Molecular alteration of a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor system during synaptogenesis

Biochemical properties of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor system of the avian retina were found to change during the period when synapses form in ovo. Comparison of ligand binding to membranes obtained before and after synaptogenesis showed a significant increase in the affinity, but not proportion, of the high affinity agonist-binding state. There was no change in receptor sensitivity to antagonists during this period. Pirenzepine binding, which can discriminate muscarinic receptor subtypes, showed the presence of a single population of low affinity sites (M2) before and after synaptogenesis. The change in agonist binding was not due to the late development of receptor function; tests for receptor-stimulated phosphatidylinositol turnover and for modulation of agonist binding by guanylylimidodiphosphate showed functional coupling to be present several days prior to the onset of synapse formation. However, detergent-solubilization of membranes eliminated differences in agonist binding between receptors from embryos and hatched chicks, suggesting a developmental change in interactions of the receptor with functionally related membrane components. A possible basis for altered interactions was obtained from isoelectric point data showing that the muscarinic receptor population underwent a transition from a predominantly low pI form (4.25) in 13 day embryos to a predominantly high pI form (4.50) in newly hatched chicks. The possibility that biochemical changes in the muscarinic receptor play a role in differentiation of the system by controlling receptor position on the surface of nerve cells is discussed.     

Regulation of ornithine decarboxylase activity by spermidine and the spermidine analogue N1N8-bis(ethyl)spermidine.

Polyamine biosynthesis in intact cells can be exquisitely controlled with exogenous polyamines through the regulation of rate-limiting biosynthetic enzymes, particularly ornithine decarboxylase (ODC). In an attempt to exploit this phenomenon as an antiproliferative strategy, certain polyamine analogues have been identified [Porter, Cavanaugh, Stolowich, Ganis, Kelly & Bergeron (1985) Cancer Res. 45, 2050-2057] which lower ODC activity in intact cells, have no direct inhibitory effects on ODC, are incapable of substituting for spermidine (SPD) in supporting cell growth, and are growth-inhibitory at micromolar concentrations. In the present study, the most effective of these analogues, N1N8-bis(ethyl)SPD (BES), is compared with SPD in its ability to regulate ODC activity in intact L1210 cells and in the mechanism(s) by which this is accomplished. With respect to time and dose-dependence of ODC suppression, both polyamines closely paralleled one another in their response curves, although BES was slightly less effective than SPD. Conditions of minimal treatment leading to near-maximal ODC suppression (70-80%) were determined and found to be 3 microM for 2 h with either SPD or BES. After such treatment, ODC activity was fully recovered within 2-4 h when cells were re-seeded in drug-free media. By assessing BES or [3H]SPD concentrations in treated and recovered cells, it was possible to deduce that an intracellular accumulation of BES or SPD equivalent to less than 6.5% of the combined cellular polyamine pool was sufficient to invoke ODC regulatory mechanisms. Decreases in ODC activity after BES or SPD treatment were closely paralleled by concomitant decreases in ODC protein. Since cellular ODC mRNA was not similarly decreased by either BES or SPD, it was concluded that translational and/or post-translational mechanisms, such as increased degradation of ODC protein or decreased translation of ODC mRNA, were probably responsible for regulation of enzyme activity. Experimental evidence indicated that neither of these mechanisms seemed to be mediated by cyclic AMP or ODC-antizyme induction. On the basis of the consistent similarities between BES and SPD in all parameters studied, it is concluded that the analogue most probably acts by the same mechanisms as SPD in regulating polyamine biosynthesis.     

Delayed effect of pinealectomy on hibernation of the golden-mantled ground squirrel

Pinealectomy or radical sham pinealectomy were performed on adult golden-mantled ground squirrels,Spermophilus (=Citellus) lateralis, approximately 1 month prior to the date of normal winter emergence. The first hibernatory period and subsequent active season were not different in either of the operated groups from intact animals. However, although the initiation of the second hibernatory period was not affected in the pinealectomized animals, this group failed to show the progressive increase in the length of heterothermic bouts that is characteristic of normal hibernation. Also, terminal arousal occurred approximately 6 weeks earlier in the second year after pinealectomy. Male squirrels showed a corresponding time compression in their annual gonadal cycle, as was assessed by testicular state.These results suggest that the pineal gland of the golden-mantled ground squirrel is involved in the expression of the annual hibernatory cycle. In the absence of the pineal gland the adult of this species is unable to sustain the normal depth and duration of hibernation in the second over-wintering period following pinealectomy.We have carried out additional experiments with young, laboratory-bornS. lateralis and with field-caught, adultS. richardsonii. The results of these studies also are described in this paper.Presented at the Ninth International Congress of Biometeorology, 23 Sept – 1 Oct 1981, Osnabrück and Hohenheim, FRG.     

Potentiation by naltrexone of d-amphetamine-induced behavioral suppression and its reversal by clonidine

Rats were trained to perform a fixed ratio-15 operant for food reinforcement during a 30 minute daily session. Naltrexone, in doses up to 45 mg/kg administered 15 min before the behavioral session, failed to disrupt responding. However, 0.3 and 1.0 mg naltrexone/kg produced a dose related potentiation of the operant behavioral suppression induced by 1.0 mg d-amphetamine/kg injected immediately before the session. The naltrexone/d-amphetamine combination also produced excessive salivation and postural abnormalities not seen when either drug was administered alone. [A subsequent study indicated that the salivation induced by naltrexone in combination with d-amphetamine may require previous exposure to naltrexone and/or d-amphetamine.] Blockade of dopamine receptors with pimozide did not modify the interaction. Functional noradrenergic blockade with a low dose of clonidine significantly reversed the potentiated suppression, of operant behavior, as well as the excessive salivation and abnormal posture. These data suggest that there is an important noradrenergic component to the interaction of naltrexone with d-amphetamine. The impressive interaction of behaviorally inactive doses of naltrexone with a moderate dose of d-amphetamine reported here for rats may have clinical implications for detoxified opiate addicts maintained on naltrexone in antagonist therapy programs.