatal angiogenesis.Signals from the extracellular matrix via integrins and from growth factors to their receptors are co-ordinately integrated into the complex angiogenic cascade. Evidence exists to suggest that decorin could regulate cell-matrix interactions during early tube formation, i.e., endothelial cell sprouting and cell alignment, through both influencing integrin activity and signalling through IGF-IR.17 Later stages of angiogenesis, such as lumen formation and maturation are also potentially regulated by decorin through activation of Rac and α2β1 integrin,17 since activity of both these molecules is integral to this phase of angiogenesis.22 Additionally, Rac activity is implicated in regulating endothelium permeability and integrity,23 providing further possibilities in control of endothelium function by decorin. Further investigations would be required however, to establish whether decorin exerts its effects on tubulogenesis through these molecular mechanisms.Of relevance to α2β1 integrin-dependent endothelial cell interaction with collagen I, sprouting endothelial cells would encounter interstitial ECM, of which collagen I is a major component. Further, a ‘provisional’ matrix containing collagen I is secreted by sprouting endothelial cells and may be required for motility,24 and tube formation.25 Theoretically, various interactions could exist between decorin, collagen type I and α2β1 integrin in this context, which may be differentially supported through various stages of angiogenesis. Up to eleven interaction sites of α2β1 integrin have been postulated to exist within collagen I, albeit with different affinities towards this receptor. Some of these binding sites may only be recognized by the integrin in its highly active conformation.26 By influencing the collagen I binding activity of α2β117 decorin could thus alter the number of endothelial cell—collagen I contacts, thereby modulating adhesion and motility. Additionally, some decorin and α2β1 integrin binding sites may overlap, or are in close proximity.27 By virtue of this location, decorin would be ideally placed to locally modulate collagen I—binding activity of the integrin. Interestingly, modulation of activity of both α2β1 integrin and the small Rho GTPase Rac by decorin also could have implications for collagen I fibrillogenesis, which in turn, would indirectly influence cell-matrix interactions. Both the related Rho GTPase RhoA, and α2β1 integrin are involved in cellular control of pericellular collagen I fibrillogenesis.28 Thus in addition to regulating cell independent fibrillogenesis1 decorin could potentially influence cell-mediated aspects of this process. Pertinent questions remain therefore, as to under which biological situations is the interaction between α2β1 integrin and decorin relevant, and does decorin influence α2β1 integrin activity on the cell-surface through direct interactions, and/or by inside-out signalling through the IGF-I receptor (or alternative receptors)? Further, how do differential decorin/α2β1 integrin/collagen I interactions mediate fibrillogenesis and cell-matrix interactions?Interaction of decorin with multiple binding partners makes it challenging to fully understand the role of decorin in angiogenesis (Fig. 1). A consideration of the relative accessibility and affinity of binding sites on both decorin and its'' binding partners would facilitate further understanding. It is still an open question whether collagen I—bound decorin can simultaneously interact with other ligands. In the case of the IGF-IR, the binding site on the concave surface of decorin overlaps with that of collagen I, thus mutually exclusive interactions seem more likely. That decorin clearly influences both collagen I matrix integrity and IGF-IR activity in vivo, would suggest that decorin is not exclusively associated with collagen I. Perhaps decorin occurs in a more ‘soluble’ form when locally secreted by endothelial cells undergoing angiogenic morphogenesis. Does collagen-bound decorin interact simultaneously with α2β1 integrin? This could be a possibility, since decorin core protein interacts with collagen I, allowing the possibility of GAG—integrin interaction. In this scenario however, interaction of α2β1 integrin with the GAG moiety of decorin in preference to collagen I might sound improbable. Nevertheless, during remodelling, interactions such as these could occur in a transient manner, and be crucial in controlling cell-matrix interactions in a rapidly changing environment. Interestingly, decorin interacts with IGF-IR via the core protein,18 and with α2β1 integrin via the GAG moiety17 raising yet another possibility of simultaneous decorin interaction with multiple binding partners. Additionally, while it is a matter of some debate whether decorin exists predominantly as a monomer or as a dimer in a physiologically relevant environment, it has been proposed that collagen-bound decorin could support simultaneous interactions of decorin with additional binding partners, and that dimer-monomer transitions also could facilitate differential interactions.29 Perhaps supporting multiple simultaneous interactions of decorin, the phenotype of patients with a progeroid variant of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome indicates an essential role for properly glycosylated decorin (and the related SLRP biglycan). These patients exhibit skeletal and craniofacial abnormalities, loose skin and deficiencies in wound healing as a direct result of abnormal decorin and biglycan glycosylation, such that approximately half the population of decorin is secreted as the core protein only.30 Notably, the defect in loose skin and in wound healing is similar to the phenotype of the decorin knockout mouse.2,4 Evidently, the core protein alone cannot maintain normal function in vivo, despite being responsible for several important interactions of decorin, in particular, binding to collagen I and the IGF-IR. These studies may therefore support a requirement for simultaneous interactions of the core protein and GAG moieties for proper function of decorin.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Decorin influences cell-matrix interactions through multiple mechanisms. Decorin signals through the IGF-IR via the core protein moiety (grey diamond), and may simultaneously interact with the α2 subunit (cross-hatched subunit) of α2β1 integrin via the GAG moiety (wavy black line) (A). Activation of Rac through IGF-IR enhances motility by modulating cytoskeleton dynamics and may influence α2β1 integrin activity for collagen I through inside-out signalling (B). Decorin induces large, peripheral vinculin (grey oval)-positive focal adhesions by signalling through IGF-IR and/or α2β1 integrin (C and D). Decorin could also directly influence α2β1 integrin activity through binding to the α2 subunit and/or simultaneous interactions with collagen I (thick wavy black line) through the core protein. Collagen I interacts with the A-domain (white circle) of the α2 subunit at a site distinct to that of decorin (D). In summary, activation of IGF-IR, Rac and modulation of α2β1 integrin affinity for collagen I by decorin modulates cell-matrix interactions and contributes to enhanced motility and tubulogenesis in a collagen I environment.Modulation of cell-matrix interactions by decorin plays a key role in modulating endothelial cell motility and angiogenesis in vivo, and some of the mechanisms responsible have been elucidated in conjunction with in vitro studies. The large number of potential interactions of decorin with multiple matrix components and cell-surface receptors makes a clear understanding difficult. However, direct activation of signalling pathways by decorin has been highlighted recently as likely to play an important role. In conclusion, a better understanding of the mechanisms by which decorin regulates vessel formation and persistence would contribute to understanding how angiogenesis is dysregulated in a clinical setting, and how rational therapeutic strategies can be developed to restore tissue function and homeostasis.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号