Perfusion method for preparing pig brain cortex for Golgi-Cox impregnation

The perfusion procedure described in this paper produces high quality impregnation of pig visual and somatosensory cortical neurons with a Golgi-Cox solution. Starting within 30 min after death, pig heads were perfused with a fixative solution composed of a mixture (v/v) of liquid phenol, 5%; formalin, 14%; ethylene glycol, 25%; methanol, 28%; and water, 28% for two periods of 4 hr each. After perfusion, the heads were chilled for at least 18 hr. The entire brain was removed from the skull and then placed in 10% buffered formalin, where it remained for at least 10 days before taking the blocks that were to be immersed in the Golgi-Cox solution. Three weeks spent in the Golgi-Cox solution typically produced uniform neuron impregnation. The tissue blocks were then embedded in celloidin and sectioned at 120 micron. This procedure avoids the following difficulties: Golgi-Cox methods that produced excellent results with rodent or primate tissue were unsuccessful with pig tissue, placing fresh tissue in Golgi-Cox solution resulted in incomplete neuron impregnation, and immersion fixation in 10% buffered formalin without perfusion resulted in excessive staining of glia.     

Quantitative characteristics of radiation injury of the spermatogenic epithelium and the rate of its recovery after exposure to fast neutrons and gamma-radiation

The paper submits the results of studies on the kinetics of spermatogenous epithelium cell number after exposure to fast neutrons (60-300 cGy) and gamma-radiation (200-600 cGy). It was shown that a relative decrease in the quantity of spermatocytes is determined by an exponential dose-response curve with D0 of 35 and 120 cGy for neutrons and gamma-radiation respectively. For spermatides and spermatozoa a single D0 value of 20 and 55 cGy was obtained for neutrons and gamma-radiation respectively. As the radiation dose increases the recovery process in the epithelium is substantially decelerated. The equation T1/2 = T1/2(0)e0.0009D well describes the dependence of the half-recovery period T1/2 upon the equivalent dose.     

Radiosensitizing and damaging effects of hyperthermia on different biological systems. Ehrlich ascites carcinoma cells

The cytotoxic and radiosensitizing effects of hyperthermia was shown on Ehrlich ascites tumor cells heated in vitro. The effect of hyperthermia resulted in the formation of local lesions in membranes of dying cells.     

Parallel dose-response curves in combination experiments

A possible experimental design for combination experiments is to compare the doseresponse curve of a single agent with the corresponding curve of the same agent using either a fixed amount of a second one or a fixed dose ratio. No interaction is then often defined by a parallel shift of these curves. We have performed a systematic study for various types of doseresponse relations both for the dose-additivity (Loewe additivity) and for the independence (Bliss independence) criteria for defining zero interaction. Parallelism between doseresponse curves of a single agent and those of the same agent in the presence of a fixed amount of another one is found for the Loewe-additivity criterion for linear doseresponse relations. For nonlinear relations, one has to differentiate between effect parallelism (parallel shift on the effect scale) and dose parallelism (parallel shift on the dose scale). In the case of Loewe additivity, zero-interaction dose parallelism is found for power, Weibull, median-effect and logistic doseresponse relations, given that special parameter relationships are fulfilled. The mechanistic model of competitive interaction exhibits dose parallelism but not effect parallelism for Loewe additivity. Bliss independence and Loewe additivity lead to identical results for exponential doseresponse curves. This is the only case for which dose parallelism was found for Bliss independence. Parallelism between single-agent doseresponse relations and Loewe additivity mixture relations is found for examples with a fixed doseratio design. However, this is again not a general property of the design adopted but holds only if special conditions are fulfilled. The comparison of combination doseresponse curves with single-agent relations has to be performed taking into account both potency and shape parameters. The results of this analysis lead to the conclusion that parallelism between zero interaction combination and single-agent doseresponse relations is found only for special cases and cannot be used as a general criterion for defining zero-interaction in combined-action assessment even if the correct potency shift is taken into account.